Guilty pleas entered in 2011 murder in rural Sask. where victim died in trunk of car
Social Sharing
Edward Keith Geddes was clubbed over the head with a piece of wood, tied up and put in the trunk of a car, where he died after the drunk man who put him there went off the road into the ditch.
The details about Geddes' death were shared last week in Saskatoon Court of King's Bench, when two men entered guilty pleas for their roles, 10 days before the scheduled start of their jury trial.
Robert Wesley Pich, 61, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and his uncle John Robert Gregoire, 73, pleaded guilty to interfering with human remains. They return to court on March 20 for sentencing.
In order for Justice Richard Danyliuk to accept their guilty pleas, he needed to be sure they understood what they were pleading to, so Crown prosecutor Keltie Coupar read aloud from a draft statement of facts outlining what happened.
In late 2010, Gregoire hired Geddes, 64, as a mechanic and manager at a business he owned in Neilburg, Sask., Coupar said.
Gregoire came to suspect Geddes was stealing from him and on April 11, 2011, Gregoire called Pich and told him to get Geddes to the farm.
Pich told Geddes he needed help getting a filter off a front-end loader and Geddes came to help.
"Mr. Pich clubbed Mr. Geddes in the head with a four-by-four piece of wood when Mr. Geddes was changing the filter," Coupar said.
Pich then tied up Geddes with zip ties and waited for Gregoire. While he waited, he drank alcohol and questioned Geddes, shooting a pistol near him. After Gregoire arrived, they moved Geddes to an empty house and continued questioning him and shooting the pistol.
At some point later on, Gregoire told Pich to get rid of Geddes and take him to Saskatoon or Battleford. Pich put Geddes, who was still alive, in the trunk of a car.
"Mr. Pich was driving to Saskatoon when due to his intoxication and the freezing rain, he lost control of the vehicle and hit the ditch on Highway 40 outside Battleford, Saskatchewan," Coupar said.
Police don't know when exactly Geddes died. Police impounded the car after a passersby reported the crash at 12:34 a.m. on April 12, 2011, but they didn't search the trunk.
From jail, Piche called Gregoire to get the car. Even though Gregoire picked up the car that same day, he didn't look in the trunk until about a week later, when the foul odour from the trunk was unmistakable.
Geddes was dead. That night, Gregoire dug a hole in a brush pile on his property in the RM of Hillside, near Baldwinton, Sask., about 200 kilometres northwest of Saskatoon. Gregoire used a front-end loader to carry Geddes's remains to the hole, where he piled brush and dead cows over top of Geddes's body.
When Geddes went missing in 2011, police considered his disappearance suspicious, but they didn't crack the case until 10 years later. That's when police decided to use an undercover investigative technique, known as a "Mr. Big sting."
During the operation, Pich and Gregoire both made recorded admissions that led to their arrests in February 2022, Coupar said.
The burial site, which had become a water-filled slough, was drained and searched. Searchers found Geddes's body on Oct. 12, 2022, but the advanced state of decomposition meant the time of death couldn't be determined.
Lawyers are expecting to present a joint submission on sentencing when the case returns to court on March 20. Pich was remanded in custody, while Gregoire is out on bail.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
19 hours ago
- CTV News
North Vancouver teacher's 9 convictions for sex crimes against young boys survive Charter challenge
Dennis Cooper is seen in a 1977 class photo with his Grade 6 teacher Brian Moore. Cooper is one of two victims of Moore who successfully had the publication ban on their identities lifted. (Dennis Cooper) An 85-year-old former teacher has lost his bid to have nine convictions for historical sex crimes against young boys thrown out. In a decision issued last week, Judge Robert Hamilton dismissed various legal arguments from Brian Melicke Moore about why delays in the case should result in a stay of proceedings. Moore was convicted in North Vancouver provincial court earlier this year of eight counts of indecent assault and one count of touching for a sexual purpose. He was acquitted of three other counts of indecent assault. All of the indecent assault convictions stem from conduct that occurred between 1976 and 1982, while Moore was a Grade 6 teacher in North Vancouver. The other conviction relates to an incident involving the child of a good friend at Moore's home between 2005 and 2007. Moore's sentencing hearing in the case is scheduled for July, according to Hamilton's decision. While allegations against Moore first came to the attention of police in 1988, the decision indicates he was told by investigators and Crown prosecutors at the time that 'they would not pursue charges against him unless more information came forward.' In applications to the court, Moore argued that there had been a 34-year delay in bringing the charges against him, breaching his rights under Sections 7 and 11 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He also argued that proceeding with the prosecution after such a delay was an abuse of process by the Crown, and that an additional delay between his arrest in August 2022 and the laying of charges in February 2023 was also a Charter violation. The 34-year delay Hamilton rejected the premise of Moore's first argument, writing in his decision that 'there was no 34-year delay' in bringing charges against the teacher. Rather, the judge determined that the case was essentially 'dormant' until new information was brought to police in 2022. 'The Crown told Mr. Moore in 1988 that no charges would be laid, absent more information,' the decision reads. 'It took 34 years for that additional information to come to the attention of the police and Crown and over the course of one year, June 2022 to June 2023, the police interviewed the complainants in this case, forwarded that information to the Crown, and the Crown approved the charges that came before me at trial.' Moore argued that the threat of charges had loomed over him since 1988, though Hamilton noted that the teacher had provided no evidence of the physical or psychological toll that this knowledge had taken on him. Indeed, the judge added, if such a toll existed because Moore knew that there was other information about his crimes that could come to light and cause charges to be laid, that would not be the Crown's fault. 'I would characterize the stress and psychological/physical toll that Mr. Moore has been under since 1988 as being self-inflicted, but nothing to be laid at the feet of the police or Crown,' the decision reads. Abuse of process On the question of abuse of process, Hamilton noted that he had dismissed a previous application from Moore that sought to stay the proceedings for the same reason. 'In my view, nothing has changed from the facts advanced in support of the earlier abuse of process allegation and now at the end of the trial,' the judge's decision reads. It notes that the legal concept of abuse of process involves a two-stage test. First, the court must consider whether the conduct of the prosecution has affected the accused's right to a fair trial, something Moore conceded had not happened in his case. Second, the court must consider whether the prosecution's conduct undermines the integrity of the justice system. Hamilton found no such issue, noting that the Crown did had honoured its 1988 statement to Moore that he would not be charged unless new information came forward, and finding that the Crown did 'exactly what the public would expect' once such information was revealed. Pursuing the case based on new information after 34 years did not undermine the integrity of the justice system, the judge concluded. 'In my view, the opposite proposition is accurate, that being that if the Crown did not prosecute these allegations against Mr. Moore, that failure to prosecute would undermine the integrity of the judicial system,' the decision reads. 'The evidence in this case against Mr. Moore was overwhelming. Failing to bring justice to Mr. Moore's victims would shake the confidence of the public in our justice system. This prosecution needed to happen.' The undertaking deadline Finally, Moore argued that his Charter rights were violated when the Crown failed to charge him in a timely manner after his arrest. According to the decision, the teacher was arrested on Aug. 4, 2022, and released on a police undertaking that imposed various conditions on him and set a first court appearance for Dec. 7 of that year. However, the charges against Moore were not laid until Feb. 15, 2023, which was well after the court date set in the undertaking. 'Mr. Moore says that because of the failure by the Crown to approve charges by Dec. 7, 2022, there should be a stay of proceedings in this case,' the decision reads. Hamilton disagreed with this proposition, noting that police set the Dec. 7 first appearance date without input from prosecutors. 'To enter a stay of proceedings because the Crown had not yet reached a conclusion about whether to approve charges in a case dating back to between 1976 and 2005, involving 12 complainants, on or before a date the police selected without any Crown input, in my view, would not only bring the administration of justice into disrepute, such a decision would serve (as) an injustice to the complainants that no informed member of society would endorse,' the decision reads.
Calgary Herald
2 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Judge says Calgary teen's version of events 'impossible,' convicts him of murder
Finding a city teen's claim that Jal Acor Jal accidentally shot himself during a struggle over a rifle 'impossible,' a Calgary judge on Monday found a youth guilty of second-degree murder. Article content Article content The convicted killer, now 19, will undergo a psychiatric assessment in advance of a potential Crown application for an adult sentence. Article content The offender was just 15 when he met with Jal, 16, at a secluded area near the Crowfoot LRT station in northwest Calgary the evening of March 31, 2022, and shot him in the back of the head. Article content Article content While the killer said Jal met with him to see the high-powered rifle he had displayed online, a friend of Jal's family said they dispute that version of how the two teens came to be at that spot. Article content Article content The family says Jal went there to buy a pair of sneakers from the offender for $90, cash he had earlier obtained from his mother, the friend said. Article content But regardless of the reasons the two met before walking to an LRT substation where Jal was shot, Jeffrey found the killing didn't play out as the youth claimed. Article content The offender earlier testified he had handed the gun and two magazine clips to Jal before he began walking away. He told defence lawyer Andrea Urquhart he heard Jal load the weapon before turning toward him and raising it. Article content He said he struggled with Jal for possession of the gun, but lost his grip moments before it fired, testifying it was pointed toward Jal's upper chest and head when he last saw it. Article content Article content But Jeffrey said expert evidence called by Crown prosecutors Todd Buziak and Tahira Amin made that version of events impossible. Article content A pathologist testified Jal was shot in the back of the head, with the bullet exiting the front of his face almost perpendicular to his body. Article content And a firearms expert said the bullet fired from the teen offender's Chiappa M1-9 rifle was discharged with the muzzle pressed against the back of Jal's lower head, and testing showed the gun could not fire without significant pressure on the trigger. Article content 'The end of the gun barrel was pressed right up against the back of (Jal's) head when the fatal shot was fired,' Jeffrey said.
Calgary Herald
2 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Judge says Calgary teen's version of events "impossible," convicts him of murder
Finding a city teen's claim Jal Acor Jal accidentally shot himself during a struggle over a rifle 'impossible,' a Calgary judge on Monday found a youth guilty of second-degree murder. Article content Article content And the convicted killer, now 19, will undergo a psychiatric assessment in advance of a potential Crown application for an adult sentence. Article content The offender was just 15 when he met with Jal, 16, at a secluded area near the Crowfoot LRT station in northwest Calgary the evening of March 31, 2022, and shot him in the back of the head. Article content Article content While the killer said Jal met with him to see the high-powered rifle he had displayed online, a friend of Jal's family said they dispute that version of how the two teens came to be at that spot. Article content Article content The family says Jal went there to buy a pair of sneakers from the offender for $90, cash he had earlier obtained from his mother, the friend said. Article content Regardless of the reasons the two met before walking to an LRT substation where Jal was shot, Jeffrey found the killing didn't play out as the youth claimed. Article content The offender earlier testified he had handed the gun and two magazine clips to Jal before he began walking away. He told defence lawyer Andrea Urquhart he heard Jal load the weapon before turning towards him at raising it. Article content He said he struggled with Jal for possession of the gun, but lost his grip moments before it fired, testifying it was pointed towards Jal's upper chest and head when he last saw it. Article content Article content But Jeffrey said expert evidence called by Crown prosecutors Todd Buziak and Tahira Amin made that version of events impossible. Article content A pathologist testified Jal was shot in the back of the head with the bullet exiting the front of his face almost perpendicularly to his body. Article content And a firearms expert said the bullet fired from the teen offender's Chiappa M1-9 rifle was discharged with the muzzle pressed up against the back of Jal's lower head and testing showed the gun could not fire without significant pressure on the trigger. Article content 'The end of the gun barrel was pressed right up against the back of (Jal's) head when the fatal shot was fired,' Jeffrey said. Article content 'There was no space between the end of the firearm barrel and the back of (the victim's) head,' the Calgary Court of King's Bench judge said.
