
Fear of Trump's tariffs ripples through France's Champagne Region
'A 200% tariff is designed to make sure that no Champagne will be shipped to the United States,' said Calvin Boucher, a manager at Michel Gonet, a 225-year-old Champagne house on the avenue. With 20% to 30% of the 200,000 bottles it makes yearly exported to U.S. wine merchants and restaurants, 'that business would be crushed,' he said, adding that the price of a $125 Champagne would more than triple overnight.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Épernay sits in the heart of a region that produces the world's finest bubbly. The United States is its biggest foreign market, with 27 million bottles shipped there in 2023, valued at around 810 million euros ($885 million).
Advertisement
Chardonnay, pinot noir and Meunier grapes blanket the rolling hills and deep valleys of Champagne, which covers more than 130 square miles, from the city of Reims to the Aube river. The area is under France's strict Appellation d'Origine system, which ensures that only the sparkling wine made here, using specific methods, can legally be called Champagne.
With more than 4,000 independent winemakers and 360 Champagne houses, the region produces about 300 million bottles annually, with 1 billion more resting in cellars. The biggest houses -- including Dom Pérignon, Veuve Clicquot and Moët & Chandon, owned by the luxury conglomerate LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton -- dominate production, and exports and account for one-third of total sales.
But such figures were of little comfort in the wake of Trump's threat. Just off the Avenue de Champagne, Nathalie Doucet, president of Besserat de Bellefon, a specialty Champagne house that exports 10% of its premium production to the United States, said the trade war made her anxious.
Advertisement
'We are waiting to see what happens, but it's not good news,' said Doucet, whose Champagne is made with a laborious low-pressure process that gives it a crisp acidity and fine effervescence.
Champagne already had a tough year with bad weather that had reduced the harvest. Consumption has declined as young people shifted habits and switched to cocktails and artisanal beer. Champagne sales have thinned since the pandemic, falling 9% last year.
At the same time, she said, Europe is grappling with wars in Ukraine and the Gaza Strip. And now the trade war with the United States, one of France's traditional allies, over issues that have nothing to do with Champagne, has made her feel like collateral damage.
'It seems like a deliberate punishment,' said Cyril Depart, owner of the Salvatori wine shop, just off the avenue, which offers a wide variety of artisanal Champagnes. His wife was an export manager for one of the big Champagne houses and had already been crunching numbers on the potential impact.
Leah Razzouki, an Épernay resident whose family has worked in the Champagne business for generations, said she was infuriated. 'Many of our friends are small producers and they would be hit very hard,' she said.
The damage of a trade war would spread far beyond Champagne's regal houses, hitting U.S. American importers and distributors and putting numerous small businesses at risk.
Michael Reiss, president of Vineyard Road, a small distributor in Framingham, Massachusetts, that imports Champagne and wines from Europe and distributes them in New England, said small businesses like his, including restaurants and retail shops, would be 'very hurt.' The unpredictable trade environment could force businesses to cancel planned investments, he added.
Advertisement
Adding to the pain, tariffs applied at the beginning of the supply chain can multiply, as each business handling the product marks it up accordingly, Reiss said. 'So even a 25% tariff can easily lead to a 40% to 60% increase in prices,' he said.
A 200% tariff 'would eliminate the possibility of people buying things that bring them joy in their lives,' he added.
Even inside the Champagne Museum bordering the avenue in Épernay, the chatter strayed to Trump's tariffs. Sacha Raynaud, whose family owns a small Champagne house, had brought a friend to learn the history of Champagne, which first appeared in the 17th century on the tables of royalty, giving the drink its nickname, 'the king of wines.'
'French people are waking up to what's happening in the United States, and starting to speak about boycotting American products,' she said.
Similar worries circulated in the fields. Working in a buttery morning light, a dozen field hands secured knotted brown vines to wires ahead of the spring growing season on freshly plowed earth in the shadow of the Champagne-producing town of Reuil, just west of Épernay.
Even these jobs were at risk, said Patrick Andrade, who runs a small company that helps maintain Champagne vineyards. The 12-hectare (30-acre) plot belongs to a small house that exports to the United States, he said.
Should sales fall, wine producers would need fewer field hands, and there would be less work for tractor operators, cork makers and bottle makers. In the worst case, he added, it could force Champagne producers to consider ripping out vines.
Advertisement
On Friday, French Foreign Minister Eric Lombard called the trade war 'idiotic' and said he would travel to Washington soon. 'We need to talk to the Americans to bring the tension back down,' he told French television.
France's biggest Champagne houses have stayed conspicuously silent, declining to say anything while waiting to see how Trump's threat would play out -- and whether European officials could get him to back off.
Among them was LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, which sells nearly 35% of its wines and spirits in the United States. The company did not respond to a request for comment.
Outside LVMH's Moët & Chandon mansion on the Avenue de Champagne, a group of Americans snapped selfies in front of a statue of Dom Pérignon, the monk who invented Champagne. Inside the stately building, no staff members wanted to talk tariffs.
Even so, locals whispered rumors that the big houses were upset by the tariff threat, but expected that it could possibly blow over.
After all, some said, Bernard Arnault, France's richest man and the head of the LVMH empire, which dominates much of Champagne's production, has a long-standing relationship with the U.S. president and was invited by Trump to his inauguration. Perhaps Arnault's friendship would prevail at the end of the day, they said.
But for now, that is all just speculation. The reality is that nothing is certain -- and uncertainty is bad for business.
Back at the Michel Gonet Champagne house, Boucher pointed to a display of cuvées that were popular among customers in the United States.
Advertisement
'It's just a stressful situation because we don't know if the tariffs will even happen,' he said. 'It's not good for anybody.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Vance on LA unrest: Newsom should ‘look in mirror' and stop blaming Trump
Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday tore into California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) for suggesting the unrest in Los Angeles is a consequence of federal involvement in state and local law enforcement efforts. 'Gavin Newsom says he didn't have a problem until Trump got involved,' Vance wrote in a post on X, attaching two photos that he said were taken before Trump ordered the National Guard to protect border patrol agents in California. One depicted rioters appearing to attack a 'border patrol' van, and another depicted a car set ablaze. The Hill was not able to verify the authenticity of the photos. 'Does this look like 'no problem'?' Vance asked. Vance suggested Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass 'fomented and encouraged the riots,' with the goal of promoting mass migration into the U.S., adding, 'It is their reason for being.' 'If you want to know why illegal aliens flocked to your state, stop accusing Donald Trump. Look in the mirror,' Vance said. 'If you want to know why border patrol fear for their lives over enforcing the law, look in the mirror.' Vance pointed to California's Medicaid expansion last year to low-income undocumented immigrants as an example of a policy that has 'encouraged mass migration into California.' Newsom has since proposed ending new Medicaid enrollment for undocumented adults, but his proposal faces resistance from the state legislature. 'Your policies that protected those migrants from common sense law enforcement. Your policies that offered massive welfare benefits to reward illegal immigrants. Your policies that allowed those illegal migrants (and their sympathizers) to assault our law enforcement. Your policies that allowed Los Angeles to turn into a war zone,' Vance continued. 'You sure as hell had a problem before President Trump came along. The problem is YOU,' Vance added. Vance's post is the latest in a back-and-forth between the administration and Newsom, who has resisted Trump's extraordinary steps to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops to the area and mobilize 700 active-duty marines. Newsom has insisted that the situation was under control before the Trump administration escalated tensions by making a provocative show of force. He accused Trump of 'intentionally causing chaos, terrorizing communities and endangering the principles of our great democracy.' After Trump suggested his border czar arrest Newsom, the California governor responded by saying, 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America.' 'I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,' Newsom added Monday afternoon. Vance then replied to Newsom, saying, 'Do your job. That's all we're asking.' 'Do YOUR job. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. Rescind the order. Return control to California,' Newsom responded, prompting Vance's latest response.


Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Newsom denies Trump spoke to him before deploying more National Guards
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Tuesday said President Trump did not speak with him, despite deploying national military personnel to respond to Los Angeles protests. Why it matters: Trump claimed that he had spoken with the governor and criticized his handling of the rallies against Immigration and Customs Enforcement's actions. "There was no call. Not even a voicemail," Newsom said on X. "Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to." Driving the news: Trump, speaking to the media on Tuesday, said he last talked with Newsom "a day ago." "Called him up to tell him, got to do a better job," Trump said. "He's doing a bad job, causing a lot of death and a lot of potential death." Reality check: California authorities have not reported any deaths during the protests. A total of 72 people have been arrested over the past weekend, with five police officers being injured, according to local media report on Monday Context: The Marines deployed to LA have not yet responded to immigration protests.


Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable
Congressional Black Caucus chair Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday she believes President Trump mobilizing the National Guard and deploying Marines to Los Angeles rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Why it matters: It's a break with House Democrats' general aversion towards impeachment from the head of one of their most powerful groups. The comment comes amid growing animosity between Democrats and the Trump administration over the president's use of law enforcement to carry out a campaign of mass deportations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Driving the news: During a press conference, Clarke was asked if Trump's actions to quell protests in L.A. rise to the level of an impeachable offense "I definitely believe it is," she responded, "But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it." Clarke and other Democrats have argued that Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by mobilizing the National Guard over Newsom's objections. Reality check: Democrats are highly unlikely to pursue an organized impeachment effort against Trump any time soon. Two rank-and-file members, Reps. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) and Al Green (D-Texas), have spearheaded their own rogue impeachment initiatives, but most Democrats have dissociated themselves with those efforts. Most Democrats are clear-eyed that impeachment would be doomed to failure with Republicans in control of Congress — and they often note that Trump won in 2024 despite previously being impeached twice. What they're saying: House Democratic Caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters at a subsequent press conference, "I've said before that ... House Democrats aren't focused on impeachment today."