U.S. gov't restores some medical research grants, says top Trump official
NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya is a physician and health economist who left a professorship at Stanford University to join the Trump administration
A senior U.S. health official on Tuesday admitted President Donald Trump's administration had gone too far in slashing biomedical research grants worth billions of dollars, and said efforts were underway to restore some of the funding.
Jay Bhattacharya, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), made the remarks during a Senate committee hearing examining both recent cuts to his agency and deeper reductions proposed by the White House in next year's budget.
Bhattachartya said he had created an appeals process for scientists and laboratories whose research was impacted, and that the NIH had already "reversed many" of the cuts.
"I didn't take this job to terminate grants," said the physician and health economist who left a professorship at Stanford University to join the Trump administration. "I took this job to make sure that we do the research that advances the health needs of the American people."
The hearing came a day after more than 60 NIH employees sent an open letter to Bhattacharya condemning policies they said undermined the agency's mission and the health of Americans.
They dubbed it the "Bethesda Declaration" -- a nod both to the NIH's suburban Washington headquarters and to Bhattacharya's role as a prominent signatory of the 2020 "Great Barrington Declaration," which opposed Covid lockdowns.
Since Trump's January 20 inauguration, the NIH has terminated 2,100 research grants totaling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch.
Affected projects include studies on gender, the health effects of global warming, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer.
Trump has launched a sweeping overhaul of the US scientific establishment early in his second term -- cutting billions in funding, attacking universities, and overseeing mass layoffs of scientists across federal agencies.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Bessent says 90-day tariff pause could be extended for key partners
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testifies before the House Ways and Means Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday. The United States could extend a 90-day pause on the implementation of steep tariffs on goods from its major trading partners if they continue to negotiate "in good faith," U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Wednesday. "It is highly likely that those countries -- or trading blocs as is the case with the EU -- who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiations," Bessent said during a congressional hearing. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not." Bessent made the remarks when asked about the upcoming end of the pause in early July, while reiterating that President Donald Trump's administration has been in talks on deals with 18 important trading partners. Japan is one such partner that has been negotiating with the Trump administration at a fast pace, given that Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Trump are slated to hold a one-on-one meeting in less than a week when they attend a Group of Seven summit in Canada. Japan's chief tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is due to hold his sixth round of talks with U.S. cabinet members on Friday in a last-ditch effort to find common ground before the G7 summit. It will be Akazawa's fourth straight week visiting Washington. Bessent's remarks marked the first time a high-ranking official of the administration has publicly hinted at its readiness to push the deadline beyond 90 days. Later Wednesday, Trump, who unveiled his so-called reciprocal "Liberation Day" tariffs on April 2, told reporters, "I would but I don't think we're going to have that necessity," when asked about the possibility of extending the pause. It remains uncertain if the latest remarks by Trump and Bessent, a central figure dealing with tariff issues, will change the pace of the ongoing talks with Japan and some other trading partners. So far, the Trump administration has not reached as many agreements as it initially hoped. During the window for negotiations, the administration has been particularly focused on clinching trade deals with Japan and other major trading partners, including India, South Korea and the European Union. On Wednesday, Trump reaffirmed that the administration's priority remains unchanged, saying it is engaging with Japan, South Korea and other key trading partners. He added the administration does not have time to deal with more than 150 other countries, seen as less important for the United States, so it will unilaterally send out letters in "about a week and a half to two weeks" to inform them of what their trade deals would look like. He said they could accept or ignore the letters. The pause, which runs until July 8, only applies to country-specific tariffs under his reciprocal scheme, covering about 60 trading partners that have notable trade surpluses with the United States. It does not affect his baseline duty of 10 percent targeting imports from all parts of the world. Japan is facing an additional country-specific tariff of 14 percent, for a total rate of 24 percent. On top of the reciprocal tariffs, Japan, along with other countries, has been subject to new sector-specific tariffs on products such as automobiles and steel, which fall outside the scope of the pause. Ishiba and Akazawa have repeatedly said they will not rush into a deal with the United States at the expense of Japan's national interests. The two have urged the Trump administration to remove all of its additional tariffs on Japanese imports. But they have also suggested the need to reach some agreement with the administration as quickly as possible to prevent the measures from further impacting the Japanese economy. © KYODO
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Israel appears ready to attack Iran, officials in U.S. and Europe say
Israel appears to be preparing to launch an attack soon on Iran, according to officials in the United States and Europe, a step that could further inflame the Middle East and derail or delay efforts by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump to broker a deal to cut off Iran's path to building a nuclear bomb. The concern about a potential Israeli strike and the prospect of retaliation by Iran led the United States on Wednesday to withdraw diplomats from Iraq and authorize the voluntary departure of U.S. military family members from the Middle East. It is unclear how extensive an attack Israel might be preparing. But the rising tensions come after months in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has pressed Trump to seize on what Israel sees as a moment of Iranian vulnerability to a strike. Trump waved off another plan by Israel several months ago to attack Iran, insisting that he wanted a chance to negotiate a deal with Tehran that would choke off Iran's ability to produce more nuclear fuel for a bomb. Two weeks ago, Trump said he had warned Netanyahu about launching a strike while U.S. negotiations with Iran were under way. It is not clear how much effort Trump made to block Netanyahu again this time, but the president has appeared less optimistic in recent days about the prospects for a diplomatic settlement after Iran's supreme leader rejected an administration proposal that would have effectively phased out Iran's ability to enrich uranium on its soil. Netanyahu has walked up to bombing Iran's nuclear facilities in the past, only to back off at the last minute. Word of the U.S. decisions to withdraw personnel from the region, along with a warning from Britain about new threats to Middle East commercial shipping, came hours after Trump told The New York Post in a podcast released Wednesday that he had grown "less confident' about the prospects for a deal with Iran that would limit its ability to develop nuclear weapons. Steve Witkoff, the White House special envoy to the Middle East, listens to U.S. President Donald Trump during his swearing-in ceremony in Washington on May 6. | Eric Lee / The New York Times American and Iranian negotiators have been planning to meet Sunday for another round of talks, although Trump told reporters Monday that Iran had adopted an "unacceptable' negotiating position. As of Wednesday, Trump's envoy to the talks, Steve Witkoff, was still planning to attend the negotiations in Oman, officials said. Asked about the reason for the departures of U.S. personnel and dependents from the region as he arrived at the Kennedy Center in Washington for a Wednesday evening performance of "Les Miserables,' Trump told reporters, "Well, you're going to have to figure that one out yourself.' The British warning came from a maritime trade agency that monitors Middle East shipping and that said in a public advisory that it had "been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners.' The advisory urged commercial vessels transiting the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz to use heightened caution. Iranian military and government officials have already met to discuss their response to a potential Israeli strike, according to a senior Iranian official. The official said that Tehran had devised a response plan that would involve an immediate counterstrike on Israel with hundreds of ballistic missiles. In October 2024, a major Iranian missile assault against Israel related to the war in the Gaza Strip inflicted limited damage, however, in part because of U.S. assistance in intercepting the missiles. Trump spoke by phone Monday with Netanyahu, but the White House disclosed few details about the conversation. Trump had met on Sunday evening at Camp David with his national security team. Iran's defense minister, Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh, raised alarms Wednesday with a warning that, in the event of a conflict following failed nuclear talks, the United States would suffer heavy losses. "America will have to leave the region because all its military bases are within our reach and we will, without any consideration, target them in the host countries,' he told reporters. People walk past an anti-U.S. mural in Tehran on May 11. | West Asia News Agency / via REUTERS Iranian officials also balked at remarks Tuesday by Gen. Michael E. Kurilla, the head of Central Command. Kurilla testified before a House committee that he had presented Trump and Hegseth "a wide range of options' for a potential strike against Iran. Kurilla had been scheduled to testify again Thursday before the Senate Armed Services Committee, but his testimony was postponed without explanation. Iran's mission to the U.N. denounced Kurilla's comments in a Wednesday social media post as "militarism' that "fuels instability.' The tough talk came amid a week of meetings in Vienna by the International Atomic Energy Agency's board of governors. The United States, Britain, France and Germany have submitted a resolution to the agency that would censure Iran for rapidly advancing its nuclear program and violating other commitments under a 2015 nuclear deal brokered with those countries, along with China and Russia. The board is expected to vote on the censure resolution on Thursday morning. Censure could be grounds for the U.N. Security Council to restore, or "snap back,' heavy economic sanctions on Tehran that were lifted as part of the 2015 deal, which was struck by the Obama administration. Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from that agreement in 2018, a move that Iran says gave it license to abandon its commitments to limit its nuclear activity. The deal's European parties insist that it remains enforceable through restored sanctions. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on social media on Wednesday that censure "will compel Iran to react STRONGLY.' The State Department did not provide details on how many personnel would be removed from Iraq, or why. The Associated Press reported on Wednesday that nonessential U.S. personnel would be withdrawn from Baghdad, and that nonessential personnel and family members of diplomats had been authorized to depart from U.S. embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait. The military dependents authorized to depart the Middle East are largely from Navy and Marine families in Bahrain, home to a major U.S. naval base, a senior Navy official said. Iran's atomic program has progressed dramatically since Trump abandoned the 2015 deal. Analysts say that Iran is now on the brink of being able to manufacture enough nuclear material to fuel 10 nuclear weapons. Constructing a workable device, if Iran chose to pursue that option, could take several more months. But many top Israeli officials already consider Iran's progress to be unacceptable and have openly threatened military action against its nuclear facilities. Many Israeli officials believe they have a golden opportunity to solve a decades-long problem. Israel has recently decimated Hezbollah and Hamas, Iranian proxy groups that Tehran has long relied on as a deterrent to Israeli action. And Israeli airstrikes last year severely reduced Iran's air defense systems. Some analysts warn that Iran has been restoring those defenses, making Israeli action against Iran's nuclear program riskier by the week. It is also unclear whether Israel can inflict decisive damage on Iran's nuclear program without U.S. military assistance. Armored vehicles belonging to Iraqi security forces are stationed outside the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad's Green Zone, Iraq, on Thursday. | REUTERS U.S. oil prices climbed above $68 a barrel on Wednesday afternoon, their highest level since early April, when Trump placed tariffs on nearly all U.S. trading partners. Fighting in the region could disrupt oil supplies, as could tougher American sanctions on Iran. The aircraft carrier Carl Vinson has been in the Arabian Sea for several weeks. More than 60 aircraft are aboard the Vinson, including advanced F-35 stealth strike fighters. The senior Navy official said there were currently no plans to change the carrier's position in response to the developing situation. The United States also has several dozen attack and fighter jets deployed in the Middle East. These aircraft were used extensively to defend Israel from Iranian strikes last year.
Yomiuri Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Nutrition Program for Americans on Food Stamps at Risk in GOP Bill
Wesley Lapointe/For The Washington Post Aretha Richardson waters seedlings planted during an adult SNAP-Ed class in the community garden at Moravia Park Elementary School in Baltimore on June 4. BALTIMORE – A group of kindergartners sat attentively in a bright elementary school, ready to learn the keys to living a healthy life. One of the four main pillars, nutrition educator Karen Turner told them, was to drink lots of water. 'What about Pepsi?' Turner asked. 'No!' the kids screamed. 'What about Capri Sun?' 'No!' For more than 15 years, Turner has been teaching healthy habits to students at schools like Moravia Park Elementary, where 100 percent of the children are eligible for free and reduced meals. The effort is part of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education, or SNAP-Ed, a federally funded initiative that aims to help low-income Americans make healthier, cost-effective food choices. But Turner's classes – and other activities to increase nutrition and prevent obesity across the country – could soon end. House Republicans have proposed eliminating SNAP-Ed. The potential cut alarms program leaders who say states would be forced to pare back efforts to improve Americans' health at a moment when addressing childhood illness and chronic disease has rapidly become a major theme of President Donald Trump's domestic agenda. Supporters of the program wonder why Congress would defund efforts to teach food stamp recipients how to eat healthy at the same time Trump administration officials are, for the first time, approving state efforts to crack down on using benefits to pay for soda and candy. Nearly 20 percent of U.S. children are obese, almost four times the rate in the 1970s before the proliferation of ultra-processed food, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nation's top health official, has called for sweeping change to the nation's food supply. 'If you want America to be healthier and you're cutting SNAP-Ed, I don't see how that can be done,' said Turner, who is with Maryland's SNAP-Ed program run by the University of Maryland Extension. The cut was just one line item in the House version of Trump's massive tax and immigration bill, which passed the chamber last month. It's not yet clear what Senate Republicans will do. A spokeswoman for the Senate agriculture panel, which oversees SNAP, said the committee is 'working through the process' of crafting its portion of the bill with the aim to release it in the 'coming days.' She did not say whether the chamber will also seek to eliminate dollars to SNAP-Ed. On Monday evening, Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Alabama), a member of the Agriculture Committee, said the Senate has not yet decided. Another member, Sen. Jim Justice (R-West Virginia), said he did not believe the program would be fully eliminated, but funding could be reduced. Republicans cast SNAP-Ed as duplicative and ineffective, saying they don't believe it has delivered meaningful change in the nutrition or obesity of Americans who receive benefits formerly known as food stamps – an assertion those who have evaluated the program contest. 'The data shows it hasn't moved the dial in making America healthy again,' Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-Pennsylvania), the chair of the House Agriculture Committee, said in a brief interview. A 2019 Government Accountability Office report stated that the U.S. Department of Agriculture needed to improve how it gathers information on the effectiveness of SNAP-Ed programs to determine if the program is meeting its goals. Since then, the program has bolstered its reporting mechanisms. The sweeping legislation – which the Senate is currently reworking in an effort to pass it by July 4 – includes other major changes to SNAP, which provides food assistance to needy families. The House bill expanded work requirements to receive benefits. It also required states to pay between 5 to 25 percent of SNAP benefits in moves that could lead millions of low-income Americans to lose access to food stamps or see decreases in their monthly benefits. Yet, many SNAP-Ed leaders were caught off guard by the complete elimination of the $536 million annual program, one of the USDA's largest nutrition education initiatives. Congressional scorekeepers estimate repealing the program would save the government nearly $5.5 billion over the next decade. 'Each day, the Department of Agriculture spends roughly $400 million across its 16 nutrition programs. Yet diet-related, chronic disease is skyrocketing, particularly in children,' a USDA spokesperson said in a statement, adding that 'Secretary [Brooke] Rollins will continue to support President Trump's agenda while making certain we respect the generosity of the American taxpayer to Make America Healthy Again.' Fed and watered In Baltimore in early June – less than two weeks after the House passed legislation to eliminate SNAP-Ed – a two-hour nutrition class for adults was wrapping up. The smell of Cajun-style catfish overwhelmed the hallways of the elementary school as participants enjoyed the food they made based on ingredients they had received earlier from a food bank. Cheryl Colvin poured some salt into her hand and sprinkled it on her fish. Then, the self-professed 'salt-a-holic' took a bite. 'I just added that little pinch of salt,' she said, 'and I shouldn't have.' Colvin – who receives roughly $300 in food stamps each month – said she grew up cooking with a lot of grease. Through Turner's classes, the two-time cancer survivor is learning to prepare foods in a healthier way, she said, such as by roasting chicken rather than frying it (and using less salt). She, along with the other participants, also made 'container gardens' out of empty strawberry containers. They planted a lettuce mix as Turner told the class they could use their food stamp benefits to buy seeds. 'Can you see how that can actually help you save money?' Turner asked the class. For roughly 25 years, Maryland has operated a SNAP-Ed program through the University of Maryland Extension. But the groundwork for the nationwide initiative was laid decades ago, and starting in 1992, the federal government began partially funding nutrition education plans from states that chose to participate. Nearly two decades later, SNAP-Ed became a nationwide grant program with the passage of the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act. States get federal grants to fund an array of educational activities, such as marketing campaigns, farm-to-school programs and community gardens. The focus is also on creating new policies aimed at improving the overall health in a community, like an effort in Maryland to work with school districts to strengthen wellness policies. The program is targeted to those who are eligible for SNAP, as well as those who qualify for other federal food assistance. In a markup of the House bill last month, several Democrats criticized the move to eliminate dollars to SNAP-Ed. 'SNAP benefits are being cut in this hearing – right now through this bill,' said Rep. Jill Tokuda (D-Hawaii). 'Now we're also talking about taking away the education that helps families stretch them further.' Thompson, the Republican committee chair, said that he'd always believed the concept of SNAP education was a 'really good thing.' He argued that 'numerous studies' had not shown evidence that SNAP-Ed has influenced long-term behaviors, adding that the federal government has other nutrition programs. A spokesman pointed to the GAO report as well as two studies from 2012 and 2013, which had varied results. Those who have evaluated the program contend they believe it is effective. They point to data they say show there is evidence the program is accomplishing its goals and contend it fills gaps that other federal programs can't fill. 'Republicans didn't talk with us about bipartisan solutions for how we might improve the program,' Rep. Angie Craig (Minnesota), the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, said in a statement to The Washington Post. 'They took a page out of Elon Musk's DOGE playbook and deleted SNAP-Ed entirely.' In recent years, SNAP-Ed launched a new electronic national reporting system to better compare data across states, according to the Association of SNAP Nutrition Education Administrators. Pamela Bruno, the lead evaluator of Maine's SNAP-Ed program, said the association recently analyzed data from the new reporting system that showed improvement in fruit and vegetable intake, as well as shopping behaviors and physical activity. 'As someone who's evaluated it for over a decade, I see the impacts,' Bruno said, 'and I believe there is a rigorous and really effective process for both planning and evaluating this program nationally.' Jerry Mande, who oversaw SNAP-Ed at the Agriculture Department for six years under the Obama administration, says he wants the initiative to have a greater focus on developing pilot programs to test out new policies in SNAP and mass-media campaigns – efforts he believes could have the broadest reach. But, Mande said, he opposes the effort to defund the program. He noted the Trump administration's recently released budget dealing with discretionary spending mentions funding for SNAP-Ed. The White House has not detailed how it will handle funding levels for programs, like SNAP-ED, set outside the annual appropriations cycle. Some prior Trump budgets had proposed terminating funding. After the nutrition lesson with Turner at the Baltimore elementary school, Tina Smith walked her kindergartners back to the classroom. They had just learned about four ways to be happy and healthy. Enjoy healthy snacks. Eat healthy meals. Use playtime as exercise. Drink lots of water. For 14 years, Smith has worked at Moravia Park Elementary School. The classes, she said, were an 'eye-opener.'
