logo
Stratford wants to know what people think about a proposed mobile food vendor bylaw

Stratford wants to know what people think about a proposed mobile food vendor bylaw

CBC05-03-2025

Social Sharing
The Town of Stratford is seeking public feedback on its draft street vendor bylaw, which proposes new regulations for the operation and permitting of food trucks within the municipality.
Under the proposed rules, mobile food vendors would be allowed in five town parks: Fullerton's Creek Conservation Park, Robert Cotton Park, Michael Thomas Waterfront Park, Pondside Park and Tea Hill Park, as well as a few commercial areas.
A public meeting is scheduled for Wednesday evening at Stratford Town Hall, and written comments can be submitted until noon on Friday, March 7.
Mayor Steve Ogden said the town wants to hear from both residents and key stakeholders, including people in Stratford's restaurant industry.
"We want to give a fair balance between, you know, more dining options for Stratford residents, but also being fair to existing property owners who have invested significantly in their dining establishments — bricks and mortar," he told CBC's Island Morning.
"We did put licensing fees in place to try to make sure that, you know, there was some fairness to existing property owners who pay taxes every year, and to level the playing field in that respect a little bit."
The bylaw includes licensing fees ranging from $75 to $1,500, depending on the type of permit. Mobile vendors would fall into two categories: Class A for motorized units and Class B for non-motorized units, with fees varying based on the category and length of operation.
Ogden said the bylaw aims to establish clear guidelines for food truck locations and the approval process, adding that applications will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
"We obviously wouldn't want, you know, someone's offering the same cuisine as an existing establishment or whatever. There's a number of aspects that we can look at."
Unless given special permission, food trucks would have to be closed between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. to minimize disturbances for nearby residents, he said.
Ogden said Stratford developed the bylaw after finding limitations with the provincial licence, which covered aspects like food safety but did not regulate operating hours and locations.
The town's planning group reviewed how other municipalities, including Charlottetown and Riverview, N.B., regulate food trucks. Ogden said this research helped shape a plan that should meet the needs of the community.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Carney, Trump to sit down Monday ahead of G7, as hope blooms for a tariff deal
Carney, Trump to sit down Monday ahead of G7, as hope blooms for a tariff deal

CBC

time2 hours ago

  • CBC

Carney, Trump to sit down Monday ahead of G7, as hope blooms for a tariff deal

Social Sharing In his first big test at the G7, Prime Minister Mark Carney will meet with U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday morning, according to an official in his office. The Prime Minister's Office said the two leaders will sit down one-on-one before the main talks with the other leaders officially get underway. Carney has been keen to ink a deal with Trump on trade and security, and for the U.S. president to drop his punishing tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminum and the auto industry. Earlier this week CBC/Radio-Canada reported Canada and the U.S. appear to be making progress toward some sort of trade agreement. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation said a working document outlining details of a potential deal has been sent back and forth between Ottawa and Washington. The document is considered a step toward the overall goal of reaching a deal, but sources cautioned work needs to be done before there's an agreement. Carney is far from the only world leader seeking Trump's ear during his trip to Kananaskis, Alta., as his administration pushes an aggressive trade position that's shaking up global markets. The leaders of some of the most powerful democracies will begin landing in Alberta on Sunday ahead of the high-stakes gathering, set against the scenery of the Canadian Rockies and the thundering Bow River. This year's gathering will largely be judged on whether a group built on consensus can actually get along. The G7 — which includes the United States, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and Canada, as well as the European Union — has met annually for the past 50 years to form a co-ordinated voice on major issues, including trade and economics, security and climate change. No joint communiqué But the group has become more fractured over the years. The last time Trump attended a G7 in Canada back in 2018, he sent the gathering into disarray and withheld U.S. support from the joint communiqué typically issued at the end of the summit. This year, Canadian organizers are taking a different route and are forgoing the traditional list of priorities and accomplishments that all countries agree to sign. Instead, Canada is looking to secure leaders' approval on a series of short, joint statements focused on concrete actions and outcomes in key areas, a senior government official said ahead of the summit. WATCH | What are Canada's objectives for the G7 summit? What are Canada's objectives for the G7 summit? 23 minutes ago Duration 21:06 This year, Carney has set a list of priorities reflective of the challenging state of the world. They include: war and peace; energy security, with a focus on critical minerals and artificial intelligence; and "securing the partnerships of the future," according to the Prime Minister's Office. With parts of Western Canada still grappling with a devastating fire season, Carney has also put wildfires on the agenda. In addition to the G7 members, leaders from India, Brazil, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, South Korea, Ukraine, Mexico and Australia have been invited for at least part of the proceedings, along with the secretaries general of the United Nations, NATO and the European Union and the head of the World Bank.

How the trade war with the U.S. could fix Canada's internet
How the trade war with the U.S. could fix Canada's internet

CBC

time12 hours ago

  • CBC

How the trade war with the U.S. could fix Canada's internet

When life hands you tariffs, fix the internet. At least, that's what Cory Doctorow hopes might happen. Because, he says, Canada's internet is in desperate need of saving. "We created a policy environment that rewards companies and executives who do things that are bad for the internet and bad for internet users, and that does not punish them when they do things that harm us," said Doctorow, a tech journalist, activist, and host of the CBC podcast Understood: Who Broke the Internet?. He believes that the current trade troubles could actually free Canada to fix how it polices the internet — more in line with the rest of the world, but less restrictive than the U.S. That's because the current state of Canada's internet policy is directly connected to trade pressure — specifically tariff threats — surrounding internet and copyright law from the United States decades ago. But since free trade with our southern neighbours is already in turmoil, Doctorow says it's time to unlock our internet by removing laws that benefit big tech companies, and opening up access for users. The start of internet laws Like many countries, Canada's internet laws can be traced back to two treaties from the UN's World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in 1996. It asked signatories to protect copyrights online. Canada signed the two treaties, but wouldn't ratify them until over a decade later. But the U.S. moved quickly and ratified its version of copyright laws in 1999, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa and Canada Research Chair in internet and e-commerce, says the American act heavily favoured copyright holders, but held few protections for users. And the U.S. wanted other countries to follow their lead. "They then oftentimes either use direct bilateral trade pressure or trade agreements to try to take that U.S. position and make it the standard for how you implement a treaty that was otherwise very flexible in nature," said Geist. In 2007, Stephen Harper's Conservative government introduced a bill that Geist says was basically a Canadian version of the DMCA. Geist said that for decades, copyright laws in Canada protected the copyright holder, without limiting how a person could use a product. But the new bill allowed for digital locks on software, which are technologies used to protect copyrighted content and prevent people from tinkering with the program. "This idea that you could use technology, now aided by legislation, to effectively remove or lock users out of what is their rights struck me as enormously problematic," said Geist. What are digital locks, and why do they matter? One example of a digital lock, says Doctorow, is how Apple prevents iPhone users from downloading third-party apps onto the device. Apple says it's for your protection, as it vets the apps in its store to prevent you from downloading anything harmful. But because of the digital lock, Apple is also able to take 30 per cent of the cost of every purchase made on its app store without any competition. And Doctorow says its argument of security doesn't exactly check out. "This is no longer about you trusting Apple and choosing Apple. This is about Apple requiring you to trust them," said Doctorow. "Any time someone puts a lock on something that belongs to you and doesn't give you the key, that lock isn't there for your benefit." Following pushback from Geist and others on the initial proposed bill, the government introduced a new version. But much to Geist's disappointment, it still had those digital locks he was concerned about. The reason? The U.S. threatened that if locks weren't included, Canada could say goodbye to tariff-free trade with the United States. "The U.S. had been clear that it wanted copyright reform, but even more than just any old copyright reform, it wanted U.S.-style legal protections for these digital locks," said Geist. "If there was one thing this legislation was going to do, it was going to remove this ongoing trade irritant with the United States." The bill was pushed through and labelled Bill C-11. And its impact was felt quickly. Doctorow says people working on accessibility software to programs they didn't own, such as screen readers for ebooks, had to stop, because they were worried about what digital locks might be waiting for them. A group that was building tools to access public government data had to halt their work because their lawyers advised them it could get them in trouble. "What happened was you saw a procession of extremely abusive technologies creating the opportunities for extremely high margins at the expense of Canadian consumers. And no Canadian company stepped up to bypass or correct these market failures," said Doctorow. That's because, thanks to digital locks, they legally couldn't. James Moore, the heritage minister at the time, told CBC in an email that he still agrees and supports the bill, saying "Canada has obligations to our trading partners to protect [intellectual property]." What can be done Canada's trade relationship with the U.S. is now more uncertain than ever, thanks to President Donald Trump's unpredictable regime of tariffs. But even though it's a bad situation, Doctorow says, it's an opportunity for Canada to do something it should've done before. Since it was trade pressure that pushed Canada to go above and beyond what the WIPO treaties required, and that trade situation is in flux, Doctorow says Canada has the chance to change its digital copyright laws to something more in line with the rest of the world, and isn't as restrictive as the U.S.'s laws. "We could change our law so that it was only illegal to break a digital lock if you also infringed someone's copyright. You don't have to infringe anyone's copyright to install your own app store on your iPhone," said Doctorow. The European Union moved in this direction in April, by fining Apple 500 million euro ($788-million Cdn) for not allowing third-party app stores on its phones. The fine was issued under the EU's Digital Markets Act, designed to give consumers and businesses more choice and prevent big tech companies from cornering digital markets. This wouldn't just give you more freedom on your phone, says Doctorow. It also means a company like Apple would have to compete with other companies to earn your business. Tinkerers and innovators in Canada could build ways to improve all aspects of how we use the internet, says Doctorow, converting the internet from a walled garden to a public space. But Geist isn't so confident it will happen. "I fear that … in our zeal to deal with the very real threats that we see from Trump on tariffs and on a number of other things with respect to Canada, we'll give on some issues simply because the hope will be that that will be enough to address some of these other concerns that are ultimately seen as even more significant," said Geist.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store