Kuwait raises legal marriage age to 18, banning child marriages
Kuwait has amended Article 26 of its Family Law, officially prohibiting the registration or validation of marriages for individuals under 18.
The amendment, published in the official news outlet "Kuwait Today", is a significant step toward protecting children and aligning with international commitments.
The decree states that marriage registration is now only allowed for individuals aged 18 or older, in line with Kuwait's constitution, which upholds the protection of family, motherhood, and childhood following Islamic law.
According to Sky News, the amendment aligns with Kuwait's international obligations, particularly the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which defines a child as anyone under 18 and mandates protection from early marriage.
It also supports the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, which ensures full and free consent in marriage and encourages setting a minimum marriage age.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
a day ago
- Roya News
Details of Putin, Trump call on Ukraine, Iran
US President Donald Trump said he spoke to Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin Wednesday about Ukraine and Iran, warning that the Kremlin leader had "very strongly" pledged to respond to Kyiv's stunning drone attack on Russian bombers. Trump said that there was no "immediate peace" on the horizon in Ukraine, following what he described as a one hour and 15 minute call with the Russian president. On Iran, Trump said that Putin had offered to "participate" in talks on Tehran's nuclear program, as Trump accused the Islamic republic of "slowwalking" its response to Washington's offer of a deal. The call came three days after Ukraine conducted a massive, daring drone attack against Russian military airbases, saying it had destroyed several Russian nuclear-capable bombers worth billions of dollars. Trump said that he and Putin had "discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides." "It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields," Trump said in his post. Trump did not say whether he had warned Putin off any such retaliation against Ukraine, which Washington has supported to the tune of billions of dollars in its fight against Russia. The Kremlin described the call as "positive" and "productive". "At the end of the conversation, the two leaders described the exchange of views as positive and quite productive and confirmed their wish to stay in permanent contact," Putin's diplomatic adviser Yuri Ushakov told reporters. "The subject of the strikes on the military airfields was also discussed. Donald Trump underlined that the American side had not been informed in advance," Ushakov added. 'Definitive answer' The Republican has repeatedly alarmed Kyiv and Western allies by appearing to side with Putin over the war, and had a blazing Oval Office row with visiting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But Trump has also showed growing frustration with Putin as Russia has so far derailed the US president's efforts to honor a campaign pledge to end the war within 24 hours -- even if he never explained how this could be achieved. The call between Trump and Putin did however show that Washington and Moscow may be eying cooperation on another key global issue -- Iran. Trump said he believed they were both "in agreement" that Iran could not have a nuclear weapon, and that time was running out for Tehran to respond to US offers of a deal. "President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion," Trump said. The US president added: "It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!" Putin told his Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian that Moscow was ready to help advance talks on a nuclear deal, the Kremlin said on Tuesday. But Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said earlier Wednesday that Washington's proposal was against Tehran's national interest, amid sharp differences over whether Tehran can continue to enrich uranium.
Roya News
3 days ago
- Roya News
Man convicted for Quran burning outside Turkish consulate in London
A 50-year-old man has been convicted of a religiously aggravated offence after burning a copy of the Quran in front of the Turkish consulate in London earlier this year. Hamit Coskun, who traveled from Derby to Knightsbridge, set fire to the Islamic holy book while making offensive remarks about Islam on February 13. The act, which took place outside the consulate on Rutland Gardens, was deemed both inflammatory and hostile by Westminster Magistrates Court. District Judge John McGarva found Coskun guilty of a religiously aggravated public order offence as well as disorderly behaviour, handing down a 240 pound (USD 324) fine and imposing an additional statutory surcharge of 96 pounds (USD 130). In court, Judge McGarva criticized the nature of Coskun's actions, describing them as 'provocative and taunting,' and stated, 'You have a deep-seated hatred of Islam and its followers.' The judge said Coskun's motivations were rooted in personal and familial experiences in Turkey, adding, 'It's not possible to separate your views about the religion from your views about the followers.' He further noted, 'Your actions in burning the Quran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language… motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.' Coskun, who is of Kurdish and Armenian descent, had argued that his protest was aimed solely at the Turkish government, particularly President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whom he accused of turning Turkey into a haven for "radical Islamists". Prosecutors cited social media posts where Coskun denounced Erdogan's government and voiced concern about alleged moves toward establishing a 'Sharia regime.' Following his conviction, Coskun issued a statement calling the ruling 'an assault on free speech' and warning that it could discourage others from exercising their rights to protest. His legal defense has received backing from both the National Secular Society and the Free Speech Union (FSU), who have vowed to challenge the verdict through every legal channel. An FSU spokesperson said the organization is prepared to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary, arguing, 'Religious tolerance is an important British value, but it doesn't require non-believers to respect the blasphemy codes of believers.' The case has also drawn attention from political figures. Equalities Minister and Conservative MP Kemi Badenoch took to X, stating, 'De facto blasphemy laws will set this country on the road to ruin. Freedom of belief, and freedom not to believe, are inalienable rights in Britain.' While a spokesperson for the prime minister refrained from commenting on the specific case, they reaffirmed that 'there are no blasphemy laws and no plans to introduce any.' Judge McGarva emphasized in his ruling that the conviction was not an attempt to revive blasphemy laws, which were officially abolished in 2008. He acknowledged that burning a religious book is not inherently unlawful but said the combination of Islamophobic remarks and inflammatory conduct rendered Coskun's actions criminal in this instance. Humanists UK also weighed in, expressing concern about the legal threshold for such prosecutions. A spokesperson stated, 'We must make sure that public order legislation is not used to disproportionately target speech – even offensive speech – on religious matters, thereby chilling legitimate criticism and expression.'
Roya News
3 days ago
- Roya News
Too little, too late: Public fury as former US official shifts stance on "Israel's" actions in Gaza
Former US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller has come under fire after admitting that he believes that the Israeli Occupation has "without a doubt" committed war crimes in Gaza — a sharp departure from his previous public stance while serving in government during the Biden administration. Appearing on the Trump 100 podcast by Sky News on Monday, Miller, now speaking as a private citizen, stated, 'I don't believe it's genocide, but I think it is without a doubt true that Israel has committed war crimes.' His comments have fueled fierce reactions across social media, with many accusing him of attempting to distance himself from the very policies he once defended. Miller, who held the spokesperson role from 2023 until the end of President Joe Biden's term, repeatedly echoed the administration's line of support for "Israel" during its military campaign in Gaza. Now out of office, he claims he is finally free to share his personal perspective. 'You are a spokesperson for the president, the administration, and you espouse the positions of the administration. And when you're not in the administration, you can just give your own opinions,' he explained during the podcast. Although Miller stopped short of labeling "Israel's" military operation as genocide, he emphasized that 'individual incidents' by "Israeli" soldiers constitute war crimes and criticized "Israel" for failing to hold those individuals accountable. He acknowledged there were 'disagreements all along the way' within the US government about how to respond to "Israel's" war in Gaza. His remarks have been met with widespread skepticism and outrage, especially from Palestinians, activists, and critics who followed his time in office. Many point to his past behavior during press briefings — where he frequently brushed off questions about civilian deaths and deflected accusations of war crimes — as evidence of complicity. One such moment, which went viral, featured journalist Sam Husseini confronting Miller for 'smirking' while discussing the rising death toll in Gaza. That incident has resurfaced as critics accuse him of attempting to rehabilitate his image now that public sentiment has shifted. Here are some online reactions: Matthew Miller without a doubt belongs in jail for the rest of his life. — Asa Winstanley (@AsaWinstanley) June 2, 2025 "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him." - Nuremberg Principle IV. Miller is a war criminal! — Sunny Singh (@ProfSunnySingh) June 2, 2025 you directly helped cover for those war crimes so we could keep sending more munitions to do new crimes with! — hasanabi (@hasanthehun) June 2, 2025 We will also never forgive and forget you, and you will always be remembered as the smirker of the Gaza Genocide. You also must be held accountable. — Abubaker Abed (@AbubakerAbedW) June 2, 2025 He did not confess out of the good of his heart but because where he went he was looked at like the face of a genocide. Now that the shiny office is gone. He wants to gain back his respect amongst normal people. Shame — Saeed Khan (@saeedk247365) June 3, 2025 If Israel's guilty of war crimes—and they are—then so is the U.S. You don't bankroll, arm, and shield atrocities on the world stage and walk away with clean hands. It's not just complicity; it's co-authorship. — JT (@escapeeJT) June 2, 2025 Are we talking about the same guy who used to come every day to defend Israel in front of journalists as if his life depended on it? The only explanation is that he, like all the former unconditional supporters of Israel, is now trying to cover his tracks. — Hicham from Montréal (@MontrealHicham) June 2, 2025
