
Younger generations less likely to have dementia, study suggests
People born more recently are less likely to have dementia at any given age than earlier generations, research suggests, with the trend more pronounced in women.
According to the World Health Organization, in 2021 there were 57 million people worldwide living with dementia, with women disproportionately affected. However, while dementia risk increases with age, experts have long stressed it is not an inevitability of getting older.
'Younger generations are less likely to develop dementia at the same age as their parents or grandparents, and that's a hopeful sign,' said Dr Sabrina Lenzen, a co-author of the study from the University of Queensland's Centre for the Business and Economics of Health.
But she added: 'The overall burden of dementia will still grow as populations age, and significant inequalities remain – especially by gender, education and geography.'
Writing in the journal Jama Network Open, researchers in Australia report how they analysed data from 62,437 people aged 70 and over, collected from three long-running surveys covering the US, England and parts of Europe.
The team used an algorithm that took into account participants' responses to a host of different metrics, from the difficulties they had with everyday activities to their scores on cognitive tests, to determine whether they were likely to have dementia.
They then split the participants into eight different cohorts, representing different generations. Participants were also split into six age groups.
As expected, the researchers found the prevalence of dementia increased by age among all birth cohorts, and in each of the three regions: UK, US and Europe. However, at a given age, people in more recent generations were less likely to have dementia compared with those in earlier generations.
'For example, in the US, among people aged 81 to 85, 25.1% of those born between 1890–1913 had dementia, compared to 15.5% of those born between 1939–1943,' said Lenzen, adding similar trends were seen in Europe and England, although less pronounced in the latter.
The team said the trend was more pronounced in women, especially in Europe and England, noting that one reason may be increased access to education for women in the mid-20th century.
However, taking into account changes in GDP, a metric that reflects broader economic shifts, did not substantially alter the findings.
Prof Tara Spires-Jones, the director of the Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences at the University of Edinburgh, described the study as well conducted. 'The number of people living with dementia is still increasing due to our ageing population, but this study adds to the good news that more recent generations have a decreased risk compared to past generations,' she said.
While the study did not investigate the reasons for the decline, Spires-Jones noted a number of factors could be at play. 'This is likely due to interventions such as compulsory education, smoking bans, and improvements in medical treatments for conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and hearing loss, which are associated with dementia risk,' she said.
Spires-Jones added the study had limitations, including that it did not rely on official diagnoses of dementia based on clinical testing.
Prof Tom Dening, of the University of Nottingham, said the study contained good news but it should not be assumed that the trend would continue, given some of the biggest health changes to reduce dementia risk may already have been made.
Prof Eric Brunner of University College London said it was important to look closely at recent trends and the impact of policies such as austerity, given other studies – including his own work relating to England and Wales – have suggested dementia incidence, in other words the rate of new cases, may no longer be declining.
David Thomas, the head of policy and public affairs at Alzheimer's Research UK, said evidence suggested nearly half of dementia cases could be prevented or delayed by addressing 14 key risk factors – from smoking to air quality – although he noted not all were within individuals' control.
'That's why Alzheimer's Research UK is calling on the government to put in place a strategy for preventing ill health, including addressing dementia risk,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
31 minutes ago
- Sky News
Europe's first rover to land on moon - and it's carrying a tiny red house
The first lunar rover made in Europe is set to land on the moon tonight, carrying a tiny red house and a scoop. The rover, called Tenacious, is just 31.5cm wide and 54cm long and weighs 5kg - around the size and weight of an empty carry-on suitcase. It is one of the smallest and lightest rovers in the world and is operated by ispace EUROPE from Luxembourg. "It's a big deal," said ispace EUROPE's chief executive Dr Julien Lamamy to Sky News. "We've designed this rover, built it, tested a lot of it, and we're going to operate it all from Luxembourg." "We're showing that in Europe, [...] space companies have a startup mindset that can contribute a lot to the achievements of the European space." Tenacious will also be the first private rover to operate on the moon's surface, and will drive for around ten days before it "gets too cold and too dark", according to Dr Lamamy. The rover, which blasted off from Earth on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket in January, is arriving on the moon with some fairly unusual cargo. A tiny red house, designed by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg, will be placed on the lunar surface and photographed to represent "an artistic and epic story of new possibilities", according to ispace. Mr Genbeg has been trying to get his art to the moon for 25 years, said Dr Lamamy, "but 25 years ago, only space agencies were going to the Moon". "To me, that reflects what we're here for," he said. "Of course, we're here to contribute to science and exploration and knowledge about the moon, but we're also here to give access to other folks that have cool projects." There's also a scoop on board to collect moon dust, which will be sold to NASA for $5,000 (£3,685) - the first ever sale of off-planet resources. The rover is being carried in a lander spacecraft called Resilience, which launched in January on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and entered lunar orbit on 6 May. Also aboard the lander is a water electrolyser, a module containing food production experiments, a deep space radiation probe and a commemorative plate. It is due to land on the Mare Frigoris region of the near side of the Moon at 7.17pm BST. This will be ispace's second attempt to land on the moon, after it tried in 2023, only to lose connection with its lander in the final stages of the mission. After spending 100 days in space and decelerating from 6,000 kilometres per hour to a walking pace a few metres above the moon's surface, the signal from the lander was lost. "We have to assume that we could not complete the landing on the lunar surface," said Takeshi Hakamada, CEO of ispace, at the time. Dr Lamamy said those issues have been rectified - for his team, now what remains is to experience "one of the biggest moments of our lives".


The Sun
36 minutes ago
- The Sun
Major anthrax outbreak at holiday hotspot after one dead and four hospitalised – and signs of infection to spot
A DEADLY anthrax outbreak has struck one of Thailand's top tourist areas, killing a man and hospitalising four others, health officials say. Authorities are now racing to trace the source of the highly dangerous livestock disease and stop it from spreading. 3 3 3 Anthrax is a serious, life-threatening infection caused by spores of the bacterium Bacillus anthracis. Known for its links to bioterrorism, the spores can lie dormant in soil for decades before infecting humans through cuts or contact with animals. All those infected in Thailand likely caught it through contact with infected cattle or animal products, local health authories have said. The 53-year-old victim, from Mukdahan near the Laos border, died after developing a dark lesion on his hand days after slaughtering a cow on April 24. By April 27, his lymph nodes had swollen and he suffered dizziness and seizures. He sought treatment at Don Tan Hospital but died on April 30, just three days after first getting help, local reports say. Lab tests confirmed anthrax infection. This is Thailand's first anthrax death in 25 years. Four others in the same province also fell ill, all linked to infected cattle or meat. Three have recovered, while a fifth case was reported on May 28. Mystery 'Island of Death' where visitors are BANNED after WW2 experiments Officials have quarantined animals, vaccinated cattle within five kilometres, and disinfected 23 high-risk households. Samples from meat, knives, chopping boards, and soil tested positive for anthrax spores. More than 600 people exposed to infected livestock or meat are being monitored. The World Health Organisation (WHO) said local authorities had 'identified and provided post-exposure prophylaxis to all high-risk contacts,' and 'implemented a robust set of control measures.' They added: 'Currently, due to the robust public health measures implemented by Thailand, the risk of international disease spread through animal movement remains low.' But they warned of risks to trade and tourism if the outbreak isn't contained. 'Any decisions regarding international travel and trade should be based on a thorough risk assessment and should be proportionate to the actual public health risks involved.' No travel advice has been issued by the UK government. In the UK, anthrax is rare but not unheard of. NHS data shows three cases in England during 2023-2024, mostly inhalational anthrax or sepsis linked to drug use rather than cutaneous infections. Thailand's health ministry has urged farmers not to slaughter sick animals and to cook meat thoroughly to prevent further infections. Signs of anthrax infection What is anthrax? Anthrax is caused by a spore-forming bacteria called Bacillus anthracis and typically affects cows, sheep and goats but can also spread to people. The bacteria produce potent toxins which are responsible for the symptoms. The most common form is anthrax of the skin, when spores get into cuts or scratches, leading to black bumpy sores, headaches, muscle aches, fever and vomiting. Gastrointestinal anthrax is caught from eating meat from an infected animal and can lead to severe abdominal pain, vomiting of blood and severe diarrhoea. The rarest and most severe form of human anthrax is when the spores reach the lungs, which can cause severe breathing problems. Inhaled anthrax, if untreated, can have a fatality rate as high as 90 per cent.


Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Erin Patterson makes new claims about fatal beef Wellington lunch - as she accuses the lone survivor of lying
Accused killer Erin Patterson has refuted claims she told her lunch guests at an ill-fated lunch that she had been diagnosed with cancer. Entering the witness box for a second day on Thursday, Patterson further claimed she had never asked her guests over on the pretext of discussing with them a medical issue. The 50-year-old has pleaded not guilty to the murders of Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson. They died after consuming death cap mushrooms served in beef Wellingtons during lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. In opening the trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria, sitting in the Latrobe Valley Magistrates' Court in Victoria's east, Patterson's barrister Colin Mandy, SC told the jury on day one there was no dispute with the prosecution about how and why the guests came be at the lunch. 'It is not in dispute that Erin Patterson invited the guests over for lunch to her house in Leongatha. It is not in dispute that she invited her husband, Simon, over as well because she said she wanted to discuss a health issue that she was concerned about,' he said then. 'That is not in issue. The fact that she's never been diagnosed with cancer is not in issue.' But on Thursday, Patterson told the court she had never mentioned anything to her in-laws about a medical issue to entice them to accept her lunch invite. The jury heard previously evidence from child protection worker Katrina Cripps who claimed on August 1, 2023 at the Monash Medical Centre Patterson told her she had invited her guests over to discuss a medical issue. 'I wouldn't have put it like that because that wasn't the reason I invited people,' Patterson told prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers under cross examination. 'Ms Cripps is wrong, is she?' Dr Rogers asked. 'Yes,' Patterson responded. 'You deny that?' Dr Rogers continued. 'I didn't say that to her. I told her I had invited Don and Gail and Ian and Heather to lunch and I did confirm we had discussed some medical issues, but I did not tell her that was the reason for the lunch or the reason for the invitation, because it was not,' Patterson said. The jury had heard evidence in the opening days of the trial from Pastor Ian Wilkinson, who was the only person to survive the deadly lunch. Mr Wilkinson claimed Patterson told lunch guests she had undertaken a diagnostic test that showed a spot on the scan that was a tumour. 'I remember him saying that in his evidence, but I don't believe I said that,' Patterson said. 'Might you have said it?' Dr Rogers asked. 'I don't think so, no,' Patterson said. Slowly dying at Korumburra Hospital after the lunch, the court heard Don Patterson also claimed Patterson mentioned she had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The court heard Don had told Simon: 'Mum doesn't want me to tell you this. It's about what Erin talked to us about at the lunch.' 'Donald asked if Simon thought he should tell him and Simon said 'yes'. Donald then said, 'Erin told us that she had tests for a medical term relating to something on her elbow 'and that they'd found ovarian cancer. She will probably need chemo and some surgery and she wasn't sure how to tell the kids',' Dr Rogers said at the trial's opening. Patterson told the jury she denied telling her lunch guests she had been diagnosed with cancer. 'I don't think I put it that precisely, no,' she said. 'Well, how did you put it?' Dr Rogers asked. 'I don't remember saying I'd had a diagnosis,' she responded. In what became nothing short of a heated exchange, Dr Rogers bombarded Patterson with questions suggesting she told repeated lies about the deadly lunch. 'You told this lie, I suggest, as part of your efforts to get the lunch guests, and Simon, to attend your lunch; correct or incorrect?' Dr Rogers asked. 'Incorrect,' came the response. 'I suggest that you never thought you would have to account for this lie about having cancer because you thought that the lunch guests would die?' Dr Rogers said. 'That's not true.' 'And your lie would never be found out; correct or incorrect?' 'That's not true,' Patterson insisted. The trial before Justice Christoper Beale continues. . I