logo
From The Gaza Strip To The U.S. Border With Mexico – A Growing Strategic Threat From Terrorist Use Of Tunnels

From The Gaza Strip To The U.S. Border With Mexico – A Growing Strategic Threat From Terrorist Use Of Tunnels

Memri05-02-2025

Since October 7, 2023, the issue of terrorist use of tunnels has been front and center for those involved in strategic planning and military preparedness. While Western officials responsible for border security should be concerned about the tunnels that Hamas has used in its warfare and that Hizbullah has built over the past two decades along Israel's northern border, the fact that every major terrorist group in the world has been gaining experience and training in the use of tunnels in recent years should be a cause for alarm across the West.
Over the past two years, The Middle East Media Research Institute's (MEMRI) Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM), has been examining terrorist groups' tunnel warfare efforts. The findings of the research will be published in an upcoming study, "A Review of the Use of Tunnels by Hamas, Hizbullah, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Houthis, and Other Jihadi Groups and Ramifications for U.S. National Security," set for publication this week.
Drawing on documentation of a decade of terrorist organizations' activities, including never-before-seen releases of terrorist activity inside tunnels, the study examines how jihadi terrorist groups around the world, including: the Islamic State (ISIS), Al-Qaeda's Syrian affiliate Hurras Al-Din, Hay'at Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS), Hizbullah, the Houthis, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and other Syria-based jihadi groups, have used tunnels.
The use of tunnels has included military exercises, communications, and dissemination of data and intelligence; training, transportation and logistics; resupply, storage, and smuggling; weapons manufacturing; infiltration, exfiltration, and ambushes; maneuvering, attacking, and capturing enemies and for cover and concealment of fighters; firing mortars and artillery; and emplacing and deploying multiple launch rocket systems.
The study reveals further details not widely known – for instance, how, under Egypt's brief Muslim Brotherhood rule, the organization helped Hamas plan and develop its tunnel system. Muslim Brotherhood leader Tareq Suwaidan, who likes to gossip about jihadi insider information, disclosed in a February 2024 lecture: "You know, if you are following the news, that there are hundreds of kilometers [in Gaza].... How were they able to dig these tunnels? They happened in one year, when Mohamed Morsi was ruling [Egypt]. He gave them the equipment to do that. So, when we have sincere leaders, then you see the true support for Palestine and the true resistance."
It also includes extensive information about Hizbullah, long known for its extensive network of massive tunnels – that, like Hamas, it aims to use to attack and invade Israel. It is no secret that Hizbullah has shared its tunnel knowhow with Hamas, and trained Hamas in tunnel construction. Destroying these tunnels, many of them built under Lebanese towns, in southern Lebanon is now one of Israel's major strategic goals there.
The October 7 attack, which will go down as one of the most devasting intelligence failures in history, and Hamas's well-known and extensive use of tunnels are forcing the U.S. and the West to redouble their efforts on studying tunnel warfare. The construction of at least 300 miles of tunnels under the noses of Israeli and even U.S. intelligence was a stunning achievement for Hamas and Iran's Axis of Resistance and continues to serve as inspiration for other terrorist organizations.
The U.S. government has long been concerned about terrorist use of tunnels. In recent years, the Department of Defense has, via the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), has been examining the potential offensive and defensive use of tunnels and investing in new technologies. This is also a direct threat to U.S. national and homeland security, not only because of threats to U.S. embassies, military bases, and other obvious targets, but because of tunnels originating in Mexico and Canada. Additionally, Israel's ongoing difficulties in identifying and taking control of Hamas tunnels underneath the Gaza Strip – due primarily to Hamas's use of human shields – give military strategists much to plan for, now and into the future.
While the U.S.-Mexico border was one of the top issues in the 2024 presidential election, there has been little discussion of the national security threat posed by tunnels that are known to exist there. Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported on a sophisticated smuggling tunnel, described as "historic" and measuring six feet tall and four feet wide – comparable to Hamas tunnels in Gaza – from Mexico to the U.S. that opened up into the public storm drain system in El Paso, Texas. Finally, on January 27, Mexican authorities began filling in the underground tunnel.
The threat posed by the tunnels in Mexico is exemplified by the Hamas October 7 attack. Tunnels have been a concern vis-à-vis the security of the U.S.-Mexico border for decades. Former U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Chris Landau said on September 13, 2024: "Hamas folks have this tunnel technology and the cartels in Mexico want to take advantage of that kind of technology... This has got to be the Number One national security interest of the United States – to make sure our own borders are secure."
Tunnels on the U.S.-Mexico border have been linked to other designated terrorist organizations. The notorious Los Zetas drug trafficking organization, which smuggles its goods into the U.S. via manmade tunnel systems along the Mexico-U.S. border, has reportedly partnered with Hizbullah.
Other terror elements are constantly seeking ways to enter the U.S. This is shown by a September 2023 chat on the encrypted server Rocket.Chat operated by ISIS supporters, where two users discussed ways to enter Mexico and Canada. A user asked, in Arabic and English, whether anyone was going to either country and added that he had seen videos showing Iraqi and Yemeni men illegally crossing from Ecuador into Mexico.
Arab-American YouTuber Jad Manon posted a video in Arabic on August 1, 2024 on immigration into the U.S. from Mexico that highlighted the process his viewers must go through in order to cross into the U.S. either legally or illegally as well as showing on the ground the network there in place to assist each other including through a local established mosque. He said: "There are also people who cross through tunnels they dig underground, or they can saw [through a beam] and go under it, like that Mexican guy showed us, or they climb the wall and go to the other side, to America, and especially to San Diego."
One of the most recent incidents that should alarm the U.S. military is a December 16, 2024 report by Qatar's Al-Jazeera Network focused on a tunnel abandoned by Iran-backed militias in Deir Al-Zour in eastern Syria. The 15-meter tunnel, under Iranian militia and Russian Wagner operations headquarters, was where military operations were planned, including some that had been carried out against U.S. forces. The Al-Jazeera correspondent zoomed in on documents in Farsi and on a map highlighting the U.S. military base at the nearby Conoco gas field and other U.S. sites in eastern Syria, which could very well have been targeted in an attack using tunnels.
Another tunnel network was reported on January 24 by the independent Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR); the report provided video and details on a network of tunnels in "strategic areas" constructed and used by Iran-backed militias in Deir Al-Zour, Syria recently in use.
Those involved in counterterrorism, homeland security, and active military service must all continue to study and prepare for how terrorist organizations have been using tunnels and focus on how to detect, map out, fight in them, deal with hostages taken inside of them, and ultimately how to destroy them. History teaches that terrorists learn from successful tactics other groups have used and adopt the same strategies that have been proven successful.
* Steven Stalinsky, Ph.D., is Executive Director of The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) and lead author of "A Review of the Use of Tunnels by Hamas, Hizbullah, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Houthis, and Other Jihadi Groups and Ramifications for U.S. National Security."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SDF denies claims linking al-Hol camp to Damascus church attack
SDF denies claims linking al-Hol camp to Damascus church attack

Shafaq News

time6 hours ago

  • Shafaq News

SDF denies claims linking al-Hol camp to Damascus church attack

Shafaq News – Al-Hasakah / Qamishli On Wednesday, the Syria Democratic Forces (SDF) denied accusations by Damascus authorities that individuals who carried out a recent suicide bombing at Mar Elias Church in the al-Duwaila'a district of Damascus came from the al-Hol camp in northeast Syria. In a statement, the SDF described the remarks by the Syrian Interior as 'unfounded and not based on factual evidence,' calling Syrian government to conduct 'transparent investigations and publicly share their findings to prevent further terrorist attacks.' The attack caused civilian casualties and was followed by the reported foiling of another bombing attempt targeting the Sayyida Zainab shrine south of the capital. The SDF stated that internal investigations showed no record of anyone leaving the al-Hol camp during the period in question, apart from Syrians transferred at the request of the Damascus government and Iraqi nationals repatriated through official arrangements with Baghdad. The statement also emphasized that al-Hol primarily houses women and children from ISIS-affiliated families and does not contain foreign combatants, 'making it unlikely that non-Syrian suicide bombers could have emerged from the camp.' Meanwhile, dozens of Christians and residents of Qamishli took to the streets to protest the deadly bombing that targeted Mar Elias Church, denouncing 'a terrorist attack on places of worship and the Christian community in Syria.' Carrying photos of the victims, demonstrators chanted slogans celebrating the Christian faith and the cross, while condemning violence against religious minorities. One of the protesters, George Younan, told Shafaq News that 'the continuing security lapses are allowing such crimes and violations against Christians and other minorities to occur repeatedly,' and called for an end to what he described as government negligence. Another protester, Issa Issa, said the bombing was not an isolated incident, but a direct consequence of 'security chaos and the power vacuum, worsened by the government's policy of arming unlawful groups under various pretexts.' He pointed to similar attacks in the countryside of Latakia, Suwayda, and Jaramana in recent years.

Iranian Regime Spokesmen: We Will Continue To Enrich Uranium; We're Adopting A Policy Of Nuclear Ambiguity; 'Death To America'
Iranian Regime Spokesmen: We Will Continue To Enrich Uranium; We're Adopting A Policy Of Nuclear Ambiguity; 'Death To America'

Memri

time6 hours ago

  • Memri

Iranian Regime Spokesmen: We Will Continue To Enrich Uranium; We're Adopting A Policy Of Nuclear Ambiguity; 'Death To America'

Despite President Donald Trump's most daring and historically unique military operation against Iran's military nuclear facilities – a move for which Western civilization is morally indebted to him for preventing the destruction of an entire country, Israel – the Iranian regime is still not defeated. Furthermore, in their reactions to the U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Iranian regime officials are emphasizing that the regime will continue with its uranium enrichment project, and will even from now on adopt a policy of nuclear ambiguity. The following are statements by Iranian regime spokesmen on this topic, both before and after the U.S. strike: Iranian Regime Spokesmen: We Will Continue To Enrich Uranium; 'The Game Is Not Over' Iranian Majlis speaker Mohammad Qalibaf and Majlis members announced, amid cheers of "Death to America," that today, June 25, they had approved a bill suspending Iran's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).[1] Qalibaf even promised that "Iran's nuclear program for peaceful purposes will proceed from now on more rapidly... Agency [IAEA] officials will be prohibited from entering until the security of the nuclear facilities and scientists is assured."[2] The previous day, June 24, Behrouz Kamalvandi, deputy director and spokesman for the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) stressed in his response to the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities: "They must know that this industry is deeply rooted in our country and they will not be able to uproot it. Considering our capability, the growth of this industry must continue, and it will not be stopped."[3] In a June 23 interview on a German TV show, Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi was asked, "After the American attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, will Iran stop its uranium enrichment?" He replied: "We are members of the Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT] and in this framework we will continue to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes and our country's needs. No one can tell us what to do or not do as long as we operate within the framework of our obligations under this treaty."[4] Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told NBC in a June 21 interview, before the U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, that "zero enrichment is impossible" for Iran, adding: "We don't know how we can trust them [the Americans] any more" after Israel's attacks.[5] Ali Shamkhani, top advisor to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, wrote on X in Hebrew on June 23: "Even assuming that the facilities were completely destroyed, the game is not over; the enriched material, the local experts, and the politics will remain. Now, the political and operational initiative, together with the legitimate right of self defense, are in the hands of the side that plays wisely and refrains from indiscriminate fire. The surprises will continue!"[6] Shamkhani's post on X, June 23, 2025. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian announced to French President Emmanuel Macron on June 21, before the U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear facilities: "We are ready to negotiate and cooperate in order to build trust in the area of our nuclear activity for peaceful purposes – but we will in no way accept reducing our nuclear activity to zero."[7] On June 24, Majlis member Amir Hossein Thabeti said: "The West must get accustomed to complete ambiguity regarding the Iranian nuclear program."[8] On June 23, Iranian television presenter Amir-Hossein Tahmasebi announced, addressing President Trump, that Iran was now adopting a policy of nuclear ambiguity. He said: "We will enrich uranium to whatever level we choose. We will retain as much [enriched] material as we see fit. We will import to and export from any country we wish. We will build [nuclear] facilities wherever we decide. We will reconsider our position on the NPT, and we will answer to no one." To view this clip on MEMRI TV, click here or below:

Syria's Al-Sharaa: indirect talks underway with Israel
Syria's Al-Sharaa: indirect talks underway with Israel

Shafaq News

time8 hours ago

  • Shafaq News

Syria's Al-Sharaa: indirect talks underway with Israel

Shafaq News – Damascus On Wednesday, Syria's transitional president, Ahmad al-Sharaa, revealed that indirect negotiations are underway with Israel to halt its ongoing strikes on southern Syria, according to a presidential statement. In a meeting with community leaders and elders from Quneitra province and the occupied Golan region, Al-Sharaa stated that 'efforts are ongoing to stop the Israeli attacks through indirect negotiations via international mediators,' emphasizing the importance of local leaders in strengthening national unity and communicating citizens' grievances. The meeting focused on security conditions, essential services, and the daily struggles of residents in the affected border regions, many of whom have been caught in the crossfire between Israel and Iranian-linked groups operating in Syria. Earlier, Israeli media reported that Israel's National Security Council chief, Tzachi Hanegbi, is personally overseeing diplomatic and security coordination with Syria. Speaking to Israel Hayom, Hanegbi said he is managing 'dialogue with Syrian political figures on behalf of the Israeli government,' adding that the coordination includes both political and security matters. He confirmed 'daily contact at all levels with Syria,' and suggested that such engagement could eventually pave the way for Syria and Lebanon to join the Abraham Accords — a series of US-brokered normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab states. When asked whether Israel might consider withdrawing from the separation zone in the Golan Heights in the event of a normalization deal with Damascus, Hanegbi said, 'If normalization happens, we will consider it.' On May 31, Syria's Minister of Information, Hamza al-Mustafa, also acknowledged the existence of indirect negotiations with Israel, stating that they center on the 1974 Disengagement Agreement brokered by the United Nations following the October 1973 War.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store