logo
We surveyed 1,500 Florida kids about cellphones and their mental health – what we learned suggests school phone bans may have important but limited effects

We surveyed 1,500 Florida kids about cellphones and their mental health – what we learned suggests school phone bans may have important but limited effects

Yahooa day ago

In Florida, a bill that bans cellphone use in elementary and middle schools, from bell to bell, recently sailed through the state Legislature.
Gov. Ron DeSantis signed it into law on May 30, 2025. The same bill calls for high schools in six Florida districts to adopt the ban during the upcoming school year and produce a report on its effectiveness by Dec. 1, 2026.
Parents are divided on the issue. According to a report from Education Week, many parents want their kids to have phones for safety reasons – and don't support bans as a result.
But in the debate over whether phones should be banned in K-12 schools – and if so, how – students themselves are rarely given a voice.
We are experts in media use and public health who surveyed 1,510 kids ages 11 to 13 in Florida in November and December 2024 to learn how they're using digital media and the role tech plays in their lives at home and at school. Their responses were insightful – and occasionally surprising.
Adults generally cite four reasons to ban phone use during school: to improve kids' mental health, to strengthen academic outcomes, to reduce cyberbullying and to help limit kids' overall screen time.
But as our survey shows, it may be a bit much to expect a cellphone ban to accomplish all of that.
Some of the questions in our survey shine light on kids' feelings toward banning cellphones – even though we didn't ask that question directly.
We asked them if they feel relief when they're in a situation where they can't use their smartphone, and 31% said yes.
Additionally, 34% of kids agreed with the statement that social media causes more harm than good.
And kids were 1.5 to 2 times more likely to agree with those statements if they attended schools where phones are banned or confiscated for most of the school day, with use only permitted at certain times. That group covered 70% of the students we surveyed because many individual schools or school districts in Florida have already limited students' cellphone use.
Some 'power users' of cellphone apps could likely use a break from them.
Twenty percent of children we surveyed said push notifications on their phones — that is, notifications from apps that pop up on the phone's screen — are never turned off. These notifications are likely coming from the most popular apps kids reported using, like YouTube, TikTok and Instagram.
This 20% of children was roughly three times more likely to report experiencing anxiety than kids who rarely or never have their notifications on.
They were also nearly five times more likely to report earning mostly D's and F's in school than kids whose notifications are always or sometimes off.
Our survey results also suggest phone bans would likely have positive effects on grades and mental health among some of the heaviest screen users. For example, 22% of kids reported using their favorite app for six or more hours per day. These students were three times more likely to report earning mostly D's and F's in school than kids who spend an hour or less on their favorite app each day.
They also were six times more likely than hour-or-less users to report severe depression symptoms. These insights remained even after ruling out numerous other possible explanations for the difference — like age, household income, gender, parent's education, race and ethnicity.
Banning students' access to phones at school means these kids would not receive notifications for at least that seven-hour period and have fewer hours in the day to use apps.
However, other data we collected suggests that bans aren't a universal benefit for all children.
Seventeen percent of kids who attend schools that ban or confiscate phones report severe depression symptoms, compared with just 4% among kids who keep their phones with them during the school day.
This finding held even after we ruled out other potential explanations for what we were seeing, such as the type of school students attend and other demographic factors.
We are not suggesting that our survey shows phone bans cause mental health problems.
It is possible, for instance, that the schools where kids already were struggling with their mental health simply happened to be the ones that have banned phones. Also, our survey didn't ask kids how long phones have been banned at their schools. If the bans just launched, there may be positive effects on mental health or grades yet to come.
In order to get a better sense of the bans' effects on mental health, we would need to examine mental health indicators before and after phone bans.
To get a long-term view on this question, we are planning to do a nationwide survey of digital media use and mental health, starting with 11- to 13-year-olds and tracking them into adulthood.
Even with the limitations of our data from this survey, however, we can conclude that banning phones in schools is unlikely to be an immediate solution to mental health problems of kids ages 11-13.
Students at schools where phones are barred or confiscated didn't report earning higher grades than children at schools where kids keep their phones.
This finding held for students at both private and public schools, and even after ruling out other possible explanations like differences in gender and household income, since these factors are also known to affect grades.
There are limits to our findings here: Grades are not a perfect measure of learning, and they're not standardized across schools. It's possible that kids at phone-free schools are in fact learning more than those at schools where kids carry their phones around during school hours – even if they earn the same grades.
We asked kids how often in the past three months they'd experienced mistreatment online – like being called hurtful names or having lies or rumors spread about them. Kids at schools where phone use is limited during school hours actually reported enduring more cyberbullying than children at schools with less restrictive policies. This result persisted even after we considered smartphone ownership and numerous demographics as possible explanations.
We are not necessarily saying that cellphone bans cause an increase in cyberbullying. What could be at play here is that at schools where cyberbullying has been particularly bad, phones have been banned or are confiscated, and online bullying still occurs.
But based on our survey results, it does not appear that school phone bans prevent cyberbullying.
Overall, our findings suggest that banning phones in schools may not be an easy fix for students' mental health problems, poor academic performance or cyberbullying.
That said, kids might benefit from phone-free schools in ways that we have not explored, like increased attention spans or reduced eyestrain.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Justin D. Martin, University of South Florida and Chighaf Bakour, University of South Florida
Read more:
Do smartphones belong in classrooms? Four scholars weigh in
How old should kids be to get phones?
Kids with cellphones more likely to be bullies – or get bullied. Here are 6 tips for parents
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"THIS Is What A Patriot Sounds Like": A Video Of A Protester Calling Out ICE To Their Faces Is Going SUPER Viral
"THIS Is What A Patriot Sounds Like": A Video Of A Protester Calling Out ICE To Their Faces Is Going SUPER Viral

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

"THIS Is What A Patriot Sounds Like": A Video Of A Protester Calling Out ICE To Their Faces Is Going SUPER Viral

By now, you've certainly seen some of the powerful (and oftentimes horrifying) images coming out of the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. In the face of continued ICE raids, escalation by law enforcement, and displays of police violence at protests, the people of LA continue to show up to defend the immigrant communities that truly define the city. One protester in particular has gone ultra-viral for his brave confrontation of a group of California National Guard officers stationed outside the Los Angeles VA Clinic. The clinic is part of the complex that houses the LA Federal Building and the Metropolitan Detention Center, one of the focal points of the protests. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who is against President Trump's deployment of the National Guard to the city, said that the troops are only protecting federal property. "They're guarding the federal building here in downtown, and they're guarding the federal building in Westwood. That's what they're doing," she said at a news conference. "You're tough with your assault rifles and your sticks," he starts out. "You should be standing here with us. You're on the wrong side of history." @only__loo / TikTok / Via "We know you got a job to do," he says. "But you took an oath to the Constitution, not to the fascists in the White House." @only__loo / TikTok / Via He goes on, "Think about what you're doing now. Think about what this means, coming into our community. Peaceful fucking community. People working their jobs." @only__loo / TikTok / Via "They send in men in military fatigues. Weapons of war in our communities, and you stand here and you allow it," the protester says, pointing at the assembly of officers guarding the building. @only__loo / TikTok / Via "I am sick and tired of it." "You should be sick and tired of it." Related: The Internet Is Having A Field Day Over Marjorie Taylor Greene's Tweet About Homeschooling With An Altered Map He then asks, "You think any of these people in the White House sending you these commands give a fuck about you? Not one of them do." @only__loo / TikTok / Via "They laugh at you. Our president laughs at you," he goes on. "He called you fools. He said the people who died overseas in the military were chumps. That's who you're defending right now." @only__loo / TikTok / Via In the second clip in the video, the protester continues his impassioned confrontation. "Think about your place in history, ladies and gentlemen," he says as the camera pans to a crowd of soldiers in front of military tactical vehicles. @only__loo / TikTok / Via The camera pans the scene of armed soldiers as he speaks to them. "Ask yourself when you wake up tomorrow. I don't know if you have kids. Ask yourself the future you want for your children. Is it this?" @only__loo / TikTok / Via Related: A NSFW Float Depicting Donald Trump's "MAGA" Penis Was Just Paraded Around Germany, And It' "You can answer me. Is it this? Do you feel good about this?" he asks. "You're tough behind your fucking masks and your fatigues with your weapons, but how do you feel on the inside?" "This is our fucking community," he shouts. "And we will fight for it if we have to." @only__loo / TikTok / Via The original video alone has been viewed over 350,000 times, but it's been reposted by countless news outlets and social media users. COURIER posted it to their TikTok, where it currently has 3.4 million likes and a staggering 18 million views (and counting). As you can probably imagine, people were moved by the protester's courage and powerful words. COURIER / TikTok / Via TikTok / Via A ton of people thought this was a display of true patriotism. Many thought he should be running for office right about now. This person said we need to hear more of this. "This is everything. The truth cannot hide," one commenter wrote. People were very moved. "That is bravery. Wow," someone said. And finally, someone gave all of us on the sidelines a great reminder: you can always be the hero. You can watch the full clip here. COURIER / @only_loo / TikTok / Via What do you think of his speech? Let me know in the comments. Also in In the News: JD Vance Shared The Most Bizarre Tweet Of Him Serving "Food" As Donald Trump's Housewife Also in In the News: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral Also in In the News: AOC's Viral Response About A Potential Presidential Run Has Everyone Watching, And I'm Honestly Living For It

Viral Video: ICE Protester Confronting National Guard
Viral Video: ICE Protester Confronting National Guard

Buzz Feed

timean hour ago

  • Buzz Feed

Viral Video: ICE Protester Confronting National Guard

By now, you've certainly seen some of the powerful (and oftentimes horrifying) images coming out of the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. In the face of continued ICE raids, escalation by law enforcement, and displays of police violence at protests, the people of LA continue to show up to defend the immigrant communities that truly define the city. One protester in particular has gone ultra-viral for his brave confrontation of a group of California National Guard officers stationed outside the Los Angeles VA Clinic. The clinic is part of the complex that houses the LA Federal Building and the Metropolitan Detention Center, one of the focal points of the protests. "You're tough with your assault rifles and your sticks," he starts out. "You should be standing here with us. You're on the wrong side of history." "We know you got a job to do," he says. "But you took an oath to the Constitution, not to the fascists in the White House." He goes on, "Think about what you're doing now. Think about what this means, coming into our community. Peaceful fucking community. People working their jobs." TKTKTK raid in garment district "They send in men in military fatigues. Weapons of war in our communities, and you stand here and you allow it," the protester says, pointing at the assembly of officers guarding the building. "I am sick and tired of it." "You should be sick and tired of it." He then asks, "You think any of these people in the White House sending you these commands give a fuck about you? Not one of them do." "They laugh at you. Our president laughs at you," he goes on. "He called you fools. He said the people who died overseas in the military were chumps. That's who you're defending right now." In the second clip in the video, the protester continues his impassioned confrontation. "Think about your place in history, ladies and gentlemen," he says as the camera pans to a crowd of soldiers in front of military tactical vehicles. The camera pans the scene of armed soldiers as he speaks to them. "Ask yourself when you wake up tomorrow. I don't know if you have kids. Ask yourself the future you want for your children. Is it this?" "You can answer me. Is it this? Do you feel good about this?" he asks. "You're tough behind your fucking masks and your fatigues with your weapons, but how do you feel on the inside?" "This is our fucking community," he shouts. "And we will fight for it if we have to." The original video alone has been viewed over 350,000 times, but it's been reposted by countless news outlets and social media users. COURIER posted it to their TikTok, where it currently has 3.4 million likes and a staggering 18 million views (and counting). As you can probably imagine, people were moved by the protester's courage and powerful words. A ton of people thought this was a display of true patriotism. Many thought he should be running for office right about now. This person said we need to hear more of this. "This is everything. The truth cannot hide," one commenter wrote. People were very moved. "That is bravery. Wow," someone said. And finally, someone gave all of us on the sidelines a great reminder: you can always be the hero. What do you think of his speech? Let me know in the comments.

Nevada Legislature Approves State's First Open Enrollment System
Nevada Legislature Approves State's First Open Enrollment System

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Nevada Legislature Approves State's First Open Enrollment System

An education reform package recently passed in the Nevada Legislature will launch the state's first open enrollment system for public school students. The legislation is a compromise between dueling education bills, one sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Nicole Cannizzaro and the other supported by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo. It passed unanimously in the Senate on June 1 and with a 38-4 Assembly vote June 2. Lombardo said in a June 3 statement that the Legislature 'passed historic education choice and accountability, so that every Nevada student can graduate career or college ready.' The bill was sent to his desk June 6. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter More than 40 states allow interdistrict open enrollment, according to the nonprofit Education Commission of the States. Nevada's new system will let students transfer to schools outside their residential zone if there's room in their grade. It will also provide transportation subsidies for students trying to leave low-performing schools. Many states don't require transportation to be provided for open enrollment students, as it is for residents, according to Education Next. In New Hampshire, for example, lawmakers recently passed an open enrollment bill that places responsibility for transportation on parents. Families can drive their child to a bus stop on an existing route if they are attending a school outside their attendance zone, according to the bill. Related Multiple times a year, districts will be required to publish open enrollment data online, including school vacancy numbers and the total number of students who transferred in and out of their attendance zones. Nevada school boards will have to create a method, such as a lottery, to determine which open enrollment students are accepted into a grade that reaches capacity. Schools that deny a student's application will have to explain why. The bill prohibits districts from considering factors like disability, English learner status, athletic ability and residential address when evaluating applications. Schools will be required to create a priority lottery for students who have low academic scores. Related Students can be denied if they were expelled or suspended for 10 or more days during the previous school year. Parents can appeal a rejection to the district superintendent. The Nevada Department of Education will have to provide transportation for students who want to transfer from a low-performing school but have no way to get there. According to the bill, the department will award grant funds 'to the extent money is available' to local organizations that provide transportation. The bill will also create a statewide accountability system for districts and charter schools. The department could intervene in persistently low-performing districts by replacing leadership or assuming state control. 'We implemented open zoning so our children can attend the school that best fits their educational needs, and we provided resources to allow those children trapped in underperforming schools transportation to attend the school of their choice — regardless of their zip code,' Lombardo said in his statement. 'Simply put, we have instituted more educational accountability measures than during any legislative session in the history of Nevada.' Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store