
Deep sea diver crushed by giant underwater hammer wins huge payout
A deep sea diver who miraculously returned to work on the seabed 18 months after losing a leg when he was crushed by a giant underwater hammer has won a £915,000 compensation payout.
Veteran diver Allan Peacock, 55, suffered devastating injuries when he was crushed by heavy equipment while working underwater off the coast of India in 2011.
A heavy pile - acting like a "hammer" to nail another into the seabed - unexpectedly moved, sucking him between the two pieces of equipment and crushing his foot.
Mr Peacock was able to hop and drag himself away and was treated in India and in Newcastle after flying home, but ended up having to have a below-knee amputation.
But despite that, with efforts described as "quite exceptional" by a surgeon, he was back working underwater within 18 months with the help of a special prosthetic leg.
And now, after suing at the High Court, Mr Peacock has been awarded £765,866 in compensation from his former employer, Indian company Del Seatek India Private Limited, having already received about £169,000 from the operator of the barge he was working on.
The court heard Mr Peacock qualified in 1998 and was working as a saturation diver for Del Seatek when he was injured while working from a cargo barge in pipe laying operations in the Paradip area of India in November 2011.
His barrister, Mark Chapman KC, said conditions were difficult, with poor visibility of only about a metre and a strong tide when he descended underwater in a dive basket to work at a depth of up to 30 metres.
His task was to disconnect two chains which were holding vertical piles together, one on top of the other, with the top driving the other into the seabed and "acting like a hammer on a nail."
As he began to work, the top pile parted from the other and the barge began to roll due to the tide, also causing the piles to move, the barrister continued.
"They parted because they were insecurely attached," he said. "There was too much slack in the chains holding them together.
"The claimant's right foot was sucked in between the parted piles before the top pile fell back on top of the bottom pile and, in doing so, crushed the claimant's foot.
"The claimant's foot was stuck for a few seconds before the piles moved again and the claimant was able to remove the foot.
"The claimant detached his umbilical and hopped and dragged himself back to the dive basket after informing the dive supervisor of the accident.
"The basket had been removed to the surface and so the claimant had to await its return."
He was initially treated in India, before being moved to the Royal Victoria Infirmary, in Newcastle, where he had to have his below-knee amputation due to the lack of blood flow to the foot.
Mr Chapman said the extent of his injury had been "graphically revealed" to him and he was told without warning that amputation was required, which left him 'extremely shocked and quite emotional.'
"Following the accident, the claimant was absent from all/any work for a period of around 18 months," he continued.
"However, he is a stoical, resourceful and determined individual. He was resolute in his ambition to return to his pre-accident work, having independently researched the regulatory position applicable to amputees and commercial diving operations.
"The claimant has managed to return to work in a field which is very demanding with the use of prostheses provided by the NHS."
In his written evidence put before the court, Mr Peacock himself described the problems he faced in getting back to work after the accident.
'One of the things raised was what would happen if my prosthetic leg came off in the water," he said.
"In order to deal with this issue I came up with the idea of having climbing harnesses attached to my prosthetic leg.
"This was approved by health and safety and now it is something that I use all of the time when at work.'
Although he is now slower in the water, he continues working as a diver, but fears becoming more disabled in later life, the court heard.
"I am fully aware that it is likely that I will be wheelchair-bound at some later stage in my life and to be honest this scares me," he said.
"I try not to think about it too much and concentrate on keeping myself fit and healthy. I watch what I eat, I exercise and I try to keep myself in the best possible shape.'
Addressing the judge, Mr Chapman described Mr Peacock as an "impressive" man, who, because he can no longer run, has taken up kayaking and is still a keen mountain biker.
Mr Peacock initially sued his former employer Del Seatek and also the barge's operator, South Korean company Hyundai heavy Industries Company Ltd.
His lawyers claimed that the work had been done in "hazardously strong tides and with poor visibility" and that the piles were "not sufficiently secured together."
Hyundai settled his claim with a payment of £169,000, but Mr Chapman said Del Seatek had since 2016 "taken zero interest in this matter and had no involvement since 2016," leaving the judge to simply decide the amount in damages he is due from them.
Ruling on the case after a half-day trial at the High Court, Deputy Admiralty Registrar Simon Brown awarded Mr Peacock £915,871 damages, to be reduced by the amount already received from Hyundai.
The sum includes awards of £150,000 for lost earnings and £681,000 to pay for prostheses and equipment, as well as smaller sums to cover the extra cost of first class seats while flying back and forth to work and to mark the care he received from his wife, Samantha Vincent.
Speaking afterwards, Mr Peacock's solicitor Simon O'Loughlin, of Irwin Mitchell, said: 'What Allan went through was very traumatic, but he's shown such bravery and resilience to get to where he is today. To see him get back out working as a professional diver after such a serious injury is nothing short of incredible. He's truly an inspiration.
'It's been a privilege to get to know him and I hope that the settlement will be able to provide him with some closure as well as help fund any future treatment and support he requires and deserves.'
Mr Peacock added: 'Not for one minute did I ever expect to be back doing what I love after what happened to me. However I knew that my only options were to sit back and let my injury define me or take back my life – I chose the latter and I'm so glad I did.
'It took me a while to regain my confidence in the water, but I'm so proud of how far I've come. I've also had amazing support which I'm very grateful for.
'I wouldn't wish what I've been through on anyone, but I hope that I can show that there is life after such serious injury.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Top cricket official among four arrested over deadly stadium crush in India
Indian authorities have arrested four people, including the top marketing official of a cricket team, over the deaths in a stampede in the southern city of Bengaluru where the celebration of a match victory turned fatal. At least 11 people died and 56 were seriously wounded on Wednesday when a crowd of tens of thousands of fans swelled outside the Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru and grew unmanageable, leading to a crush. The celebrations for the Indian Premier League title's winner Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), which has been a runner up at least three times before and a fan-favourite, took a deadly turn within minutes. Locals said it was allegedly announced free entry would be permitted for the celebration in the stadium, causing the crowd to surge. Police officials said a top marketing official of RCB, Nikhil Sosale, was among those arrested. He was arrested from Bengaluru's Kempegowda International Airport on Friday around 6.30am when he was on his way to board a flight to Mumbai. His arrest comes after the Karnataka police filed a First Information Report (FIR), often the first step in any police investigation in India, against the winning team, an event management firm and the Karnataka State Cricket Administration (KSCA) under various sections of Indian law, including culpable homicide, voluntarily causing hurt, and unlawful assembly, among several others. The FIR stated that the state police had denied permission to hold the celebration. Mr Sosala also approached the Karnataka High Court, objecting to the manner in which he was arrested, calling the method illegal, arbitrary, and violative of his fundamental rights. He added that the arrest was made on the instructions of state chief minister Siddaramaiah without even the police carrying out a preliminary inquiry. Police officials said the arrests were made in an overnight operation by the Central Crime Branch and the accused are likely to be sent to the Crime Investigation Department on Friday. Naseer Ahmed, political secretary for the Karnataka chief minister, told broadcaster NDTV the crowd became uncontrollable and authorities were unable to make proper arrangements. Chief minister Siddaramaiah said the fans of the team superseded the authorities' estimates. "At a time of celebration, this unfortunate event should not have happened. We are saddened by this. The fans that showed up were beyond our expectations," he said. Thousands of people, some waving the home team's red flag, had lined streets around the Chinnaswamy Stadium as the players arrived in a bus in the evening, TV channels showed, with some climbing trees and the stadium wall for a better view. One policeman carried an injured spectator to an ambulance, while people gathered around another lying seemingly unconscious on the ground.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
India's GAIL sells LNG cargo as early monsoons cause weak power demand, say sources
SINGAPORE, June 6 (Reuters) - GAIL (India) Ltd ( opens new tab has re-sold one liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargo this week, said three market sources on Friday, as the state-run firm's storage tanks for the fuel are full amid weak power demand in India. Fewer LNG imports by GAIL, the country's largest gas distributor, could reduce India's overall appetite for the super-chilled fuel. India is the world's fourth largest LNG buyer, importing about 26 million metric tons last year as it goes through rapid urbanisation and industrialisation and to meet growing power demand. However, GAIL's LNG tanks are filled to the brim as power demand slumped due to cooler weather from the monsoon season, leading the company to sell its LNG cargo, said two of the sources. GAIL did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The three sources did not identify which cargo GAIL sold, but shiptracking data shows two LNG vessels controlled by GAIL diverting from their routes this week. LNG tanker Gail Urja, which is currently in the southern Atlantic Ocean, was en-route to reach the Dahej terminal in India on June 21 before it made a U-turn on June 5 to head to the Gate LNG terminal in the Netherlands, Kpler data showed. The vessel loaded LNG at Cove Point, Maryland, in the United States on May 21-22, Kpler and LSEG data showed. GAIL has a 20-year deal to lift 2.3 million metric tons per annum of LNG from Cove Point. It typically takes about four weeks for LNG tankers to travel from Cove Point to India. Meanwhile another LNG tanker, Grace Emilia, has changed its course several times around Reunion Island and Mauritius since June 2, the data showed. The vessel is now heading towards Asia. India's weather office had forecast an above-average monsoon season for the second straight year in 2025, with annual rains arriving at their earliest in 16 years. The early monsoons had alleviated sweltering temperatures nationwide at the end of summer, with a sharp drop in temperatures cutting electricity consumption and briefly pushing down prices to near zero on power exchanges. Increased generation from hydropower and nuclear had also led to a decline in natural gas-fired power output, which in May fell at the steepest rate in nearly three years.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Diner wearing high heels wanted £100k after ‘slipping on chocolate truffle'
A high-heeled diner who claimed she slipped on a 'runaway truffle' while exiting a restaurant has lost her fight for £100,000 compensation. Rosina Malik, 62, twisted her ankle and broke her right wrist when she fell at Chapter One, a fine-dining restaurant in Farnborough Common, Kent. The fall happened after she stood to adjust her dress at the end of a three-course dinner with two friends. She blamed her accident on stepping on a 'runaway' caramel-filled chocolate truffle – which had been 'dropped but not retrieved' by a waiter during dessert. Mrs Malik sued the restaurant's owners, Simply Chapters Ltd, for up to £100,000 in damages. The restaurant denied liability and while not disputing that a truffle was dropped onto the floor, the restaurant's managers insisted Mrs Malik did not step on it before the accident. In a judgment at Central London county court this week, Judge Nigel Gerald ruled against Mrs Malik, finding that her right shoe had 'no contact' with the truffle. The 62-year-old told the court she was left 'in shock' after her fall, which left her with injuries to her ankle and wrist. The offending truffle was among a selection offered by the waiter which she and her friends decided to have boxed up. But the truffle fell from its dish while being transferred to the box, explained Mrs Malik, rolling off the edge of the table, where, she claimed, she subsequently trod on it, or its residue. The judge said that immediately after the accident everyone assumed the truffle was the culprit as it was found on the floor, while some of the chocolate remains were also on the sole of her shoe. A trawl through the restaurant's CCTV showed a more complex picture, the restaurant maintaining there was no point where Mrs Malik was in fact seen to stand on the caramel choc. Judge Gerald in his ruling said the traces of sticky caramel on her shoe probably ended up on the sole 'after the accident and before her shoes were removed'. Defence lawyers acting for the restaurant claimed Mrs Malik ended up on the floor after her right ankle 'inverted' and she tripped over, insisting that the 'runaway truffle' had nothing to do with the accident.