Your rights as a landlord – and how you can still evict a tenant
The Renters' Rights Bill currently in the House of Lords is a more comprehensive version of the Renters' Reform Bill which was brought to parliament under the previous government. The new bill brings an end to 'no fault evictions' leaving landlords worried about removing problem tenants.
But there are still ways to remove troublesome tenants, even after the bill is passed, most likely at some point in 2025.
If you are faced with a rogue tenant, then here is what you need to know in order to legally evict them, once Section 21 has been abolished. In this article, we will cover:
What are the current eviction rules?
Evicting problem tenants after the Renters' Rights Bills
How to legally evict a tenant
Until now landlords have been able to use Section 21 to evict renters at the end of their tenancy without providing justification, as long as they give them two months' notice.
Landlords can still use Section 8 to get rid of tenants who wreck the property or stop paying rent. However, this involves going to court, which can take months.
A problem tenant is any landlord's worst nightmare, costing potentially thousands of pounds in damage or unpaid rent – in the past Telegraph Money has heard of rogue tenants who set up cannabis farms in the loft and others who filled the house with rotting trout.
During the pandemic, the government imposed a ban on evictions. Ever since this was lifted in 2021, there has been a surge in landlord possession claims and evictions, according to the Ministry of Justice.
Almost 20,000 households were served a Section 21 notice last year, more than double the number in 2021, as landlords rushed to regain control over their properties before Section 21 was scrapped.
There are still ways you can evict problem tenants even after the Renters' Rights Bill comes in. Those include:
Anti-social behaviour
Property damage
Unpaid rent
The Government recently revealed an action plan to help landlords crack down on anti-social tenants, although no date for new powers has been decided.
Currently, landlords can only end a tenancy over anti-social behaviour if there is a conviction. The new proposals would remove the requirement for a conviction, meaning an eviction could be obtained by a landlord on evidence alone.
James Wood, of the National Residential Landlords Association, said anti-social behaviour is notoriously difficult to prove. 'Most of the victims will be the immediate neighbours or other tenants, who are understandably scared of providing evidence in court.'
If there are reports of anti-social behaviour, give the other tenants and neighbours a channel to report the information confidentially. Ideally, they should keep an evidence log of when and where incidents occur, as this will strengthen your case if it goes to court.
Reporting the behaviour to the police or local authority could also help here. You should warn the tenant that their behaviour is not acceptable, without identifying the informer. If the behaviour persists, then you will have to serve a possession notice. Read more on these below.
Some wear and tear is to be expected over the length of the tenancy. But if the tenant has caused damage to the property, the cost can be deducted from the deposit.
There is a clear difference between natural wear and tear and property damage. Scratches on the wall and appliances that have broken down are examples of natural wear and tear, whereas cigarette burns on a carpet, a broken chair, or an overloaded plug socket constitute damage.
Before renting out the property, it is best to complete an inventory report with the items in the property but also the condition of those items. If deducting costs from the deposit, this must be on a like-for-like basis. You cannot charge a tenant for the cost of a new premium mattress if they damaged a cheap one.
There has been a rise in the number of landlords chasing unpaid rent from tenants since the pandemic began. Last year instructions for rent debt recovery services surged by 180pc compared to the previous 12 months, according to Landlord Action, an eviction firm.
Paul Shamplina, founder of Landlord Action, said that if a tenant stops paying rent, the landlord should get in touch as soon as possible. Hopefully, the problem is only temporary and you can compromise. Mr Shamplina said: 'A good tenant doesn't turn rogue overnight.'
However, if a compromise cannot be reached, and if the rent goes unpaid for more than two months, the landlord can decide to serve a Section 8 notice. This gives the tenant 14 days' notice to pay.
If the rent still has not been paid, the landlord would have to apply to the courts for a possession order and a money order.
Mr Wood said: 'Alternatively, landlords can apply via Money Claim Online for a judgment for just the arrears if they still want the tenancy to continue.'
Money Claim Online is an online portal, operated by HM Courts & Tribunal Service, which allows claims to be made for up to £100,000. Mr Shamplina added: 'If at this point the tenant still does not pay, the landlord would have to instruct bailiffs.'
If a tenant has been in at least two months' arrears three times in the previous three years, this is grounds for mandatory eviction.
You must give your tenant appropriate notice that you wish for them to leave the property. With Section 21 abolished, you must use Section 8 notice under the Housing Act 1988.
Section 8 can be used where the landlord has grounds for eviction including property damage, rent arrears or anti-social behaviour. However, you will need to have evidence to back up your claim if your tenant takes you to court.
Mr Wood said: 'Because of the lack of certainty in this route, most landlords prefer to use Section 21 to deal with cases where the tenant is in arrears or is anti-social.'
You must fill in a 'Notice seeking possession of a property let on an assured tenancy or an assured agricultural occupancy'. On this form you should specify what terms of the tenancy have been breached. You should give between two weeks' and two months' notice, depending upon which terms you are relying.
If your tenant refuses to leave after receiving notice then you can serve a possession order. This requires you to fill in a Form N5 claim for possession and N119 particulars of claim for possession.
In theory, a landlord should be able to get a bailiff 14 days after they receive a possession order.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
They Called It a Care Home — It Was Actually a 'House of Horror' Where Elderly Residents Were Tied Up
Bulgarian authorities rescued 75 elderly people from two unlicensed care facilities where they were forcibly tied up, sedated, and isolated from the outside world The facilities had been fraudulently reclassified from a care facility to "rooms for rent" to avoid inspections, per the Bulgarian Ministry of Justice Five people were arrested and are under investigation for kidnapping and abuse. Some elderly individuals have been relocated, though many families were unable or unwilling to take them backAuthorities in Bulgaria rescued dozens of elderly people found forcibly tied up and locked in their rooms at illegal care homes, completely disconnected from the outside world. The 75 elderly people were found tied up in two facilities in Yagoda, a village in central Bulgaria. The residents were forcibly sedated or kept under the influence of narcotics and locked in their rooms — which had the handles of their windows removed — the Ministry of Justice in Bulgaria said in a statement. The Ministry of Justice said in their statement that the locations had been registered as care facilities for the elderly, but the owner recently gave up his license and re-registered the facilities as 'rooms for rent' so that social health services wouldn't conduct inspections. Georgi Georgiev, the Minster of Justice, described the rooms as 'houses of horror' and mentioned that it took the department several hours to enter the facilities after being denied entry twice. 'A total of 75 Bulgarian citizens – someone's mothers, fathers, grandparents. Held in conditions that violate all human rights,' Georgiev said in the statement. 'Some of the people are in very poor health.' A majority of the families of the elderly people involved were unable to accept them or refused them, Deputy Social Minister Ivan Krastev said in a statement. 14 have been placed in other care facilities, four are accommodated in a nearby town and eight are still in the hospital. 'Phones were confiscated and residents had no contact with the outside world or access to their ID cards,' Georgiev said to the Bulgarian News Agency. 'They were told their phones would be returned if relatives called.' Georgiev added that there was no permanent medical care for the residents, per the local outlet. Doctors only came if a resident died and unqualified staff were administering injections. Five people have been arrested in connection with the incident, according to the Ministry of Justice. The regional prosecutor's office said to CBS News that the five people are being investigated for kidnapping, violence and negligence. 'According to testimonies, one older woman had not left the establishment for four years,' the office said in a prosecutor's office said in their statement that another resident who tried to flee, but was caught, beaten and left unconscious, per the outlet. Deputy Social Minister Krastev said in a statement that in Bulgaria, over the last four years, 2,090 inspections of care facilities have been carried out and 240 licenses have been revoked so far. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Telling detail in tribute to slain teen
A candlelight vigil will be held in honour of Queensland teenager Pheobe Bishop, after police revealed they had uncovered human remains. Queensland Police discovered the remains, believed to be the missing 17-year-old, about 2.30pm on Friday near the Good Night Scrub National Park. Ms Bishop was last seen near Bundaberg airport on May 15, with her roommates James Wood, 34, and Tanika Bromley, 33, being charged over her death. On Sunday, members of the community in Gin Gin, where the teen was residing, will gather from 4pm at the Kolan Community Park for a candlelight vigil. Attendees have been encouraged to wear bright colours and 'butterflies' in honour of the teen. News of the event triggered an outpouring of support from an already shattered community. 'May the love and light of the community surround Pheobe's family and friends during this difficult time,' one person said on Facebook. Another added: 'Words cannot describe the pain and suffering that your family would be feeling right now'. It comes after police on Friday charged Ms Bishop's roommates with one count each of murder overt the teens death, as well as interfering with a corpse. Police will allege the pair moved the teen's body more than once. In a major breakthrough, police on Friday revealed they had discovered human remains after scouring 'unforgiving' terrain. Detective Inspector Craig Mansfield said the remains had been tested and 'identified as being human remains'. 'We have been in contact with Pheobe's family and advised them of this development,' he said. 'Understandably, this has caused great distress to them.' Inspector Mansfield said technological analysis and on-ground mapping prompted officers to expand their search into a new area. He confirmed the remains were located in bushland and had not been buried. Ms Bishop's phone and luggage have not yet been located and investigations are continuing.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Rioters and people smugglers to be moved to open prisons early
Serious offenders, including rioters and people smugglers, will be transferred early to open prisons to tackle the jail overcrowding crisis, governors have warned. The Prison Governors' Association (PGA) said it was 'concerned' by a rule change that will allow potentially dangerous criminals to be moved to open prisons up to three years before they are due to be released. It could mean criminals serving sentences of more than seven years will be transferred within two weeks of being jailed, the PGA said. Among the eligible prisoners are human traffickers bringing in migrants for forced labour, offenders convicted of rioting or violent disorder, criminals caught with guns, class A drug dealers, motorists who have caused serious injury by dangerous driving and fraudsters. The rule, known as TPRS36, which takes effect on Friday, introduces a 'presumption' that offenders who meet certain risk and offence criteria should be transferred to open prisons three years before their automatic scheduled release date. Governors will make the final decision on transfers, but the PGA said they would only have limited discretion, in exceptional circumstances, to reject moves to open prisons While closed category A to C prisons remain overcrowded, there is space within category D open prisons. However, open prisons have minimal security with no physical barriers such as high walls, fences and secure gates and less supervision by officers to stop offenders from simply walking out. Accommodation is more akin to student digs, with eligible inmates allowed to spend most of their day away from the prison on licence to work, attend education or participate in other resettlement programmes. Tom Wheatley, PGA president, said: 'Open prisons are not a suitable place to house men that have been very recently sentenced for serious offences without any risk assessment. 'To ask the governor to decide that such risk is 'wholly unacceptable', given eligibility after just 14 days, is too short a time to make any such assessment and therefore to protect the public. It is also not what victims of crime expect, nor what the courts intend. 'This is simply a scheme to manage the lack of suitable prison capacity and, having already released many low-risk offenders, it is becoming difficult to use the capacity in open prisons. If TPRS36 rules were not used, many of these men would remain in the closed prison estate safely behind walls and fences.' Eligible prisoners include those serving standard determinate sentences, where they are eligible for release 40 per cent of the way through their terms, no history of escape attempts, have served at least 14 days of their time and have a 'low or medium' risk of causing serious harm on release. Terrorists, sex offenders, violent offenders serving sentences of more than four years and stalkers are excluded. A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: 'We are building new prisons and are on track for 14,000 places by 2031 – the largest expansion since the Victorians. 'Our sentencing reforms will also force prisoners to earn their way to release or face longer in jail for bad behaviour, while ensuring the most dangerous offenders can be kept off the streets. 'Only certain thoroughly risk-assessed offenders are eligible for moves to open prison and anyone found breaching the rules can be immediately returned to a closed prison.' The move follows the introduction of an early release scheme where offenders are freed 40 per cent of the way through their sentence and changes so that violent criminals, burglars and robbers recalled to jail will serve just a month in prison. The early release schemes are designed to tide the MoJ through until the introduction of its sentencing reforms which will see prisoners who behave well released as little as a third of the way through their sentences and killers, rapists and other violent offenders eligible for release at the halfway point rather than two thirds. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.