Philippines and EU to set up security and defence dialogue, minister says
MANILA, June 2 (Reuters) - The Philippines and the European Union have agreed to start a dialogue on security and defence in order to tackle emerging threats like cyber attacks and foreign interference, Foreign Minister Enrique Manalo said on Monday.
The announcement came during the visit to Manila of EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas for meetings with Manalo as well as a courtesy call with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
"We hope that through the security and defence dialogue we will remain proactive and united in addressing emerging security threats that transcend borders, cyber attacks and foreign interference and manipulation of information," Manalo said in a joint briefing with Kallas.
Kallas said the new dialogue will be a "dedicated platform" in which the regional bloc and the Philippines can deepen defence cooperation, share expertise on security matters and explore joint initiatives.
The dialogue will be part of a partnership and cooperation agreement between the Philippines and the EU, which was established in 2012 and entered into force in 2018.
Kallas said the EU remains committed to upholding a rules-based order, promoting peace and addressing common concerns in the South China Sea and Russia's war against Ukraine.
"We reject any unilateral changes to the status quo, including use of coercion," Kallas said when asked what the EU's red lines are when it comes to China's activities in areas like Taiwan and the South China Sea.
China claims sovereignty over nearly all the South China Sea, including parts of the exclusive economic zones of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Elon Musk blasts Donald Trump's ‘big, beautiful' tax and spending bill branding it a ‘disgusting abomination'
ELON Musk slams Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination" on X. The tech tycoon's criticism of the bill passed by the House in May comes shortly after he stepped down from the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) last week. 2 2 The bill includes multi-trillion dollar tax breaks and increased defence spending while also allowing the US government to borrow more money. The tech billionaire said on X that those who voted to pass the bill are "wrong". Mike Johnson, speaker of the US House of Representatives, soon after said: 'With all due respect, Elon is terribly wrong about the one big beautiful bill." Musk had previously called the bill "disappointing", claiming it undermined the cost-cutting work of the DOGE. .
Sky News
4 hours ago
- Sky News
Keir Starmer has some big decisions to make - and may not have long to make them
Barely a day after lift-off for the Strategic Defence Review, there are serious questions about whether the government needs to go further. It has emerged senior defence figures believe the prime minister will have to bow to pressure from NATO to announce a target of spending 3.5% of GDP within a decade. It's no surprise the 32-member defence alliance - facing its greatest twin challenge since the end of the Cold War - is calling for more money. With Russia bringing war to Europe, and Donald Trump making clear the US is not willing to fund its security indefinitely, countries are already stepping up like never before. What is stark is the widespread acknowledgement in Whitehall that spending 3%, which is still only a government ambition for the next parliament, will be a minimum. The authors of the Strategic Defence Review make clear Britain is most likely to fight a future war not on its own, but as a leader in NATO - and NATO's spending ambitions are soaring. 1:46 Money is tight - and there are plenty of priorities The secretary general of NATO, Mark Rutte, is calling for 3.5% on hardware and an overall 5% target for military, cyber and intelligence spending. Keir Starmer's spokesman insisted today it is "not just about cash" - the UK steps up as a member with its nuclear programme, combat aircraft, carriers, and the quality of its personnel. But with only a firm commitment to a rise to 2.5% in two years' time, and the Ministry of Defence already over budget on its current commitments, the ambitions set out for 12 new attack submarines, F35 aircraft carrying nuclear warheads and a home guard will require further injections of cash. The government's reluctance to go further at this stage is understandable. The rise to 2.5%, announced by the prime minister in February, required a controversial cut to the foreign aid budget - and the resignation of a cabinet minister. Welfare reforms are causing Labour MPs further pain. As one put it to me: "The party doesn't, in the main, oppose any of the defence decisions. The fault line will be that if there's money for that, why can't there be money for public services." 6:01 Are tax rises inevitable? The price tag of a rise to 3.5%, from 2.5%, would be £30bn a year. Paul Johnson, of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said "chunky" tax rises would be required. "We could get away with not having tax increases if the economy starts growing much, much faster than it has over the last 15 years," he told Sky News. "But if it doesn't and the government can't think of other bits to stop or cut then inevitably we'll have tax rises." 'We have to up our game' Tan Dhesi, chair of the Commons defence committee, who visited the US and spoke to Pentagon and State Department officials last week, said the UK had to "up its game" - but also its messaging. "We've got growing concerns that the wider public may not be aware of," he said. "Firstly, we've got the US. Their stated intention is to focus more elsewhere, on homeland security and the Pacific. They want the Europeans effectively to fund more for themselves. So, we collectively have to increase our focus on spending on defence. "We've also got the fact that Russia in Ukraine and spending more than 40% of its budget on defence. They're rearming at a rate of knots. Likewise, 30% with China. "The UK is also the third most targeted nation on the planet in terms of cyberattacks. For all those reasons, we have to up our game." He said the push to 3.5% was "inexorable", and the prime minister then has "a very difficult decision to make." 4:16 Polling by YouGov on Monday showed public support for making cuts in other areas to fund defence spending hikes was 29%, with 53% opposed. The prime minister often says the first duty of his government is to keep people safe. It's particularly acute for him, because of the legacy of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, and because Mr Trump and his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine, which Europe would police, has changed the calculations. But hiking defence spending further will require taking the public with him - and he may not have long to start that work.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
In defence of Canada and its war efforts
Following King Charles's speech in Canada (27 May), it is time to challenge the repeated claim by Donald Trump that Canada has been a freeloader on America with regard to defence. In the first world war, Canada lost around 61,000 people out of a population of 8 million. US combat deaths were 53,000 from 100 million. In the second world war, both nations lost similar proportions of their populations. Canada supplied quality and technical skills for the frontline, from the tunnellers of Vimy Ridge, portrayed in the Canadian parliament chamber, to the strategic bomber crews (40% Commonwealth) and the corvettes that protected American ships in the Battle of the Atlantic. In Britain, we benefited from Canadian generosity. The US charged interest for decades on its postwar loan to the UK, while Canada donated $1bn. Prof Nick BosanquetYork Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
