
Higher US metals tariffs kick in as deadline for 'best offers' arrives
Washington doubled its tariffs on steel and aluminium imports on Wednesday, the same day President Donald Trump's administration expects trading partners to make "best offers" to avoid other punishing import levies from taking effect in early July.
Maros Sefcovic, the trade negotiator for the European Union, said he "had a productive and constructive discussion" with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Wednesday morning.
"We're advancing in the right direction at pace - and staying in close contact to maintain the momentum," Sefcovic said on X, without giving any detail on the talks. He had been due to make the case for cutting or eliminating threatened tariffs on European imports.
Late on Tuesday, Trump signed an executive proclamation that activates from Wednesday a hike in the tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50% from the 25% rate introduced in March.
"We started at 25 and then after studying the data more, realized that it was a big help, but more help is needed. And so that is why the 50 is starting tomorrow," White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett told a steel industry conference in Washington on Tuesday. The increase came into effect at 12:01 a.m. (0401 GMT).
The increase applies to all trading partners except Britain, the only country so far that has struck a preliminary trade agreement with the U.S. during a 90-day pause on a wider array of Trump tariffs. The rate for steel and aluminium imports from the UK - which does not rank among the top exporters of either metal to the U.S. - will remain at 25% until at least July 9.
The United States imports about a quarter of all its steel, and Census Bureau data shows the increased levies will hit the closest U.S. trading partners - Canada and Mexico - especially hard.
Canada will be even more exposed to the aluminium levies since it exports to the U.S. roughly twice as much as the rest of the top 10 exporters' volumes combined. The U.S. gets about half of its aluminum from foreign sources.
Prime Minister Mark Carney's office said Canada was "engaged in intensive and live negotiations to have these and other tariffs removed."
Mexico's Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard reiterated that the tariffs were unsustainable and unfair, especially given that Mexico imports more steel from the U.S. than it exports there.
The increase in the levies jolted the market for both metals this week, especially for aluminium, which has seen price premiums more than double this year. With little capacity to increase domestic production, U.S. import volumes are likely to be unaffected unless the price increases undercut demand.
'Best offer' due date
Wednesday is also when the White House would like trading partners to propose deals that might help them avoid Trump's hefty "reciprocal" tariffs on imports across the board from taking effect in five weeks.
U.S. officials have been in talks with a number of countries since Trump announced a pause on those tariffs on April 9, but so far only the UK deal has come to fruition. Even that pact is more of a preliminary framework for more talks.
Reuters reported on Monday that Washington was asking countries to list their best proposals in a number of key areas, including tariff and quota offers for U.S. products and plans to remedy any non-tariff barriers.
In turn, the letter promises answers "within days" with an indication of a "landing zone," including what tariff rates countries can expect after the 90-day pause ends on July 8.
At issue for most trading partners is whether they retain the current baseline rate of 10% on most exports to the U.S. after that date, or something possibly much higher.
Havoc for businesses
Separately, alarm over China's hold on the critical minerals market is growing as global automakers joined U.S. counterparts to complain that its restrictions on exports of rare earth alloys, mixtures and magnets could cause production delays.
China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors globally.
Uncertainty around U.S. trade policy is creating havoc for businesses around the world. On Wednesday, French spirits group Remy Cointreau abandoned its 2030 sales growth ambitions, saying tariffs, slow U.S. sales and high uncertainty could derail its plans for this financial year and beyond.
Austrian speciality steelmaker Voestalpine also warned that tariffs were likely to dent its earnings, while German engineering lobby group VDMA blamed uncertainty caused by Trump's tariffs for a 6% drop in orders its members reported in May.
Meadow, a Swedish business which reuses aluminium cans to make packaging for consumer goods, said the company was looking for ways to protect against future shocks.
"One way to do that is to move supply chains closer to home so as to become less reliant on strategically compromised countries for supply," said Meadow's head of sustainability Ross Murdoch.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
LA police brace for more protests as Trump and California governor trade blame
President Donald Trump and California's governor have traded blame for the protests that have rocked Los Angeles following immigration raids in the second largest US city. Police braced for more protests on Monday after ordering demonstrators to go home. Law enforcements clashed with demonstrators at the weekend, after immigration authorities staged raids in the city's fashion district and several other places over the past week. 'Donald Trump has manufactured a crisis and is inflaming conditions,' Governor Gavin Newsom wrote in a post on social media late Sunday night. 'If he can't solve it, we will. To the bad actors fuelling Trump's flames – California will hold you accountable.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass made similar comments during a press conference on Sunday. 'What we're seeing in Los Angeles is chaos that is provoked by the administration,' she said. 'This is about another agenda – this isn't about public safety.' Mr Trump, meanwhile, said Mr Newsom and Ms Bass should apologise for the 'absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the continuing LA riots'. 'These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists,' he said in a post on his Truth Social platform. Federal security agents on Saturday confronted protesters in the Paramount area of south-east Los Angeles, with a second protest developing in the city's downtown area on Saturday night. Protests intensified on Sunday, as demonstrators blocked a major motorway, throwing rocks, electric scooters and other items on to police vehicles. Several self-driving Waymo cars were set on fire. Vandalism and looting were reported by area businesses overnight on Sunday, with graffiti visible on several buildings. Police have declared the entirety of downtown Los Angeles as an 'unlawful assembly', although there were indications that protests would continue, with local station KTLA 5 saying a rally was scheduled for noon in Los Angeles's Grand Park. Police have been using mounted officers, non-lethal munitions and tear gas to control crowds. An Australian journalist who was covering the event on live TV was hit with what was believed to be a rubber bullet as she reported live from the protests. Lauren Tomasi of 9News was speaking to a camera on Sunday when an officer behind her suddenly raised their firearm and fired a nonlethal round at close range. The video shows Tomasi scream and limp away, but she can be heard assuring the film crew that she was 'good'. About 30 protesters have been arrested so far, in addition to the scores of immigration-related detentions made over the past several days. In response to the unrest, Mr Trump activated 2,000 National Guard troops to support local law enforcement officers. It is the first time since 1965 that a president has deployed a state's National Guard without a request from the governor. Mr Trump wrote on social media that the National Guard troops were doing a 'great job'. 'These radical left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will not be tolerated,' he said. In a later post, he demanded that all people wearing masks be arrested. Police and immigration enforcement agents have also been seen wearing masks during the protests. The President said that the chief of the Los Angeles Police Department had reported protesters – whom he described as 'thugs' and 'paid insurrectionists' – were getting 'very much more aggressive'. 'These past few nights we've seen a level [of violence] that disgusts every good person in this city,' Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said on Sunday. Police have said they will clear streets and protect lives but will not take part in immigration enforcement. Mr Newsom had requested in a letter that Mr Trump remove the National Guard, calling their deployment unlawful and a 'serious breach of state sovereignty'. He added in a later post that he would be suing Mr Trump over the decision to send in the troops. The Trump administration has made cutting down on illegal immigration a cornerstone of its domestic policy, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents carrying out an increased number of raids in cities across the country. The White House recently set a goal for its agents to arrest at least 3,000 migrants a day. Thousands have been swiftly deported, sometimes without due process. California is home to more than two million undocumented immigrants, according to the Public Policy Institute of California. About 800,000 were believed as of last year to be residing in the Los Angeles area, which is in the southern part of the state, not far from the border with Mexico.


Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Defence or environment? Britain faces spending choices
Torn between growing geopolitical tensions and constrained public finances, Britain's finance minister Rachel Reeves is set to unveil feared trade-offs in a government spending review on Wednesday. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is boosting the defence budget, and reports point to National Health Service (NHS) being bolstered — forcing other key ministries to tighten their belts. "Sharp trade-offs are unavoidable," said the Institute for Fiscal Studies, a respected think tank, of the Labour government's spending plans through to 2029-2030. Reeves, the chancellor of the exchequer, is to detail day-to-day spending plans in her review to parliament on Wednesday. Ahead of the announcement, the government on Monday reversed a policy to scrap a winter heating benefit for millions of pensioners, following widespread criticism, including from within its own party. Labour will raise the income threshold for receiving the subsidy, which "extends eligibility to the vast majority of pensioners", or nine million people, the Treasury said in a statement. The policy to remove the allowance from millions of pensioners began this winter and followed the government's inaugural budget in October featuring tax rises and big spending announcements on infrastructure. Since Labour won power last July, sweeping aside years of Conservative Party rule, it has unveiled also contested cuts to disability welfare payments, hoping to save more than £5 billion ($6.8 billion) by 2030. Thousands of protestors gathered in central London on Saturday, many holding placards that read "tax the rich, stop the cuts -- welfare not warfare". The government on Sunday announced £86 billion of investment in science and technology and defence by 2030. Reeves hopes the spending will boost sluggish growth, which risks added pressure from the tariffs trade war unleashed by US President Donald Trump. Reeves is set to announce a funding boost of up to £30 billion for the NHS, according to The Times newspaper. Britain's media has in recent days reported on tough, last-minute discussions between the Treasury and the interior ministry, particularly regarding the police budget, as well as with the energy department amid fears for the UK's carbon-reduction commitments. - Defence priority - Reeves has amended her fiscal rules to allow the government more headroom for investment in the run-up to the spending review. At the same time, she wishes to balance the books so that tax revenues match day-to-day spending, meaning the government borrows only to invest. The chancellor has allowed the Treasury to borrow more, particularly for infrastructure projects across the vital housing and energy sectors. This has handed her a windfall of £113 billion over five years. "When it comes to capital spending, government investment is set to be sustained at historically high levels in the coming years," the IFS noted. "If spent well, this should help contribute to growth and to better public services in years to come." Citing Russia's invasion of Ukraine, London has announced it will increase its defence budget to 2.5 percent of UK gross domestic product by 2027 -- and up to 3.0 percent by 2034, helped by cutting international aid. "While going for growth and fixing the NHS will still be central to the Spending Review, bolstering the nation's defence is now considered an urgent pressing need," said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown. While seeking to cut costs, it has been reported that the government may later this year announce plans to lift a cap on child benefits, also after a backlash over the policy from some of its party members. "U-turns on benefit and welfare spending, increased pressure to ramp up defence spending and higher borrowing costs have left the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, in a sticky position", concluded Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics. "If she wishes to avoid a political backlash and/or an adverse reaction in the financial markets, she probably has little choice but to raise taxes in the Autumn Budget." The government has already hiked a business tax that entered into force in April.


Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Oil prices steady ahead of US-China trade talks
Oil prices were stable on Monday as investors awaited U.S.-China trade talks in London in the hope that a deal could boost the global economic outlook and subsequently fuel demand. Brent crude futures gained 11 cents, or 0.2%, to $66.58 a barrel by 1312 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude rose by 6 cents, or 0.1%, to $64.64. Brent rose 4% last week and WTI 6.2% as the prospect of a U.S.-China trade deal boosted risk appetite for some investors. U.S. President Trump and China's leader Xi Jinping spoke on the telephone on Thursday before U.S. and Chinese officials meet in London on Monday in an effort to calm trade tensions between the two nations. A trade deal between the U.S. and China could support the global economic outlook and in turn boost demand for commodities including oil. Monday's talks could dampen the impact on prices of a slew of Chinese data releases, said IG market analyst Tony Sycamore. Chinese export growth slowed to a three-month low in May as U.S. tariffs curbed shipments while factory gate deflation deepened to its worst in two years, heaping pressure on the world's second-largest economy at home and abroad. "Bad timing for crude oil, which was testing the top of the range and knocking on the door of a technical break above $65," Sycamore said, referring to WTI prices. The data also showed that China's crude oil imports declined in May to the lowest daily rate in four months as state-owned and independent refiners began planned maintenance. The prospect of a potential China-U.S. trade deal outweighed concern over the price impact from increased output by the OPEC+ group of oil producers next month. (Reporting by Robert Harvey in London, Florence Tan in Singapore and Colleen Howe in Beijing. Additional reporting by Ahmad Ghaddar in London Editing by David Goodman and David Evans)