Major US Government Website Could be Shut Down After Mass Layoffs
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A central U.S. government website that educates the public about climate science may soon cease to publish new material following a mass firing of its content team, says The Guardian.
Newsweek contacted the NOAA for comment on The Guardian's report via email, outside of standard working hours on Thursday.
Why It Matters
Climate.gov is one of the most widely used climate science resources online, receiving hundreds of thousands of visits monthly, The Guardian noted in its report.
A National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) logo is seen during a NOAA media day at the Aircraft Operations Center in Lakeland, Florida, on May 6, 2025.
A National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) logo is seen during a NOAA media day at the Aircraft Operations Center in Lakeland, Florida, on May 6, 2025.
Miguel J. Rodriguez Carrillo/AFP via Getty Images
The reported layoffs are the latest in a wave of cutbacks by the Trump administration that have already targeted numerous government departments and agencies, including the Department of Education, Food and Drug Administration, and NOAA.
What To Know
The content production team at Climate.gov, operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), was abruptly terminated at the end of May, a former contractor among those terminated told the paper anonymously. Newsweek has not verified the anonymous sources.
Other former staff said decisions to eliminate their positions appeared not to be based on performance but rather were targeted by political appointees within the Trump administration. "It was a very deliberate, targeted attack," Rebecca Lindsey, the former program manager of the website, told The Guardian.
Lindsey, who was fired in February despite receiving what she described as "stellar" performance reviews and a bonus, said the site's funding was stripped during contract negotiations due to pressure from higher-level officials.
The 10 or so content staff were supported by NOAA scientists. The site was housed in the agency's science wing rather than its public affairs division, and was designed to maintain political neutrality and scientific accuracy, she told the outlet.
"We operated exactly how you would want an independent, nonpartisan communications group to operate," Lindsey said.
"It does seem to be part of this sort of slow and quiet way of trying to keep science agencies from providing information to the American public about climate."
Tom Di Liberto, a former spokesperson for the NOAA who was fired earlier this year told the outlet: "It's targeted, I think it's clear."
"They only fired a handful of people, and it just so happened to be the entire content team for climate.gov. I mean, that's a clear signal."
What People Are Saying
Former NOAA spokesperson Tom Di Liberto told The Guardian: "My bigger worry, long-term, is I would hate to see it turn into a propaganda website for this administration, because that's not at all what it was."
What Happens Next
While the site may continue to host some prescheduled updates through June, there are no confirmed plans for future content, The Guardian reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Alligators: Our apex predator allies against climate change
Alligators: Our apex predator allies against climate change | The Excerpt On a special episode (first released on June 11, 2025) of The Excerpt podcast: The story of the American alligator is one of survival. From 1967 to 1987, they were officially listed as an endangered species. But the wetlands of Louisiana, Florida's Everglades National Park and many other southern habitats are now teeming with roughly five million alligators. And their story continues to evolve. Recent studies suggest alligators shape how carbon is stored in soil. Could alligators be an unexpected ally in the fight against climate change? Christopher Murray, Associate Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Southeastern Louisiana University, joins The Excerpt to share insights from his recent study published in Nature. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending an email to podcasts@ Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text. Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here Dana Taylor: Hello and welcome to The Excerpt. I'm Dana Taylor. The story of the American alligator is one of survival. From 1967 to 1987, they were officially listed as an endangered species, but the wetlands of Louisiana, Florida's Everglades National Park, and many other southern habitats are now teeming with roughly 5 million alligators, and their story continues to evolve. Recent studies suggest alligators shape how carbon is stored in soil. Could alligators be an unexpected ally in the fight against climate change? Here to share insights from his recent study published in Nature is Christopher Murray, associate professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Southeastern Louisiana University. Thanks for joining me, Chris. Chris Murray: Of course. Dana Taylor: Before we tie your findings to alligators, what story unfolded when you looked at soil in areas populated by alligators? Chris Murray: Yeah, so the story that we sort of uncovered was really interesting to us and a little bit surprising. What we found was a correlation, positive correlation between alligator abundance and carbon sequestration in specific habitats. So what that effectively means is, where we have more alligators, from small populations to much larger populations, we actually see a positive relationship, positive correlation between alligator abundance and carbon sequestration. And this is purely correlative at this stage, but what this essentially rests on is trophic cascade theory. Trophic cascade theory sounds a little nerdy, but what it essentially means is that where we have more apex predators in the habitat, they do a better job at eating the things that eat the plants that do the carbon sequestration. That trophic cascade theory, of course, is not my work. It's been thrown around in really high-end journals for some time. I read a paper by Dr. Trisha Atwood at Utah State in Nature Climate Change and kind of got the idea, hey, I wonder if this Blue Carbon marine hypothesis will sort of show or tell the same story in our tidally inundated coastal wetlands with the American alligator? Dana Taylor: And speaking of wetlands, what's the potential climate impact here if the wetlands they inhabit dry out? Chris Murray: Really the issue isn't them drying out. In the case of Louisiana, the issue is actually them sort of going underwater. Louisiana is one of the states where we see a very rapid rise in sea level associated with climate change. But what's interesting is that our tidally inundated wetlands are one of the most critical and effective carbon stock habitat in the world, with around 40% of them actually persisting in coastal southeastern United States. So what we have here is a situation where we've got really good habitat for carbon sequestration and an apex predator that, at least at this point, correlates with higher carbon sequestration rates in that habitat. So the ramifications from a conservation or environmental standpoint are pretty serious, in my eyes. Dana Taylor: Prior to this study, what was already known about how alligators reshape the land and water around them? Chris Murray: Most of the work on ecosystem functionality in the context of the American alligator actually comes from the Everglades, like you mentioned. We know there, from a lot of work from a lot of other alligator biologists, really good work in South Florida, that they actually do sort of environmental mechanical engineering. They orchestrate these wallow ponds where, when the Everglades is dry during the dry season, these ponds that alligators actually help construct hold water and serve as aquatic refugia, a place where animals that need water and plants can go to seek water during harsher periods of the season. Dana Taylor: What do you think would happen to those ecosystems if alligators weren't there? Chris Murray: Yeah, see, that's the interesting thing, where science sort of comes into play here. Right now, I mean, speaking about simply Louisiana and other coastal tidal wetlands, really talking about not the Everglades, we have correlative data. So our next task is to prove causality. This is a lot of nerd talk, but this is how science has to work. We have a relationship right now, a pattern right now that we see. Now the next stage is to say, "Okay, alligators are causally responsible for the effect that we saw when we looked at the correlation in the paper that you're referencing." So if alligators aren't there, my hypothesis is that carbon sequestration rates would lower, meaning more CO2 would be emitted into the atmosphere. Or in the case of the Everglades, maybe we wouldn't get these aquatic refugia, these water islands that animals can go to, and we may see losses in biodiversity in that context. The other thing about Louisiana and other tidally inundated coastal wetlands that are inhabited by the American alligator is, what happens to all these invasive species when the alligators aren't there? Feral hogs, right? Or nutria rats. These things are really good at eating plants. So my hypothesis is that if alligators all of a sudden vanished, we would get high populations of these herbivores that eat the plants and we may see decreased carbon sequestration in those areas because the plants that are good at sequestering carbon are being eaten by things that really aren't participating very well in ecosystem functionality. Potentially more harm than good. Dana Taylor: Chris, was there anything in your research that surprised you? Chris Murray: My original hypothesis was that, well, where there's alligators, we're going to see more carbon sequestration as a function of trophic cascade theory. Looking back on those data and finding that there's no difference between where alligators naturally persist and where they don't, places like Maryland, Virginia, Massachusetts, it became obvious to me later on that there's a different apex predator that is working in those habitats. So originally I was surprised by that finding, but looking back at it, just having a cursory understanding of ecosystem functionality and community structure, there's a different participant outside of the alligators by geographic range. So surprised me initially, but then it was sort of a no duh moment. Dana Taylor: I want to turn now to the commercial alligator industry. There was a time when the American alligator was near extinction. Can you take us through the journey of protecting the species from extinction to having an industry that sells alligator meat and hides? How is this a success story in terms of conservation? Chris Murray: Yeah, it's interesting. I'm a conservation biologist, right? I'm an ecologist. I do some evolutionary biology. And to think that someone in my profession would lean on or at least be positively influenced by an industry, I think, is a little bit of a unique phenomenon. But what we saw and what we continue to see is that the natural resource of the American alligator not only saved the American alligator from extinction, specifically here in Louisiana I can speak to the best, it saved the American alligator from extinction from harvest, recreational harvest that really had no limitation, that dwindled numbers way, way down to a dangerous degree, especially from a genetic standpoint. What we saw was that biologists and governments put together a strategy to monetize a natural resource. And what this ultimately culminated in was one of the most effective ecological head-starting programs that really has ever existed. The system functions by taking eggs and incubating them, and then returning a portion of the population at a head-started age or size. We see this a lot in endangered species where we like to take some animals that are used in the laboratory to breed, and then we raise them up to a degree where their survivorship is a little bit enhanced, and then we re-release them. Well, what happened here in Louisiana and across the southeast was that this head-starting program became part of the economy, right? And it continues to be part of the economy, where what we see is, we have the exact same structure, right? Eggs are taken, they're hatched out, they're raised up to a size, and a portion is put back. This not only saved the American alligator from extinction, but as some of the research that we're talking about here today, it actually may have far broader environmental positive consequences that we're just now beginning to look into across the broad range of the American alligator. Dana Taylor: I was hoping to see drone footage of your team at work in the field, but there's a reason why it isn't widely shared. This can be dangerous work, and others shouldn't be enticed or encouraged to attempt to do what your professional team does. Chris Murray: Right. Dana Taylor: What can you share about how you prep for doing work out in the field? Chris Murray: The one thing I need to do is learn to not wear shorts. I have a tendency to wear shorts in the field, and my legs come back all scratched up every summer. So that's something that my team, specifically me, is working on navigating. But the prep for the team, it sort of depends on the job. If we're interested in doing some nest monitoring work, the first step is finding the nests, right? And that can actually be really challenging across a vast wetland landscape. Then we have to get to the nests, and that's perhaps the most challenging part. The wetland is a dense jungle of phragmites and different types of grasses with some tree hammocks, and it can be very thick. So we essentially just utilize boats to arrive through navigable waterways as close as we can get, and then we walk. Most of our drone footage is actually from trying to guide the person walking to the nest in a habitat that they can't see more than a foot in front of their face. It's a lot of fun, but it can get pretty hot out there. Dana Taylor: Chris, what are your hopes regarding what your future research may prove, in terms of climate change, if alligator populations and the wetlands where they reside are properly protected? Chris Murray: The word prove is an interesting one, right? I think that's the next step, and that's my next hope, is to conclude some type of causality and test hypotheses from a causal perspective. Alligators are causing these ecosystem processes to occur at higher capacity or higher efficiency or higher rates. So my hopes are that this correlation that we've published leads to a better scientific understanding of what alligators do for the environment, from an ecosystem scale perspective. And I think in doing so, what we're actually doing is sort of telling chapter two of the alligator story, right? There were biologists that created the alligator industry to save the American alligator, and that worked. What I'm interested in doing with crocodilian colleagues around the US is to think about, okay, what else are alligators doing? And highlighting and elucidating, to science and to the world, that alligators are really important in ecosystem functionality. They're a good thing to have around, potentially in the face of land loss or climate change and other metrics that are important to us from a conservation perspective, like biodiversity. So my hope is to be able to share to the world and to science and to the public that alligators are not nuisances, right? Alligators are not scary. Of course, they command respect. They can get big and they can hurt, but it's better to mitigate human-crocodilian, in this case, human-alligator conflict, than it is to remove a nuisance because these animals are keeping the world a better place for us all to live in, potentially. So putting that story together, in summary, is my hope. Dana Taylor: Chris, it's wonderful to talk to you. Thanks for being on The Excerpt. Chris Murray: Of course. Thanks so much, Dana. Dana Taylor: Thanks to our senior producers Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan for their production assistance. Our executive producer is Laura Beatty. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending a note to Podcasts at Thanks for listening. I'm Dana Taylor. Taylor Wilson will be back tomorrow morning with another episode of The Excerpt.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Amid NASA cuts, popular social accounts for Mars rovers, Voyager going dark
President Trump's NASA budget plans look to cut its public relations funding by half, but already the agency is shuttering social media accounts that include those dedicated to popular missions including Mars Curiosity, Mars Perseverance and Voyager. Those three in particular have quite the fanbase on X with Curiosity's account touting more than 4 million followers, Perseverance and its little flying buddy Ingenuity have more than 2.9 million followers and Voyager nearly 900,000. The X handles for the robotic missions have taken whimsical approaches to posting over the years. And after NASA announced Monday the planned consolidation of accounts, prompting an outpouring of support online, each posted thankful responses. 'Wow, thank you all for the supportive messages. I may be a robot, but I felt every bit of love,' reads a post from @MarsCuriosity, the account created in 2008 on what was then Twitter ahead of its 2011 launch from Cape Canaveral and 2012 landing on Mars. 'Every single one of you has made this curious journey even more meaningful. This account isn't archived just yet — so stick around for some highlights these next few weeks.' The account for @NASAPersevere, created in 2020 for the mission that launched that year and landed on Mars in 2021, posted a 'Thank you' with a heart emoji and said, 'All of your supportive words are more meaningful to me than ones and zeroes could ever be. My work on Mars continues, and while this account will soon be archived, I'm going to share a few mission highlights before signing off.' The account for @NASAVoyager, created in 2010 for the nearly 50-year-old mission, posted, 'Thanks to everyone who sent messages of support after yesterday's announcement that this account will be archived in coming weeks. Until then, we'd love to take you on a trip down memory lane and highlight some of our grand adventures and discoveries. Sound OK to you?' Another mission-specific account to hear the death knell is for New Horizons, which flew by Pluto in 2015 and is now traveling through the Kuiper Belt. It's one of several active missions the proposed Trump budget looks to shut down. It similarly posted a farewell message @NASANewHorizons and like the others asks followers to look for updates on other NASA accounts that remain active. They are among the most popular accounts as NASA streamlines its message, according to the agency announcement. Some social media accounts shuttering include NASA's Launch Services Program (@NASA_LSP) and Exploration Ground Systems (@nasagroundsys) based at Kennedy Space Center. Also being consolidated are Orion (@NASA_Orion), Space Launch System (@NASA_SLS) and Gateway lunar station (@NASA_Gateway) accounts under the Artemis program. Others shuttering include ones dedicated to NASA's astronaut corps (@NASA_Astronauts), climate missions (@nasaclimate), the Commercial Crew Program (@Commercial_Crew), moon science (@NASAMoon) and atmosphere research (@NASAAtmosphere) among others. 'Over time, NASA's social media footprint has expanded considerably, growing to over 400 individual accounts across 15 platforms,' the agency posted. 'While this allowed for highly specialized updates, it also created a fragmented digital landscape that was challenging for both the public to navigate and for NASA to manage efficiently.' NASA will still give updates to the missions, but just on broader channels. So many will be deactivated, while some will merge and in a few cases some will be rebranded. The move is a precursor to plans to centralize communications in its headquarters and eliminate those at its nine space centers, including Kennedy Space Center, according to Trump's proposed 2026 budget. 'Beginning in FY 2026, the Office of Communications will restructure the organization to an Agency or centralized structure vs Center-specific to eliminate functions not statutorily mandated, except functions the Agency deems necessary, consolidate management layers and duplicative functions, and evaluate/implement technological solutions that automate routine tasks,' reads the proposal. The 2024 budget funded the Office of Communications with $76.2 million of the NASA's nearly $25 billion. The 2026 spending plan drops that to $33.8 million of the agency's $18.8 billion. That includes eliminating $7.8 million for KSC — the most of any space center's public relations budgets. The shuttering of individual accounts is part of a plan for a more uniform message, NASA stated, citing the 1958 law creating the agency that required the 'widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof.' 'The 2025 social media consolidation project is designed to fulfill this mandate more effectively. By reducing the number of agency accounts, NASA seeks to make its work more accessible to the public, avoiding the potential for oversaturation or confusion that can arise from numerous social media accounts bearing the NASA name and insignia,' it stated. Aside from fans who bemoaned losing the popular accounts, the change in approach has critics — including Jonathan McDowell. The British-American astronomer and astrophysicist works at the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics' Chandra X-ray Center. 'So @NASA is consolidating media accounts for 'consistent messaging'. Which is bad the same way every cafe in town being a Starbucks forcing a consistent menu on you is bad. Much less chance of something interesting to *your* taste but not to HQ making it into the public domain,' McDowell posted on X. 'In my view the core strength of social media is letting individual voices and their quirks find their individual audiences. Making a bland uniform corporate account to replace individual @NASA voices is a mistake.'
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Wanted: One NASA administrator
Presented by WELCOME TO POLITICO PRO SPACE. Thanks to everyone who read our inaugural issue. The excitement continues this week with speculation on the next NASA administrator, Congressional Golden Dome talk, and a Florida push to snag NASA HQ. Who do you think the next NASA chief should be? Email me at sskove@ with tips, pitches and feedback, and find me on X at @samuelskove. And remember, we're offering this newsletter for free over the next few weeks. After that, it will be available only to POLITICO Pro subscribers. Read all about it here. The Spotlight Now that Donald Trump has pushed NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman through the airlock, the search is on to find the space agency's next boss. We spoke to 12 insiders and analysts about who could get the nod. The conclusion? They'll probably be retired military. Starship Troopers: At least three former two- and three-star generals with space ties could be in the mix, according to four industry officials, who like others were granted anonymity to discuss internal discussions. These include retired Space Force Maj. Gen. John Olson, Lt. Gen. John Shaw, and Air Force Lt. Gen. Steve Kwast. Olson served in the Space Force and in NASA. Shaw retired as deputy commander of Space Command in 2023. Kwast last served in the Air Force, but supporters pushed for him to lead the Space Force. (Notice a theme?) The industry buzz follows Trump's decision two weeks ago to rescind the nomination amid a feud between SpaceX founder and Isaacman ally Elon Musk. The president then made the head-turning announcement that Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine would weigh in on the search for the next administrator for NASA — an agency that is not part of the military. Starfleet: Retired service members rarely lead the civilian agency, whose employees are known more for studying the stars than working with weapons. It has some people worried. Other potential names floating in the stratosphere include NASA's Kevin Coggins and astronaut Mike Hopkins. Coggins is a former military official who serves as head of NASA's Space Communications and Navigation program. Hopkins is a former NASA astronaut who joined the Space Force — from space — and was the first astronaut for the U.S.'s newest military service. Former Rep. Mike Garcia (R-Calif.), who served on the House science subcommittee on space before Rep. George Whitesides (D-Calif.) unseated him this year, is yet another name circulating. Under Pressure: Both industry and lawmakers are eager to fill the role amid the White House's proposed budget cuts to NASA, competition with China to return to the moon, and Trump's plans to land astronauts on Mars. 'I had thought we would have [an administrator] by now,' Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, which oversees NASA, told my colleague Joe this week. 'I don't know what their timing is, but I hope that the White House moves swiftly.' Some senators were even willing to swallow their concerns about Isaacman, a billionaire who had no experience in government, to speed up the process. 'In this landscape of getting back [to the moon] quickly, usurping China, I was ready to give a technology entrepreneur a chance,' Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the ranking member of the Senate Commerce committee, told Joe. Twilight Zone: But industry officials were not aware of any candidates the White House had spoken with yet, a sign that no one has emerged as a frontrunner. A White House spokesperson declined to comment. The physics of the nomination process is also working against the space industry, thanks to a nomination backlog. Isaacman, who Trump tapped early relative to past NASA administrators, took six months to even get on the roster for a Senate vote. And we all know how that turned out. Galactic Government THE NASA HQ RACE TRAILS ALONG: States have spent months duking out who will snag NASA's headquarters once its Washington lease expires in 2028. Florida has just upped the ante. Much of the Florida congressional delegation sent a letter this week to Trump urging him to consider moving NASA headquarters to Florida's Space Coast. It looks remarkably like a letter sent in April by Texas Republicans making a similar plea to relocate NASA to Houston, aka the 'Space City.' All in? But only two of Florida's eight Democratic representatives stamped their approval. None of Texas' 12 Democrats did. 'Both states could rally their delegations if it was important,' an industry official said. Military GOLDEN GANG: The Trump administration may not know how it will build the president's 'Golden Dome' defense shield, but that hasn't stopped lawmakers from creating a caucus for it. Reps. Jeff Crank (R-Colo.) and Dale Strong (R-Ala.) launched the House Golden Dome caucus this week to complement its counterpart in the Senate, created in May by Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.). The highly nebulous plan involves placing interceptors in space to shoot down enemy missiles, a scheme that could cost more than $500 billion. Crank, a first time lawmaker, represents Colorado Springs, home of Space Command. Strong represents Huntsville, a space hub and possible future home of Space Command — over the opposition of his colleague. What Next: Trump announced in May that he had selected a design for the multi-layered system and tapped Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein to lead development. But senators from both parties have said the plan is opaque, and the Pentagon canceled a major conference with industry on its plans just two weeks before the meetings were set to take place. The Reading Room House appropriators call for new Space Force acquisition pilot: Breaking Defense How Private Space Drives Space Force's Intel Delivery: Payload Space Force's first next-gen missile warning launch pushed to 2026: Defense News Voyager raises $383 million from upsized IPO: SpaceNews Event Horizon MONDAY: The Washington Space Business Roundtable holds a discussion on 2025 priorities for the FCC's Space Bureau. The Paris Air Show starts Monday and runs through Sunday. TUESDAY: The Lunar and Planetary Institute holds a virtual and in-person discussion of NASA's Europa Clipper mission. WEDNESDAY: The National Security Space Association hosts a classified forum on the Space Force's strategic plans. The Senate Armed Services Committee holds a hearing on the Defense Department's 2026 budget request. Photo of the Week
