Israel bombs Iran state TV during live broadcast
Israeli aircraft have struck the headquarters of Iran's state broadcaster in Tehran, after the Israeli military told residents of the area of the capital where it is located to evacuate.A live broadcast on Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting's TV channel was briefly interrupted after blasts were heard and the studio lights went out. Iranian media reported that at least one staff member was killed.The Israeli military said it targeted a "communications centre of the Iranian regime". Iran's foreign ministry said the strike was a "war crime".Residents of Tehran meanwhile appeared to be fleeing in large numbers, with pictures showing traffic jams on one highway heading north.
Earlier, the Israeli military declared that it had achieved "full air superiority" over the city and had destroyed a third of Iran's missile launchers.It came after Iranian missiles struck four different areas in the northern and central Israel overnight, killing at least eight civilians, according to the military.Iran's health ministry said at least 224 people had been killed and more than 1,200 injured in Israeli air strikes since Friday, when Israel launched a large-scale air campaign targeting Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missiles.Iranian missile strikes have killed at least 24 people and injured 592 others in Israel over the same period, according to the Israeli prime minister's office.Latest updates: Israel 'working to intercept threat' after Iran launches wave of missilesLyse Doucet: Where is Israel's operation heading?'Don't let beautiful Tehran become Gaza': Iranians tell of shock and confusion'They're weak': Israelis back conflict with Iran in neighbourhood struck by missileOn Monday afternoon, the Israeli military's Persian-language spokesperson called on residents of western Tehran's District 3 to evacuate immediately, saying it planned to target military infrastructure and that their lives were at risk.Hours later, the Israeli strike on the building housing Iran's state broadcaster was broadcast live on its TV network, IRINN.Following the sound of several explosions, newsreader Sahar Emami said: "What you noticed is the sound of a clear aggression by the Zionist regime on IRIB."Another, much louder explosion then shook the studio, forcing Emami to leave.The broadcast was cut off and replaced with news bulletins, before resuming minutes later.Later, the head of IRIB, Peyman Jebelli, appeared on TV showing a blood-stained paper. He said the channel and its employees were "standing until the end".The semi-official Fars news agency reported that Masoumeh Azimi, an employee of the IRIB Secretariat, was killed in the attack.Iran's foreign ministry spokesman, Esmail Baqai, condemned the strike, saying it was a "wicked act" and a "war crime".
The Israeli military's spokesman, Brig Gen Effie Defrin, said it targeted "a communications centre of the Iranian regime, which served Iran's armed forces"."According to our intelligence, the centre was used by military forces to advance operational activity under the cover of civilian assets and infrastructure," he alleged.Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz called IRIB the "propaganda and incitement broadcasting authority of the Iranian regime".The Iranian Red Crescent also said three of its first responders were killed when an ambulance was hit by an Israeli strike in Tehran's Shahid Bagheri district on Monday."This incident is not only a crime against international humanitarian law but also a blatant attack on humanity and morality," a statement added.There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military, but Deffrin said aircraft had struck trucks carrying weapons, surface-to-air missile launchers, other military infrastructure, and also eliminated "operatives" attempting to flee Tehran.
A resident of western Tehran told the BBC in a message that the sound of explosions from Israeli air strikes and Iranian air defence batteries was "constant"."Many have left Tehran. And I noticed that some local shops are also closed," they wrote. "The bakeries are packed, though, and those out and about you see them panic buying."They added: "Panic and fear are the words to describe the mood in Tehran right now. [But] I don't want to leave."A second Tehran resident told BBC Persian that their family had gathered their documents and jewellery and fled northwards early on Saturday."I cleaned and tidied the house completely, said goodbye to it, and cried for 15 minutes. Then we left Tehran," they said.A third person with two young children said she had decided to stay."I'm too exhausted to even think of leaving and coming back to find my life destroyed," they explained. "I've struggled to get here. If everything is going to be ruined, then I'd rather my kids and I go with our home."Iran's foreign ministry also accused the Israeli military of targeting a hospital during a series of air strikes in the western city of Kermanshah on Monday.State media reported that parts of the Farabi hospital were damaged by Israeli projectiles and that several patients were injured as a result.Kurdish human rights group Hengaw said it had received credible information that the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) had converted buildings near the hospital into "storage sites for military projectiles" and accused the force of using civilians as "human shields".
Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, told Israeli Air Force personnel at Tel Nof airbase that taking control of the skies over Tehran "changes the entire campaign"."We are on the way to achieving our two objectives: eliminating the nuclear threat and eliminating the missile threat," he said."When we control the skies over Tehran, we strike regime targets, as opposed to the criminal Iranian regime which targets our civilians and comes to kill women and children. We tell the people of Tehran to evacuate - and we act."In a separate interview with ABC News, Netanyahu was asked about reports from US media that President Donald Trump had rejected an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, because it might escalate the conflict."It's not going to escalate the conflict. It's going to end the conflict," he replied.President Trump blamed Iran for not engaging fully in talks with the US on a new deal that would place strict curbs on its nuclear programme."Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk... before it's too late," he told reporters at the G7 summit in Canada.Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Netanyahu had attacked Iran to scuttle a deal between Iran and the US."If President Trump is genuine about diplomacy and interested in stopping this war, next steps are consequential," he added."Israel must halt its aggression, and absent a total cessation of military aggression against us, our responses will continue."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
G7 expresses support for Israel, calls Iran source of instability
WASHINGTON, June 16 (Reuters) - The Group of Seven nations expressed support for Israel in a statement, opens new tab issued late on Monday and labeled its rival Iran as a source of instability in the Middle East, with the G7 leaders urging broader de-escalation of hostilities in the region. The air war between Iran and Israel - which began on Friday when Israel attacked Iran with air strikes - has raised alarms in a region that had already been on edge since the start of Israel's military assault on Gaza in October 2023. "We affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself. We reiterate our support for the security of Israel," G7 leaders said in the statement. "Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror," the statement added and said the G7 was "clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon." Israel attacked Iran on Friday in what it called a preemptive strike to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. Since then the two Middle Eastern rivals have exchanged blows, with Iranian officials reporting over 220 deaths, mostly civilians, while Israel said 24 civilians were killed. Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and has said it has the right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, including enrichment, as a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel, which is not a party to the NPT, is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that. President Donald Trump planned to leave the G7 summit in Canada early to return to Washington due to the Middle East situation. The United States has so far maintained that it is not involved in the Israeli attacks on Iran although Trump said on Friday the U.S. was aware of Israel's strikes in advance and called them "excellent." Washington has warned Tehran not to attack U.S. interests or personnel in the region. "We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza," the G7 statement said, adding the nations were also ready to coordinate on safeguarding stability in energy markets. An Israeli strike hit Iran's state broadcaster on Monday while Trump said in a social media post that "everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran." Separately, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also discussed the Israel-Iran war in phone calls with his British, French and European Union counterparts on Monday. Washington said Trump was still aiming for a nuclear deal with Iran.
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Javier Bardem sparks backlash with anti-Israel rant on The View as he is cut off after claiming he's suffering
Actor Javier Bardem was cut off on The View after suggesting he 'suffers on a daily basis' for the people of Gaza and said Israel was committing 'genocide.' The Oscar-winner was speaking to conservative panelists Alyssa Farah Griffin and Sara Haines, who wear yellow pins everyday to support Israeli hostages being held in Gaza. 'I see your [pins] and, of course, they have to return those hostages obviously,' Bardem said. 'But the situation in Gaza has come to a term now where I cannot express the pain that I, along with many millions of people there, suffer on a daily basis watching those horrible images of children being murdered and starving to death.' The actor stated his case for Israel committing 'genocide' based on his belief that international law and human rights experts and even Holocaust survivors agree with him. 'First of all, because the impunity that is taking Israel in doing these actions, and the lack of action on any government of course the back up of the United States with all those weapons and the economics, and also the silence of Europe, is creating a scenario where there is such impunity that if we really don't do something about that we are going towards, well, what is happening now,' he said. Host Whoopi Goldberg clearly wanted to get to a commercial break but Bardem tried to continue. 'And also, with this I will finish, the most important thing is to not lose the humanity and really denounce when we have to denounce and who we have to denounce,' he said. Abruptly, the show cut back to Goldberg, who said: 'Javier, come back.' The long-running ABC chatfest then went straight to commercial to a somewhat muted applause. A source at the show told Decider that they were simply running out of time and needed to head to break. However, several viewers were alarmed by Bardem's statements. 'Again, The View becomes a hot bed for political hatred and antisemitism,' wrote Nicholas Fondacaro of MRC and Newsbusters. 'Actor Javier Bardem claims he's suffering as much as the people in Gaza as he parrots Hamas propaganda.' Another social media user reminded people that 'ABC considers this part of their news product.' 'English is Javier Bardem's second language, stupid is his first,' added another on X. Leftist YouTube channel The Serfs spoke in favor of Bardem's comments and mocked the liberal ABC show for cutting away. 'Javier Bardem went so hard on the genocide of Palestinians that the View had to cut to commercial break.' None of the reaction nor the cut to break stopped Bardem from making similar statements at the premiere of his new movie, F1, later that night. 'Thousands of children are dying… It's a genocide happening before our eyes. The American support has to stop.' Many on the far left and even mainstream Democrats have accused the Israelis of genocide in their response to the October 7, 2023 Hamas terror attack on an Israeli music festival. Significant protesting has come from American college campuses, who have received smackdowns from the Trump administration for refusing to protect Jewish students and fostering antisemitism.
Spectator
41 minutes ago
- Spectator
Why is the US so reluctant to fight Iran?
MAGA (Make America Great Again) isolationists all agree: the United States must not be drawn into the Israel-Iran war. Donald Trump was not elected president to become entangled in pointless foreign conflicts. Over on Truth Social, Trump's hokey-pokey routine continues – in, out, in, out, send the Fifth Fleet out? – and America Firsters despair at the prospect of the US fighting 'a war for Israel'. In Jerusalem, the thinking is the exact opposite: Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly concerned that the unpredictable Trump could push Israel to conclude Operation Rising Lion before its military objectives are met. This is all very interesting as Kremlinology, but it also throws up a point of curiosity: why is the US so reluctant to get involved? This is, after all, an offensive conducted by its most reliable ally in the region against a regime where 'Death to America' practically doubles as the national anthem. It kills and kidnaps American citizens, funds Islamist groups that commit terror attacks against the US, and pours cash and arms into every conceivable conflict in the region. Lighting up Ayatollah Khamenei like a nuclear Christmas tree would fall squarely in the category of 'US interests'. Ah, but Iraq. And Afghanistan. And, for those of a certain vintage, Vietnam. Ever since the last Bell 204B took off from the roof of Saigon's Pittman apartments, the American collective consciousness has come to associate military invention with bloody and expensive quagmire, an instinct seemingly vindicated by Mogadishu, Afghanistan and Gulf War II. Why is that? The US armed forces are the mightiest military on the planet, a $1 trillion carnage factory that could obliterate an average-sized European country in the space of a morning – before breakfast if nukes were involved. Is it simply that the US now excels only in aerial firepower in a way it previously also did with boots on the ground? Is it poor leadership among the joint chiefs; substandard intelligence out of Langley, Fort Meade and Anacostia–Bolling; squeamishness in rules of engagement and norms of armed conflict; or hubris in planning and executing action against nations and forces the Pentagon underestimates as primitive or ill-prepared? Is it spiritual? Are civic and military elites so macerated in national and civilisational self-hatred, in an anti-Americanism pervasive in higher education, elite media and high-status culture, that they possess neither the confidence nor the will for American victory that were taken for granted among the pre-1960s generations? If any country should be morally paralysed at the thought of armed conflict, it ought to be Israel Whatever the answer, it prompts a corollary question: why doesn't tiny Israel, vulnerable on all fronts, with its own bitter memories of quagmires and retreats, its own self-lacerating institutions, and its own intelligence failures, evince a similar pessimism about military engagement? After all, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is a conscript army. In theory, every mother's son is on the frontline. If any country should be morally paralysed at the thought of armed conflict, it ought to be Israel. Perhaps in this contradiction lies an answer. Israel's is a drafted army because the threats the country faces are existential. As October 7 confirmed, it is not only possible but relatively easy to murder large numbers of Israelis in a short space of time. Americans are insulated by oceans and land mass and awesome firepower, whereas Israeli security is a much more fragile thing, not a definite but something that must be won and guarded every single day. American isolationists object to what they regard as foreign wars but for Israel, regardless of the theatre of engagement, every war takes place at home. The prospect of defeat, and the unbearable price that would come with it, does not grip Israeli leaders with the same paralysing pessimism as afflicts their US counterparts. When the next battle could be your last, wallowing in military or strategic inadequacies is an indulgence that can ill be afforded. The ability to win might well be downstream of the will to survive.
