One of the Grimmest Days in American Diplomacy
Leave aside, if only for a moment, the utter boorishness with which President Donald Trump and Vice President J. D. Vance treated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House today. Also leave aside the spectacle of American leaders publicly pummeling a friend as if he were an enemy. All of the ghastliness inflicted on Zelensky today should not obscure the geopolitical reality of what just happened: The president of the United States ambushed a loyal ally, presumably so that he can soon make a deal with the dictator of Russia to sell out a European nation fighting for its very existence.
Trump's advisers have already declared the meeting a win for 'putting America first,' and his apologists will likely spin and rationalize this shameful moment as just a heated conversation—the kind of thing that in Washington-speak used to be called a 'frank and candid exchange.' But this meeting reeked of a planned attack, with Trump unloading Russian talking points on Zelensky (such as blaming Ukraine for risking global war), all of it designed to humiliate the Ukrainian leader on national television and give Trump the pretext to do what he has indicated repeatedly he wants to do: side with Russian President Vladimir Putin and bring the war to an end on Russia's terms. Trump is now reportedly considering the immediate end of all military aid to Ukraine because of Zelensky's supposed intransigence during the meeting.
Vance's presence at the White House also suggests that the meeting was a setup. Vance is usually an invisible backbencher in this administration, with few duties other than some occasional trolling of Trump's critics. (The actual business of furthering Trump's policies is apparently now Elon Musk's job.) This time, however, he was brought in to troll not other Americans, but a foreign leader. Marco Rubio—in theory, America's top diplomat—was also there, but he sat glumly and silently while Vance pontificated like an obnoxious graduate student.
[Read: At least now we know the truth]
Zelensky objected, as he should have, when the vice president castigated the Ukrainian president for not showing enough personal gratitude to Trump. And then in a moment of immense hypocrisy, Vance told Zelensky that it was 'disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media.' But baiting Zelensky into fighting in front of the media was likely the plan all along, and Trump and Vance were soon both yelling at Zelensky. ('This is going to be great television,' Trump said during the meeting.) The president at times sounded like a mafia boss—'you don't have the cards, you're buried there'—but in the end, he sounded like no one so much as Putin himself as he hollered about 'gambling with World War III,' as if starting the biggest war in Europe in nearly a century was Zelensky's idea.
After the meeting, Trump dismissed the Ukrainian leader and then issued a statement that could only have pleased Moscow:
I have determined that President Zelensky is not ready for Peace if America is involved, because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations. I don't want advantage, I want PEACE. He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for Peace.
Trump might as well have dictated this post on Truth Social before the meeting, because Zelensky didn't stand a chance of having an actual discussion at the White House. When he showed Trump pictures of brutalized Ukrainian soldiers, Trump shrugged. 'Tough stuff,' he muttered. Perhaps someone told Zelensky that Trump doesn't read much, and reacts to images, but Trump, uncharacteristically, seems to have been determined to stay on message and pick a fight.
Vance, for his part, fully inhabited the role of a smarmy talk-show sidekick, jumping in to make sure the star got the support he needed while slamming one of the guests. The vice president is an unserious man who tries to insert himself into serious moments, but this time the stakes were much higher than the usual dustups with the media or congressional Democrats. He chuckled as Brian Glenn, a journalist from the right-wing channel 'Real America's Voice' who is reportedly dating Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, asked Zelensky the tough and incisive question of why he had not worn a suit in the Oval Office. (Perhaps he'll ask Elon Musk why he wore a hat and T-shirt to a Cabinet meeting, but I doubt it.)
The sheer rudeness shown to a foreign guest and friend of the United States was (to use a word) deplorable as a matter of manners and grace, but worse, Trump and Vance acted like a couple of online Kremlin sock puppets instead of American leaders. They pushed talking points that they either knew, or should have known, were wrong. Even if Zelensky were as fluent and capable in English as Winston Churchill, he would never have been able to rebut the flood of falsehoods. No, the U.S. has not given Ukraine $350 billion; yes, Zelensky has repeatedly expressed his thanks to America and to Trump; no, Zelensky was not attacking the administration. The Ukrainian leader did his best to stand up to the bullying, but Trump and Vance were playing to the cameras and the MAGA gallery at home.
Vance showed how dedicated he was to point-scoring rather than policymaking with an observation so shallow that he was lucky that Zelensky was too off-balance to call him out for it. To emphasize Ukraine's perilous situation, Vance noted that Zelensky was sending conscripts to the front lines, as if this was an unprecedented policy that only the most desperate regime would dare enact. Zelensky said that all nations at war have problems, but he might have pointed out to Vance that Ukraine is fighting for its very existence, while the United States has dragged conscripts to places far from home—including Korea and Vietnam—to fight against troops supported by the Kremlin.
[Tom Nichols: Don't blame Zelensky]
Today's meeting and America's shameful vote in the UN on Monday confirmed that the United States is now aligned with Russia and against Ukraine, Europe, and most of the planet. I felt physically sick watching the president of the United States yell at a brave ally, fulminating in the Oval Office as if he were an addled old man shaking his fist at a television. Zelensky has endured tragedies, and risked his life, in ways that men such as Trump and Vance cannot imagine. (Vance served as a public relations officer in the most powerful military in the world; he has never had to huddle in a bunker during a Russian bombardment.) I am ashamed for my nation; even if Congress acts to support and aid Ukraine, it cannot restore the American honor lost today.
But no matter how disgusted anyone might be at Trump and Vance's behavior, the strategic reality is that this meeting is a catastrophe for the United States and the free world. America's alliances are now in danger, and should be: Trump is openly, and gleefully, betraying everything America has tried to defend since the defeat of the Axis 80 years ago. The entire international order of peace and security is now in danger, as Russian autocrats, after slaughtering innocent people for three years, look forward to enjoying the spoils of their invasion instead of standing trial for their crimes. (Minutes after Trump dismissed Zelensky from the White House, Putin's homunculus, former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, posted on X: 'The insolent pig finally got a proper slap down in the Oval Office.')
Friday, February 28, 2025, will go into the history books as one of the grimmest days in American diplomacy, the beginning of a long-term disaster every American, every U.S. ally, and anyone who cares about the future of democracy will have to endure. With the White House's betrayal of Ukraine capping a month of authoritarian chaos in America, Putin, along with other dictators around the world, can finally look at Trump with confidence and think: one of us.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
25 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Court orders Trump administration to facilitate another deported man's return from El Salvador
WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court in New York on Tuesday ordered the Trump administration to facilitate the return of a man who was deported to El Salvador roughly 30 minutes after the court suspended an order to remove him from the U.S. The ruling in Jordin Alexander Melgar-Salmeron's case marks at least the fourth time this year that President Trump's administration has been ordered to facilitate the return of somebody mistakenly deported. The government said 'a confluence of administrative errors' led to Melgar-Salmeron's deportation on May 8, according to the decision by a three-judge panel from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The panel said administration officials must facilitate his return to the U.S. 'as soon as possible.' The judges gave them a week to identify his current physical location and custodial status and to specify what steps they will take to facilitate his return. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose mistaken deportation in March became a flashpoint in Trump's immigration crackdown, was returned from El Salvador this month to face human smuggling charges in Tennessee. In April, a Trump-nominated judge in Maryland ordered his administration to facilitate the return of a man who was deported to El Salvador in March despite having a pending asylum application. U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher ruled that the government violated a 2019 settlement agreement when it deported the 20-year-old man, a Venezuelan native identified only as Cristian in court papers. And in May, another judge ordered the administration to facilitate the return of a Guatemalan man whom it deported to Mexico despite his fears of being harmed there. U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy found that the removal of the man, who is gay, likely 'lacked any semblance of due process.' Kunzelman writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China is a real threat to US biotech innovation: EY life science expert
China's growing biotech prowess has become a real threat to the industry in the US in recent years. Moves by the Trump administration could weaken the US market further, according to several experts watching the deals flowing into China, which amounted $30 billion in 2024 and are already more than half that total in mid-2025. EY life sciences leader Arda Ural is among those watching and said that China is no longer the land of generics and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) used by the rest of the world. China has long been known as a "me too" producer — that is, a manufacturer of generics — as well as a source of APIs. But China is showing its might as it clinches more licensing deals for drugs developed domestically and increases clinical trials being conducted in the country. "The numbers are pretty compelling," Ural told Yahoo Finance. "A couple of years ago, we had pretty much no deals, or maybe under $1 billion in 2016. As of last year, there were $30 billion of licensing deals of Chinese assets into the US." But this didn't happen overnight. The Chinese Communist Party laid out a roadmap in 2015 that included investing in and growing the country's biotech sector. Ten years later, that is coming to fruition, Ural said. "That journey now is taking them upstream to more advanced innovation. Probably, we still have not seen first-in-class, but clearly they are going for best-in-class," Ural said. US companies buying or licensing products from China include a due diligence process, which can involve head-to-head comparisons to existing drugs or repeating clinical trials to ensure the data and efficacy results are accurate. This has helped ease concerns about intellectual property theft of US products, as well as concerns about data integrity in China. The prior doubts spurred the introduction of the Biosecure Act in Congress in 2023, which would prevent any entity receiving federal funds from using biotech equipment or services from "companies of concern." That bill has stalled in Congress. Meanwhile, the life sciences community continues to increase its interest in China. Companies like WuXi Biologics (WXXWY), WuXi AppTec (WUXAY), and BGI (formerly Beijing Genomics Institute) are among those under the spotlight. And during the pandemic, companies like CanSino ( which developed a vaccine, came into view. Now, with cuts to research funding in the US to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), as well as the loss of Food and Drug Administration staff, insiders are warning that China could fill the gaps and scoop up talent from the US. "The US still has the capacity to invest, but it is not, potentially, the only game in town," Ural said. He explained that China is still early in its journey, and while it does have government funding and Western-educated doctors and researchers, it doesn't have the type of firepower of US capital markets. "That is where they are lacking. There is no IPO market comparable to Western markets, there is no M&A exit strategy ... so that's the opportunity for them to come up," Ural said. A majority of the deals so far are US-based companies buying early-stage assets from Chinese company pipelines, bringing them to the US to validate and then produce and sell. At the same time, the US-based biotech industry has seen a slowdown in investment and IPO activity, and the NIH funding cuts by the Trump administration are exacerbating the dry spell. China's growth is also adding to the pressure since China is known for making things cheaper and faster than Western countries. Ural said that's why the partnership with US-based firms is a "winning strategy" for the overall industry. Anjalee Khemlani is the senior health reporter at Yahoo Finance, covering all things pharma, insurance, care services, digital health, PBMs, and health policy and politics. That includes GLP-1s, of course. Follow Anjalee as AnjKhem on social media platforms X, LinkedIn, and Bluesky @AnjKhem. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest health industry news and events impacting stock prices
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Says He May Send Additional Patriot Systems to Ukraine
President Trump said Wednesday that he was weighing sending additional Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine amid intensifying Russian attacks. But it was not immediately clear whether Mr. Trump was considering donating the Patriots to Ukraine — as his predecessor, former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., and several European allies have done — or selling them to Kyiv. 'We're going to see if we can make some available,' Mr. Trump said during a news conference at the NATO summit in The Hague, where he held a nearly hourlong meeting with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. But Mr. Trump cautioned that the systems, which Mr. Zelensky proposed buying directly in April, were 'very hard to get' and in limited supply, especially with the United States already providing some to Israel. Mr. Zelensky said in a statement that his meeting with Mr. Trump had been 'meaningful' and that the pair had discussed the prospects for a cease-fire. But neither he nor the White House offered details about how the meeting unfolded or whether it would lead additional American support. Mr. Zelensky has a complicated relationship with Mr. Trump, marked by meetings that have at times been tense and fraught, and at other times more substantive. His visit to the White House in February, where he was supposed to sign a landmark bilateral minerals deal, quickly unraveled as the two leaders publicly argued in the Oval Office. It took two more months for them to sit down together again, on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral in late April. That meeting helped defuse tensions between Kyiv and Washington and finalize the minerals deal. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
