
One step closer: What Timor-Leste's Asean milestone means and what comes next — Khoo Ying Hooi
KUALA LUMPUR, May 26 — When the announcement came on 26 May 2025 at the 46th Asean Summit in Kuala Lumpur that Timor-Leste would attain full membership in Asean at the upcoming 47th Summit in October, my heart leapt.
Over the years, I've come to know this small, beautiful country not just through research, but through time spent on its soil, through conversations, and shared experiences.
I've listened, learned, and grown alongside its people.
This moment is more than just a diplomatic milestone.
It's personal.
It is a moment of recognition, a long-awaited regional embrace, and, I hope, transformation not just for Timor-Leste but for Asean as a whole.
This declaration by the 46ᵗʰ Asean Summit is historic.
For the first time, a clear and public timeline has been announced.
After years of evaluations, readiness assessments, quiet diplomacy and patient waiting, we now see a firm political commitment to welcome Timor-Leste into the Asean family.
It is not only long overdue but also profoundly significant.
Why this moment matters
Timor-Leste has been knocking on Asean's door for over a decade.
The country formally applied for membership in 2011 and has been granted observer status since 2022.
Since then, it has consistently shown commitment through participating in Asean meetings, initiating institutional reforms, and building capacity across government institutions.
From improving public administration to strengthening its diplomatic engagement in the region, the country has made steady efforts to meet Asean's expectations.
And yet, the road has not been easy.
Asean's consensus-based decision-making has meant that progress has often been slow and unclear.
In Asean, consensus rules, but consensus can also stall.
Concerns over institutional readiness and economic disparities have slowed progress.
This has tested the patience of both Dili and its regional supporters.
But no country can ever be 'perfectly ready.'
What matters is political commitment, and on that, Timor-Leste has delivered.
For me, this step affirms the collective efforts I've had the privilege of observing over the years, from the dedication of civil servants and government officials to the work of communities.
It also recognises the country's unique post-colonial journey, marked by struggle, resilience, and a deep yearning to be part of the regional community it so strongly identifies with, both geographically and culturally.
Concerns over institutional readiness and economic disparities have slowed Timor-Leste's progress, testing the patience of both Dili and its regional supporters. — Unsplash pic
Timor-Leste's symbolic shift
Timor-Leste's admission is about more than just increasing Asean's membership count.
It signals a symbolic shift in how the region defines itself.
This is a country that emerged from conflict with a determination to chart its own democratic path.
While far from perfect, it has upheld democratic practices in ways that stand out in a region where political space is increasingly contested.
Its commitment to dialogue, peaceful transitions, and openness offers a valuable perspective rooted in lived struggle and hard-earned sovereignty.
For Asean, often criticised for its silence on democracy and rights, this could be a quiet recalibration.
Including Timor-Leste does not magically resolve these tensions, but it does invite a broader reflection: What kind of community does Asean want to be?
Timor-Leste's presence, I believe, can bring fresh energy into this conversation, reminding the region that principles like justice, solidarity, and dignity should not be seen as external pressures, but as aspirations from within.
Looking ahead: Hopes and cautions
As someone who has spent over a decade with Timor-Leste's society, political institutions, and cultural landscape, I hold cautious optimism for what this membership can bring for both sides.
For Timor-Leste, Asean membership is an avenue to diversify its foreign relations, secure economic partnerships, and gain a stronger diplomatic voice.
But there are risks too.
The bureaucratic demands of Asean integration can overwhelm small states.
Timor-Leste must ensure it is not subsumed into a passive role but instead brings its agency, voice, and lived experiences to the regional table.
It must guard its democratic spirit and not let Asean's often non-confrontational norms dilute its advocacy for justice and human rights.
Capacity-building must go beyond government ministries.
Asean engagement must include Timorese youth, artists, educators, and rural communities.
Too often, regionalism in Southeast Asia is elite-driven and technocratic.
Timor-Leste has an opportunity to do things differently, especially if it grounds its Asean journey in participatory inclusion.
For Asean, Timor-Leste's admission should be a wake-up call.
It must not treat Timor-Leste as a 'charity case' or a symbol of inclusivity alone.
Instead, Asean must walk the talk by providing financial, technical, and political support to ensure Timor-Leste's integration is smooth and sustainable.
And perhaps, in return, Asean gains something even more valuable: a renewed moral compass.
At a time when the region is grappling with the Myanmar crisis, South China Sea tensions, and growing US–China rivalry, it is easy to lose sight of the original aspiration: a united, resilient Southeast Asia that values peace, sovereignty, and dignity.
Timor-Leste's journey, its scars, and its dreams can re-anchor that vision.
Making Asean matter to the people
One of my long-standing frustrations with Asean is how little it resonates with ordinary people.
Despite its decades-long existence, Asean still feels distant, abstract, and elite-driven.
For many across the region, Asean is a name on paper, not something that touches their daily lives.
Timor-Leste's entry offers a chance to shift this perception.
This is a country whose people have fought hard to be seen and heard.
A story of a small state that dared to imagine itself as part of a regional community.
And that story, if told and shared meaningfully, has the power to connect with others across Southeast Asia, especially the youth who are searching for a regional identity that speaks to their hopes, not just official documents.
But this will require effort.
Asean must be more transparent and communicative about what Timor-Leste's membership means.
It must invest in people-to-people exchange and create spaces for connection and dialogue.
Most importantly, it must treat this moment not as the end of a process, but as the beginning of a more grounded and inclusive regional vision.
Final reflections
The road ahead will not be without challenges.
Timor-Leste continues to face structural challenges, and Asean itself is far from a perfect institution.
But this moment, this decision to welcome Timor-Leste by October 2025, is a milestone worth celebrating and safeguarding.
From where I stand, having walked with Timor-Leste's journey in my own small way, I can only hope Asean sees this moment not just a new member but the beginning of a meaningful partnership.
One that invites a shared vision of regionalism grounded not only in economic cooperation or political stability but also towards a Southeast Asia rooted in dignity, respect and shared belonging.
And perhaps, just perhaps, this long-awaited embrace can help Asean remember why it came together in the first place.
*Khoo Ying Hooi, PhD, is an associate professor of international relations and human rights at Universiti Malaya.
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
35 minutes ago
- The Star
Singapore and Philippines to expand collaboration in renewable energy, sustainability and healthcare
MANILA: Singapore and the Philippines will deepen their collaboration in several areas, including renewable energy, sustainability, healthcare and civil service development. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr announced this at a joint press conference on Wednesday (June 4), the first day of an introductory visit to Manila by PM Wong. At the press conference at Malacanang Palace following their meeting, PM Wong thanked President Marcos for his invitation to visit and said the bilateral relationship 'has never been better'. 'It is a partnership that has been carefully nurtured over the decades by successive generations of leaders and officials,' he said. 'It is built on a high degree of mutual trust and respect, and it has enabled mutually beneficial cooperation over a wide range of areas, for example in trade and investments.' On renewable energy, the two countries agreed to deepen both bilateral and regional cooperation, and to accelerate efforts towards realising the Asean power grid. This is a plan to connect the electricity networks of the group's 10 member countries to enable cross-border power trading by 2045. Marcos said Singapore will continue to be a major partner in the Philippines' aspiration to diversify its energy sources, and hailed the robust ties between the two countries. PM Wong said Singapore companies are interested in renewable energy in the Philippines, including solar and wind projects. 'Such projects can generate economic opportunities for the Philippines, while supporting the Philippines' renewable energy targets,' he added. On the sustainability front, the two countries are working to finalise a legally binding implementation agreement for cross-border carbon credit transfers that is aligned with Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement governs international cooperation to tackle climate change, and includes guidelines for countries to trade carbon credits to meet their climate targets. An implementation agreement will facilitate commercial participation in carbon credit projects, which can spur technology transfer, green investment and create good jobs, said PM Wong. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong is on an official visit to the Philippines on June 4, 2025, on invitation from President Ferdinand Marcos Jr, where the two countries agreed to deepen collaboration on energy, sustainability and healthcare. The two leaders also said their respective health ministries are exploring ways to deepen health cooperation, such as in upskilling and the reintegration of returning Filipinos into the Philippine healthcare system. Marcos expressed his appreciation that Singapore has ensured the welfare, safety and security of the over 200,000 Filipinos working in the city state, while PM Wong said Singapore is committed to being a good second home for them. 'They live and work in Singapore, contributing to our economy and society and enriching our cultural diversity,' said PM Wong. 'I conveyed to the President Singapore's appreciation for their invaluable contributions, especially the Filipino healthcare workers who stood with us during the Covid-19 pandemic.' Marcos noted that the two sides are working to conclude an agreement on health cooperation and a digital leadership programme between the Philippine Civil Service Commission and the National University of Singapore (NUS). Besides NUS' leadership programme, PM Wong said Temasek Foundation has also been active in the healthcare space in Taguig City – which is to the east of Manila – and the two countries will continue to step up cooperation in this field. Both countries also agreed to work 'shoulder to shoulder' at the Asean level, so as to accelerate regional integration and unlock the grouping's full potential, said PM Wong. The Philippines can count on Singapore's full support for its Asean chairmanship in 2026, he added. 'We will coordinate closely, because Singapore takes over from the Philippines the Asean chairmanship the following year,' he said. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong is on an official visit to the Philippines on June 4, 2025, on invitation from President Ferdinand Marcos Jr, where the two countries agreed to deepen collaboration on energy, sustainability and healthcare. During their meeting, the leaders reaffirmed the excellent bilateral ties between the two countries, exchanged views on regional and global developments, and underscored the importance of strengthening cooperation towards a more resilient Asean, said Singapore's Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a statement. At an official dinner held in his honour, PM Wong noted that this was his first bilateral visit since Singapore's recent general election, and also his first visit to the Philippines as prime minister. Mrs Wong and Mrs Louise Araneta-Marcos were also at the dinner. He said the visit came as the two countries have become more connected than ever, having signed an upgraded Singapore-Philippines air service agreement in May 2024. The agreement, which raised the number of code-share services between the two countries by Singapore and Philippine airlines from 35 to up to 150 flights, will enable more exchanges between the two peoples, said PM Wong. 'The Singapore-Philippines partnership is built on firm and growing connections between our countries,' he said in a toast speech. 'And I look forward to working with President Marcos Jr to take it to even greater heights.' - The Straits Times/ANN


BusinessToday
an hour ago
- BusinessToday
China Announces ‘ASEAN Visa' To Facilitate Travel With Southeast Asia
China has announced the implementation of an 'ASEAN visa' aimed at citizens from the 10 ASEAN member states as well as Timor-Leste, an ASEAN observer, in a move to ease travel and exchanges between China and Southeast Asia. The announcement was made by Lin Jian, spokesperson for China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, during a press conference held on Tuesday. Lin explained that the initiative seeks to simplify cross-border travel in the region, complementing existing visa exemptions China has with countries such as Singapore, Thailand, and Malaysia. It also adds to the 'Lancang-Mekong visa' programme offered to tourists from countries in the Mekong River basin. 'The construction of a China-ASEAN community with a shared future is being strengthened, and joint efforts to build 'a safe, peaceful, prosperous, beautiful and friendly home' have shown results over recent years,' Lin said. He added that exchanges and visits between the people of China and Southeast Asian countries are very close, and further facilitation of such exchanges is a shared aspiration among all parties. The new 'ASEAN visa' will offer eligible applicants a multiple-entry visa valid for five years for business visit purposes to China. The visa will also cover spouses and children of the applicants, allowing a maximum stay of up to 180 days per entry. Related


Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Shahriman denies ‘blowing hot and cold' over collateral for Sapura tower
Shahriman Shamsuddin wants the High Court to wind up Sapura Holdings Sdn Bhd citing a breakdown of mutual trust with elder brother Shahril. KUALA LUMPUR : Sapura Holdings Sdn Bhd director Shahriman Shamsuddin today insisted he was not inconsistent as regards using the group's Sapura@Mines property as collateral to fund its business ventures. Testifying in his petition to wind up Sapura Holdings on grounds of a breakdown of mutual trust with elder brother Shahril, Shahriman said he had objected to using the property as collateral for the development of the group's flagship office tower. In his petition, Shahriman had claimed that his 'strained relationship' with Shahril had been 'exacerbated' by the differing opinions they voiced over Project Apex at a special board meeting of Sapura Resources Bhd (SRB) on Jan 31, 2023. Project Apex was the codename given by SRB for its joint venture with KLCC Holdings Sdn Bhd to develop Permata Sapura, a 52-storey office building in the KL city centre. Lawyer S Rabindra, representing Shahril, then referred Shahriman to the minutes of that meeting. Rabindra: At various board meetings and in relation to loan proposals that we've already gone through, you voiced strong concerns and protested the use of Sapura@Mines as collateral for Sapura Holdings' financial assistance, particularly for Permata. Correct? Shahriman: Yes, for Permata. Rabindra: Yet, at the board meeting on Jan 31, 2023, you were comfortable with Sapura Resources using Sapura@Mines as collateral for new projects. Is that correct? Shahriman: For other projects that were going to yield (returns). Rabindra: So there was a risk, according to you, that using Sapura@Mines as collateral for Permata could lead to a loss of the property, but here, you were quite happy to suggest using the same property for new ventures, despite the same risk. Correct? Shahriman: Not correct. Rabindra: But it is the same risk. There is still the possibility of losing the property. Shahriman: We know the negative risk of Permata. But there were other projects that we could have gone into. Rabindra: I suggest to you that you were blowing hot and cold with respect to the use of the Sapura@Mines property as collateral. Shahriman: I disagree. Shahriman also agreed that, in essence, he had wanted SRB to exit Project Apex, while Shahril wanted to remain in it. Rabindra: I'm suggesting to you that this was a difference of opinion between two directors of a public-listed company about what they see as being in the best interest of the company. Do you agree? Shahriman: Agree. That was a difference of opinion. Rabindra: And this was openly discussed at the Jan 31 board meeting. Correct? Shahriman: Yes. Rabindra: So it essentially came down to a commercial disagreement between two directors on a matter of business judgement based on what is best for SRB? Shahriman: On a matter of business judgement, a difference of opinion, yes. Sapura Holdings is the parent entity of over 40 subsidiaries valued at RM832 million, including the publicly-listed SRB. Both Shahril and Shahriman hold a 48% stake each in Sapura Holdings, with the remaining 4% owned by Rameli Musa. In the petition filed last September, Shahriman claims that an irreparable breakdown of mutual trust and confidence between him and Shahril necessitated the dissolution of Sapura Holdings. However, Sapura Holdings, Shahril and Rameli, all named as respondents, oppose the petition, contending that the company was never intended to be a family business and that dissolution would be neither just nor equitable. The hearing before Justice Leong Wai Hong continues.