logo
FIRST PERSON: 50 years ago attempt was made to murder democracy, but ultimately Indians prevailed

FIRST PERSON: 50 years ago attempt was made to murder democracy, but ultimately Indians prevailed

Hans India7 hours ago

New Delhi: Fifty years ago, the night of June 25, an attempt was made to murder democracy, but ultimately, people's power prevailed, saving India.
The Congress party that screams the loudest about democracy was the perpetrator of the heinous crime, throwing opposition politicians, both national and local, into jails, imposing physical censorship on the media and arresting editors, stifling public opinion and strong-arming the judiciary.
It was 1975, when the summer of discontent over corruption and high-handedness gave rise to waves of fury against Indira Gandhi, whose legitimacy had been shattered by an Allahabad High Court verdict unseating her from Parliament for violations of the election laws.
Riding the crest of a mass movement that began in Gujarat and rolled across the northern plains, Jayaprakash Narayan – JP as he was known – brought the spirit of the rebellion to the citadels of power in Delhi on June 25.
At the Ramlila Maidan, a spot hallowed by the annual enactment of the drama of victory of good over evil, before a crowd of 100,000, JP thundered, "Singhasan Khaali Karo Ke Janata Aaati Hai, Leave Your Throne, the People Have Come."
It was his call for Indira Gandhi to leave the prime ministership that she was clinging to with a temporary stay of the court verdict banning her from parliament.
Presciently, he also called on the police and the Army to follow their conscience and not obey illegal orders.
This writer, then a sub-editor with barely three years' experience on the overnight desk of the United News of India (UNI) news agency, witnessed firsthand the attack on democracy.
The reporters and senior editors wrapped up the story of the day and headed home, leaving the desk to this writer, Arul Louis, the founding executive editor of IANS and now its correspondent in New York, and colleague Tarun Basu, a former chief editor of IANS.
Just after midnight, ominous dispatches clacked on the teleprinter machines – the electrically driven typewriter-like machine linked through telephone lines -- in the pre-digital age.
Reports dribbled in from Haryana, Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, and Himachal Pradesh that trucks delivering newspapers were being stopped by police, and power was going out at newspaper offices and printing plants, while some local opposition politicians were being rounded up for unclear reasons.
A Madhya Pradesh bureau passed on a rumour among local officials that "martial law" was coming. Unbeknownst to a sleeping nation, the Emergency had been declared.
Sometime after 2 a.m., this writer picked up a ringing landline. The caller cryptically narrated what would shock the nation and change the course of modern Indian history: "JP giraftar ho gaye (JP has been arrested)'.
A 10-letter bulletin went out on the wire service teleprinter network: F L A S H J P ARRESTED that marked the long night of fascist terror, 21 months marked by lathis and bullets, censorship, cowardice and despair – but also heroism, faith in democracy, unbending commitments, idealism and hope.
This writer, called Myron L Belkind, the bureau chief of the Associated Press, to get the word out to the world before censorship struck and shut down communications. This writer and colleague ran to the nearby Parliament Street Police Station.
In the dimly lit exterior of the colonnade building, the cops hadn't yet grasped the near-infinite power the Emergency had conferred on them and said politely that nothing was happening and to go away.
Suddenly, there was a bustle, and the frail JP was brought out.
Asked through the cordon of police in uniform and plain clothes around him what was happening, he gave a look of sadness, but behind it was a glint of steeliness.
He said feebly: "Vinaashakaale Viparita Buddhi." Krishna Kant, a Congress party dissident and supporter of JP's movement who was under arrest alongside him, repeated louder for all to hear the Sanskrit saying that translates as, "Madness takes hold at the moment of disaster."
JP was put in one of the white Ambassador tourist taxis and driven away. His kidneys failed during the harsh imprisonment.
Back to the UNI office, a story was filed with his quote that became a motif of the opposition to the Emergency.
GG Mirchandani, the fearless general manager of UNI, ordered that reports of the arrests and intimidation flow through the wires without being cowed down. Every ring of the phones brought news of more arrests – Morarji Desai, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Jyotirmoy Basu and many others, across the swath of politics. But two names were missing from the list of arrested: George Fernandes and Subramanian Swamy. Both had staged strategic disappearances to lead the resistance.
Editors and reporters poured into the office as the night was fading, to write the first draft of a tragic history in the making.
The UNI had been spared electricity and communications cuts that many media offices suffered that morning, as it shared the grid with many government offices and Parliament. The machines spewed rolls of copy on arrests and interdictions from the bureaus across the country, and some lapsed into silence when power or communications lines were cut.
At around 7 a.m., Indira Gandhi came on the All India Radio, then a government-run monopoly on the airwaves, to proclaim the rules of dictatorship.
Two government censors, drafted from the government's Press Information Bureau, burst in with two rubber stamps, one for stories censored and another for those approved, and imperiously took seats on the news desk.
Later, they marched into other newspaper offices and overpowered journalism.
Mirchandani defiantly kept the reports flowing till the censors delivered an ultimatum: Submit to censorship or the agency will be shut down permanently.
Mirchandani deferred, but with an order to the staff to continue to cover the news professionally and never to self-censor, anticipating censorship.
That was the censors' job, not the reporters', he said.
The censors slashed reports to meaninglessness or stamped them "Not for publication". But the reports secretly made their way to the proliferating samizdat, the underground bulletins crudely printed or run on cyclostyle machines, the inky predecessor of copying machines.
Some journalists associated with or loyal to the Congress Party or the pro-Mosow Communist Party strutted around giving advice – and veiled threats – to colleagues about the dawning of the new era of Indira Gandhi and there would be no more indiscipline.
Outside, a line soon formed of politicians, businessmen, trade unionists, and self-styled civic activists with press releases swearing fealty to the dictator.
And in the media, as in all other sectors, many lived up to BJP leader L. K. Advani's pessimistic deecription: "Some who were asked to bend, chose to crawl."
Among the editors arrested were Kuldip Nayar, the resident editor of The Statesman, and KR Malkani, the editor of The Motherland, an English-language daily newspaper associated with the Jan Sangh, the precursor of the BJP.
A journalist from UNI, SS Prakash, died after he was found with head injuries near the house of the dictator, his scooter with underground tracts. That was the time of fascism – the real fascism, not the fake term flung glibly like foul epithets, often by the intellectual and political progeny of those who put the yoke of fascism on the nation.
Those who have sat across from censors on the news desks, watched colleagues in the media and from universities arrested, or saw people snitch on others, know what fascism is like. That was the time in the name of socialism and secularism, the people in the hinterlands were hauled off buses to be sterilised, houses of the poor were demolished for no reason but the aesthetic whims of wielders of power, films were seized and burnt, when upstarts with connections became what were known as 'extra-constitutions authorities'.
Let no one, least of all the Congress party, talk of fascism. Except for the BJP, the Marxists, the assorted socialists now scattered in different parties, the DMK and the courageous independents, the others lost their moral ground that day 50 years ago.
Yet some of them, like the DMK, are now aligned with the Congress that had imprisoned their leaders.
The power of the people and their commitment to democracy had boiled like a river of magma beneath the surface of the facade of untruth to erupt like a volcano searing through the fascism when elections were held by the oblivious dictator.
The nation breathed free again after 21 months on March 21, 1977. "Vinaashakaale Viparita Buddhi" is the epitaph for that era of infamy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian students bare their digital souls to win US visas
Indian students bare their digital souls to win US visas

Time of India

time37 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Indian students bare their digital souls to win US visas

New Delhi: If you want to study in the land of the brave, and the home of the free, forgo your (social media) privacy. And most Indian students applying for US colleges are willing to make their social media accounts public to fulfil their dreams to study in the US, experts say. This will impact them as most are on at least one of the social media platforms like X, Instagram, TikTok, or Linkedin. According to the US embassy's X post on Monday, Indian students applying for visas to study in US colleges will now have to make their social media accounts public by changing the privacy settings. Making the social media accounts public is one of the measures among many, either introduced or reinforced, in the last few months impacting Indian students either studying or considering studying in the US. These restrictions include further tightening of student visa rules; heightened scrutiny of students' records, including social media posts; student and exchange visitor information system (SEVIS) record glitches; and increased scrutiny at ports of entry. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Over 95% of students enrolled with IDP (a study abroad platform) are fine making their social media profiles public. "Rest 4-5% are considering going to other countries like the UK, Canada and Australia," said Piyush Kumar, regional director, South Asia, Canada and Latin America, IDP. Live Events F-1 is a student visa to study in an accredited US college, J-1 is an exchange visa for participation in an exchange programme, while M-1 is student visa for non-academic or vocational study or training in the United States. Students with strong intent to study in the US are not changing their plans due to social media vetting, experts said. Students have been required to provide their social media account details in visa applications for several years now. "But for the first time, they (students) are being asked to make their profile settings 'Public'," said Kumar. "Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media accounts to public to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under US law," stated the US Embassy post. "I've worked so hard on my profile - academics, research, community work - but now I have to audit every tweet and post I've ever made," one such student applying for a Master of Science to UC Berkeley (Fall 2025) told ET. "Though it feels like I'm being judged for more than my merit, still I'm not giving up. I'll do whatever it takes to achieve my dream to study in the US." "We have not seen and do not believe that this will reduce the interest of students going to the US," said Rajneesh Pathak, founder of immigration and investment advisory firm, Global North Residency and Citizenship. He added that no other country has asked for this. "But usually all countries independently do a 'World Check' which includes social media and the internet," Pathak said. According to Adarsh Khandelwal, co-founder, Collegify, the US is no longer just reviewing your application - "it's reviewing you. Other countries might assess risk, but none require digital transparency at this level," said Khandelwal. Nevertheless, many students have started cleaning up their digital footprint like never before.

Both Iran's best friends and worst adversaries don't want it to have nuclear weapons
Both Iran's best friends and worst adversaries don't want it to have nuclear weapons

The Print

time38 minutes ago

  • The Print

Both Iran's best friends and worst adversaries don't want it to have nuclear weapons

There's one issue on which Iran's best friends and worst adversaries have unanimity: it must not have nuclear weapons. Nobody's happier than Gulf Arabs. Geopolitics is that rude and cynical. Friend and foe have drawn that line in the sand for Iran. That achieved for now, peace can be declared. Karnataka Congress is doing what it lectures BJP about. Proposed bills curb free speech Siddaramaiah government's proposed bills on misinformation and hate speech are a poorly disguised attempt to muzzle dissenting voices. It's duplicitous for Congress to lecture BJP on free speech when own government wants to curb it. It's a desperate act of a beleaguered CM who has nothing to show for governance.

No responsibility for losses: Cong woes go beyond rifts
No responsibility for losses: Cong woes go beyond rifts

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

No responsibility for losses: Cong woes go beyond rifts

Jalandhar: Having lost another byelection, the Congress appears to be showing remarkable consistency in its refusal to learn lessons. There is little hidden about discord within the party's state unit, and knives are being unsheathed, though carefully and in a calibrated manner. However, its problems go beyond factionalism, and the buck does not stop with state leadership, but goes up to its central leadership. The grand-old party has been consistent in not analysing its performance and not holding anybody accountable after big losses. After the party showed its worst performance in the 2022 assembly elections, when its vote share dropped to just 23%, there was no objective review or analysis of the reasons for the defeat. Before Ludhiana West, Congress lost four assembly and two parliamentary bypolls, but no questions were asked; none was held accountable, and nothing was heard about an objective analysis. This happened even as the party lost Jalandhar, its strongest parliamentary seat in Punjab. The only byelection Congress won was the Barnala assembly seat last year, where the only reason for its victory was an AAP rebel in the battle. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 年最紓壓的農場遊戲!無需安裝 東加:島嶼農場 立即播放 Undo You Can Also Check: Chandigarh AQI | Weather in Chandigarh | Bank Holidays in Chandigarh | Public Holidays in Chandigarh In the parliamentary elections, the main factors on the ground were Sikhs and Dalits remaining apprehensive of BJP, and the element of anti-incumbency working against AAP govt in the state. Though a few party leaders publicly sought introspection and objective analysis of the results, arguing that the party could get just 26.3% vote share and win only from 38 assembly segments, nothing was heard about any meeting for the purpose. Before the 2022 assembly elections, amid the farm movement, there was a strong yearning in Punjab for a qualitative shift in politics, which party leader Rahul Gandhi was articulating. However, when it came to translating those ideas on the ground, Congress stuck to its old template and arguments of communal and caste equations while removing a strong regional leader like Capt Amarinder Singh. Though Capt Amarinder faced strong questions about his govt's performance, rightly so as the 2017 elections were fought in his name and big promises were made, Congress has been missing a leader of his stature, appeal, political acumen, and intellect. His second tenure appeared to be a case of wasted talent and opportunity. Factions in Punjab Congress are not bound by an element of affinity or loyalty, but by opposition to one or the other leader. In 2021, the only glue among Congress leaders was opposition to Capt Amarinder. As soon as he was removed, the glue disappeared, and party leaders started grappling with one another. Then, opposition to Navjot Singh Sidhu united quite a few of them, and he was mainly blamed for whatever went wrong with the state Congress, and knives were out against him. For the last year-and-a-half, Sidhu has been silent on state politics, but Congress remains a house in disorder. As the principal opposition, Congress has not been able to proactively set the agenda or drive the narrative, even as scores of Punjabi activists and netizens, not aligned with any party, have taken up the mantle and have been giving a tough time to the state govt on several issues. Notwithstanding Rahul Gandhi's articulations at the national level, in which he appears to be taking unconventional, strong, and clear ideological positions, the party in Punjab has not been showing any inclination towards reinventing itself, even as the ground situation in the state appears to be providing a favourable ground for that.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store