logo
There's a ‘Sensible Center' on Transgender Politics. Here's Where Democrats Can Find It.

There's a ‘Sensible Center' on Transgender Politics. Here's Where Democrats Can Find It.

Politico6 days ago

It will go down as one of the most infamous taglines in modern campaign history: 'Kamala is for they/them — President Trump is for you.' With a reported $200 million behind ads like that in 2024, the right successfully placed Democrats outside the mainstream. Yet since the election, the party has made no serious effort to reposition itself on transgender issues, the defining cultural battle of this moment. That denial must end if Democrats are to return to the mainstream — and to winning.
Can Democrats remain supportive of a small and vulnerable segment of the population without seeming out of touch with much of America? Is there a middle ground they can occupy on issues relating to transgender people and still find their way out of the political wilderness? I believe the answer to these questions is yes.
First, Democrats should express their frustration and disgust with the ways extremists on both sides have weaponized the issue. Doing so will immediately signal to swing voters that they are trying to resolve, not exploit, the culture wars. Democrats can make clear that on the right, hardcore conservatives have used this debate primarily to inflict harm, painting transgender people as monsters who seek to change our culture and history. On the far left, progressive activists police our language, attempting to shame those who step out of line or do not agree with every item on their agenda. While there is no moral equivalency between those two sides — the demonization by the right is much worse — both extremes are wrong and are adding far more heat than light to this evolving and complex national conversation. Democrats must forcefully reject polarization and point-scoring and instead champion a middle ground that allows for a more reasonable debate.
Second, for Democrats to regain the support of centrist voters who deliver electoral victories, they must meet Americans where they are today, not where advocates might wish them to be, or where society may be headed in the future. Culture is always upstream of politics, and views may shift in the coming decades. But the current political reality is stark: The GOP was able to raise serious doubts among swing voters using this issue because Democrats allowed themselves to be seen as out of sync with the values and views of the American majority.
Where exactly does the majority stand on transgender issues? Many Americans know someone who is trans or who has a transgender loved one and wants them to be treated with kindness. Even as the left and right offer simplistic slogans and moral certitude, the broader public understands the complexity. As recent Pew research shows, a majority wants some limitations on sports participation based on an athlete's sex assigned at birth. And the same majority believes we must protect transgender people from discrimination in work, housing and healthcare.
Swing voters believe that Republicans can be cruel. But they also are exasperated with many Democrats. Polling from Blueprint identified this as a significant vulnerability for Democrats last year. The statement, 'Kamala Harris is focused more on cultural issues like transgender issues rather than helping the middle class,' ranked third in their testing of the most compelling reasons not to vote for the vice president. (It trailed only inflation and immigration.) Democrats ignore or dismiss such flashing red warning signs at their electoral peril.
Third, Democrats must be clear about their convictions and positions — and those must align with that compassionate but concerned majority. As a baseline, most voters believe there are two biological sexes: male and female, and that a person's gender matches the sex he or she was assigned at birth. At the same time, many also recognize that there are people who feel deep down that the sex they were assigned at birth is not who they are. Instead of arguing over X and Y chromosomes or getting into complicated scientific topics, Democratic politicians should keep it simple: Share your view that there are two sexes and that there are many ways people can identify by gender, a social construct not a biological one.
When it comes to kids under 18, Republicans are stoking fears that minors could access medical care for a gender transition without parental consent. That's why Democrats must be firm: Without explicit parental consent, no one should ever receive gender-affirming care, whether that's medication or any other medical intervention beyond mental health support. (This has the benefit of being both the medical standard of care and a legal requirement in every state; Republicans are trying to criminalize gender-affirming care even when parents support it.) As for sports, transgender girls and women should not be allowed to compete in women's sports at the level of high school or above in ways that compromise safety or fairness. But these should not be decisions for politicians; instead, rules governing those activities should be made by sports associations and local school districts.
When it comes to adults, Democrats should take a different approach and be committed libertarians. Transgender adults should be accepted and included. They should be free to lead the lives they choose and have the same rights and opportunities, including to health care and employment, enjoyed by all Americans. This is not only morally right, it is politically sound. Defending fundamental liberties for adults is strongly backed by majorities in virtually all nonpartisan public opinion research.
To win the middle, Democrats need not shy away from criticizing the harsh rhetoric and policies of the right and insisting on treating transgender people with dignity and respect. Preventing transgender Americans from getting passports that reflect their gender identity, threatening to defund suicide hotlines, kicking them out of the military — all of this is gratuitous and mean, and voters agree. In fact polling shows solid support for non-discrimination protections of transgender people even as Trump has rolled out an anti-trans agenda. And once they move to the center, Democratic policymakers will have far better standing to vote against Republican proposals to ban health care, impose gender checks on girls' sports at every age or attempt to erase the very existence of transgender people.
Lastly, Democrats must cancel the gender language police. If someone's heart is in the right place, that's what counts, not using what advocates may deem the politically correct words on a subject for which the language is in flux. Insisting on, and even using, new and controversial terms like 'pregnant people' unnecessarily puts Democrats outside the mainstream. Similarly, no one should be pressured to introduce themselves with their pronouns — a practice many Americans find at best annoying and at worst deeply alienating.
This middle ground will not satisfy the advocacy groups on the left. Indeed, it may well upset them. That's OK; it's their job to push. But there's nothing in such a principled and pragmatic approach that throws anyone under the proverbial bus. A centrist stance also won't be a feature on Megyn Kelly's podcast, since nuance doesn't generate clicks, while outrage is a ratings bonanza.
I recognize the backlash I will likely face in proposing that Democrats seize the center on this issue. But many in the Democratic coalition share, if only among close and trusted friends, the sense that we are walking on eggshells. They fear they'll be berated or ostracized by making public any viewpoints or using language that diverges from progressive groupthink or online orthodoxy.
That silence is proving a political disaster. It's time for real discussion, dissent and debate, without fear of being canceled. Because if we feel that way, imagine how it strikes swing voters, who are tired of being lectured to and feeling judged. They will give the party a serious second look only if they see a heterodox and welcoming space in the Democratic coalition, including for Americans who are deeply uncomfortable with these issues for personal or religious reasons.
If you ask voters to name their top 20 policy priorities, few would put transgender issues on that list. But what Trump and Republicans understood was that a cultural issue like this one can be made into a defining characteristic. There may be no 'winning' on transgender issues. But if Democrats hope to flip the House, expand the Senate map and take back the White House, it is imperative they pivot decisively to meet Americans where most of them are now: in the sensible center.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Doug Ford urges Canada's leader to ramp up tariffs on US
Doug Ford urges Canada's leader to ramp up tariffs on US

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Doug Ford urges Canada's leader to ramp up tariffs on US

Ontario Premier Doug Ford is pressuring Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney to ramp up tariffs against the United States after President Trump doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum earlier this week. 'I highly recommended to the prime minister directly that we slap another 25 percent on top of our tariffs to equal President Trump's tariffs on our steel,' Ford said during his Wednesday appearance on CNN's 'Situation Room.' 'He has to, he has to start looking around the world at China and other locations that are taking Chinese steel and really stop the flow of steel. That's the problem,' Ford told host Wolf Blitzer. 'Canada is not the problem. Again. We purchased 30 billion, with a 'B,' of steel off the US, and that's going to come to an end real quick.' Trump signed the executive order to hike the tariffs on Tuesday. The measure went into effect on Wednesday and would levy steel and aluminum tariffs on almost all imports to the U.S.. The United Kingdom is exempt as it inked a trade deal with Washington last month. Canada has retaliated against the U.S. previously, slapping a 25 percent reciprocal tariff on U.S. aluminum and steel products. Carney, who met with Trump at the White House in early May, did not express readiness to implement Ford's suggestion. 'We will take some time, not much, some time because we are in intensive discussions right now with the Americans on the trading relationship,' Carney said to reporters on Wednesday, according to Politico. 'Those discussions are progressing. I would note that the American action is a global action. It's not one targeted in Canada, so we will take some time, but not more,' the prime minister said. Ontario is open to imposing its own countermeasures, according to Ford. When asked on Wednesday if willing to bring back the electricity surcharge, he told reporters that 'everything's on the table.' Ontario implemented a 25 percent extra charge on the electricity Canada exports to three U.S. states after Trump threatened to double tariffs on steel and aluminum. Ford eventually spoke to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and later suspended the tax impacting Michigan, New York and Minnesota.

Inflation data threatened by government hiring freeze as tariffs loom
Inflation data threatened by government hiring freeze as tariffs loom

Associated Press

time13 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Inflation data threatened by government hiring freeze as tariffs loom

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Labor Department has cut back on the inflation data it collects because of the Trump administration's government hiring freeze, raising concerns among economists about the quality of the inflation figures just as they are being closely watched for the impact of tariffs. The department's Bureau of Labor Statistics, which produces the monthly consumer price index, the most closely watched inflation measure, said Wednesday that it is 'reducing sample in areas across the country' and stopped collecting price data entirely in April in Lincoln, Nebraska, and Provo, Utah. It also said it has stopped collecting data this month in Buffalo, New York. In an email that the BLS sent to economists, viewed by The Associated Press, the agency said that it 'temporarily reduced the number of outlets and quotes it attempted to collect due to a staffing shortage' in April. The reduced data collection 'will be kept in place until the hiring freeze is lifted.' President Donald Trump froze federal hiring on his first day in office and extended the freeze in April until late July, suggesting future inflation reports will also involve less data collection. The cutbacks have intensified worries among economists that government spending cuts could degrade the federal government's ability to compile key economic data on employment, prices, and the broader economy. The BLS also said last month that it will no longer collect wholesale prices in about 350 categories for its Producer Price Index, a measure of price changes before they reach the consumer. The cutbacks are also occurring at a time of heightened uncertainty about the economy and the impact of Trump's sweeping tariffs on hiring, growth and inflation. 'The PPI is cutting hundreds of indexes from production, and the CPI is now being constructed with less data,' Omair Sharif, chief economist at the consulting firm Inflation Insights, said in an email. 'That alone is worrying given that we're heading into the teeth of the tariff impact on prices.' Earlier this year, the Trump administration disbanded several advisory committees that worked with BLS and other statistical agencies on fine-tuning its data-gathering. The BLS said that the cutbacks 'have minimal impact' on the overall inflation data, but 'they may increase the volatility' of the reported prices of specific items. Alan Detmeister, an economist at UBS, an investment bank, said the cutbacks likely had little impact on April's inflation figures. But 'if these types of cuts continue, they will degrade the reliability and efficacy of these statistical agencies,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store