logo
AI in Education Report: New Cengage Group Data Shows Growing GenAI Adoption in K12 & Higher Education

AI in Education Report: New Cengage Group Data Shows Growing GenAI Adoption in K12 & Higher Education

Yahoo03-04-2025

Optimism for GenAI increased 5% across Higher Education and K12
HED students, instructors validate importance of AI literacy in courses
K12 experienced higher GenAI adoption rates YoY alongside increased concerns
BOSTON, April 03, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cengage Group, a global edtech company, today released updated data from its "AI in Education" research series, which regularly evaluates AI's impact on education.
This edition, which surveyed over 3,000 higher education (HED) students and instructors and over 1,000 K12 teachers and administrators, found similarities among HED instructors' and K12 teachers' optimism for GenAI specifically. Nearly half of HED instructors (45%) and almost three in five K12 teachers (55%) have positive perceptions about GenAI, despite concerns and perceived risks in its adoption.
However, while both K12 and HED share similar optimism, the data also exposed strong differences in GenAI adoption rates. Nearly 2 in 3 K12 teachers (63%; +12% year-over-year) say they (or their school district) have incorporated GenAI technology into their teaching process compared to 49% (+5% YoY) of HED instructors.
"Educators and administrators remain optimistic about the potential of GenAI and are starting to realize the positive impact it can have on learning," said Kimberly Russell, Vice President, UX, Market and Product Research at Cengage Group. "While we're encouraged by this optimism, we found a significant delta – 28% difference – in reported adoption rates between both groups. Adoption and usage trends are important because they provide our product development team a more holistic view of how both markets are using GenAI in education."
While differences remain, both markets continue exploring GenAI to support various professional and student needs. Within HED, instructors are currently using GenAI to create course content / student-facing materials (45%; +11% from 2023) including quizzes and assessments (39%; +16% from 2023), assist in lesson planning (42%; +18% from 2023) and support their lectures (42%; +12% from 2023). Nearly 2 in 5 (36%) use it to complete administrative tasks (36%; +3% YoY). HED students are also leveraging GenAI in learning, primarily by using it to help summarize complicated concepts (67%), generate writing assignment ideas (61%) and create study materials (55%).
Additional HED findings among students and instructors show:
Demand for Future Use Cases: Most desired AI use cases among HED instructors is AI that supports language learners (63%), assesses whether cheating is occurring, (57%) completes administrative tasks (55%) and personalizes learning and instruction (52%).
AI Skills and Literacy Matter: Almost all HED instructors (92%) and students (83%) say it's important to include AI literacy in courses, partly because most students (84%) believe AI skills proficiency is important for future employment.
Instructors Still Need to Catch Up: About two-thirds (65%) of HED students believe they know more about AI than many of their instructors and 45% wish their instructors used AI and taught AI skills in applicable courses.
"We are just scratching the surface on the potential GenAI has for personalizing learning and supporting HED educators, and it's encouraging to see such optimism and adoption growth in this market," said Darren Person, Chief Digital Officer at Cengage Group. "At the same time, we're noticing new opportunities to meet the evolving needs of students. Students need educators to embrace and encourage GenAI use in their curricula to support greater employability; instructors want expanded AI capabilities that help them personalize and evaluate students' learning efforts. Both are critical focus areas Cengage Group is leaning into as we evolve and develop new AI edtech capabilities."
Within K12, YoY adoption has increased, including an 18% increase in teachers who recently started using GenAI prior to this semester/school year (40%; 16% in 2024). However, adoption has increased alongside a rise in concerns about GenAI risk with 88% of administrators (+4% YoY) and 87% of teachers (+4% YoY) believing there is a moderate to severe risk in using GenAI. While K12 teachers' concerns about GenAI's impact on academic integrity (83%, -1% YOY) and a lack of training/support (34%, -4% YOY) have gone down, concerns about data privacy (32%, +4% YOY) have increased.
Additional findings among K12 teachers and administrators show:
Demand for Future Use Cases: For districts planning to use GenAI, there was a notable increase in demand for teacher support (53%, +15% YOY), classroom support (40%, +13% YOY) and tutoring (23%, +9% YOY). Additional features that would further increase K12 adoption include GenAI products that help personalize instruction (27%), completing administrative tasks (20%), helping language learners (17%), instruction (16%) and lesson planning (14%).
Specific Content Generation Needs: K12 teachers are more likely to adopt GenAI materials that can create and build the following types of content: assessments (e.g., test and quiz questions) (34%), animations (e.g., videos integrated into digital content) (30%), narrative content (e.g., textbook readings) (30%) and visuals (e.g., images included in textbooks and digital content) (29%).
GenAI Isn't Going Anywhere: Nearly all administrators (96%; +2% from 2024) and teachers (87%; +3% from 2024) believe GenAI will play an increasingly important role in education to boost student engagement (teachers: 66%, +4% YoY; administrators: 81%, +1% YoY) and bridge the gap between traditional and online learning (teachers: 62%, -1% YoY; administrators: 73%, +3% YoY).
"We're encouraged to see high adoption rates within the K12 market, but the data shows there's still work to be done," said Person. "There is tremendous potential for K12 to continue realizing the impact that GenAI can have on education, but first, we must overcome and close perceived gaps around data and privacy concerns. We know that before any new tool or technology is introduced, K12 educators and administrators, rightfully, have an invested interest in the security and safety of students and their learning environments. Any future edtech products we create for this market, in the same way we support HED instructors, must deliver on that interest and keep the highest pedagogical standards in place."
View previous findings from Cengage Group's research on AI in Education here.
Survey methodology: The data presented in this report comes from a survey conducted in Spring 2025. It surveyed 1,190 HED instructors, 1,834 HED students, 872 K-12 Teachers and 311 K-12 administrators in the United States.
About Cengage GroupWith more than 100 years serving learners, Cengage Group is a global edtech company that enables student choice. No matter how, where, when or why someone wants to learn, our portfolio of education businesses supports all students, from middle school through graduate school and skills education, with quality content and technology. Collectively, our three business units – Cengage Academic, Cengage Work and Cengage Select – help millions of students each year in more than 125 countries achieve their education and career goals and lead choice-filled lives. Visit us at www.cengagegroup.com or find us on LinkedIn and Twitter.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250403574936/en/
Contacts
Emily Featherston, Vice President, Corporate Communicationsemily.featherston@cengage.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Deadline Alert: Organon & Co. (OGN) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit
Deadline Alert: Organon & Co. (OGN) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit

Business Wire

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

Deadline Alert: Organon & Co. (OGN) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP reminds investors of the upcoming deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Organon & Co. ('Organon' or the 'Company') (NYSE: OGN) securities between October 31, 2024 to April 30, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR ORGANON INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. What Happened? On May 1, 2025, Organon released its first quarter 2025 financial results, announcing that management had reset the Company's dividend payout, from $0.28 to $0.02 and would 'redirect those funds to debt reduction.' On this news, Organon's stock price fell $3.48, or 26.9%, to close at $9.45 per share on May 1, 2025, thereby injuring investors. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) Organon's optimistic reports of the dividend payout as the Company's 'number one priority,' were offset by Organon's newly implemented debt reduction strategy, thus, leading to a drastic decrease – over 70% – of the quarterly dividend; (2) Organon planned to prioritize debt reduction following the Company's acquisition of Dermavant; and (3) as a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Organon securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than July 22, 2025 to request appointment as lead plaintiff in this putative class action lawsuit. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Charles Linehan, Esq., Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles California 90067 Email: shareholders@ Telephone: 310-201-9150, Toll-Free: 888-773-9224 Visit our website at Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook. If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased. To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Deadline Alert: Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit
Deadline Alert: Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit

Business Wire

time34 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

Deadline Alert: Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP reminds investors of the upcoming July 22, 2025 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Red Cat Holdings, Inc. ('Red Cat' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: RCAT) securities between , inclusive (the 'Class Period'). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR RED CAT INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. What Happened? In March 2022, Red Cat announced that its subsidiary Teal Drones, Inc. ('Teal') had been selected to compete in Tranche 2 of the U.S. Army's Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record (the 'SRR Program'). On July 27, 2023, Red Cat released its fiscal year 2023 financial results and revealed that its Salt Lake City Facility could only produce 100 drones per month and that construction of the facility was only 'substantially completed' and, while it could potentially reach a production capacity of one thousand drones per month over the next two to three years, it would require additional capital investments. On this news, Red Cat's stock price fell $0.10, or 8.9%, to close at $1.02 per share on July 28, 2023, thereby injuring investors. Then, on September 23, 2024, Red Cat released its first quarter fiscal 2025 financial results, missing consensus estimates and disclosing that it had spent 'the past four months . . . retooling [the Salt Lake City Facility] and preparing for high volume production[,]' while admitting that a 'pause in manufacturing of Teal 2 and building our Army prototypes impacted Teal 2 sales' because it 'couldn't produce and sell Teal 2 units while retooling [its] factory.' On this news, Red Cat's stock price fell $0.80, or 25.3%, over two consecutive trading days to close at $2.36 per share on September 25, 2024. Then, on November 19, 2024, Red Cat announced that it had won the SRR contract, stating that it was worth potentially hundreds of millions of dollars. However, on January 16, 2025, Kerrisdale Capital published a report alleging, among other things, that Red Cat had overstated that value of the SRR Contract and that it was worth approximately $20-25 million, based on U.S. Army budget documents. On this news, Red Cat's stock price fell $2.35, or 21.5%, over two consecutive trading days to close at $8.56 per share on January 17, 2025, thereby injuring investors further. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Salt Lake City Facility's production capacity, and Defendants' progress in developing the same, was overstated; (2) the overall value of the SRR Contract was overstated; and (3) as a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Red Cat securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than July 22, 2025 to request appointment as lead plaintiff in this putative class action lawsuit. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Charles Linehan, Esq., Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles California 90067 Email: shareholders@ Telephone: 310-201-9150, Toll-Free: 888-773-9224 Visit our website at Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook. If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased. To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Why Companies Using AI Should Increase Prices
Why Companies Using AI Should Increase Prices

Forbes

time39 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why Companies Using AI Should Increase Prices

AI can be a game changer for businesses, but it can also be an expensive drag on the balance sheet. A new report from billing software provider Chargebee found that companies that grew most in the last year were the ones that changed their pricing strategies to account for AI. The ones that were most successful combined a variety of pricing models: recurring subscriptions, usage-based models, outcome-based models and flat fees. Four in five of the companies surveyed that added AI said they are also changing their pricing. But how to adjust prices, especially in a time of economic uncertainty, is a challenge. Just over half said customer retention is their top concern, but 40% of businesses that adjusted prices last year reported a disconnect between increases and customer value. Nearly a quarter of companies struggled with explaining the benefits of adding AI functions to their services, while technical issues also caused struggles. Most SaaS providers have traditionally charged enterprises based on individual licenses, which is far different from a usage fee. Many companies, the study found, are testing out a variety of pricing structures to see what works best. A vignette in the study from AI fiction writing tool Sudowrite's founder Amit Gupta laid out an issue they had with their original flat subscription-based pricing model: There were users paying $20 a month for the service, but their use of AI was costing the company $400 a month. They started charging by the word—and letting users develop custom tools—but that also could be more unsustainable if the users did a lot to modify those tools. Now they have a credit and usage-based model, but the company is still experimenting with it. While decisions on pricing and value calculations often come from the CFO or CEO, input from the CIO—who best understands cost, usage and value of AI-driven functions—is vital to driving revenue growth through a company's AI transition. CIOs also know which functions are needed for their enterprise, and which price increases may be worth budgeting for. Use of AI and new technology depends on infrastructure as well as service, and updating the technological capacity of a place can be a huge undertaking. The Kraft Group, which owns businesses including the New England Patriots and their home field Gillette Stadium, recently signed a five-year agreement with infrastructure provider NWN to upgrade the stadium and other playing facilities. I talked to Kraft Group CIO Michael Israel and NWN CEO Jim Sullivan about how they are preparing these mega-facilities for a more connected future. An excerpt from our conversation is later in this newsletter. The Clinton Clean Energy Center in Clinton, Illinois. All of the things AI can do with computing need power, and a lot of it. This week, Meta made a deal to get the power it needs, signing a 20-year agreement to buy all of the power produced at a Constellation Energy nuclear plant in Clinton, Illinois. The agreement starts in June 2027—after an existing state agreement runs out—and will expand the plant's output. Meta has prioritized finding sources of nuclear power, both with new plants and utilizing existing ones, to support its technology going forward. The company announced an RFP for nuclear energy developers in December, and says it has shortlisted potential new nuclear power resources. This is the second deal a tech company has made with Constellation to redevelop its nuclear plants for AI. In September, Microsoft announced a 20-year deal with the power provider for one of its reactors at its Three Mile Island facility in Pennsylvania (not impacted by the 1979 meltdown). Constellation has said it expects to restart the reactor by 2028. Amazon and Google have both been investing in small nuclear reactors, and Google announced an investment in three advanced nuclear energy projects by Elementl Power. These deals, coupled with four executive orders from President Donald Trump aimed at bolstering nuclear power, seem to be heralding a new nuclear power age in the U.S., writes Forbes senior contributor David Blackmon. In the meantime, tax incentives for renewable energy sources, including solar panels and wind turbines, are in line to be cut in Trump's latest budget. Still, Forbes senior contributor Ken Silverstein writes, renewable energy is touted by many as the fastest and least expensive way to get more power into the grid—and could also play a huge role in generating the electricity needed for the AI-driven future. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The Trump Administration is reorganizing the AI Safety Institute into a new group: the Center for AI Standards and Innovation. Forbes' Thomas Brewster writes that there are few obvious changes. The AI Safety Institute was created in 2023 as part of President Joe Biden's AI executive order, and operated within the National Institute of Standards & Technology to research risks in AI systems. The revamped Center for AI Standards and Innovation is still part of NIST but is under the purview of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and positions itself as taking a bulwark against 'censorship and regulations [that] have been used under the guise of national security. Innovators will no longer be limited by these standards.' But the statement about the revamped organization says that this group will also work on research to measure and improve security of systems, evaluating where risks exist. At this juncture, it's difficult to see what the big difference in purpose is—except, of course, that this iteration has a different name and was established by a different president. Outside of the government sphere, computer scientist Yoshua Bengio, often referred to as the 'godfather of AI,' launched a new nonprofit organization aimed at creating AI systems prioritizing safety, writes Forbes senior contributor Leslie Katz. LawZero is starting with $30 million in funding and is assembling a team of world-class AI researchers to work on a system called Scientist AI—a non-agentic system that behaves in response to human input and goals. 'Such AI systems could be used to provide oversight for agentic AI systems, accelerate scientific discovery and advance the understanding of AI risks and how to avoid them,' the statement on the organization's website says. 'LawZero believes that AI should be cultivated as a global public good—developed and used safely towards human flourishing.' Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images All USB-C ports are not created equal, and Microsoft intends to do something about it. Ports don't always have the same capabilities now, meaning users sometimes plug peripherals into their computers and they don't work. Forbes senior contributor Barry Collins writes that the company will establish minimum settings for all USB-C ports on its computers, meaning things will work every time they are plugged in. But while this will be a welcome change, it is a hardware one—meaning it will make no difference until users actually upgrade their physical computers. Kraft Group CIO Mike Israel and NWN CEO Jim Sullivan. In April, the Kraft Group—which owns the New England Patriots, MLS' New England Revolution and Gillette Stadium—signed a five-year agreement with tech infrastructure provider NWN to transform the tech framework for the Kraft Group's facilities, including Gillette Stadium and a new training facility for the Patriots. I talked to Kraft Group CIO Michael Israel and NWN CEO Jim Sullivan in April about the challenges of bringing the latest technology infrastructure to a place like Gillette Stadium, and how big facilities with a multitude of uses can plan for the future. This conversation has been edited for length, clarity and continuity. A longer version is available here. How do you come up with what you want to accomplish, and how do you figure out what kind of infrastructure is needed to make it happen? Israel: We have our Monster Jam [this weekend] at the stadium. On Saturday, I'll be walking around the stadium engaging. Gillette is one of the few stadiums in the country in which we own and self-operate our stadium. It's our security staff, our concession staff. I am walking around watching how our fans engage with us. How are our systems being used? Where are they inefficient? Where are they doing their job? How can we improve that experience? Guests will come up to me and say, 'How do I get to the gate?' 'How do I get to my suite?' 'Where's the nearest bathroom?' When they're asking me these things, that's registering in my mind: They don't have that information today. When you have these types of events, they're new users. You want them to have a positive experience because that's your lead in to a potential soccer season ticket holder or future Patriots season ticket holder. But even when you get to the Patriot season ticket holders, what can we do to enhance that experience? It's seeing how our guests experience things, what we're doing right, what we're doing wrong, and not sitting back and saying, 'I'm good. I'm going to go watch the game.' I've been here six years. I think I've seen 15 minutes of one football game. On a football day, I'll generally do about 30,000 steps walking the stadium, watching what's going on. The other side of the coin is what do we do from a technology perspective, looking at what do I need to do to ensure that I have connectivity, and what devices are now connecting to the networks that hadn't in the past? The system that waters the field is an IoT system that's attached to our network. If it's not connecting, it's not watering the field, and we don't know what's going on. We have to allow for connectivity, secure that connectivity, and make sure that that connectivity is reliable. We constantly do surveys after a winter to say, what got impacted by the winter? Do I have Wi-Fi access points that may be misaligned that need to be looked at? I have FIFA coming in next year. That's like having seven Super Bowls over six weeks here at the stadium. They're going to use my parking lots on the east and west side as fan activation zones. I don't have connectivity there. Working with the NWN team, we have to determine what does FIFA need? How do we light up those areas that when the fans are there, they have connectivity. Their booths can operate, their systems can operate, the fans can get connectivity, and we'll have maybe 50,000 or 60,000 fans in the bowl, but we could have an additional 50,000 people on the campus, and that's not a crowd that we're used to having. On the NWN side, how do you determine what to do in large facilities like these and how to support current and future needs? Sullivan: NWN, over the past five years, has grown from $250 million to over $1 billion dollars this year, and really expanded this full end-to-end IT infrastructure. The market is changing really fast with AI adding in. For us, it's working with organizations to start with the end state: What's the vision of what we have to have here, what we're trying to drive? And then, what's the required capabilities? Most of these environments, from the application, to the AI, to the infrastructure, to the unified communications, to security all have to be assessed as one holistic solution. Then we put in the right required capabilities from the technology, the services, the overall management, and co-management with Mike's team. We've reached the breadth and scale where we're dealing with organizations where there's hundreds of thousands of people, or states with 50,000 deployments of people and requirements. We can cover end-to-end, but also have the scale to handle a large project that goes across multiple technology domains and supports a smaller event, and all of a sudden it surges to hundreds of thousands of people. Everyone is getting used to [the fact] that customer experience needs to be world-class; there's expectations there. Ultimately, the Wi-Fi is going to be fast, strong and secure. And then going into these new technologies to a real beneficial evolution, where it's creating new user experience, new knowledge, but is also driving a backend that's going to create a lot more capacity demands on the networks, on the infrastructure. You've got to be able to tie it all together. What advice do you have for CIOs looking to bring more technology to their facilities, thinking about not only what to do today, but what to do in the future? Israel: Ultimately, it's not just if you build it, they will come. If you're building it, you need to be brainstorming how you're going to use it, and you need to have relationships with all of your stakeholders to understand what's holding them back, what would they like to see? In some cases, they don't know what they don't know, and we have to take these technology discussions, take the technology out of it, and think about how are we going to provide solutions. Sullivan: We did 5,000 distinct deployments last year. The really successful ones are driven with a positive outcome you're trying to get to. Collaboration and a partnership between the two as a seamless team really drives the most success to drive those outcomes. With the rise of agentic AI, non-human agents will soon have the ability to do significant work tasks, like the more technical jobs of database administrators. That seems like a huge leap, but here's how to start warming to the idea and embracing this kind of AI agent (even if you're a DBA). You may be an introvert, but that doesn't mean you can't be a successful leader. Here are 10 things you can do to become a thriving manager. Which Big Ten university just introduced an AI Fluency initiative, embedding AI education into the core of all undergraduate curriculum, regardless of major? A. Northwestern University B. Purdue University C. Ohio State University D. Michigan State University See if you got the answer right here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store