Nations League roundup: Wales suffer thrashing by Italy in Euro 2025 send-off
Rhian Wilkinson said Wales would not suffer any trauma in Switzerland after being thrashed 4-1 by Italy at their Euro 2025 send-off. Wilkinson suffered the biggest defeat of her 15-month reign as Italy scored four times in the first half of a Nations League finale in Swansea – the Wales manager calling it a 'little bit of capitulation'.
First-half goals from Cristiana Girelli, who struck twice with excellent headers, Elena Linari and Sofia Cantore punished poor Wales defending and secured Italy second place in the group. Jess Fishlock produced some late cheer with a stunning consolation eight minutes from time, scoring off the underside of the crossbar from 35 yards for her 47th Wales goal.
'The first half felt like a punch in the face,' Wilkinson said after Wales' final fixture before their opener against the Netherlands in Lucerne on 5 July 5. 'Let's be clear, that was not a performance that I expect from this team. 'Obviously this is a painful lesson and this is the first time that we've really been exposed. There's no psychological damage, there really isn't. This team punished us for every mistake, and that's something that we talk about as a team.
There was more bad news for Wales as goalkeeper Olivia Clark, already sporting a black eye suffered in the Denmark game, was forced off before half-time with a head injury. Clark had required treatment for a head injury 15 minutes earlier after being caught by her own defender Hayley Ladd, but continued before conceding a third goal. Wilkinson said: 'Two head hits in a week is not good, so we decided to pull her. We weren't messing with this and took her out, but I'm not concerned there's any lasting damage.'
The Scotland manager, Melissa Andreatta, thought her side were unlucky not to win after they picked up their first point in the Nations League with a 1-1 draw away to the Netherlands. Already-relegated Scotland fell behind when midfielder Jill Roord put the hosts in front – and they were in position for a sixth defeat from a possible six – but Andreatta's side got themselves on level terms courtesy of Kathleen McGovern's 27th-minute equaliser. Scotland were not happy with just the point and pushed for a winning goal after the break, but Netherlands had goalkeeper Daphne van Domselaar to thank for their point after she made a string of saves in the second period.
Andreatta was happy with her side's performance, telling BBC Scotland: 'With that performance. We earned that result. Especially when you think about the last 24 hours that we had, I think that showed what this team is about. That was established long before me but they put in a great performance tonight. I was really pleased. I think we did start well then the Netherlands started to dominate. We did a tactical change, got a foothold back in the game and we were unlucky to concede that chance but I think we dominated the second half and were unlucky not to win.'
Sign up to Moving the Goalposts
No topic is too small or too big for us to cover as we deliver a twice-weekly roundup of the wonderful world of women's football
after newsletter promotion
Northern Ireland secured a promotion playoff place after securing a 1-1 Group B1 draw against Bosnia and Herzegovina in Zenica. The visitors only needed to avoid defeat to secure their playoff spot and Simone Magill's opener put them in a healthy position before Sofija Krajsumovic brought Bosnia back on level terms before the break. Northern Ireland seemed happy to protect their result but suffered a scare when Una Rankic hit the goal frame from a free-kick but hung on to grab their chance to climb into League A.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Aryna Sabalenka dethrones French Open queen Iga Swiatek in thrilling semi-final - as world No1 eyes fourth Grand Slam title
The queen of Paris is dethroned, guillotined by the Tiger from the East. Iga Swiatek had won three straight French Open titles and four overall - but never before had she faced Aryna Sabalenka. The Belarusian hammered home her status as world No1, winning a pulsating semi-final 7-6, 4-6, 6-0. The two finest players of the decade had not met at a Grand Slam since the 2022 US Open, and after three years of cold warfare, of straining at the leash, they flew at each other with tooth and claw. When the dust settled, Sabalenka, 27, moved into her first Roland Garros final. Whichever of Coco Gauff and French wildcard Lois Boisson wins the other semi-final, Sabalenka will be favourite to complete the third leg of a career Grand Slam, after her US Open title and two in Australia. The context to this match was Swiatek's terrible form coming in. The 24-year-old had not won a single title since her fourth here last year, and had suffered a succession of shocking defeats - mostly to the kind of power baseliners of which Sabalenka is the gold standard. It has been akin to when a Test cricket batsman is 'worked out' by the bowling fraternity. Not everyone can execute it - still very few in fact - but it is now clear how you beat Swiatek: you rush her, especially on the forehand win where she takes such a big backswing; you play relentlessly flat and hard, attack her first and second serves, especially by drilling the ball straight at her on the forehand side. Sabalenka did exactly that, steaming into a double-break 4-1 lead. Everything about Swiatek's game was frenetic, rushed. She was not giving the match, or herself, any time to breath and settle. In a comparison of these two players' strengths, the greatest advantage to Swiatek would lie in her movement. Sabalenka moves well enough but she is more of a wham bam woman; Swiatek's footwork is freakishly fast; she seems to take twice the number of steps of anyone else. Sabalenka is a tiger, as the tattoo on her left forearm denotes; Swiatek is more of a gazelle, whose traditional approach when facing a big cat is to run rings round it, not trot up and say, Fancy a scrap? In the final analysis, of rallies between one and four shots, Sabalenka won 34 more than her opponent; in rallies of five or more strokes, Swiatek was +10 - but she did not do enough to elongate the rallies. Still, at 4-1, with a double break, some tension seemed to creep into the Sabalenka game. Leading 40-30, she hit an ace that would have made it 5-1, but the umpire called back the play for a net cord, leaving Sabalenka bemused. Whether that affected her concentration or not, it was a different match thereafter. Switek was starting to pick the Sabalenka serve better and adjust to the pace of her shots. Her first hold of the match brought her back to 3-4, then Sabalenka played a shocker of a service game, including two double faults, to level the scores. At 5-5, having been a net-cord from 5-1, the Sabalenka of a few years ago would have crumbled emotionally; the imperious new version played a brilliant return game, including her best shot of the match, a curling forehand pass on the run. Swiatek responded with a break of her own but Sabalenka snatched the tiebreak 7-1. The standard of returning had been breathtaking. A recent innovation in tennis has been data company Infosys and their shot-quality metrics. The gist is every shot is scored out of 10; at the end of the first set, Sabalenka and Swiatek's return quality was measured at 9.8 and 9.4 respectively, compared to the field's average of 6.5. The return quality dipped in the second set - how could it not? - and holds became more easy to come by. Swiatek played with more poise, too, mixing up her game far better, getting her opponent on the run. Her first serve percentage almost jumped from 54 to 76; Sabalenka's dropping from 55 to 48. After two hours of brutal brilliance, we looked set for an epic deciding set. Instead it was a rout, as Sabalenka sorted out her first serve percentage and landed massive forehands time and again. She ended, appropriately, with two clean return winners.
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Survey reveals the exact demographics behind Reform's growing support
Recent voting intention polling from YouGov (May 27) shows Reform UK in first place, 8% ahead of Labour and 10% ahead of the Conservatives, who are now in third place. The rising popularity of Nigel Farage 's party is an unprecedented threat to the major parties. This was driven home in recent local elections in England, where Reform won 677 seats and took control of 10 local authorities. But where does this support come from? The survey compares respondent voting intention to their votes in the 2024 general election. If we look at Conservative voters, 27% of them have switched to Reform in their voting intentions, while 66% remain loyal. Alarmingly for Labour, only 60% of their 2024 voters have remained loyal, and 15% intend to vote for Reform, while 12% switched to the Liberal Democrats and 9% to the Greens. Labour has been squeezed from both sides of the political spectrum, but the loss to the left is significantly larger than the loss to the right. In contrast, 73% of Liberal Democrat voters have remained loyal to the party, with only 7% switching to Reform and 8% going to Labour. Not surprisingly, 91% of Reform voters have remained loyal, with 5% going to the Conservatives and 3% going to the Greens. None of the Reform voters have switched to Labour or the Liberal Democrats. Reform's rise has led the Labour government to take more hardline stances on key issues, particularly immigration and asylum – which around half of YouGov respondents say is the most important issue facing the country. And with small boat crossings on the rise again, it remains to be seen whether the government's recent proposals to reduce net migration will be enough to hold onto wavering supporters. Social backgrounds and party support If we probe a bit further into the social characteristics of voters, only 8% of 18 to 24-year-olds support Reform, compared with 35% of 50 to 64-year-olds and 33% of the over-65s. Some 34% of the younger group support Labour, 12% the Conservatives, 15% the Liberal Democrats and 25% the Greens. As far as the 50 to 64-year-olds are concerned, 19% support Labour, 16% the Conservatives, 16% the Liberal Democrats and 9% the Greens. There is currently a significant age divide when it comes to party support. With respect to class (or 'social grade' as it is described in contemporary surveys), 23% of the middle-class support Reform compared with 38% of the working class. The latter were the bedrock of Labour support a couple of generations ago, but now only 19% support Labour, with 17% supporting the Conservatives and 12% the Liberal Democrats. Current support for the parties among middle-class voters, apart from Reform, is 22% for Labour, 21% for the Conservatives and 17% for the Liberal Democrats. Again, the middle class used to be the key supporters of the Conservative party, but at the moment the party is running third behind its rivals in this group. Finally, the relationship between gender and support for the parties is also interesting. Some 35% of male respondents support Reform compared with only 24% of female respondents. In contrast, 21% of both men and women support Labour. The figures for the Conservatives are 16% of men and 22% of women, and Liberal Democrat support is 14% from men and 16% from women. There is also notable support for Reform among those who voted Leave in the 2016 Brexit referendum in the YouGov survey. Altogether 53% of Leave voters in the EU Referendum opted for Reform and 24% supported the Conservatives, with 8% supporting Labour, 8% the Liberal Democrats and 4% the Greens. In the case of Remain voters, 10% chose Reform, 17% went for the Conservatives, 30% for Labour, 23% for the Liberal Democrats and 14% for the Greens. Not surprisingly, Reform takes the largest share of Brexit voters, but just over half of them – indicating that a lot of change has occurred in support since the 2016 referendum and Farage's role in the Leave campaign. The fact that 10% of Remain voters switched to Reform and 20% of Leave voters have switched to Labour, the Liberal Democrats or the Greens shows that it is not just a simple case of support for Brexit leading to support for Reform. Voting and volatility Before Nigel Farage starts picking out curtains for Number 10, it is worth looking at another volatile moment in British political history - the effects of the split in the Labour party in 1981, when the Social Democratic Party was formed by the 'gang of four' breakaway Labour politicians, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins, David Owen and Bill Rodgers. The newly formed party agreed to an electoral pact with the Liberals, which continued until the 1983 election. A Gallup poll published in December 1981 shows a massive lead for the SDP-Liberal Alliance. And yet, Margaret Thatcher's Conservatives won that election. Labour came second by a small margin ahead of the SDP-Liberal Alliance and remained the main opposition party. The point of this example is that a massive lead in the polls for the SDP-Liberal Alliance shortly after it was established did not provide a breakthrough in the general election two years later. Reform may be in the lead now, but this does not mean that it will win the general election of 2028-29. That said, there is a real risk for Labour continuing to lose support to both the left and the right – something which it needs to rapidly repair. Rachel Reeves 's 'iron chancellor' strategy, in which the government announces fiscal rules which it claims to stand by at all costs, is no longer credible. As the Institute of Government points out, every single fiscal rule adopted since 2008 has subsequently been abandoned. A strategy of continuing austerity by making significant cuts in the welfare budget to calm financial markets is likely to fail, both in the economy and with voters. Paul Whiteley is a Professor in the Department of Government at the University of Essex.
Times
35 minutes ago
- Times
Why have footballers' shin-pads become so incredibly small?
What's the best parallel to draw. A bank card? A prawn cracker? A Nokia 8210? There have been times this season when I've pondered what a referee — or the game's lawmakers, Ifab, for that matter — would do if footballer actually decided to stuff one of the above down their socks instead of the micro shin-pads many are choosing to wear these days. You must have noticed. The trend of players wearing mini shinnies beneath socks rolled down beneath their calves. The outline of a pair no bigger than, as Everton's Dominic Calvert-Lewin once described his, a custard cream. A couple of the alternatives above would probably offer more protection — and, as it turns out, providing they were covered by the player's socks and stayed put throughout, there's nothing much a referee can do about a player's choice of lower-limb protection. Shin-pads have been mandatory since 1990, but there's nothing in Ifab's laws beyond hazy definitions like 'suitable' and 'appropriate' that states what size or material they should be. As the trend for smaller and smaller versions grows, Ifab maintains that it is the responsibility of players, not the referee, to decide what constitutes reasonable protection. Jack Grealish's penchant for low slung socks and children's shin-pads is no secret — a look born during his youth-team days with Aston Villa, when the socks kept shrinking in the wash. He performed well and a superstition took root that has never left him. Grealish is by no means the first maverick to eschew shin-pads, of course, but when England's best centre half and Real Madrid's newest defensive recruit are shunning them it is clear that this is a trend that has moved beyond flair players and fashionistas. The uber-confident Dean Huijsen, who will swap Bournemouth for the Bernabeu in a £50million deal this summer, has spent the season nonchalantly marshalling the south coast club's defence wearing a pair no bigger than a Mars bar. So too Illia Zabarnyi, 22, with whom Huijsen, 20, formed the Premier League's youngest central defensive pairing, but they are by no means alone. Marc Guéhi, Crystal Palace's FA Cup-winning captain, bossed England's defence at last summer's Euros wearing a pair that looked as substantial as a piece of cardboard — and, these days, it wouldn't come as much of a surprise if that's what they were made of. A few years back, the right back, Aleix Vidal, suffered a nasty gash to his right shin while playing for Espanyol against Real Betis, which left him requiring 15 stitches. Turned out his only protection was a floppy piece of material inside his sweaty socks. Some players are now slipping a piece of foam padding down there to comply with regulations. Back in November, Michael Olise went a step further, refusing to wear shin-pads altogether. As the former Crystal Palace winger prepared to come off the bench for Bayern Munich in their Champions League game against Paris Saint-Germain, the fourth official noticed he wasn't wearing any protection at all. After a curt exchange, and begrudgingly slipping a pair down his socks, Olise surreptitiously removed them and tossed them back towards the dugout before running on to the pitch. Now, does any of this really matter? Are micro shin-guards dangerous? Or are shin-pads really as important in the modern game? And have they ever done much to protect you from the most serious injuries anyway? In one sense, none of this is new. Before 1990, players could wear what they wanted under their socks and many preferred wearing nothing at all. Believe it or not, though, shin-pads have been around in football for about 150 years. Sam Weller Widdowson, a cricketer for Nottinghamshire and footballer for Nottingham Forest, is credited for introducing the concept after cutting down a pair of cricket pads and strapping them to his stockings for a game of football in 1874. Unsurprisingly, perhaps, he's said to have copped a bit of stick that day. But they soon caught on and Widdowson — who was also capped once by England and became chairman of Forest — went on to produce and market them with the Nottinghamshire batsman and Notts County co-founder, Richard Daft. The shin-pad's ultimate origin is arguably the greave (from the Old French greve 'shin, shin armour'), which was used to protect the tibia from attack from as far back the Bronze Age. My first shin-pads certainly bore closer resemblance to heavy battle armour than today's microscopic wee things. There are pictures (in my loft) of me playing for junior teams with my skinny legs guarded with contraptions that wouldn't have looked out of place in the film 300. But I was playing left back for Celtic Boys' Club's under-11s, not slashing my way through enemy hordes alongside Gerard Butler's Spartans. That was back in the mid-90s, when giant plastic and foam knee-high protectors, with ankle guards and wrap-around velcro straps at the top and bottom, were very much in vogue. I was still playing in them until I turned professional with Forest in 2002, aged 17. That's when I noticed all my team-mates slipping far more ergonomic, slim-line versions down their socks, while I spent ten minutes wedging each leg into its sheathing. Needless to say, those didn't last much longer. And, if you asked players back then, the primary reason they'd give for shedding those cumbersome things would be the same as today's players: comfort. Players want to feel light and agile on the pitch, even if only in their own minds. When you train all week without wearing any, you can perhaps see why looking down at legs with chunks of plastic (or carbon fibre) strapped to them might have the opposite effect on match day. Yet there's no doubting that the modern-day fashion for socks below the calves has a lot to answer for. Footballers are a funny bunch. Every detail matters; appearance too. And as the game has evolved — with more protection from referees, and tactical developments that mean defenders make far more passes than tackles — so too have priorities for this generation. But what about younger ones? Where Premier League idols walk, wide-eyed children tend to follow, and micro shin-pads have become a familiar sight in the grassroots game. Some clubs have enforced bans. One of them, Penistone Church from Barnsley, made headlines in August when their 15-year-old player, Alfie, suffered a double leg break while wearing a pair measuring 3x9cm. 'They are the most pathetic shin-pads you've ever seen,' Alfie rued afterwards, telling the BBC: 'It's not worth the extra bit of speed to have you knocked out of football for months and months.' Studies have shown that shin-pads offer some measure of protection against tibia fracture, but the force of a challenge alone is rarely the only factor in such traumas. More often than not, the foot is planted, or trapped in an unfortunate position at the point of impact, which often arrives from the side as opposed to head on. I speak from experience, having suffered a compound fracture of my left leg in a tackle during a game in 2009. The only thing my shin-pads did that day was hide the bone piercing out of my skin. Vidal's nasty gash, cited earlier, could easily have been inflicted on an unprotected part of the leg even if he had been wearing a more substantial pair of shin-guards. But young Alfie was right about one thing: there are some truly 'pathetic' examples on show nowadays. Jack Hinshelwood caused a stir last season when one of his micro-pads fell out against Arsenal. When the referee handed it back, it looked like he was sharing a Pringle crisp with the Brighton & Hove Albion defender. The trend has spawned a cottage industry. As well as micro shin-pads by specialised brands, customised versions adorned with pictures of family, sporting triumphs or, in the case of the former Real Madrid and Spain striker Joselu, his beloved dog, are now commonplace in changing rooms. The Manchester City defender, Josko Gvardiol, has been known to rock a small pair of Godfather-themed numbers, with the message, 'Keep your friends close but your enemies closer,' above an image of Marlon Brando's character, Don Corleone. Gvardiol must really like The Godfather. If you're willing to part with £195, your shin-pads can now gather reams of performance data too. XSEED, created by the Italian analytics company Soccerment, collates everything from passing, shooting and expected goals metrics, to distance, speed and geo-location data. All the information is collated on an app on your phone, to be harnessed by coaches or uploaded to scouting platforms. Inter Milan's Federico Dimarco swears by them, even if you have to charge them up every few games. However, unless Ifab steps in, the humble shin-pads' days could be numbered. Widdowson would be turning in his greve.
