logo
Trump administration announces yet another investigation into the UC system

Trump administration announces yet another investigation into the UC system

Once again, the Trump administration is targeting California's renowned higher-education system with an investigation — this time, into whether the University of California is considering the race and sex of applicants for teaching positions. It's the latest of a series of attacks on states' policies that hamper President Donald Trump's war on diversity, equity and inclusion.
Among other things, the U.S. Justice Department said Thursday that the university is ordering its campuses 'to hire 'diverse' faculty members to meet race- and sex-based employment quotas.'
'We have reason to believe the University of California's UC 2030 Capacity Plan precipitated unlawful action by the University,' Harmeet Dhillon, the Justice Department's chief civil rights lawyer, said in a letter to UC President Michael Drake. She was referring to the university's plan to add 23,000 students and 1,100 faculty members in the next five years.
But UC hasn't used hiring or enrollment quotas since 1978, when they were outlawed by the Supreme Court in the case of Allan Bakke, a white student who sued UC Davis medical school for denying him admission.
California voters banned affirmative action for racial minorities at public institutions in 1996, and the Supreme Court imposed the same ban for all schools and colleges in 2023. But in March, the Trump administration announced an investigation into whether UC Berkeley, UCLA, UC Irvine and Stanford University were complying with the court ruling.
Also in March, UC said it would halt policies at some of its 10 campuses that have required applicants for teaching positions to describe how they would promote diversity in race and other categories. EdSource reported that Drake told members of the UC Academic Council that the university 'needed to show signs it was listening to the Trump administration.'
In February, the Justice Department said it was investigating 'widespread antisemitic harassment' at UC Berkeley and four schools in other states, without providing specific details. In March, the department said it was expanding its investigation to cover all 10 UC campuses.
As for the investigation announced Thursday, its conclusion seems inevitable: The university will be found in violation of the law, as interpreted by the Trump administration, and face financial penalties that will most likely be contested in court.
That would be similar to the outcome of an investigation announced by the administration's Department of Education into California for allowing transgender girls to compete on girls' sports teams. After a brief inquiry, the department announced Wednesday that state schools and athletic officials had violated sex-discrimination laws and had 10 days to change their practices or face punishment.
The Department of Education has also announced an investigation into San Jose State University for allowing a transgender player on its women's volleyball team, after Trump claimed — falsely — to have seen the player injure an opponent with a spike shot that traveled 80 mph.
Federal education officials said in April that they would withdraw billions of dollars in funding for states whose schools had programs promoting racial and gender diversity, programs the administration describes as discriminatory. California and 18 other states have filed suit, saying the defunding would be both illegal and 'catastrophic.'
Later in April, the Department of Education announced an investigation into UC Berkeley for allegedly failing to disclose funding from a foreign government, citing what the department called 'credible news media reports.' The university has denied receiving any such funding but says it will cooperate with the investigation.
Thursday's announcement of an investigation into UC's hiring practices 'reads more as a policy announcement to further the federal government's reinterpretation of the Civil Rights Act to be inconsistent with minority protections and to require policies that favor privileged majorities,' said Ming Chen, a professor at UC College of the Law in San Francisco, where she directs its Race, Immigration, Citizenship and Equality Program.
Legal commentator Ian Millheiser said a likely goal of the Trump administration is to persuade the Supreme Court to prohibit 'diversity-based hiring in universities and trans participation in sports,' after the court's recent rulings against affirmative action and medical care for transgender youths. He said the Justice Department's 'internal procedures require them to start with an 'investigation' before they file a lawsuit.'
Catherine Fisk, a labor law professor at UC Berkeley, said it wasn't clear what evidence was the basis for the government's investigation.
'Under current law, employers are allowed to engage in outreach to ensure that they have a diverse pool' of applicants and consider them fairly, Fisk told the Chronicle. 'The law does not require complete blindness to race or gender. It just prohibits hiring based on race or gender.'
The more often universities are targeted, she said, 'the more they are forced to hire lawyers rather than providing scholarships for students or hiring faculty.'
In response to the announcement, UC spokesperson Rachel Zaentz said the university 'aims to foster a campus environment where everyone is welcomed and supported. We will work in good faith with the Department of Justice as it conducts its investigation.'
Asked about the purpose of the investigation, Justice Department spokesperson Pierson Furnish said, 'No comment.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Let Bibi go': Trump says US is 'not going to stand' for Netanyahu's prosecution
'Let Bibi go': Trump says US is 'not going to stand' for Netanyahu's prosecution

USA Today

time37 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'Let Bibi go': Trump says US is 'not going to stand' for Netanyahu's prosecution

In a social media post, Trump said corruption charges against Israel's Netanyahu should be dropped President Donald Trump lashed out at Israeli prosecutors over the corruption trial facing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying that the United States having given billions in aid to Israel is "not going to stand for this." Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 in Israel on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust – all of which he denies. The trial, which began in 2020, involves three criminal cases. He is scheduled to return for cross examination Monday after several delays over the COVID-19 pandemic, Israel's war with Hamas and other conflicts in the region. "How is it possible that the Prime Minister of Israel can be forced to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING (Cigars, Bugs Bunny Doll, etc.). It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure," Trump said on June 28 in the post on Truth Social. Netanyahu thanked Trump in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. "Together, we will make the Middle East Great Again!" he said. Israel's main opposition leader Yair Lapid criticised Trump's statement, saying he should not "intervene in a legal process of an independent state," the BBC reported. Trump said the trial complicates negotiations with both Iran and Hamas. The United States targeted several nuclear sites in Iran after Israel launched an air war on June 13 and tensions erupted between the Middle Eastern nations. Hamas attacked Israel out of Gaza on Oct. 7, 2023 and is still holding hostages, while Israel has unleashed strikes on the strip for nearly two years. Trump also said the ongoing trial "tarnishes" the "victory" from bombing Iran, which agreed to a ceasefire after the US bombed several nuclear enrichment facilities. "It was the United States of America that saved Israel, and now it is going to be the United States of America that saves Bibi Netanyahu,' Trump said in a separate post earlier in the week. "THIS TRAVESTY OF 'JUSTICE' CAN NOT BE ALLOWED!"

Leftist media's Iran misreporting: Letters to the Editor — June 30, 2025
Leftist media's Iran misreporting: Letters to the Editor — June 30, 2025

New York Post

time41 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Leftist media's Iran misreporting: Letters to the Editor — June 30, 2025

The Issue: CNN's report on an assessment doubting the US's success in its strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. Once again, we have an apparent security leak coming from a government security agency and a cable news channel, CNN, runs the story as though the leaked information is 100% true ('Well, leak of the devil, CNN,' Miranda Devine, June 26). CNN did not disclose that the leaked information came with low confidence and that a full assessment of the bomb damage will take weeks or months to verify. Despite this cautionary warning, CNN ran the story and then other media outlets and Democrats followed CNN's lead. They will do anything to disparage the president. The full facts and respected analysis have not been disclosed, so CNN's actions should be severely criticized. Let's wait for the facts to come out before we judge the success or failure of the mission. Harold Fishman Manhattan If Democrats were given a briefing about the Iran strike, then soon after some of this news was leaked to the news media, what is the president supposed to think? This is information so sensitive it is top secret. To leak this information is a federal crime. Whoever is responsible for leaking the intelligence could be looking at losing 10 years of their life behind bars. Joseph Comperchio Brooklyn We now have a president who makes decisions on behalf of the American people. But all those in the media who see everything through a haze of Trump-deranged hatred respond with reporting aimed toward demonstrably false stories about (for example) mission failure rather than actual success. They couldn't wait to report false stories, leaked by spiteful, residual saboteurs. One can only deduce from this behavior that those Trump-deranged people in the media hate Trump more than they love their country. Rick Cabrera Elmhurst This bombing was as close to the taking out of the Death Star in 'Star Wars' as you can get. America dropped bombs through air shafts the size of your kitchen refrigerator from 13,000 feet and it was a direct hit. This action may lead to actual peace in the Middle East. Yet you'd be hard-pressed to find any mainstream media outlet that cheers anything America succeeds at anymore. This needs to end. If you don't love being here, maybe you should leave. This bombing also showed the rest of the world we are the rulers of the skies and nobody is a close second. James Schwartz Summit, NJ The Issue: AOC and other Democratic politicians' disapproval of President Trump's Iran strike. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez should consider that old saying: 'Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt' (' 'Make my day' & impeach,' June 25). One wonders what purpose this one-trick pony actually serves in legislative matters other than to oppose, accuse and rabble-rouse, mostly for the sake of anything to say. Vincent Ruggiero Scottsdale, Ariz. How ironic: AOC is up in arms over President Trump's bombing of Iran, saying it's unconstitutional, calling once again for an impeachment. Funny: I don't remember the Dems being upset with former President Barack Obama not asking Congress for permission. Thomas De Julio Delray Beach, Fla. The wimpy and feckless so-called leaders are outraged, with AOC calling for Trump's impeachment. Every one of them complained that Trump didn't go before Congress. But the last time Congress was apprised of the president's intentions for an enemy attack was long ago. JR Cummings Manhattan Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

Leaving Trump's side didn't make Elon Musk much more popular
Leaving Trump's side didn't make Elon Musk much more popular

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Leaving Trump's side didn't make Elon Musk much more popular

Recent polls show Elon Musk's favorability declined with Republicans after feuding with Donald Trump. Musk's overall favorability already had sustained significant hits during his time in the White House. The billionaire's struggles come during a critical time for Tesla. Elon Musk's image isn't what it used to be. The Tesla CEO's feud with President Donald Trump risked worsening his already underwater popularity, and new polling shows that even the apparent peace between the once-friends hasn't repaired Musk's standing with Republicans. A new Morning Consult poll found that Musk's net favorability is at -14 percentage points. The good news for the billionaire is that his overall standing as of June 20 is up four points since June 15, the week after the peak of his feud with Trump. It's still lower than where he stood when he left the White House in late May. Among Republicans, Musk is down roughly 12 points; he'd dropped 10 points immediately after he criticized Trump in early June. "In the US, Musk managed to alienate both those on the left (due to his support for DOGE, the Trump administration, and the election) and those on the right (as seen in his statements on X following his fallout with the President over the "big beautiful bill")," Frank T. Rothaermel, a regents' professor at the Scheller College of Business at Georgia Tech, told Business Insider in an email. "The good thing in the US is that people's memories are short and a ton of stuff is happening every day," he added. Voters began to become increasingly polarized toward Musk after his takeover of Twitter, Morning Consult US Politics Analyst Eli Yokley told Business Insider. Musk's closeness to Trump "poured fuel on the fire," which left his image in a much different state than some of his fellow tech moguls, who also sought to curry favor with the White House. "It weighs on him in a very unique way that other CEOs who have tried to kiss the ring a bit just haven't experienced to the same extent," Yokley told Business Insider. Musk's favorability isn't polled as frequently as someone like Trump. YouGov, which has sporadic data on Musk going back to 2018, found that immediately after the feud, Musk recorded his lowest net favorability in its records. The handful of post-feud polls that have been released show similar warning signs. Namely, many Republicans, who were once the bulwark for Musk's sagging numbers, no longer have such rosy views of the billionaire. An Economist-YouGov poll taken in the week after the feud found that Musk's net favorability among Republicans dropped 20 points. A Reuters-Ipsos poll found that he dropped 13 points in net favorability in a roughly one-month span. This embedded content is not available in your region. On June 22, Tesla began a limited rollout of its robotaxi service in Austin. The stock jumped as much as 11% the following day, though it had pared its gains by the end of the week. Overall, it's been a wild year for Tesla's share price. Musk is the face of Tesla, a close association that comes with some risk. Some analysts downgraded the company during his feud with Trump. "The recent incident between Musk and President Trump exemplifies key-person risk associated with Musk's political activities," Baird senior research analyst Ben Kallo wrote in a note earlier this month. Musk has signaled a retreat from politics, though whether he sticks by that commitment remains to be seen. Tesla is facing other challenges. In China, the newly announced Xiaomi YU7 is priced to compete with Tesla's popular Model Y, and Tesla's sales have fallen in key markets like Europe in recent months. The automaker is set to announce its second-quarter delivery numbers on Wednesday, and many analysts are expecting a year-over-year decrease. John Helveston, an assistant professor at George Washington University, told BI that Musk's "political unpopularity is very unhelpful" as the CEO looks to navigate Tesla through the challenges it's currently facing. "Elon Musk is strongest [indeed, world-class, second to none] when he focuses on his core competencies: solving 'impossible' engineering problems," Rothaermel said. "If I were on the board of directors at Tesla, that is what I would want him to focus on." The Morning Consult poll is based on data collected during the firm's tracking poll from June 20 to 22nd, based on a representative sample of 2,205 registered U.S. voters. The margin of error is +/- 2 percentage points. Smaller subsamples have a larger margin of error. Full results are available here. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store