logo
Players voice burnout fears over tennis schedule

Players voice burnout fears over tennis schedule

BBC News2 days ago

French Open 2025Dates: 25 May-8 June Venue: Roland GarrosCoverage: Live radio commentaries across 5 Live Sport and BBC Sounds, plus live text commentaries on the BBC Sport website and app
For several years, the top tennis players have said the physical demands on them are becoming increasingly unsustainable.Australian world number nine Alex de Minaur is the latest to voice concerns about the calendar, saying an earlier-than-expected French Open exit was a result of "feeling burned out".The 26-year-old held a two-set lead in his second-round match against Kazakhstan's Alexander Bublik but faded physically from then on.Britain's Jack Draper raised fears at the end of last year about the "mental" schedule for the top players, while five-time women's major champion Iga Swiatek feels the current demands are "pretty exhausting".Casper Ruud criticised the rankings "rat race" after his Roland Garros exit, while De Minaur said: "Players' careers are going to get shorter because they're going to burn out mentally."There is just too much tennis."The ATP Tour says it "does not take these concerns lightly" and the WTA Tour has previously said the health and wellbeing of players is "always our priority".So what is the solution to stop the leading stars feeling the strain?
How much are the leading stars playing?
The season for the top players stretches across 11 months.Last year, men's world number one Jannik Sinner played 79 matches across 17 tournaments, while top-ranked women's player Aryna Sabalenka contested 70 matches across 17 tournaments.Ruud played 25 tournaments - the second most in the ATP year-end top 10 last season - with De Minaur third on 23."What's not normal is that for the last three or four years I've had two days off, gone straight into pre-season and straight into the new season again," De Minaur said on Thursday."Once you start, you don't finish until late November. It's just never ending. That's the sheer fact of it."
Pre-season starts in December, with the ATP and WTA Tours resuming at the end of the month.The first major is the Australian Open in mid-January, with the French Open starting in late May and Wimbledon in early July.The US Open rounds off the Grand Slams in early September.The season ends with the ATP and WTA Tour finals, followed by Davis Cup and Billie Jean King Finals - where players represent their nations in team events now nicknamed the 'World Cup of Tennis'.The ATP Tour said it "understands" why its leading players are worried about the length and demands of the season."We're focused on strengthening the sport by building a more premium product - one that creates more prize money, and more opportunities for players," a statement to BBC Sport read."A key part of that vision is calendar reform. "Creating a longer off-season for the players is a key objective, and we're actively exploring ways to make that a reality."
Is playing through the pain leading to 'rat race'?
Tennis players get used to playing through pain and discomfort during a long season. Japan's Naomi Osaka says she won two of her four Grand Slams while injured, adding: "I can rarely count the number of times I have felt perfect on the court."But I do know I'm the type of person that if I'm injured, I can almost play better. "Not physically better but mentally, I'll know I have to give all my energy into every point time and time again."Of course, injuries can be too severe - and the pain too much - to play through.That is where Ruud and De Minaur believe players are being unfairly punished by the current structure."You feel like you lose a lot if you don't show up and play - both economically, points-wise, rankings-wise and opportunity-wise," said Ruud."I know these weeks and months are really important for the remainder of the year and for my career. "Of course, if my leg is broken, I won't play. But it's tough."The ATP said there are "protections in place" for injured players, pointing to its Baseline programme, external which seeks to spread wealth further down the tour."Players ultimately have the freedom to choose where they compete, and for many years we've had financial incentives in place to encourage participation at the top events - because that's what fans want to see," it added."'We continue to work to strike the right balance between performance, recovery, and opportunity, for all players.'
Does the rankings structure need changing?
Nineteen events count towards ATP rankings every year, while the eight best players of the season also receive points at the season-ending ATP Finals.That includes:Four Grand SlamsEight mandatory Masters eventsSeven 'best other' tournaments - including events at ATP 500, ATP 250 and Challenger levelDe Minaur, who missed three Masters events in Cincinnati, Montreal and Shanghai last year because of injury, believes this unfairly punishes players."I had to deal with that. I'm still dealing with that now," he said."My ranking now consists of three zeros because I was injured and I couldn't play - which is ridiculous if you ask me."The WTA rankings are based on 18 tournaments, but the leading players are expected to play at least 20: Four Grand SlamsTen 1000 events Six 500 eventsThe WTA said the structure, which was introduced last year, has not increased workload."Over the last 10 years, data showed that players competed in an average of 20 events each year, inclusive of the Grand Slams," it said."The new structure does not require players to commit to playing more than this average."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Melissa Andreatta on where she wants Scotland to improve
Melissa Andreatta on where she wants Scotland to improve

The National

time33 minutes ago

  • The National

Melissa Andreatta on where she wants Scotland to improve

The Australian saw her first match end in a 1-0 defeat by Austria to make it seven games without a win for Scotland. But she was encouraged by elements of the second-half display ahead of the final game of the group, against the Netherlands in Tilburg on Tuesday. Andreatta said on the Scottish Football Association website: 'We've gone back and looked at the areas that we need to work on from the game on Friday and we'll look to start against the Netherlands with the momentum that we saw in the second half against Austria. Read more: Celtic fan who attacked man on way to a game banned from Glasgow on matchdays Cameron Norrie out of French Open as best ever run ended by Novak Djokovic 'I think I have a good baseline now to understand where we're at and some areas to work on to get where we want to be. 'I really believe in this group and what I want to see is a team that takes another step forward, that we're on the front foot at the right moments in the game.' Andreatta has called up Charlton full-back Charlotte Newsham from the under-23 squad after losing Amy Rodgers and Nicola Docherty.

Doctor Who's ‘woke, boring rubbish' storylines have caused staggering number of fans to turn off
Doctor Who's ‘woke, boring rubbish' storylines have caused staggering number of fans to turn off

The Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Doctor Who's ‘woke, boring rubbish' storylines have caused staggering number of fans to turn off

MORE than half of Brits who used to watch Doctor Who say they turned off because it had become 'woke, boring rubbish'. That is the result of an ­independent survey conducted as star Ncuti Gatwa exited the Tardis with a paltry 2.3 million viewers on Saturday. 4 4 In a shock twist, he appeared to regenerate into the Doctor's former companion Rose Tyler, played by Billie Piper — but many are not convinced she is the Time Lord's 16th incarnation. The Sun exclusively revealed last month that Ncuti, 32, would be leaving the role after two series — the shortest tenure of any actor in the role since Christopher Eccleston, who left the rebooted BBC show after one series in 2005. The survey quizzed 2,135 adults and found 42 per cent of current and former viewers said it had got worse since its relaunch two decades ago, with ­stories increasingly preachy and worthy. Even one in three current viewers think it has got worse. Plotlines over the past three years have featured trans heroines, non-binary baddies and drag-queen villains — and the Doctor coming out as gay, and crying in most episodes. James Johnson of pollsters JL Partners said: 'This is the first ever major poll done on attitudes to Doctor Who and the results are bleak. 'The public believe a once-great show has lost its way — and their biggest complaint is it puts pursuit of wokeness above entertainment value. 'The main words associated with it are rubbish, boring, and woke. 'If the BBC want to grow the show's audience once more, they will need a total revamp. 'And to get back to telling entertaining stories rather than preaching lessons that simply do not have an audience among the British public.' Dr Who gone Woke The poll found 46 per cent of current viewers think it puts social justice and woke issues above quality, compared with 37 per cent who believe the show puts quality first. Those who have stopped watching say it puts social justice and woke issues first by a ratio of three to one. The average age of current viewers is 42, compared with 51 for ex-fans. They are also heavily Labour voters compared to a more politically diverse former audience. The wokery ratcheted up after Doctor Who was taken over for a second time by showrunner Russell T Davies in 2023. He was the man who rebooted the show in 2005 with Eccleston, followed by David Tennant. 4 Who has starred in Doctor Who? Which actors have portrayed the famous Time Lord over the years? First Doctor: William Hartnell (1963 - 1966) Second Doctor: Patrick Troughton (1966 - 1969) Third Doctor: Jon Pertwee (1970 - 1974) Fourth Doctor: Tom Baker (1974 - 1981) Fifth Doctor: Peter Davidson (1982 - 1984) Sixth Doctor: Colin Baker (1984 - 1986) Seventh Doctor: Sylvester McCoy (1987 - 1989) Eighth Doctor: Paul McGann (1996) Ninth Doctor: Christopher Eccleston (2005) Tenth Doctor: David Tennant (2005 - 2010) 11th Doctor: Matt Smith (2010 - 2013) 12th Doctor: Peter Capaldi (2014 - 2017) 13th Doctor: Jodie Whittaker (2018 - 2022) 14th Doctor: David Tennant (2023) 15th Doctor: Ncuti Gatwa (2023 - present) A respectable 5.1 million tuned in to see his 'comeback episode' with David returning to play the Doctor for a second time in 2023. The actor then handed over to Ncuti who had his first full series as the Fifteenth Doctor last year. One Whovian writing on X/Twitter, said: 'Thanks to RTD (Russell T Davies) Ncuti is tainted and '15' will be remembered as the worst Doctor with the worst era in the history of Doctor Who.' The Sun revealed BBC bosses were considering a hiatus for the show, though execs maintained they would not make a decision until the second series had aired. Russell T Davies teased a return on Saturday, saying: 'After 62 years, the Doctor's adventures are only just beginning!' But that seems optimistic given their current multimillion-pound deal partnership with Disney+ is facing an uncertain future — and the viewing figures for one episode of the last series fell as low as 1.6 million. A spokeswoman for Doctor Who said: 'Doctor Who remains one of the biggest dramas on the BBC and is the most watched drama for under-35s, as well as being one of the most popular brands on BBC iPlayer. 'As we have previously stated, a decision on any future deal between the BBC and Disney+ regarding Doctor Who is yet to be made and any other claims are pure speculation.' WARNING: ALIENS AHEAD By Thomas Godfrey A THEATRE adaptation of sci-fi novel The War of the Worlds has been slapped with a woke warning — as it features Martians. The alien invaders, who try to destroy humanity in H.G. Wells' 1895 book, have been included in a list of potential triggers. The 3D immersive experience at central London's Hallmark Building also has warnings about violence. A spokeswoman said: 'The notices ensure transparency and inclusion.' But ex-Tory minister Sir Alec Shelbrooke said last night: 'They clearly think the public is stupid.' 7 Hints that Billie's no true Doc BILLIE Piper's arrival on Saturday as Ncuti Gatwa left was seen as a sign the show would continue. Known for playing past companion Rose Tyler, Billie appeared to debut as the 16th Doctor. But Whovians think she may not be the true Time Lord, meaning a big question mark hangs over the troubled show's future. TV Editor Rod McPhee looks at seven clues: NOT CREDITED AS THE DOCTOR: Every new Time Lord has been introduced as the Doctor in the end credits. In Saturday's episode, hers simply read: 'introducing Billie Piper'. RUSSELL T. DAVIES WON'T EVEN SAY: After the twist, Doctor Who's own showrunner said of Billie's return: 'Quite how and why and who is a story yet to be told.' BILLIE HINTED SHE'S STILL ROSE: Just after her return, Billie posted on Instagram a picture of herself holding a rose with the caption: 'A rose is a rose is a rose.' TENNANT'S RETURN WAS CLEARER: When Jodie Whittaker regenerated into David Tennant in a similar twist, execs immediately confirmed he was the Doctor. ROSE IS LINKED TO THE TARDIS: Ncuti tapped into the Tardis before regenerating. Fans reckon it caused Rose to return, since she held the power of the Tardis in 2005. SHE STILL SEEMS TO BE REGENERATING: Billie is still glowing when the episode ends, suggesting the transformation is incomplete and the true Doctor is yet to emerge. THE BBC DON'T CALL HER THE DOCTOR: The corporation avoids calling her the Doctor in a news item released soon after the episode.

Shameful pic of French cops watching migrants sail to Britain proves we've got to take action to stop small boats
Shameful pic of French cops watching migrants sail to Britain proves we've got to take action to stop small boats

The Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Shameful pic of French cops watching migrants sail to Britain proves we've got to take action to stop small boats

SOMETIMES it takes a photograph to shift political debate. Hopefully, one such image will be that of French border guards standing on a beach watching on as yet another boat-load of migrants set sail across the Channel in a dinghy, heading for sanctuary in soft-touch Britain. 2 2 One of them seems even to be filming the occasion on his phone. The boat load they were watching was just one of 19 which made it across the Channel on Saturday. Between them, they carried 1,195 migrants, more than enough to fill yet one more migrant hotel. In case anyone had forgotten, we British taxpayers have handed £480million over the past year to the French authorities supposedly to police the shores and prevent boats from setting off. That was under a deal negotiated by former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in 2023, in which Britain agreed to fund a doubling in the number of French border control guards from 400 to 800. Go through the motions A more expensive and pointless job-creation scheme would be hard to imagine. Since Britain agreed to cough up the money, the proportion of would-be migrants being intercepted before they reach UK waters has fallen from 46.9 percent in 2023 to 38 percent so far in 2025. People-smugglers have got around the extra patrols by finding a new way to play the system: Rather than launch a boat- load of migrants directly from the beach they push the boats a few yards offshore and ask their clients to wade into the waters. That, apparently, confounds the French border guards ' rules of engagement, hence they just stand and watch. But let's be frank and ask: Do the French really have any intention of stopping these boats? Starmer 'loses control' as over 1,000 migrants cross Channel in biggest daily total of 2025 – as French cops watch on Needless to say, every migrant who leaves French territory is one fewer the French authorities have to worry about. It makes perfect sense for the French to take our money and then go through the motions of pretending to stop migrants, while in practice letting them go. If Emmanuel Macron 's government really wanted to stop the boats it could do so in an instant by doing a deal with Britain in which it agreed to the systematic return of every migrant who made it across the Channel. If asylum seekers were obliged to do as international treaties supposedly insist they do, and make their claim in the first safe country in which they arrive, Channel crossings would all but cease. Let's be frank and ask: Do the French really have any intention of stopping these boats? There would no longer be any point in making a dangerous journey only to be shipped back immediately to France. But of course France won't do that sort of deal because it doesn't want the burden of thousands of extra asylum seekers to process. Meanwhile, our own government has thrown away the one tool which Sunak had painstakingly added to Britain's feeble border force armoury: The Rwanda scheme. How foolish Labour's rejection of the scheme looks now. Keir Starmer is now talking about a similar plan to process asylum claims in the Balkans, but sorry, it is too late. Labour tries to claim the credit for a fall in overall net migration, which was entirely the result of visa changes by the Conservatives, while hoping we will somehow fail to notice the sharp rise in small- boat crossings since it came to power 11 months ago. The Border Command which was supposed to tackle people-smugglers has proved to be a farce. Since the election, 38,054 migrants have arrived by small boat, with numbers this year running ahead of any previous year. The Rwanda scheme might have been expensive in terms of the cost per migrant, but that misses the point. In practice, we may have ended up having to send rather few asylum seekers to Rwanda because migrants would have had such a disincentive to travel to Britain in the first place. In the end we have the worst of all worlds. We have more and more migrant arrivals while we are still picking up the tab for the abortive Rwanda scheme. Paying dearly Accommodation funded by us to house our asylum seekers now looks like being used by migrants sent there from other countries. Nor has Starmer made use of another obvious piece of leverage. Two weeks ago he renegotiated Britain's Brexit agreement, extending French fishing boats' access to UK waters without making it dependent on France putting a genuine effort into stopping the boats. Why didn't he at least say: You can fish in British waters only if you agree to take back every single migrant who makes it illegally across the Channel? As Kemi Badenoch said last week, every time Labour negotiates, Britain loses. But then the previous Tory government hardly set an example, either, in handing France nearly half a billion a year to pretend to tackle illegal migration. Truth is that we are all paying dearly for French border guards to stand around photographing the flotilla of migrant boats setting sail for Britain — and then again to feed and house the migrants once they arrive on our shores.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store