
8000-mile test
Close
Why we're running it: To see i f this veteran might actually be the pick of Volvo's growing, tech-first EV range
Much of the talk surrounding Volvo concerns its evolving model range, headlined by the addition of the electric Volvo EX30 crossover and Volvo EX90 flagship SUV.
But the Swedish firm's first production EV has also been transformed in recent years – to the point that it's been rebranded as the EX40 to differentiate it from its petrol-powered Volvo XC40 sibling.
The XC40 Recharge was launched in 2019, which is several generations ago in the fast-developing world of electric car technology.
That's forced Volvo to make significant upgrades, although they can go only so far. For example, the infotainment in the EX40 remains an older generation than in the EX30 and EX90, in which virtually all of the controls have migrated to a screen. Of course, for many buyers that old-school design could well hold plenty of appeal.
All this has left Autocar's latest long-term test car, for better or for worse, feeling a bit old-tech by comparison. That said, it's still based on parent company Geely's Compact Modular Architecture, which it shares with the much lauded Polestar 2.
The updated car looks almost identical on the outside to the XC40 Recharge, but some important changes have been made under the skin. While the old model was front-wheel drive, single-motor EX40s instead have a powered rear axle, which should theoretically improve efficiency.
Our car is a Single Motor Long Range model, with a 78kWh battery giving it an official range of 340 miles and putting it between the 69kWh Single Motor (295 miles) and 82kWh Twin Motor and Twin Motor Performance models (332 and 326 miles) in the EX40 line-up.
That in theory should be enough to last me an entire week with my driving schedule, but this report is being written during winter, so I'm not going to be complacent. After all, the EX40 is a heavy beast (2001kg) and its boxy silhouette doesn't exactly lend itself to peak aerodynamic performance. That a lone is a recipe for low efficiency, and while I've previously driven EVs through the coldest months without heating, those spending over £50,000 to buy this car understandably won't want to compromise their comfort in return for a respectable range, so the climate control will be glued at a toasty 21deg C until the sun decides to come out again.
Over its first few hundred miles, the EX40 has self-reported use of around 38kWh per 100 miles, which equates to about 2.6mpkWh, or 205 miles of range – a full 135 miles below the advertised figure. At least charging speeds aren't quite so miserly – the quoted 185kW easily beats the Skoda Enyaq (125kW) and BMW iX3 (155kW).
While efficiency may be an early concern, the EX40's performance is not. Even this Single Motor version makes 252bhp and 310lb ft, good for a 0-62mph time of 7.2sec. I suspect that will be plenty fast enough for buyers of this kind of car, who will also appreciate the smooth delivery of that power. At least as importantly, it's so far proving to be a very comfortable cruiser over longer distances too.
The interior is also full of promise. Like the exterior design, it's almost identical to that of the XC40 Recharge so doesn't subscribe to the minimalist, hands-free ethos of the EX30 and EX90 – yet. It almost sounds silly to draw attention to such things at this point, but the steering wheel has buttons for quick access to multimedia functions and the cruise control and our car has a modest 9.0in portrait infotainment touchscreen, paired with a 12.3in digital gauge display.
Both displays are crisp and clear, and Volvo's Google-powered user interface remains one of the best – although many functions, including Google Assistant, Maps and Play Store (for downloading apps), will demand paid subscriptions after four years. Regardless, it's so well integrated that I haven't even considered using the standard Apple CarPlay. I can just get into the car and forget about my phone for the duration of the journey. Bliss.
Plus trim, the middle one between Core and Ultra, is well equipped. In addition to wireless phone charging, heated seats and a reversing camera, it gets air purification, adaptive cruise control, 19in alloy wheels and keyless entry. And I've already had some highly satisfied passengers, because Plus also offers rear heated seats – quite a rarity.
Early complaints? The EX40's low-speed ride is a bit unsettled and road noise is pronounced. Handling is on the numb side too, but that's hardly surprising given it's positioned as a relaxed family runner, not a Hyundai Ioniq 5 N rival.
So far then, the EX40 on the whole feels as impressive on the road as it looks on paper. Whether it goes nearly as far on a charge as the brochure says it will may prove the deal-breaker. We will see. Update 2
Shortly after starting life with a new car, it's become a ritual for me to take it on a south-westerly trip across the country to get properly acquainted.
Our Volvo EX40 comes with the larger, 79kWh battery that is claimed to offer a range of up to 340 miles, so there was initially some hope that I'd make it the full 302 miles from north London to Lizard Point without stopping. The plan never stood a chance, however, once a meagre '220 miles' appeared on the range display as I set off.
That was enough to get me to my usual stopping point of Exeter services, where a Gridserve charger replenished the battery from 10-80% at a peak rate of 145kW (not far off the EV's claimed 155kW maximum). It meant I didn't have to sit in the car park for more than 30 minutes during the worst storm of the year.
The journey itself was silky smooth. This Volvo's ride quality over long distances is excellent, with its cosseting front seats and unobtrusive ADAS technology helping to shrink hours-long drives.
Its 252bhp electric motor was more than a match for the hilly A303 and faster A30, but it was here that efficiency took a big hit. The EX40 returned an economy of 2.4 miles per kWh for the duration of the journey. That's equivalent to around 190 miles of range – nowhere near the WLTP figure.
It's a world away from the nearly 200kg-lighter Cupra Born I ran previously: that car routinely achieved 4.5mpkWh at highway speeds. But where the 2001kg Volvo has the Cupra beaten is refinement, in which area the EX40 has so far been hard to fault.
Those comfort seats, fitted as standard in Plus-spec models like ours, live up to their name and like the steering wheel are heated too, so I'm kept warm without being too reliant on energy-sapping climate control. This electric SUV does a good job of nullifying wind and road noise too. The EX40 certainly stakes a strong claim to being among the most refined and relaxing models in its class.
Unlike in the newer, more technologically advanced Volvos on sale today, the EX40 's safety kit leaves you largely to your own devices, and its software doesn't intrude. Switch off the lane assist, driver monitoring and other handholding systems, and they stay off.
The only feature that switches on (owing to European legislation) each time you start the car is the speed limit warning, which for me isn't a problem. The system reads roadside speed limit signs and motorway gantries effectively, and it augments that with GPS data. It 's actually quite handy to have in London, which is beset with continually changing speed limits. Over 2000 miles so far, I have yet to experience any difficulties or erroneous speed limit detection.
While most of the tech is simple to use and (for the most part) effective, it's not perfect. The regular cruise control works well, but the Pilot Assist system takes some getting used to. It is in effect a semi-autonomous cruise control that can support braking, steering and acceleration, but it feels a bit odd in practice. It lacks the smoothness of BMW's Active Cruise Control: the steering wheel jerks around in small increments rather than with intuitive movements, and drivers behind must think I'm correcting my steering way too often. When news editor Will Rimell ran an XC40 Recharge (as the EX40 was previously known) in a different spec, he had no issues with the same system and suggested it made his commute far easier, so I'll persevere with it to see if my thoughts change.
One frustrating feature I doubt I'll get used to is the automatic braking system that functions when reversing. It detects obstacles to the side of the car and immediately behind, plus traffic when you're backing out of a parking space. It also seems to detect ghosts: often when I'm reversing, it will apply the brakes jarringly for no reason, both spooking me and making me look like a buffoon. Still, it 's a fairly minor gripe that takes little away from the EX40's overall charm. Update 3
No matter how clean and tidy you think you are, moving house always highlights how much tat you own. These occasions can expose a flaw in many small SUVs: practicality. Some, despite their raised ride height and perceived capaciousness compared with a conventional hatchback, actually have no more interior space.
My electric XC40 has decent but not class-leading practicality, according to the official figures, which I put to the test when I moved out of my north London flat with two years' worth of accumulated cargo.
My makeshift removal vehicle has a 452-litre boot. That 's some way from being the biggest in the class, beaten easily by the Kia Niro EV (475 litres) and BMW iX1 (490 litres) and positively outclassed by the Tesla Model Y (854 litres – although Tesla cheekily includes space above the parcel shelf ). Fold the rear seats down flat, however, and there's a reasonable 1328 litres to play with.
The EX40's boot is generally a practical and usable space. With a wide opening and square shape, it's ideal for shifting furniture and boxes. I squeezed in a dresser, an air fryer, three boxes of clothes and a bedside table easily, and the 252bhp electric motor had no trouble coping with all the extra weight.
I unexpectedly found a use for the tiny 31-litre 'frunk ', too. Turns out it's perfect for half a sourdough loaf and some lunchboxes.
If I had one complaint, it's that the rear doors have a narrow opening, so it can be hard to squeeze larger, rigid items in. Some reshuffling ensued, if only as a result of my own poor planning.
On the 80 -mile route back to my temporary accommodation – my parents' house – the EX40 showcased its exemplary ride quality. London's roads are rubbish – no secret there – but believe it or not the roads in this corner of Berkshire are even worse. In our village, potholes are more like trenches and cracks in the road resemble canyons. Yet the EX40 remained composed and cosseting and my treasured commemorative glassware remained undamaged.
The EX40 performed valiantly throughout the move, but despite a successful first run I succumbed to hiring a van for the rest of my stuff.
All of it will now sit in my parents' garage for two weeks (much to their dismay) until I can pack up and do it all again. After the EX40's positive initial showing, it may have earned itself a full day's work next time out. Update 4
Moving from a shared house to an unfurnished flat has meant I've had to buy furniture, cutlery and lots more besides, and because I currently run a Volvo, I knew there was only one store for the job. Okay, I'll admit I chose Ikea for its prices rather than its provenance, but it was a nice coincidence nonetheless.
So, another practicality challenge for our resident Swede: Poängs, Färgklars, Vardagens – you name it, it would all have to be squeezed into the EX40's 452-litre boot. And, once again, the car proved itself worthy – although I did have to lower the rear seats to liberate all 1328 litres.
I was feeling quite smug until my colleague and fellow shopper Sam Phillips arrived in his 128,000-mile 2011 Ford Focus and seemed to fit at least as much stuff in the back of it. And that was with a mere 316-litre boot, increasing to 1215 litres with the rear seats folded flat.His cargo included two wardrobes, a bedside table, an office desk and a lamp, albeit boxed up in classic Ikea flat-pack fashion.
The Volvo has spent most of the past few weeks quietly and effectively undertaking similarly mundane duties. The excitement has come from my 2017 Mk7.5 Golf GTI (manual, if you're asking), which I bought back in March.
Of course, comparing two very different cars would be unfair, but driving a hot hatch legend has only served to emphasise one of the EX40's biggest shortcomings: its handling. As a result of its raised height and two-tonne weight, the SUV leans significantly when cornering, and there's not much room for adjustment, either.
There are just two steering settings, standard and firm, the latter of which adds a bit of weight but little in the way of dynamic ability. And, unfortunately, while the ride is largely settled, it 's not much better than that of the low-riding hot Golf, either.
On the other hand, even the GTI can't match the instant power of the EX40, and the EV is inevitably better equipped with the latest technology.
The EX40 has another card up its sleeve. Parking in the south-west London neighbourhood I've moved to requires a resident's permit. A pain in the backside, but the council has at least included some incentives to ease the burden. Being electric, the EX40 has a Band A classification and thus is eligible for a cheaper rate. A standard permit is £108.50 for the year, but I've paid just £54.25.
More problematic is the limited number of rapid-charging stations in the area. According to Zap-Map, there's a fair discrepancy compared with other parts of London.
Within a few miles of my flat, there are six fast chargers, three of which are inaccessible on private land, while another is at a garage and has been out of service for months. The other two are at a McDonald's three miles away, so it might be time to explore the world of lamp-post chargers, unless I can stand going up a few trouser sizes. Goodbye
Such is the reassuring familiarity of a Volvo SUV that when this EX40 arrived on our fleet several months ago, I knew exactly what to expect: a dependable, refined, spacious tourer with a premium feel and a dash of Scandicool. It wouldn't be tremendously exciting, but it would fit a brief that has kept plenty of buyers happy. And, as the EX40 departs, I'm pleased to say it delivered on those expectations – mostly.
To start with, the EX40 is one of the most accessible electric cars I've driven. A newcomer to EVs wouldn't be intimidated to drive it, and it was expertly undemanding on the road. What it lacked in dynamism it made up for by making every journey straightforward and stress-free. Not a given in today's tech-led cars.
That accessibility could be because the EX40 is so familiar, being based on the highly successful petrol-powered XC40. We have run a number of examples on our fleet over the years, ranging from pure ICE and plug-in hybrid XC40s to a dual-motor XC40 Recharge EV.This EX40 Plus Single Motor Extended Range is perhaps the ideal spec for an EV, since its combination of a single rear-mounted motor and the biggest battery in the line-up gives the longest range possible. The 252bhp offered is well down on the range-topping Twin Motor Performance model's 436bhp but I found it to be comfortable enough for all day-to-day driving situations.
The feeling was reinforced when I got the chance to try a 402bhp dual-motor EC40. That model (essentially identical to the EX40 aside from the sloping coupé roofline) was sharper in the corners and clearly faster, but all its extra power felt unnecessary in a family SUV on UK roads.
My EX40 also felt more settled on country lanes, perhaps because it was rear-driven and a little lighter. I also welcomed the extra interior and boot space enabled by the EX40's higher roofline, not least because I kept bashing my head on the EC40's bootlid whenever I opened it. But that might just be me.
The EX40's 452-litre boot served me well during our time together and helped me move house more than once, but it's a fair bit down on the Audi Q4 E-tron (520 litres) and put to shame by the admittedly bigger Skoda Enyaq (585 litres). I couldn't have asked for much more from behind the wheel, though. The EX40's interior is practical and extremely relaxing. The suede textiles and Microtech upholstery and highly adjustable cushioned seats helped make all my journeys pass by in total comfort.
Comfortable inside and pleasantly undemanding to drive, then. What 's not to like? Well, there was one glaring issue I encountered whenever I drove the EX40: efficiency.
Our car was fitted with the bigger, 82kWh battery, compared with entry-level models that come with a 66kWh pack. When it was delivered, our car had an official WLTP range of 340 miles, which is competitive for this class. Better still, a software update during its time on the fleet boosted this to 353 miles.
Sadly, I never saw anything close to that. And while most EVs fail to match their official rating in the real world, this EX40 simply isn't competitive with newer, more efficient rivals, some of which can easily exceed 4mpkWh.
In 8000 miles of driving, I never saw more than 260 miles of range on my digital driver display. My average economy amounted to around 198 miles on a full battery. Even a peak of 268 miles was well down on the claimed range, pre-or post-software update. Winter driving was of course a factor, but things didn't improve markedly once the weather warmed up.
Still, the charging speed was decent at 185kW, so I was able to get it topped back up fairly quickly.
While parked up at the chargers I was able to fully explore Volvo's infotainment system, which in my experience is among the easiest to use and one I will really miss. It has a Google-powered user interface, so I was able to log into my account and access all my saved locations and Google Maps search history.
The various downloadable apps even made those charging stops rather enjoyable: I watched videos on YouTube to keep me entertained, logged in directly to Spotify to access my music library and used the fireplace app to warm me up. It nearly made me forget I had the heating turned off in January to conserve range.
It was also a reminder that Volvo cars are increasingly becoming software-based, and that this EX40 is a bit of an outlier in a line-up now also including the smaller EX30 and the larger EX90.
If you're already tempted by the EX40 and its range meets your driving needs, though, don't let its age put you off. This is a compelling proposition, mixing intuitive and user-friendly technology with a bit of old-school Volvo charm.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Twix ad banned in UK for encouraging unsafe driving
A TV ad for chocolate bar Twix has been banned for encouraging unsafe advert shows a man with flowing hair involved in a car chase and crash that results in his and an identical, caramel-coloured car sandwiched on top of each other, like a complaints issued against the advert said it encouraged dangerous driving and was who own Twix, argued that the ad had a "cinematic presentation" and was set in a "world that was absurd, fantastical and removed from reality", which Clearcast, the non-governmental organisation that approves adverts before broadcast, echoed. But the watchdog the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled the ad "must not appear again" in its current form because it "condoned unsafe driving".While the ASA acknowledged that the stunt performed highlighted the fantastical nature of the advert, it took issue with the first half of the video that showed driving "that appeared likely to breach the legal requirements of the Highway Code".It said there was an "emphasis on speed" including with "fast paced beat and music" in the car chase, noting the "visible skid marks" left on the defended the advert, saying "the cars were shot driving at lawful speeds and any emulation would only reflect the legal and safe driving presented".The sweet giant, who also own M&Ms, Celebrations and Maltesers, added that Twix is known for its absurd and playful humour, which was reflected in the final scene shows a Twix bar falling through the sunroofs of the two cars, before they drive off - still attached - and with the tagline "two is more than one".For its part, Clearcast told the ASA that the style of the video made it clear it wasn't meant to be emulated nor did it suggest "safe driving was boring."In the ASA's ruling, it said it told Mars "not to condone or encourage irresponsible driving that was likely to breach the legal requirements of the Highway Code in their ads."


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
10 cheapest new cars to insure in the UK revealed – as one motor could save you hundreds
MOTORING experts have revealed the ten cheapest cars to insure in the UK. The average insurance premium has increased by a whopping 43 per cent year on year from £284 in 2024 to a shocking high of £941. Prices have begun to drop over the past few months but the average quote is now sitting around £834, which is still a huge premium. Experts have now revealed how to get this massive premium down a bit. They've revealed the top ten cheapest cars to insure in the UK to help keep the price of motoring down for everyday Brits. Not only are the motors cheap to insure but they are affordable for anyone looking to pick up a new car. The list consists mostly of hatchbacks and super minis but some SUVs do make an appearance. Skoda Fabia 10 The Fabia is reportedly the cheapest of all UK motors to insure. The little Czech hatchback only costs around £237 a year to insure and can be bought for an impressively low £19,410. Seat Ibiza The Ibiza remains a cheap option since the mark one was introduced to the UK market in 1983. At only £240 a year and £19,795 to buy the little hatchback remains one of the UK's best cheap and cheerful models. Dacia Sandero Costing just £240 a year to insure and a very cheap £13,250 to buy, the Romanian motor offers an excellent option for first time drivers. Only slightly more expensive to insure than the Ibiza the Sandero is a fair sight cheaper to buy than most of the alternatives. Volkswagen Polo 10 The German made Volkswagen Polo is up next with an insurance premium of around £247. A favourite among first time drivers in the UK the Polo costs just £21,210 to buy. Volkswagen T-Cross 10 Surprisingly the SUV style Volkswagen T-Cross came in next, despite being large it can be insured for just £248. A Volkswagen T-Cross could be purchased for around £24,895 and offers the most space on the list, perfect for families. Hyundai i10 10 The first Japanese car on the list, the Hyundai i10, can be insured for only £259 and purchased for a modest £16,380. The most technologically advanced of the motors on this list the i10 offers a slew of futuristic features not available with some of the other options. Kia Picanto The tiny Kia Picanto can be insured for just £250 and bought for only £18,945. One of the smallest motors on the list the quick little car is a perfect option for the city, learners or first time motorists. Kia Stonic 10 Another Kia, the Stonic, though much larger than the hatchback Picanto, can be insured for around the same at £260. Buying one is a fair bit pricier though costing motorists around £20,265. Hyundai i20 10 Not to be confused with the much more powerful i20N the Hyundai i20 can be insured for just £282 and purchased for £20,880. A little larger and more powerful than some other entries on the list the i20 offers a bit of a step up in performance for a bit of a step up in cost. Toyota Aygo X Scraping in at the bottom of the list the Toyota Aygo X can be insured for £307, the only motor on the list to break the £300 mark. It remains relatively cheap to buy however at around £16,515. How to get cheap car insurance CAR insurance is an essential cost that you hope to never use but will need to cover the costs of theft or damage to your vehicle. It's a legal requirement to have car insurance, and going without it could land you with a £300 fine, six penalty points on your licence and even a criminal conviction. But there are several ways to slash your premiums. Pay upfront Insurers give you the choice of paying for insurance monthly or upfront. Paying monthly spreads the cost of your cover but the insurer adds interest charges which means the average motorist pays around ten per cent more overall. If you pay for your car insurance annually you don't pay any interest. A typical motorist can save up to £225 a year by paying in one go, according to comparison site MoneySuperMarket. Increase your excess The excess is what you agree to pay each time you need to make a claim on your policy. You can usually choose your own excess when setting up a policy and it can be as low as £100 and as high as £500 or more. The higher your excess, the lower your premium and vice versa. This means you could bring the cost of your insurance down by agreeing to pay more if you do need to make a claim. But before you hike your excess, make sure you would be able to pay in the event that you do need to make a claim. Tweak your job Certain jobs are seen as more risky than others for insurance purposes. Making small but accurate changes to your job title can save you money. For example, swapping your role from "chef" to "caterer" can save you £20, comparison site GoCompare found. And changing your role from "fast food delivery driver" to "delivery driver" could save you £40. But lying about your job could invalidate your policy so make sure any changes are legitimate and accurate. Shop around Not all comparison sites have the same range of insurers so to get the best price it's a good idea to check two or three from Go Compare, Comparethemarket, MoneySupermarket and Insurer Direct Line is also not on comparison sites so check its prices directly. You can also get a free cash bonus by going via a cashback site such as Topcashback or Quidco. Save the date Renewing your car insurance sooner rather than later could save you some cash. New cover becomes more expensive the closer you get to the renewal date. But you can buy your car insurance up to 29 days before the policy start date and 'lock in' the price you're quoted on that day. A typical driver can save up to £265 buying new cover at least 27 days before their current policy ends, according to Go Compare.


Auto Express
2 hours ago
- Auto Express
New Polestar 3 Long Range Single Motor review: less money, more range
The single-motor Polestar 3 is an attractive proposition, but in contrast to plenty of other EV model line-ups that offer both single and dual-motor configurations, the Long Range Dual Motor is the edition we'd opt for. It might cost more and have less range, but they're fairly negligible downsides when you consider the increase in performance it offers – and the improved ride quality thanks to the brilliant adaptive air suspension. Advertisement - Article continues below Until the upcoming Polestar 5 saloon arrives to tackle the Porsche Taycan and Audi e-tron GT in 2026, the Polestar 3 is the all-electric brand's flagship model, also vying against German competition in the shape of the Audi Q6 e-tron and Q8 e-tron plus the BMW iX and Mercedes EQE SUV. Helping to set the Polestar apart are its design, technology, performance and battery size – the latter resulting in some impressive range figures. There's now a Long Range Single Motor version too, living up to its name by offering even more range. The Polestar 3, like those aforementioned rivals, is a premium SUV and it's priced as such. The new Long Range Single Motor version brings the line-up's entry point to just under £70,000 with the Long Range Dual Motor adding around £6,000 to that, and the more powerful Performance model costing an additional £6,000. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below Given that it's got half the number of motors, the Long Range Single Motor is understandably less powerful than the other two Polestar 3s, offering 295bhp rather than the 483bhp of the Dual Motor and 510bhp in the Performance. Just because it's got less power doesn't mean Polestar has skimped on the battery, though; every Polestar 3 gets the same 107kWh unit. That means the Long Range Single Motor model offers up to 438 miles of range, which eclipses many of its close rivals and beats the still-impressive dual-motor's 395 miles. After testing the new car on a variety of roads, we found a return north of 400 miles would be easily achievable for most drivers. Advertisement - Article continues below We've been looking forward to driving the Long Range Single Motor model since we first drove the Polestar 3 in its dual-motor state, because we'd usually take extra range over power in an electric car - especially one that aims to offer family-friendly practicality and cruising comfort. Plenty of rear-wheel-drive electric cars offer a sprightly feel thanks to their instant torque and low centre of gravity – and both are immediately apparent in this new model. Polestar has given the single-motor car a bespoke chassis set-up with all-new anti-roll bars intended to create more front-end grip; these work together with passive suspension instead of the air suspension that comes standard on dual-motor cars. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below The result is that despite weighing in at a significant 2,403kg (the Long Range Dual Motor and Performance weigh 2,579kg), the Long Range Single Motor's body control is impressive. While it can't quite contain side-to-side movements at speed on bumpy roads, the ride is composed. Unlike the dual-motor cars that have a wonderful adaptive damping technology that offers three levels of stiffness, the standard car's suspension is fixed in a sensible setting that settles down well at speed. Our only gripe would be that it's not as compliant over speed bumps and rough roads as the dual-motor versions. Advertisement - Article continues below With power only going to the rear wheels, you'd be forgiven for thinking the Long Range Single Motor would feel sharper than the dual-motor cars in the bends – especially after Polestar's CEO Thomas Ingenlath said: 'The rear-wheel-drive configuration fits with our performance-focused driving dynamics that make the car stand out in the luxury SUV sector'. However we didn't find the LRSM to be the keen driver's choice in the Polestar 3 range, because even with the ESC mode in 'Sport', there's masses of grip from the exceptionally wide rear tyres that mutes any potential of getting the Polestar 3 to feel lively. That grip does give a feeling of stability, however – no surprise, because Polestar actively aimed to give the single-motor the same driving characteristics as the dual-motor cars. We couldn't help but be a little disappointed in this approach when cars like the MG4 and Cupra Born have a surprisingly fun rear-driven nature. The single-motor Polestar 3 also lacks the ability to switch its power delivery between 'Performance' and 'Range', although there is still a choice of three steering modes: 'light', 'standard' and 'firm'. There's a bit of vagueness in the dead-ahead, although the modes provide a decent change in weight; 'firm' felt the most appropriate to us for a 2.5-tonne SUV. But, with no air suspension, there's also no raised suspension or hill descent mode that come standard on the all-wheel-drive, dual-motor Polestar 3s. Advertisement - Article continues below Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below The Polestar 3 Long Range Single Motor might have nigh-on 300bhp, but it's got a lot of weight to lug around. As a result, it only sprints from 0-62mph in 7.5 seconds, although we found it to be perfectly zippy enough at any speed thanks to its high torque figure. Aside from those aforementioned powertrain and dynamic technology changes, equipment on the single-motor is unchanged from the dual-motor so there's Brembo brakes, electrically heated frameless door mirrors, a powered tailgate, three-zone climate control, heated front seats, a 14.5-inch central display with a Google operating system, built-in apps and 5G connectivity, plus a vast suite of safety systems. Inside there's still an exquisite selection of environmentally friendly materials. 'WeaveTech' and 'MicroTech' both feature on the Polestar 3 as 'bio-attributed' materials; to us they feel a little like a swimsuit, which sounds odd, but it suits the modern styling of the cabin, plus it seemed pretty robust too. Our test car also came with some classy charcoal-coloured animal welfare wool, which is another £1,000 option. Whether you choose the wool or the perforated Nappa leather upholstery, the Polestar 3's cabin manages to feel distinctive among its class with the build quality you'd want at this price. Model: Polestar 3 Long Range Single Motor Price: £69,910 Powertrain: 107kWh battery + 1x e-motor Power/torque: 295bhp/490Nm Transmission: Single-speed automatic 0-60mph/top speed: 7.5 seconds/112mph Range: 438 miles Max charging: 250kW 10-80% 30 mins Size (L/W/H): 4,900/2,120/1,618mm On sale: Now You can buy a new Polestar 3 now or look for a used model with our Find A Car service ... Share this on Twitter Share this on Facebook Email Car Deal of the Day: A Volkswagen Golf R Estate for less than a GTI Car Deal of the Day: A Volkswagen Golf R Estate for less than a GTI The Golf R Estate is one of the best performance estates around – and right now it's criminally cheap. It's our Deal of the Day for 9 June. Should Citroen make a new 2CV? Some say oui, others say non Should Citroen make a new 2CV? Some say oui, others say non A new Citroen 2CV could be inbound, but would this be a French fancy or a financial flop? Hyundai Santa Fe vs Volkswagen Tayron: which SUV is best for a big family? Hyundai Santa Fe vs Volkswagen Tayron: which SUV is best for a big family? Volkswagen's new Tayron takes over from the Tiguan Allspace as the brand's seven-seat family SUV. How does it fare against the latest Hyundai Santa Fe… Car group tests 7 Jun 2025