Mexican corrido band sees U.S. visas canceled after displaying cartel photos
The U.S. State Department dropped the work and tourist visas of the members of the Mexican corrido band Los Alegres del Barranco after the group displayed photos of drug lord Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes at its concert in Guadalajara, Mexico.
During their March 29 show at the University of Guadalajara, the band put an illustrated depiction of Cervantes — a key player in the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) — on a mega-screen while playing their song 'El Dueño del Palenque.' Videos of the incident were captured on social media.
The State Department's actions terminated the band's plans to tour in the U.S., which would have begun April 4 in Tulsa, Okla., and included a May 25 stop in L.A. County at the Pico Rivera Sports Arena.
On Tuesday, Christopher Landau, the deputy secretary of State, confirmed the report on X.
'I'm a firm believer in freedom of expression, but that doesn't mean that expression should be free of consequences,' Landau said in his post. 'A Mexican band, Los Alegres del Barranco, portrayed images glorifying drug kingpin 'El Mencho' — head of the grotesquely violent CJNG cartel — at a recent concert in Mexico,' he wrote.
'I'm pleased to announce that the State Department has revoked the band members' work and tourism visas. In the Trump Administration, we take seriously our responsibility over foreigners' access to our country. The last thing we need is a welcome mat for people who extol criminals and terrorists.'
A month prior to Landau's announcement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that the State Department designated eight cartels and transnational organizations — including the Jalisco New Generation Cartel — as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists.
Criticism of Los Alegres del Barranco came from both sides of the border, as there has been increased public outcry in Mexico about the praise found for crime bosses in regional Mexican music. One of the vocal critics of the band's actions was Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum.
'That shouldn't happen. It's not right,' Sheinbaum said of the incident during a March 31 press conference. 'You can't apologize for violence nor for criminal groups.' The president also called for there to be an investigation of what occurred at the concert.
But this isn't the first time CJNG has been associated with regional Mexican artists.
Last month, a federal jury convicted the chief executive of Del Records, a Bell Gardens-based label that produces música Mexicana, of conspiring to violate the Kingpin Statute that prohibits U.S. residents and companies from doing business with known drug traffickers and their associates.
In April 2018, Ángel Del Villar and his entertainment agency worked with Jesús Pérez Alvear, a Guadalajara-based music promoter who had been sanctioned by the Treasury Department, according to evidence presented in court.
Treasury Department officials said at the time that Pérez had laundered drug money for the CJNG and an affiliated trafficking group, Los Cuinis.
Pérez was accused of commingling the traffickers' profits with legitimate revenue from ticket and refreshment sales. He also promoted singers of narcocorridos, ballads that critics say 'glorify' traffickers and their crimes, Treasury officials stated.
Pérez had previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to do business with sanctioned people connected to drug trafficking. He promoted concerts for Del Entertainment in Mexico until March 2019. He was murdered in Mexico in December 2024.
According to the U.S. Attorney's office, Del Villar and Del Entertainment willfully did business with Pérez 'by continuing to have a Del Entertainment musical artist perform at concerts in which Pérez and Del Entertainment had a financial interest.'
In a statement issued by email, Del Villar's legal team said they strongly disagree with the March 27 verdict and plan to appeal. Del Villar is set to be sentenced Aug. 15 and faces up to 30 years in prison on each count. Del Entertainment will face a sentence of five years of probation and a fine of $10 million for each count.
Times' staff writer Brittny Mejia contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US State Department's planned layoffs may violate court order, judge says
By Daniel Wiessner (Reuters) -A federal judge in California on Wednesday said her recent ruling barring President Donald Trump's administration from laying off tens of thousands of federal employees likely blocks the U.S. State Department's reorganization plan that includes 2,000 job cuts. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco during a virtual meeting in a lawsuit by unions, nonprofits and municipalities said she was concerned that the State Department is flouting her May 22 order that broadly blocked government-wide mass layoffs. Illston temporarily blocked about 20 agencies, including the State Department, from carrying out plans to downsize and restructure federal agencies at Trump's direction. But the department told Congress last week that it still planned to notify about 2,000 employees this month that they were being laid off and would reorganize or eliminate more than 300 bureaus and offices. 'At this point there are some semantics being bandied about, but it appears to me that what is being implemented at the State Department now is covered by the injunction,' said Illston, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, a Democrat. Illston ordered both sides to file briefs on the matter next week and said she would hold a hearing by June 13, the earliest date that State can issue layoff notices after it submitted its plan to Congress. In her May ruling, Illston said the White House cannot order the restructuring of federal agencies without authorization from Congress. The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to pause Illston's decision while it appeals, after a San Francisco-based federal appeals court refused to permit the pause. Illston's ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul that was spearheaded by Trump ally Elon Musk, the world's richest person and CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla. Musk last week said he was ending his stint with the administration, raising questions about the future of his Department of Government Efficiency. During Wednesday's 30-minute meeting, U.S. Department of Justice lawyer Andrew Bernie argued that the State Department's reorganization plan predated a February executive order and subsequent White House memo directing mass layoffs, placing it outside the scope of Illston's decision. 'We of course recognize and take with the utmost seriousness our obligation to comply with the injunction, and we are complying,' Bernie said, adding that 17 federal agencies have halted planned layoffs. But Danielle Leonard, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, countered that State Department documents and statements regarding the planned layoffs specifically reference orders from the White House. 'We've heard some things from Mr. Bernie today, but we haven't seen anything sworn under penalty of perjury saying this was … independently done,' she said. Illston had convened Wednesday's meeting after the plaintiffs in a filing late Tuesday accused the State Department and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development of not complying with her decision. They said that HUD had fired about 80 employees who had not completed a probationary period, which Bernie on Wednesday confirmed. But he said that agencies have broad latitude to fire probationary workers, and those terminations were not the same as the mass layoffs of tenured employees that were blocked by Illston. Probationary workers typically have less than a year or two in their current roles, though some are longtime federal employees in new positions. Illston said it was not clear to her whether the firings at HUD were covered by her injunction.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mexican Supreme Court remake: Ruling-party loyalists dominate the new bench
Judicial candidates closely linked to Mexico's ruling party have swept every position on the nation's newly transformed Supreme Court, according to final results released Wednesday from the controversial judicial vote. The nine incoming justices on the high court have strong ties to the dominant Morena bloc headed by President Claudia Sheinbaum, and their election signals a radical shift in Mexico's balance of power. Among them is a new chief justice, Hugo Aguilar, who would become the country's first top jurist of Indigenous origin since the legendary Benito Juárez, who also served as president, more than a century and a half ago. Electoral regulators still must validate the vote, though that is viewed as a formality. The Supreme Court justices, along with almost 900 other newly elected federal jurists, are scheduled to take office Sept. 1. Mexican authorities have been tallying the results from Sunday's controversial national balloting — championed by Morena — in which only 13% of eligible voters went to the polls. Despite the paltry turnout, Sheinbaum has lauded the election as "marvelous" and "a great success." She has hailed the replacement of the entire federal judiciary as a victory of democracy over corruption and nepotism. Read more: Sheinbaum calls Mexico's judicial election 'extraordinary' despite turnout of less than 13% The president has been especially effusive about the likely emergence of a chief justice from one of Mexico's long-marginalized Indigenous communities. "It's a profound change," she said. Indigenous Mexicans, comprising about 10% of the population, have long been among the country's poorest residents and are often subject to racism. Some detractors have mocked the desire of Aguilar to don Indigenous dress instead of the traditional black robes. Sheinbaum said she supports his effort to honor his cultural roots. Mexico has became the first country worldwide to elect all of its judges, from Supreme Court justices down to thousands of local magistrates. Many independent observers have assailed the exercise as a triumph of politics over justice — and a potentially fatal blow for the separation of powers, a crucial pillar of democratic rule. "This is a setback for democracy in Mexico," said Stephanie Brewer, who heads the Mexico analysis section of the Washington Office on Latin America, a human rights research group. "When you have concentration of power over all three branches of government, you start to erode democratic rule." Sheinbaum's Morena party already has super-majorities in the Mexican Congress and dominates many state and local governments. Coparmex, a Mexican business group, said it had detected "multiple irregularities" in the vote and declared that the new judiciary could hamper investment in Mexico, the United States' leading trading partner. "Without independent justice, there is no sustainable investment," Coparmex said in a statement. "Mexico cannot aspire to progress without legality." Read more: Mexico judicial elections: Government calls it essential reform. Critics say it's a farce The revamped Supreme Court will have nine judges, compared to 11 in the current high court. The Supreme Court will also have reduced ability to challenge congressional and presidential actions. Sheinbaum has dismissed much of the the criticism of the election as "classism and racism," and has celebrated the rise of Aguilar, the apparent chief justice-elect, who hails from the Mixtec ethnic group in southern Oaxaca state. She accused opponents of fomenting "hate." Aguilar, who currently oversees human rights affairs for the government's National Institute of Indigenous Peoples, garnered 6 million votes, more than any other Supreme Court contender, results showed. Second highest in Supreme Court balloting was Lenia Batres Guardarrama, 5.7 million votes. From humble origins, Aguilar has said that a desire to defend Indigenous rights inspired him to study law. He has been widely praised for his legal acumen and dedication to the poor. "Hugo seems to be a brilliant lawyer," said Joaquín Galván, a human rights attorney in Oaxaca state. "But I would advise against idealizing him like he is the new Benito Juárez, or to say that—just because he is Indigenous—he cannot be criticized." Some critics have also accused Aguilar of selling out to win Indigenous support for controversial development projects promoted by former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, notably the $25-billion Maya Train, which some Indigenous groups resisted as destructive of the environment and of native communities. "Without doubt Aguilar has been a promoter and defender of the government of Morena," Galván said. Among the other candidates leading in the voting for seats on the Supreme Court are three sitting justices appointed by López Obrador, who founded Morena, and was Sheinbaum's mentor. Those three are: Batres, Yasim Esquivel and Loretta Ortiz. By law, the new court will be composed of five women and four men. For years, López Obrador battled with the country's Supreme Court about a number of contentious issues, notably his plan to overhaul the nation's electoral system. Nearing the end of his six-year term, he championed the controversial reform that led to Sunday's judicial overhaul. Special correspondent Cecilia Sánchez Vidal contributed. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal appeals court refuses to lift ruling halting mass layoffs at Department of Education
A federal appeals court declined on Wednesday to lift a judge's ruling that blocked the Trump administration from effectively shutting down the Department of Education. The unanimous decision from the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals is another significant legal setback for President Donald Trump, whose efforts to rapidly shrink the federal government – including through dismantling entire agencies – have been tied up in numerous court challenges. Cutting the Department of Education has been of particular interest to Trump in his second term. Earlier this year, he moved ahead with mass layoffs at the agency, which is tasked with distributing federal aid to schools, managing federal aid for college students and ensuring compliance with civil rights laws. The administration, 1st Circuit Chief Judge David Barron wrote for the panel, has not 'shown that the public's interest lies in permitting a major federal department to be unlawfully disabled from performing its statutorily assigned functions.' The court also said that the administration had not demonstrated that it was likely to ultimately win in the case, with Barron writing that Justice Department attorneys had not put forth evidence showing how the widespread layoffs at the department would not prevent it from carrying out its core functions. Last month, US District Judge Myong Joun of the federal court in Boston indefinitely halted Trump's plans to dismantle the agency and ordered the administration to reinstate employees who had been fired en masse. The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by a teachers' union, school districts, states and education groups. Noting that the department 'cannot be shut down without Congress's approval,' Joun, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, said that the planned layoffs at the agency 'will likely cripple' it. 'The record abundantly reveals that Defendants' true intention is to effectively dismantle the Department without an authorizing statute,' he wrote in the 88-page ruling. Attorneys for the Department of Justice quickly asked the Boston-based appeals court to pause Joun's ruling while they appealed it, writing in court papers that it 'represents an extraordinary incursion on the Executive Branch's authority to manage its workforce.' 'Beyond that, it requires the government to indefinitely retain and pay employees whose services it no longer requires, and the government cannot recoup those salaries if it prevails on appeal,' the DOJ attorneys wrote.
