Iran Threatens Response If US Crosses 'Red Line': Ambassador
The United States is "complicit" in Israel's strikes in Iran, Tehran's ambassador to the United Nations claimed Wednesday, vowing that his country would respond if Washington crosses a "red line".
After decades of enmity and a prolonged shadow war, Israel says its surprise air campaign that began on June 13 is aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons -- an ambition Tehran denies.
Iran said early Wednesday that it fired hypersonic missiles at Israel in the latest round of overnight strikes between the arch foes.
US President Donald Trump has said that Washington has played no part in the bombing campaign by its ally Israel, but has also warned Iran that his patience is wearing thin.
"We firmly believe that the United States is complicit in what Israel is doing," Iranian ambassador Ali Bahreini told a press conference.
"And at any time, at any point, if we come to the conclusion that the United States is directly involved in attacks against Iran, we will start responding to the United States."
He said Tehran was "vigilant" about Trump's "completely unwarranted" and "hostile" remarks.
"There is a line which, if crossed, there should be a response on our side... once the red line is crossed, the response will come," Bahreini said.
"We will respond strongly and we will stop aggression from any side, be it Israel or the United States," he told the UN correspondents' association.
"And we have given a message to the United States that we will respond very firmly and will stop the aggression by anybody -- including the United States.
Bahreini also said Tehran was "resolute in responding to Israeli attacks".
"We will respond very, very, very seriously and strongly, and that is what we are doing now. Nobody should expect Iran to show any kind of restraint," he said.
He also criticised the attitude of Western and European nations.
"Not only they are not condemning the attacks and aggression, they are trying to justify the aggression," he said.
Addressing the UN Human Rights Council on Wednesday, Bahreini issued a warning to Israel's allies.
"The Israeli regime's supporters, and the United States at the forefront, should know that supporting this regime means directly supporting international humanitarian and human rights law violations," he said. Iran said early Wednesday it had fired more missiles at Israel in the latest round of overnight strikes AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump's 'Short Attention Span' Led to Changes to NATO Summit to Avoid Any 'Truth Social Bombshells,' Diplomats Say
Next week's NATO summit in The Hague will be brief compared to past events, with organizers reportedly tailoring the agenda to President Donald Trump's limited focus . Typically structured around multiple long strategy sessions, this year's gathering has been slimmed down to a single 2.5-hour meeting. The summit communiqué, which often runs dozens of paragraphs, will reportedly fit on one sheet of A4 paper—just five paragraphs long. "It is about keeping the summit focused, short and sweet," an NATO diplomat told The Times anonymously. "Trump can be impatient and has said it himself—[he has] a short attention span. The shorter the better." Behind the scenes, officials are determined to avoid the kind of diplomatic blowups that have followed previous summits, where Trump has stormed out early or lashed out on social media. "Will there be a late night or early morning Truth Social bombshell if he has a summit snit?" one alliance diplomat mused. Trump's impatience was on display this week when he departed the G7 summit a day early, despite reports that that the agenda was similarly tailored with the goal of capturing Trump's engagement. Time normally dedicated to group sessions was cleared for one-on-ones, and brief written statements replaced a longer summit communique. The NATO summit will have a laser-tight focus on a single goal: getting members to commit to a new defense spending target. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, the former Dutch prime minister, is aiming for defense spending at 5% of GDP — 3.5% in core military spending and 1.5% in broader defense-related budgets. The target date remains under debate, with the U.S. calling for 2032, while U.K. Labour leader Keir Starmer prefers a less aggressive rollout by 2035. The spending pledge is expected to be framed as a personal victory for Trump, who has long blasted allies for failing to pay their share for collective defense. Trump will not hold a press conference with Rutte—a departure from tradition that further signals the alliance's desire to keep the event as tightly controlled and drama-free as possible. Originally published on Latin Times
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Nippon, US Steel Say They Have Completed Partnership Deal
Nippon Steel and US Steel announced Wednesday they have completed a partnership deal in which the US government will essentially have veto power over significant decisions affecting US jobs. The agreement modifies a transaction originally announced in December 2023 in which Nippon Steel of Japan had agreed to acquire US Steel for $14.9 billion. But the outright acquisition of the iconic US company sparked bipartisan political opposition, including from President Donald Trump, whose administration worked with the companies on a revamped deal in which the US government will have a "golden share" of the company that gives it a say on Nippon's plans for the assets. Trump, who railed against the proposed deal throughout the 2024 presidential campaign, last month announced a pivot he described in a May 23 social media post as a "planned partnership" in which Nippon pledged to invest billions of dollars and retain its headquarters in Pittsburgh. On Wednesday, US Steel filed a notice with US securities regulators to delist its shares on the New York Stock Exchange. The NYSE halted trading, pointing to a "merger effective" order. "The Companies have now completed the transaction as contemplated by their merger agreement," Nippon and US Steel said in a joint press release. "The Companies have also entered into a National Security Agreement with the US Government, and US Steel will issue a Golden Share to the US Government." Under the December 2023 transaction, Nippon agreed to pay $55 per share for US Steel, an all-cash deal that included a 40 percent premium. While the transaction included a pledge to maintain the name US Steel and the company's Pittsburgh headquarters, industry watchers expected an exodus of US Steel executives. But after the deal sparked opposition from the United Steelworkers Union and a broad range of politicians, including then president Joe Biden and former Ohio senator JD Vance -- now Trump's vice president -- Nippon stepped up its lobbying efforts in Washington and Pittsburgh to win support for the transaction. In early January, shortly before leaving office, Biden blocked the transaction, saying that placing "one of America's largest steel producers under foreign control and create risk for our national security and our critical supply chains." But backers of the deal had been hoping the shift in political climate following the presidential election might revive the deal's prospect. Besides agreeing to the Pittsburgh headquarters and to maintaining US production, the revamped deal's National Security Agreement calls for a majority of the US Steel's board to be US citizens and for key leaders, including the CEO, to be US citizens. The US government's "golden share" will allow it the right to appoint one independent director and grant it consent rights for proposed capital budget cuts, the redomiciling of activities outside the United States and on acquisitions in the United States. "I am delighted that we have made this day a reality," said Nippon Vice Chairman Takahiiro Mori, who will serve as Chairman of US Steel. "We share President Trump's commitment to protect the future of the American steel industry, American workers, and American national security, and we look forward to building a stronger and brighter future for US Steel." Representatives of the US Steelworkers Union did not immediately reply to a request for comment. But USW expressed deep skepticism in a message to members on Sunday, saying the deal appeared to be "no more than smoke screen to allow a wholly owned privately held subsidiary of a Japanese corporation to be called 'American.'"
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
LAPD Caught in the 'Crossfire' After Being Hit by LASD's Tear Gas, Rubber Bullets While Trying to Break Up 'No Kings' Protest
What began as a peaceful protest in downtown Los Angeles turned chaotic when LAPD officers were accidentally hit by tear gas and rubber bullets fired by sheriff's deputies during attempts to break up a " No Kings " rally. On Saturday, more than 30,000 demonstrators gathered at Grand Park to denounce President Donald Trump's policies during a coordinated "No Kings" protest. Although the rally began with music, speeches and organized marches, tensions rose as evening approached, and law enforcement began preparing to clear the area ahead of curfew. While attempting to disperse protesters near LA City Hall, LAPD officers coordinating with LASD deputies suddenly found themselves under fire, not from demonstrators, but from fellow law enforcement, according to LA Public Press . Tear gas canisters, rubber bullets and other less-lethal rounds were deployed by sheriff's deputies without realizing LAPD officers were in the line of fire. Police scanner audio captured at 4:55 p.m. reveals an LAPD officer shouting over the radio for LASD to "hold your goddamn crossfire," adding the code "blue blue" to indicate friendly fire. Despite repeated warnings and escalating pleas over the radio, the situation continued to deteriorate. In one instance, an LAPD officer took cover behind a City Hall pillar after being hit by a tear gas canister. Another was seen kicking the smoking canister away as visibility vanished in clouds of gas. Video footage and a livestream of police communications confirmed the events, while viral social media posts, first amplified by Los Angeles Alerts, showed deputies firing toward a crowd that included members of the media and uniformed LAPD officers. While LASD released a statement denying knowledge of any friendly fire, LAPD has yet to confirm whether any of its officers were injured. One civilian was hospitalized after being struck in the head by a rubber bullet. Originally published on Latin Times
