
Trump judicial nominee pressured DOJ to defy court on deportations, whistleblower says
WASHINGTON, June 24 (Reuters) - A top U.S. Justice Department official tapped by President Donald Trump to serve as an appellate judge profanely pressured department attorneys to defy court orders to carry out mass deportations of people living in the U.S. illegally, according to a whistleblower complaint seen by Reuters on Tuesday.
The complaint against Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, which was first reported by the New York Times, was made public the day before Bove is due to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee for a hearing on his nomination to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
It was submitted to the Justice Department's Inspector General by Erez Reuveni, the former acting deputy director for the Office of Immigration Litigation, who was fired in April after he admitted in a court hearing that the federal government made a mistake when it deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador.
Current department officials dismissed Reuveni's statements as false, describing him as a disgruntled former employee. Bove, who served as one of Trump's defense attorneys, could not immediately be reached for comment.
In his complaint, Reuveni said that during a March 14 meeting with senior officials, Bove told them that the government planned to deport migrants over the weekend under an 18th Century wartime powers law known as the Alien Enemies Act on one or more scheduled flights. Bove told them the planes "needed to take off no matter what," the complaint alleged.
Bove allegedly predicted that a court might try to block the removals before they could be carried out. Bove stated that "DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'fuck you' and ignore any such court order," the complaint alleged.
"Mr. Reuveni was in disbelief, because, on the contrary, the Department of Justice consistently advises its clients of their obligation to follow court orders, not to ignore them," the complaint said.
The next day, U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg temporarily blocked the deportations. When Boasberg inquired about the status of the flights, another department official who was present during the March 14 meeting with Bove claimed he did not know the status of the planes, the complaint alleged.
That statement was "false," the complaint said. Two planes carrying migrants deported under the wartime powers law arrived in El Salvador that day and were placed into Salvadoran custody.
Boasberg demanded that the government explain its actions. In its written response, which was signed by multiple lawyers including both Bove and Reuveni, the department denied violating the order, saying the planes had taken off before the court's injunction was issued.
Boasberg later found probable cause to hold the government in criminal contempt and launched an investigation to determine who was responsible. A federal appeals court has paused that ruling.
Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general who worked with Bove on Trump's defense team, said in a statement that the claims against Bove were made by a "disgruntled former employee" who "leaked to the press in violation of ethical obligations."
"The claims about Department of Justice leadership and the Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General are utterly false," Blanche said in a statement to Reuters.
Reuveni and his attorneys at the Government Accountability Project could not immediately be reached for further comment.
U.S. Senator Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a statement that Bove has "abused his position in numerous ways" and implored his Republican colleagues not to "turn a blind eye to the dire consequences of confirming Mr. Bove to a lifetime position as a circuit court judge.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
US will not sanction Russia yet, Rubio tells Politico
June 25 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Politico that the United States will not impose further sanctions on Russia yet, and still wants room to negotiate a peace deal. "If we did what everybody here wants us to do, and that is come in and crush them with more sanctions, we probably lose our ability to talk to them about the ceasefire and then who's talking to them?," Rubio told Politico in an interview on the sidelines of the NATO summit. Rubio added that President Donald Trump will "know the right time and place" for new economic measures against Russia, and that the administration is working with Congress to make sure they allow Trump the appropriate flexibility, Politico reported. "If there's an opportunity for us to make a difference and get them (Russia) to the table, we're going to take it," Rubio said.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: Trump doubles down on 'obliteration' of Iranian nuclear facilities in US strikes despite intel leak
At the NATO summit, Donald Trump has again rejected reports that US intelligence is suggesting strikes on Iran didn't destroy nuclear sites. He also says the Israel-Iran ceasefire is "going well". Listen to the latest episode of The World below as you scroll.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Trump should not defy judges' orders, Americans say
M ost Americans believe President Trump has crossed the line with his criticism of the US court system and should not be allowed to defy judges' orders, polling for The Times shows. After the president warned that 'nothing will stop me' and attacked 'communist radical-left judges' for trying to curb his power, a poll by Public First found that 56 per cent of respondents agreed that Trump had gone too far in his criticism, compared with 21 per cent who disagreed. However, Trump retains support from those who voted for him last year. Among this group, only 30 per cent believed Trump had gone too far, with 42 per cent disagreeing. Across both parties, most Americans believed that Trump should follow court rulings. Both Trump and Harris voters disagreed with the statement 'the president should be able to ignore rulings from the Supreme Court that go against their campaign pledges.'