Western premiers to finish talks on trade, Arctic security in Yellowknife
YELLOWKNIFE - Premiers from Western Canada are scheduled to wrap up a two-day conference in Yellowknife.
The annual meeting of leaders from British Columbia, the Prairie provinces and the northern territories comes two weeks before all Canada's premiers are to gather with Prime Minister Mark Carney in Saskatoon.
Northwest Territories Premier R.J. Simpson's office has said the western premiers are talking about trade, Arctic sovereignty and energy security.
Also on the agenda are emergency preparedness, housing and economic corridors.
Alberta's Premier Danielle Smith had said she would be advocating for new pipelines, while Saskatchewan's Scott Moe pledged to form a united front to press Carney on strengthening the Criminal Code.
B.C. Premier David Eby has lamented recent talk of western separatism.
A media availability scheduled for Thursday afternoon marks the end of the conference.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 22, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
11 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote
VIENNA (AP) — Iran's nuclear program remains a top focus for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, particularly as any possible deal between Tehran and the United States over the program would likely rely on the agency long known as the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. This week, Western nations will push for a measure at the IAEA's Board of Governors censuring Iran over its noncompliance with inspectors, pushing the matter before the U.N. Security Council. Barring any deal with Washington, Iran then could face what's known as 'snapback' — the reimposition of all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. All this sets the stage for a renewed confrontation with Iran as the Mideast remains inflamed by Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip . And the IAEA's work in any case will make the Vienna-based agency a key player. Here's more to know about the IAEA, its inspections of Iran and the deals — and dangers — at play. Atoms for peace The IAEA was created in 1957. The idea for it grew out of a 1953 speech given by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the U.N., in which he urged the creation of an agency to monitor the world's nuclear stockpiles to ensure that 'the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life.' Broadly speaking, the agency verifies the reported stockpiles of member nations. Those nations are divided into three categories. The vast majority are nations with so-called 'comprehensive safeguards agreements' with the IAEA, states without nuclear weapons that allow IAE monitoring over all nuclear material and activities. Then there's the 'voluntary offer agreements' with the world's original nuclear weapons states — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. — typically for civilian sites. Finally, the IAEA has 'item-specific agreements' with India, Israel and Pakistan — nuclear-armed countries that haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea, which is also nuclear armed, said it has withdrawn from the treaty, though that's disputed by some experts. The collapse of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord , insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land . Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. IAEA inspections and Iran Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility. The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images. In the years since Trump's 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage . It's also removed cameras . At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates , something the agency disputed. The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn't granted that, it also hasn't entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran's wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West. What happens next Iran and the U.S. have gone through five rounds of negotiations over a possible deal, with talks mediated by the sultanate of Oman . Iran appears poised to reject an American proposal over a deal this week, potentially as soon as Tuesday. Without a deal with the U.S., Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a freefall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Experts fear Tehran in response could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. If a deal is reached — or at least a tentative understanding between the two sides — that likely will take the pressure off for an immediate military strike by the U.S. Gulf Arab states, which opposed Obama's negotiations with Iran in 2015, now welcome the talks under Trump. Any agreement would require the IAEA's inspectors to verify Iran's compliance. But Israel, which has struck at Iranian-backed militants across the region, remains a wildcard on what it could do. Last year, it carried out its first military airstrikes on Iran — and has warned it is willing to take action alone to target Tehran's program, like it has in the past in Iraq in 1981 or Syria in 2007. ___ Associated Press writer Stephanie Liechtenstein contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation . The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dan Patrick on THC ban, school choice + more in Abilene
ABILENE, Texas () – Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick is touring the state following the conclusion of the legislative session, making a stop at Abilene Regional Airport. During his visit, he outlined key legislative developments and their impact on everyday Texans. GALLERY: Severe storms cause damage in north Abilene, across Big Country Patrick also took a moment to acknowledge the recent severe storms that swept through the Big Country. 'I'm glad to know that there were no serious injuries or deaths last night. I know there was some damage,' Patrick expressed. 'Some pretty bad weather rumbled through Texas, and we're glad that's behind us.' One of the top issues Patrick discussed was education, beginning with property tax relief and teacher pay raises. He explained that when school property taxes are reduced, the state must fill that funding gap. This session, the Texas Legislature will cover $51 billion in school property taxes. 'If you're over 65 and you're the average senior, you won't have any more school taxes to pay ever again as long as you live. If you're under 65, your taxes will be down about 50% on average from just several years ago,' Patrick shared. Big Country Politics: School vouchers & teacher raises under the microscope An additional $8.5 billion was allocated to public education, with nearly half dedicated to boosting teacher salaries. Rural teachers will also see a specific increase to help close the pay gap between urban and rural districts. 'The most valuable asset, the key to your child's or grandchild's education, is a great teacher. In the past, teachers just haven't been getting the benefits of all the money we spent on public education,' Patrick explained. Patrick also addressed a new law requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments in classrooms. The posters can be donated by churches, businesses, or individuals, and schools will be obligated to display them. 'The values are the basis for all Western civilization,' Patrick expressed. BCP: Lt. Governor Dan Patrick shares insight on hot-button topic senate bills In addition, legislation was passed to provide private time for students who wish to pray. 'We're not compelling anyone to pray in school, but we're giving anyone who wants to pray private time,' Patrick said. Patrick emphasized efforts to remove what he referred to as 'wokeness' from public schools. That includes a ban on DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programs and prohibiting individuals assigned male at birth from participating in women's sports. 'We've also continued to get the wokeness out of schools… DEI and other issues that were distracting students from the main goal to learn and to get a great education,' Patrick shared. Lambert backs $7.7B school bill, explains why he voted for vouchers Patrick also promoted the new school voucher-style program, recently signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott. The law allocates billions toward public education while allowing up to 100,000 students to apply for funding to attend the school of their choice. 'They can go into a system and apply. It'll be a lottery system where we'll accept up to 100,000 children to go to the school of their choice. The state will provide funding for that,' Patrick explained. 'A colossal mistake': Abilene ISD superintendent criticizes Texas' new education voucher law Patrick also touched on the claim that school choice undermines public education, saying that's far from the case. 'They said that about homeschooling… They said that about charter schools, and now they've said it about school choice,' Patrick said. 'Just so you have a comparison, we will spend a billion dollars on school choice per year, and we'll spend somewhere around $40 billion on public schools… There's no competition there.' Turning to student safety, Patrick expressed concern over vape and THC products sold near schools, sharing that seven students were hospitalized at a graduation after consuming gummies reportedly bought from a smoke shop. '8,000 smoke shops have opened up within 1,000 to 2,00 feet of a school… Police want it banned, every doctor that testified wanted it banned, and the testimony from parents was just horrendous,' Patrick shared. Saying Goodbye to the High: Bill could outlaw THC products in Abilene, sparking local outcry Despite concerns about a black market, Patrick stood firm on the need for a ban. 'Our job as elected officials is to ensure the health and safety of our citizens. THC, no one knows what's in it… This is not the pot that people smoked 20 years ago. It's four to five times more powerful; you can't control it. The only thing you can do is ban it,' Patrick shared. However, he clarified that Texans can still access medical THC through the state's Compassionate Use Program. 'Whether it's cancer, PTSD, chronic pain, whatever it may be, that program is the legal way to do it,' Patrick said. Patrick highlighted significant investments in infrastructure, including $3 billion for water and $5 billion for power improvements. Energy fuels Abilene's future — and it's just the beginning He also addressed law enforcement and border security, emphasizing the need for legal immigration while targeting and blocking criminal elements. 'A lot of people are coming for the American dream, but a lot of criminals and gang members are coming. We don't want those. People who want the American dream, we need a legal process for people to come here legally,' Patrick said. Additionally, $350 million was invested to raise pay for rural law enforcement officers. 'Sheriffs just couldn't make enough money to keep people who want to be in law enforcement in rural Texas, so now we've increased sheriffs' pay up to $75,000,' Patrick shared. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Carney says Canada will meet 2% NATO spending target by March
Saying that the era of the United States' dominance on the world stage is over, Prime Minister Mark Carney committed his government on Monday to meeting the NATO benchmark target of two per cent of the country's gross domestic product by the end of the current fiscal year in March. The prime minister outlined his vision of Canada moving more closely toward European allies in a speech in Toronto. "We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a dominant role on the world stage. Today, that dominance is a thing of the past," Carney told an audience of foreign policy thinkers, national security officials and defence industry business leaders on Monday morning. Carney said the world is at a turning point — a hinge moment — and that it's time for Canada to chart its own path."The United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security," Carney said. "In parallel, the world's trade routes, allegiances, energy systems and even intelligence itself are being rewired. Rising great powers are now in strategic competition with America. A new imperialism threatens. Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu." Carney reiterated pledges made during the election campaign to rearm the Canadian military with new submarines, armoured vehicles, drones and other technology. He provided no additional specifics during the speech. Much of the new $9.3 billion in defence spending is foundational, allowing the military to increase recruitment, give current soldiers a pay raise and set the stage for major equipment purchases — as well as an expansion of the Canadian defence industry. WATCH | Carney's full speech: There was speculation that the Liberal government would fold the Canadian Coast Guard entirely into the Department of National Defence — something other countries do. The coast guard is currently a special operating agency under the Fisheries Department with an annual budget of $2.5 billion. At a technical briefing for the media, senior defence officials said the coast guard would remain where it was and there would be no need to arm the civilian agency. However, senior federal officials insisted a more fundamental reorganization of the service would take place. One of the biggest questions on the minds of the opposition parties, whom Carney called to support the plan, was how the dramatic increase would impact the federal budget. Carney said the government would not raise taxes, but acknowledged some cuts would be made elsewhere within the federal more fundamental, defence expert Dave Perry said, is that the Defence Department has had trouble in the past being able to spend additional money. "I think the Government of Canada now has to actually try to come to grips with whether or not it can actually move this money that the prime minister talked about this morning," said Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, who's spent more than decade tracking defence spending. "If bureaucracy proceeds like normal, the way it has been over the past decade and a bit, this money is unlikely to be spent. We're going to have to actually see concrete change across the Canadian government." Federal ministers have been quietly signalling the pathway to a two per cent commitment for the last couple of weeks. The former head of NATO, George Robertson, speaking on CBC's Rosemary Barton Live on June 1, said Industry Minister Mélanie Joly had assured him that Canada would reach the alliance goal, which was first agreed upon in 2014, by the end of the year. Last week, at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Defence Minister David McGuinty signalled Carney would address Canada's defence spending targets before the upcoming leaders' summit in The the two per cent NATO target would require an investment of between $18 billion and $20 billion. In his speech, Carney said Canada will sign on to NATO's defence industrial pledge. Last year, NATO said it wanted its members to develop national plans to bolster the capacity of their individual defence industry sectors, a concept Canada has struggled with — or avoided outright — for decades. "Our goal is tangible commitments from our allies to provide NATO with the necessary resolve to deter aggression and protect against all adversaries in all domains," Carney said. "Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants." Canada under former prime minister Justin Trudeau faced regular criticism from allies for not meeting NATO's current target of two per cent of GDP. The dispute became public at last year's leaders' summit in Washington when members of the U.S. Congress from both sides of the aisle called out Canada for not having a plan to meet the goal, unlike all other allies.
