
The new US-backed Gaza aid plan and why the UN doesn't like it
UNITED NATIONS, - A U.S.-backed organization aims to start work in the Gaza Strip by the end of May overseeing a new model of aid distribution in the Palestinian enclave, but the United Nations says the plan is not impartial or neutral, and it won't be involved.
WHAT IS THE GAZA HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION?
Aid deliveries in Gaza will be overseen by the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which was established in February in Switzerland, according to the Geneva commercial registry.
The foundation intends to work with private U.S. security and logistics firms - UG Solutions and Safe Reach Solutions - according to a source familiar with the plan. A second source familiar with the plan said the GHF has already received more than $100 million in commitments. It was not immediately clear where the money was coming from.
Senior U.S. officials were working with Israel to enable the GHF to start work, acting U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Dorothy Shea told the Security Council earlier this month, urging the U.N. and aid groups to cooperate. Israel has said it will allow the foundation's work without being involved in aid deliveries.
HOW WOULD THE NEW PLAN WORK?
According to a GHF document circulating among the aid community earlier this month, the foundation would initially operate from four "secure distribution sites" that could each serve 300,000 people with food, water and hygiene kits. Israeli officials have said those hubs would be in Gaza's south.
The private U.S. companies would transport the aid into Gaza to the hubs where it would be then distributed by aid groups - not the private companies, the first source said. Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon has said a few aid groups have agreed to work with the GHF. The names of those groups are not yet known.
Israel has agreed to expand the number of distribution sites and find ways for aid to get to civilians who are unable to reach a distribution site, the foundation has said.
The foundation has asked Israel's military to identify "locations in northern Gaza capable of hosting GHF operated secure distribution sites that can be made operational within 30 days." GHF has also said it would not share any personally identifiable information of aid recipients with Israel.
WHY WON'T THE U.N. WORK WITH THE NEW DISTRIBUTION MODEL? The United Nations says the U.S.-backed distribution plan does not meet its long-held principles of impartiality, neutrality and independence. U.N. aid chief Tom Fletcher has said time should not be wasted on the alternative proposal. In a briefing to the Security Council, he explained what was wrong with the Israel-initiated plan: "It forces further displacement. It exposes thousands of people to harm ... It restricts aid to only one part of Gaza, while leaving other dire needs unmet. It makes aid conditional on political and military aims. It makes starvation a bargaining chip."
WHY HAS AN ALTERNATIVE AID DISTRIBUTION PLAN BEEN PROPOSED? Israel stopped all aid deliveries to Gaza on March 2 after accusing Hamas of stealing aid, which the Palestinian militants deny, and demanding the release of all remaining hostages taken during an October 2023 attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people, according to Israeli tallies. That assault triggered the war, which Gaza authorities say has killed 53,000 people. In early April, Israel proposed what it described as "a structured monitoring and aid entry mechanism" for Gaza. It was swiftly rejected by U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who said it risked "further controlling and callously limiting aid down to the last calorie and grain of flour."
Since then pressure had been growing on Israel to allow aid deliveries to resume. A global hunger monitor last week warned that half a million people face starvation - about a quarter of the population in the enclave - and U.S. President Donald Trump acknowledged that "a lot of people are starving in Gaza."
Amid the stalemate over Israel's plan, Washington backed the newly-created GHF to oversee aid distribution. The GHF then announced last week that it aims to start work in Gaza by the end of May. In the meantime, Israel has allowed limited aid deliveries to resume under the existing distribution model - with five trucks entering Gaza on Monday, which Fletcher described as "a drop in the ocean." The U.N. said on Tuesday it has received Israeli approval for about 100 more aid trucks to enter Gaza.
WHAT WAS THE EXISTING AID DELIVERY PLAN?
Throughout the conflict, the United Nations has described its humanitarian operation in Gaza as opportunistic - facing problems with Israel's military operation, access restrictions by Israel into and throughout Gaza and looting by armed gangs.
But the U.N. has said its aid distribution system works and that was particularly proven during a two-month ceasefire, which was abandoned by Israel in mid-March. Israel would first inspect and approve aid. It was then dropped off on the Gaza side of the border, where it was picked up by the U.N. and distributed.
"We can go back to that system. We have wheels that turn. We do not need to reinvent yet another wheel," U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said on Monday. "We don't need a newly minted humanitarian partner to tell us how to do our work in Gaza."
Fletcher on Monday listed what the U.N. needs from Israel to scale up aid: at least two open crossings into Gaza - one in the north and one in the south; simplified, expedited procedures; no quotas; no access impediments in Gaza and no attacks when aid is being delivered; and being allowed to meet a range of needs, including food, water, hygiene, shelter, health, fuel and gas.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Israeli forces storm & seize Greta Thunberg's Gaza boat, white ‘chemical substance' sprayed
Activist Greta Thunberg urged her friends and family to campaign for her return in a pre-recorded message released after she and her colleagues were detained by the Israeli military in the process of blocking their Gaza-bound aid boat. Watch for all the updates.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Pakistan's delegation in U.K. following talks in U.S. over conflict with India
Pakistan's high-level delegation led by former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has arrived in the U.K. following diplomatic engagements in New York over the recent military conflict with India, a media report said. The nine-member group on Sunday (June 8, 2025) held talks with United Nations representatives, diplomats from member states, and senior U.S. officials to present Pakistan's narrative on the conflict following the Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives, The Express Tribune reported. In response to the Pahalgam terror attack, India targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, following which Islamabad resorted to military action, leading to clashes between the two countries' military. 'Our message was clear – Pakistan seeks peace,' former foreign secretary Jalil Abbas Jilani, a member of the delegation, said in Islamabad. Mr. Jilani said Islamabad sought the resolution of all issues, including the Indus Waters Treaty, through dialogue. Speaking to the media, lawmaker Khurram Dastgir highlighted the regional impact of the water dispute and called for the restoration of the 1960 World Bank-mediated treaty, which India said remained in abeyance until Islamabad ended its support for cross-border terrorism. 'We explained to U.S. officials that India's suspension of the treaty endangers the livelihood of 240 million people and undermines the region's stability,' he said. Mr. Dastgir stressed the water dispute was a matter of survival for Pakistan, asserting the country would not compromise on it. He pointed out that the Americans initially assumed the ceasefire brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump required no further involvement. "Our mission was to make them understand that intervention is necessary as India wants neither a neutral inquiry nor talks," he said. Mr. Trump claimed to have played a role in stopping hostilities between India and Pakistan following the Pahalgam attack, a claim rejected by India. New Delhi has rejected a third-party intervention on bilateral issues with Islamabad. Senator Sherry Rehman, another member of the group, said the mission was focused on advocating for peace and ensuring the water treaty and Kashmir issue remained on the international agenda. In the U.K., the delegation is expected to meet senior British officials to highlight Pakistan's stance on the conflict and its broader implications. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy recently visited both Islamabad and New Delhi. 'We want stability, but recognise the fragility of the situation, particularly in the context of terrorism,' Mr. Lammy had said in Pakistan.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Rattled with Indus Waters Treaty suspension, Pakistan delegation talks 'peace' in US: ‘Endangers livelihood'
Days after India sent across its stern message against terrorism peddled by Islamabad, Pakistan, copying New Delhi's idea, has sent its delegation to the United Kingdom. The visit follows the Bilawal Bhutto Zardari-led delegation's diplomatic engagements in New York over the recent military conflict with India. The nine-strong group held talks with the United Nations on Sunday, along with the diplomats from member states, and senior US officials to present Pakistan's narrative on the conflict following the Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives. India has punished Pakistan for the terror attack as it put in abeyance the Indus Waters Treaty. It later attacked and demolished nine terror bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir. Pakistan's armed forces triggered an armed conflict with India by targeting the latter's civilian areas and military installations. Also read: 'World now knows the truth': Shashi Tharoor-led delegation on Operation Sindoor wraps up US visit The conflict came to an end after four days, with India attacking Pakistan's strategic air bases and the latter's DGMO urging peace from his Indian counterpart. Former Pakistani foreign secretary, Jalil Abbas Jilani, a member of the delegation, was quoted as saying by PTI, citing Express Tribune, that Pakistan's message was peace. "Our message was clear – Pakistan seeks peace," he said. Jilani said Islamabad sought the resolution of all issues, including the Indus Waters Treaty, through dialogue. India has maintained that the only dialogue it can hold with Pakistan would be on the topics of terrorism and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Also read: Delegation led by Shashi Tharoor meets US Vice President JD Vance Speaking to the media, lawmaker Khurram Dastgir highlighted the regional impact of the water dispute and called for the restoration of the treaty. "We explained to US officials that India's suspension of the treaty endangers the livelihood of 240 million people and undermines the region's stability,' he said. Dastgir stressed the water dispute was a matter of survival for Pakistan, asserting the country would not compromise on it. He claimed the Americans initially assumed the ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump required no further involvement. "Our mission was to make them understand that intervention is necessary as India wants neither a neutral inquiry nor talks," Dastgir said. Also read: India-US trade negotiations hit top gear, American delegation extends Delhi stay India has rejected Trump's claim that the US brokered the peace. Senator Sherry Rehman, another member of the group, said the mission was focused on advocating for peace and ensuring the water treaty and Kashmir issue remained on the international agenda. Several Indians delegations visited a host of countries across the world to apprise them about Pakistan's nefarious support to cross-border terrorism. With inputs from PTI