‘Living through hell': Coalition pledge to rescue jailed Australians
A new high-level position of special envoy for hostage affairs would be created if the Coalition wins the May 3 election to advocate for Australians jailed overseas on flimsy or politically motivated charges.
The pledge to take more assertive action to tackle 'hostage diplomacy' has been welcomed by Kylie Moore-Gilbert, an Australian academic who was held and imprisoned in Iran from 2018 to 2020 after being falsely charged with espionage.
She and other former detainees believe the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade's preference for 'quiet diplomacy' can be overly cautious and that raising the profile of Australians detained overseas could, in certain circumstances, help secure their release.
'Thankfully, following the determined efforts of successive governments, most, like Dr Kylie-Moore-Gilbert, Cheng Lei, and Professor Sean Turnell have been returned home to Australia from Iran, China, and Myanmar, respectively,' opposition foreign affairs spokesman David Coleman said.
'However, their release came only after years of having to endure circumstances which are difficult for anyone to comprehend, with little or no access to health care, contact with loved ones, lawyers and in some cases, no access to Australian officials.'
Loading
Coleman said several Australians were still trapped in terrible conditions in overseas prisons, including engineer Robert Pether, who has been detained in Iraq for four years, and Gordon Ng, who is detained in Hong Kong under strict national security laws.
Chinese-Australian academic and blogger Yang Hengjun has also been detained in China since 2019 and sentenced to a suspended death penalty, he added.
The Coalition will immediately move to establish the position if elected and would appoint a senior, respected figure to the role. They would report directly to the foreign minister, bypassing DFAT's bureaucratic structure.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
22 minutes ago
- The Age
Australia thinks of itself as an international player. Trump delivered a reality check
Calgary: Donald Trump's decision to leave the G7 summit in Canada a day early and skip meetings with world leaders, including Anthony Albanese, is a blow to the Australian prime minister. It's also a reminder that while Australia does get to sit at the top table of international diplomacy, sometimes, we are still, at most, a middle-ranking power. Trump's decision is not a personal snub of the Australian prime minister. The US president was also set to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. They are all likely to miss out on one-on-one meetings. But the cancellation matters to Australia because this is a transactional president who relies heavily on personal relationships and seemingly likes nothing more than doing deals face-to-face. Albanese knows this, which is why he was keen to get the first meeting done and kick-start that personal, leader-to-leader relationship. The cancellation means that question marks will continue to hang over the future of the AUKUS submarine deal, which is currently under review, for at least another month. It means Albanese will not be able to make his case in person for the deal to continue or to outline Australia's increased defence spending commitments which still fall short of the 3.5 per cent of GDP Washington wants Canberra to spend. For Australian manufacturers, it means Trump's 50 per cent tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium will remain in place. In a piece of exquisite timing, Trump's reason for leaving early was announced by press secretary Karoline Leavitt on X while Albanese was holding a press conference about the much-hyped meeting.

Sydney Morning Herald
23 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australia thinks of itself as an international player. Trump delivered a reality check
Calgary: Donald Trump's decision to leave the G7 summit in Canada a day early and skip meetings with world leaders, including Anthony Albanese, is a blow to the Australian prime minister. It's also a reminder that while Australia does get to sit at the top table of international diplomacy, sometimes, we are still, at most, a middle-ranking power. Trump's decision is not a personal snub of the Australian prime minister. The US president was also set to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. They are all likely to miss out on one-on-one meetings. But the cancellation matters to Australia because this is a transactional president who relies heavily on personal relationships and seemingly likes nothing more than doing deals face-to-face. Albanese knows this, which is why he was keen to get the first meeting done and kick-start that personal, leader-to-leader relationship. The cancellation means that question marks will continue to hang over the future of the AUKUS submarine deal, which is currently under review, for at least another month. It means Albanese will not be able to make his case in person for the deal to continue or to outline Australia's increased defence spending commitments which still fall short of the 3.5 per cent of GDP Washington wants Canberra to spend. For Australian manufacturers, it means Trump's 50 per cent tariffs on Australian steel and aluminium will remain in place. In a piece of exquisite timing, Trump's reason for leaving early was announced by press secretary Karoline Leavitt on X while Albanese was holding a press conference about the much-hyped meeting.


West Australian
27 minutes ago
- West Australian
AARON PATRICK: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's long trip to nowhere
Anthony Albanese no longer talks to people like a regular person. He 'engages' with them. In Canada, after a build up worthy of the 1986 Mikhail Gorbachev-Ronald Reagan Reykjavík summit, the engagement was off. Which was awkward for the prime minister. Some 30 minutes earlier, Tuesday morning, Australian time, he explained to the journalists travelling with him — who were really only interested in the drama of Mr Albanese's first face time with Mr Trump; call it a first date, if you must — the conversations he had to prepare for the 20-minute meeting. 'I of course have engaged with Ambassador [Kevin] Rudd, as one for example who has, I think, an extraordinary capacity in terms of his skills and knowledge of the United States system,' he said. 'I've engaged with others as well across the political spectrum and that is something that I do, as well as engaging with, yes, I've engaged with people like Greg Norman.' Mr Rudd, possibly the Australian disliked most by the Trump White House, might have used his exquisite knowledge of US and international affairs to warn Mr Rudd that a war raging in the Middle East might bump a meeting with the Australian prime minister off the president's Group of 7 'engagement' dance card. Instead, Mr Albanese tried to come across as resolute and independent. He or his staff briefed reporters the prime minister would push back on a US request to increase defence spending by 75 per cent, by emphasising the Australian bases used by American submarines, warships and marines. Instead of haggling over military budgets, Mr Albanese intended to steer the conversation to two hostile acts of the Trump administration: placing steep tariffs on steel and beef, and tacitly threating to end the AUKUS nuclear-submarine pact through a review led by a Pentagon sceptic. Protecting AUKUS now seems to fall to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who received the kind of Trump love that Mr Albanese could only fantasise about. 'We've become friends in a short period of time,' the president said. 'He's slightly more liberal than I am.' Asked about the submarine pact, Sir Keir said: 'It's a really important deal.' Mr Trump replied, not entirely convincing: 'Yes, we're proceeding with that.' Not present, Mr Albanese was relegated to repeating banal talking points while his government's most important defence policy is in danger of being killed by friendly fire. 'The sum of one plus one plus one sometimes equals more than three,' he said. Although it was never explicitly stated, there was an expectation that if the Alberta encounter went well, Mr Albanese might have been invited to fly onto Washington to 'engage' with the president in the Oval Office. As long as he was not turned on, which is always possible, it would have been a triumphant moment for Mr Albanese: a demonstration of his international relations prowess to add to his domestic political dominance. Now the prime minister will have to skulk back to Canberra with little more than vague promises of cooperating on military equipment with Europe and Canada. His invitation to Mr Trump to visit Australia sits out there, unanswered, waiting for the attention of a man, for better or worse, busy remaking the world, while Mr Albanese pursues his project to take Australia back to the '70s.