OpenAI urges U.S. to allow AI models to train on copyrighted material
OpenAI is asking the U.S. government to make it easier for AI companies to learn from copyrighted material, citing a need to 'strengthen America's lead' globally in advancing the technology.
The proposal is part of a wider plan that the tech company behind ChatGPT submitted to the U.S. government on Thursday as part of President Donald Trump's coming 'AI Action Plan.' The administration solicited input from interested parties across the private sector, government and academia, framing the future policy as a shift that would 'prevent unnecessarily burdensome requirements from hindering private sector innovation.'
In its proposal, OpenAI urged the federal government to enact a series of 'freedom-focused' policy ideas, including an approach that would no longer compel American AI developers to 'comply with overly burdensome state laws.'
Copyright in particular is an issue that has plagued AI developers, as many continue to train their models on human work without informing the original creators, obtaining consent or providing compensation.
OpenAI has been sued by several news outlets including the Center for Investigative Reporting, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune and the New York Daily News over claims of copyright infringement. Several authors and visual artists have also taken legal action against the company over unauthorized use of their copyrighted content.
Still, OpenAI said it believes its strategy — the encouragement of 'fair use' policies and fewer intellectual property restrictions — could '[protect] the rights and interests of content creators while also protecting America's AI leadership and national security.' It did not elaborate on the former.
Many leaders in the AI industry and members of the Trump administration have framed America's dominance in AI advancements as a matter of national security, comparing it to a high-stakes arms race.
'The federal government can both secure Americans' freedom to learn from AI, and avoid forfeiting our AI lead to the PRC by preserving American AI models' ability to learn from copyrighted material,' OpenAI's proposal states, using an abbreviation for China's formal name, the People's Republic of China.
Shortly after he took office, Trump issued an executive order that revoked former President Joe Biden's policies on AI, stating the United States' previous directives acted 'as barriers to American AI innovation.'
Biden's 'Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence' executive order, issued in October 2023, stated that 'irresponsible use [of AI] could exacerbate societal harms,' including threats to national security.
His first week in office, Trump also announced Stargate, a massive AI infrastructure investment venture unveiled at the White House in partnership with OpenAI, Oracle and SoftBank. Executives of those companies pledged to invest an initial $100 billion and up to $500 billion over the next four years in the project, which will be set up as a separate company.
OpenAI called for more investment into the technology in its proposal, writing, 'Sustaining America's lead on AI means building the necessary infrastructure to compete with the PRC and its commandeered resources.'
This investment in AI infrastructure, it wrote, would create jobs, boost local economies, modernize the country's energy grid and prepare 'an AI-ready workforce.'
Executives at OpenAI told reporters last month that as part of the ambitious project, the company is considering constructing new data center campuses in 16 states, CNBC reported.
OpenAI also encouraged the government to focus on exporting American 'democratic AI' to promote the adoption of U.S. technology abroad.
OpenAI says this would start with adopting AI tools within the U.S. government as well. (The company previously launched ChatGPT Gov in January, a version of ChatGPT built specifically for government use.)
The proposal directly points to DeepSeek R1 — the AI model recently released by a small Chinese lab that temporarily took ChatGPT's No. 1 spot in the Apple App Store, became the talk of Silicon Valley and caused tech stocks to crash — as a threat to the United States' global leadership on AI.
'While America maintains a lead on AI today, DeepSeek shows that our lead is not wide and is narrowing,' the company said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's Why Shopping Agents Might Have a Difficult Time Pulling Brands' Products for Consumers
Agentic AI and AI-based shopping assistants continue to capture brands, retailers and consumers' attention. But many brands and retailers may not be prepared for such a shift. While AI-based shopping assistants, like ChatGPT's new shopping function, are set up to crawl brands and retailers' sites, AJ Ghergich, vice president of consulting services at Botify, said the format of standard e-commerce sites aren't easy for agents and AI systems to ingest information from. More from Sourcing Journal Amazon Reportedly Tests Humanoid Robots for Parcel Delivery Levi's Marks Three-Year Streak of Strong E-Commerce Growth Macy's, Dick's Sporting Good Partner Grabs $44M Series B For Worker Safety Tech That's because many sites—including those built on Shopify—display product information to consumers via JavaScript, a programming language used frequently in e-commerce to load dynamic product description pages (PDPs). But AI agents and backend systems struggle to pull real-time information from websites running exclusively JavaScript. While JavaScript can help enhance the e-commerce experience for consumers searching directly on a brand or retailer's site, it might pose a new problem for brands and retailers as some consumers begin their shopping journeys using public AI systems, like ChatGPT. Many agents can't 'see' JavaScript in the way that humans can. Ghergich said to help brands understand that, Botify has been showing clients how little AI can actually see. 'One of the first things we're doing [with clients] is saying, 'OK, let's look at your site with JavaScript turned off. That's what the AI is seeing,'' he said. AI systems can crawl some generic information from JavaScript, but because the data is most often unstructured, it's difficult for them to contextualize anything about the product—the price, whether it's in stock and other important considerations. Without that information, the system is less likely to present a brand or retailer's product to a consumer, because it's unable to determine whether it fits the consumer's query parameters. Ghergich said the technology powering the shopping assistants isn't yet strong enough to parse through unstructured data with ease. 'These bots are akin to the early days of search bots, and they can't parse this dynamic nature of modern sites yet. They probably will be able to in the near future, but today, they're blind to it,' he said. To ensure products are included in results generated by chatbots, Ghergich and Botify suggest that brands use structured data by enabling a JSON or XML format. Typically, these formats give bots crawling the web a better chance at understanding the data, particularly when paired with a schema, which helps define subsections of the data. In using a schema, a brand or retailer can tell a bot crawling that when it uses 'price' as a label, that's indicative of how much the item costs, for example. So, a schema is how the data is labeled, and JSON or XML are how the data is stored. Ghergich said combining these approaches won't be too tedious for retailers and brands. 'The cool thing about structured data is, once you set it up, it's literally a schema. It can go across all of your products at once, so it's one of the ultimate quick wins in technical SEO,' he said. 'You set up the schema, and now you've done 50,000 of an [action]. It goes across all of your products at once, and it's not something that you have to go page by page and manually do; it's dynamic.' Ghergich said the next step will be better adding product details that address consumer intent—rather than simply attributes. That's because product search queries—particularly via large language models (LLMs)—continue to become longer, providing more details about why a consumer wants a specific item, rather than keywords about what they want. For example, if a retailer had previously described an item as 'midi floral dress,' they may add data into the backend that signals how a consumer might want to wear that dress—to a summer wedding, or on vacation. Updating product description pages with better intent may seem like a daunting task for fashion and apparel purveyors with ever-changing seasonal assortments, but Ghergich noted that it doesn't have to be done all at once—just that the transition needs to start sooner, rather than later. 'Start with your best sellers. Make sure they have those FAQ modules. Make sure that you're thinking about the customer intent in a conversational tone,' he said. 'Today's shopping journey increasingly begins with AI, not you. So if you're invisible to an AI assistant, it means you're invisible to the customer, full stop.'
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Utah Rep. Maloy pushes against amendment to reinstate military reimbursements for abortion travel
WASHINGTON — Utah Rep. Celeste Maloy is pushing back against efforts to reinstate Biden-era policies directing the Defense Department to reimburse costs for service members who travel across state lines to obtain an abortion. During an appropriations hearing on Thursday, Maloy rejected an amendment seeking to implement a 2022 policy allowing for reimbursements for abortion-related travel and attach it to legislation funding the Defense Department for the 2026 fiscal year. Maloy argued the proposal runs afoul of the Hyde Amendment, a federal statute passed in 1976 prohibiting federal funds from going toward abortion costs, with few exceptions. 'The Hyde Amendment is a clear federal ban on abortion funding, except in the cases of rape, incest and life of the mother,' Maloy said in her remarks. 'It's been in place every appropriation cycle for 40 years. And I've been here, I've heard a lot of talk about partisanship and how this should not be a partisan bill, but this is a completely partisan amendment, whereas the Hyde Amendment has been a bipartisan consensus for four decades.' The amendment, proposed by a Democrat during the appropriations hearing, was ultimately rejected. The DOD issued a policy shortly after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 that would allow military members to receive travel reimbursements and approved leave for abortion-related reasons. That policy was largely approved to allow service members in states where abortion was banned locally to travel across state lines if needed. That provision was criticized by Republicans and was rescinded shortly after Donald Trump took office in January and signed an executive order enforcing the Hyde Amendment and restricting taxpayer dollars from being used for any abortion-related reasons. Maloy pushed against reinstating that policy, arguing it forces taxpayers to fund travel and lodging costs for a procedure they may disagree with. 'The federal government must exercise restraint and respect diverse moral values of American people,' Maloy said. 'This amendment is not in the spirit of that neutrality, not in the spirit of the Dobbs decision or the Hyde Amendment.' 'This would allow the DOD to make federal abortion policy that isn't in keeping with what Congress has done through the Hyde Amendment, and that's a path that I don't think we should start to go down,' she added. 'Federal abortion policy should be uniform like it has been for 40 years through bipartisan consensus in the Hyde Amendment. Abortions, including abortion travel or enhanced leave policies designed to facilitate abortions, have no place in this bill.' Republicans overwhelmingly rejected the amendment and the House Appropriations Committee advanced the larger bill, the Fiscal Year 2026 Defense Appropriations Act. The legislation seeks to provide more than $830 billion to the Defense Department and includes policies to increase pay for military personnel, modernize weapons systems, codify some DOGE suggestions to cut 'waste, fraud and abuse' within the department, and more.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New York Becomes First State to Require Employers Disclose When Layoffs Are Due to AI
If you lose your job as part of mass layoffs at your company because your boss believes an artificial intelligence model can do your work instead, they will have to start filing more paperwork disclosing the decision. That is according to a new law in New York state that requires employers to disclose if mass layoffs — which is defined as 50 or more workers — were due to AI. The change to New York's Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) system went into effect in March, but has received little coverage since then; Bloomberg was the first major outlet to report on the change on Thursday. Now, employers have to fill out a form at least 90 days before a mass layoff round, according to New York law, and check a box if the cuts are due to 'technological innovation or automation.' If that box is checked, the employers then go to another screen on the WARN website where they have to specify whether AI or another technology is the reason for the cuts. New York is the first state with such a law. Other states have looked to put safeguards in place against AI replacing workers, including in California, which had a law go into effect at the start of 2025 which protects actors from having their likeness used by AI models without informed consent; California also passed a similar law last year that requires the estates of dead actors and performers to give clearance for AI models to use their likeness. The new law in New York comes as AI's rapid rise has led to questions over which jobs are safe in a number of fields. This has been an issue in the media world as of late, where a number of outlets, like Axel Springer and News Corp. have signed content licensing deals with OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT. Editorial staff at some outlets have said they are concerned about newsrooms growing too cozy with AI models; the Vox Media Union, for example, called for protections to be put in place for writers at outlets like New York Magazine and The Verge so that their jobs would not be taken by AI bots. That concern is a common one in the U.S. A Pew Research Center survey earlier this year found 52% of Americans were 'worried' about AI in the workplace, compared to 36% who said they were 'hopeful' about it. The post New York Becomes First State to Require Employers Disclose When Layoffs Are Due to AI appeared first on TheWrap.
