Easey Street murder accused to hear witnesses' evidence
Nineteen witnesses will be called to give evidence over the alleged stabbing murder of two young women in their home almost five decades ago.
Suzanne Armstrong, 28, and Susan Bartlett, 27, were found dead with more than two dozen stab wounds at their Easey Street property in the Melbourne inner-city suburb of Collingwood, while Ms Armstrong's 16-month-old son Gregory was left unharmed in his cot.
Perry Kouroumblis, 65, is facing charges that he murdered the pair and raped Ms Armstrong between January 10 and January 13, 1977 in the infamous cold case dubbed the "Easey Street murders".
Kouroumblis faced Melbourne Magistrates Court on Tuesday via a video link.
"Yeah I can," he responded when Magistrate Brett Sonnett asked if he could see and hear the courtroom.
During the hearing, Kouroumblis' lawyers requested 21 witnesses be examined in an upcoming committal hearing which will test their evidence before a magistrate decides whether the case will go to trial in a higher court.
Crown prosecutors opposed the cross-examination request for four witnesses, citing they had already provided statements of their recollections to police.
But Mr Sonnett ruled two witnesses, former police officers who were first on the scene, "are appropriate" to be cross-examined.
Kouroumblis is yet to enter a plea to the charges.
He will return to the court on October 27 for a committal hearing over six days, when he will hear the evidence of 19 witnesses which will be tested.
Kouroumblis, a dual Greek-Australian national, had been living in Greece since 2016, but a 20-year statute of limitation on the initiation of murder charges prevented him from being arrested.
He was arrested on an INTERPOL red notice after travelling to Italy before being extradited to Australia in December to face the charges.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Nineteen witnesses will be called to give evidence over the alleged stabbing murder of two young women in their home almost five decades ago.
Suzanne Armstrong, 28, and Susan Bartlett, 27, were found dead with more than two dozen stab wounds at their Easey Street property in the Melbourne inner-city suburb of Collingwood, while Ms Armstrong's 16-month-old son Gregory was left unharmed in his cot.
Perry Kouroumblis, 65, is facing charges that he murdered the pair and raped Ms Armstrong between January 10 and January 13, 1977 in the infamous cold case dubbed the "Easey Street murders".
Kouroumblis faced Melbourne Magistrates Court on Tuesday via a video link.
"Yeah I can," he responded when Magistrate Brett Sonnett asked if he could see and hear the courtroom.
During the hearing, Kouroumblis' lawyers requested 21 witnesses be examined in an upcoming committal hearing which will test their evidence before a magistrate decides whether the case will go to trial in a higher court.
Crown prosecutors opposed the cross-examination request for four witnesses, citing they had already provided statements of their recollections to police.
But Mr Sonnett ruled two witnesses, former police officers who were first on the scene, "are appropriate" to be cross-examined.
Kouroumblis is yet to enter a plea to the charges.
He will return to the court on October 27 for a committal hearing over six days, when he will hear the evidence of 19 witnesses which will be tested.
Kouroumblis, a dual Greek-Australian national, had been living in Greece since 2016, but a 20-year statute of limitation on the initiation of murder charges prevented him from being arrested.
He was arrested on an INTERPOL red notice after travelling to Italy before being extradited to Australia in December to face the charges.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Nineteen witnesses will be called to give evidence over the alleged stabbing murder of two young women in their home almost five decades ago.
Suzanne Armstrong, 28, and Susan Bartlett, 27, were found dead with more than two dozen stab wounds at their Easey Street property in the Melbourne inner-city suburb of Collingwood, while Ms Armstrong's 16-month-old son Gregory was left unharmed in his cot.
Perry Kouroumblis, 65, is facing charges that he murdered the pair and raped Ms Armstrong between January 10 and January 13, 1977 in the infamous cold case dubbed the "Easey Street murders".
Kouroumblis faced Melbourne Magistrates Court on Tuesday via a video link.
"Yeah I can," he responded when Magistrate Brett Sonnett asked if he could see and hear the courtroom.
During the hearing, Kouroumblis' lawyers requested 21 witnesses be examined in an upcoming committal hearing which will test their evidence before a magistrate decides whether the case will go to trial in a higher court.
Crown prosecutors opposed the cross-examination request for four witnesses, citing they had already provided statements of their recollections to police.
But Mr Sonnett ruled two witnesses, former police officers who were first on the scene, "are appropriate" to be cross-examined.
Kouroumblis is yet to enter a plea to the charges.
He will return to the court on October 27 for a committal hearing over six days, when he will hear the evidence of 19 witnesses which will be tested.
Kouroumblis, a dual Greek-Australian national, had been living in Greece since 2016, but a 20-year statute of limitation on the initiation of murder charges prevented him from being arrested.
He was arrested on an INTERPOL red notice after travelling to Italy before being extradited to Australia in December to face the charges.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Nineteen witnesses will be called to give evidence over the alleged stabbing murder of two young women in their home almost five decades ago.
Suzanne Armstrong, 28, and Susan Bartlett, 27, were found dead with more than two dozen stab wounds at their Easey Street property in the Melbourne inner-city suburb of Collingwood, while Ms Armstrong's 16-month-old son Gregory was left unharmed in his cot.
Perry Kouroumblis, 65, is facing charges that he murdered the pair and raped Ms Armstrong between January 10 and January 13, 1977 in the infamous cold case dubbed the "Easey Street murders".
Kouroumblis faced Melbourne Magistrates Court on Tuesday via a video link.
"Yeah I can," he responded when Magistrate Brett Sonnett asked if he could see and hear the courtroom.
During the hearing, Kouroumblis' lawyers requested 21 witnesses be examined in an upcoming committal hearing which will test their evidence before a magistrate decides whether the case will go to trial in a higher court.
Crown prosecutors opposed the cross-examination request for four witnesses, citing they had already provided statements of their recollections to police.
But Mr Sonnett ruled two witnesses, former police officers who were first on the scene, "are appropriate" to be cross-examined.
Kouroumblis is yet to enter a plea to the charges.
He will return to the court on October 27 for a committal hearing over six days, when he will hear the evidence of 19 witnesses which will be tested.
Kouroumblis, a dual Greek-Australian national, had been living in Greece since 2016, but a 20-year statute of limitation on the initiation of murder charges prevented him from being arrested.
He was arrested on an INTERPOL red notice after travelling to Italy before being extradited to Australia in December to face the charges.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
9 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Australian man holds head, appears to cry in public appearance after being arrested in Bali on drug allegations
Australian man Puridas Robinson has covered his face and appeared to cry in a public shaming after being arrested in Bali on drug allegations. The Daily Telegraph reports Mr Robinson, who is facing a prison sentence in the Indonesian province, was visibly emotional when he was placed in front of media at a press conference in Bali's capital Denpasar on Thursday. The 40-year-old originally from Queensland was arrested at a Denpasar address on May 29 and has admitted to using cryptocurrency to purchase 120g of cannabis, according to the masthead. His arrest came after Indian man Harsh Nowlakha, 31, was allegedly caught by authorities attempting to smuggle cannabis into Bali via the island's international airport, The Daily Telegraph reported. According to the masthead, Mr Nowlakha has asserted the cannabis was bound for the Australian man's address, but Mr Robinson has denied ordering the drugs. A police raid of the Australian's Bali residence reportedly located 20g of cannabis as well as small plastic bags and scales. Pictures of the Denpasar press conference on Thursday show Mr Nowlakha, who has also been arrested, among the group of detainees that were brought to face media. Drugs displayed in plastic bags were held up at the press stand-up next to Mr Robinson. The Daily Telegraph has reported that Mr Nowlakha was allegedly found at Bali's international airport with 600g of cannabis in his possession. Both the Indian man and Mr Robinson are reportedly two of five people arrested on the same day that included two Kazakhstan nationals and an American. Fellow Australian national Lamar Ahchee, a business managed originally from Cairns, faces the death penalty after being arrested in the Indonesian province last month for allegedly trying to smuggle cocaine into the country. Police have alleged Mr Ahchee aided in smuggling 1.8 kilograms of the drug into Bali. Mr Ahchee's lawyer has since claimed his client did not know the package he allegedly smuggled contained drugs. The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs' Smartraveller website outlines that penalties for drug offences in Indonesia includes 'heavy fines, lengthy prison sentences and the death penalty'. 'Do not possess or use illegal drugs in Indonesia. Police target tourist destinations and events,' reads the website, which issues official travel information for Australians heading oversees.
The Advertiser
9 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'High risk': The Star's $167m credit to money launderer
The Star was willing to offer millions in gambling credit to a known money launderer and wrote falsified letters to enable overseas bank transfers from unknown individuals. These details and many more have been exposed as financial watchdog AUSTRAC pursues the embattled casino giant in the Federal Court. The Star made "innumerable contraventions" of Australian anti-money laundering laws through its conduct, including a willingness to do business with 117 high-risk customers, barrister Daniel Tynan told a Federal Court hearing on Thursday. The casino has admitted that 70 of these customers - who were junket funders, operators or players - each posed a high money laundering risk. "They would have the opportunity to gamble that money, get the returns, wash it, do it again," Mr Tynan told Justice Cameron Moore. One of these customers, Suncity junket operator Alvin Chau, was provided with credit of up to $266.67 million. Chau funded at least 3690 junket programs at The Star's Sydney casino, bringing in a turnover of about $12.6 billion. Despite media reports linking him to overseas crime syndicates, The Star continued to engage with the Suncity head, Mr Tynan said. It was only after Chau was arrested by Macau police and hit with a number of charges - including money laundering - that the casino stopped dealing with him, the court has heard. Another customer was given almost $167 million in credit despite The Star knowing from at least 2014 that he had been involved in alleged money laundering, Mr Tynan said. The casino also facilitated high-risk transactions from 1221 customers who transferred money in and out through channels that obscured their identity, the court was told. Staff at EEIS, a Macau-based subsidiary of The Star, wrote up falsified letters for local customers wanting to send funds through the Bank of China directly to the casino, Mr Tynan continued. These letters contained false claims about the source of the funds being deposited, the barrister said. Almost $990 million in deposits were made through The Star's hotel debit cards, allowing gamblers to transfer money directly to the casino without going through an Australian bank. The cards also allowed gamblers in countries like China with restrictions on gambling to disguise their transactions by claiming they were for other purposes like hotel accommodation, Justice Moore was told. The Star advanced money to customers who complained about the 24 to 48-hour waiting period before funds hit their accounts. Individuals could also withdraw cash directly, Mr Tynan said. "This is coming in anonymously, taken out in cash - it can be used for anything." AUSTRAC is seeking $400 million in penalties over the breaches while the casino has argued it can only pay $100 million without being pushed into administration. In April, the failing casino business received a $300 million rescue package from US gaming giant Bally's Corporation. The hearing continues on Friday. The Star was willing to offer millions in gambling credit to a known money launderer and wrote falsified letters to enable overseas bank transfers from unknown individuals. These details and many more have been exposed as financial watchdog AUSTRAC pursues the embattled casino giant in the Federal Court. The Star made "innumerable contraventions" of Australian anti-money laundering laws through its conduct, including a willingness to do business with 117 high-risk customers, barrister Daniel Tynan told a Federal Court hearing on Thursday. The casino has admitted that 70 of these customers - who were junket funders, operators or players - each posed a high money laundering risk. "They would have the opportunity to gamble that money, get the returns, wash it, do it again," Mr Tynan told Justice Cameron Moore. One of these customers, Suncity junket operator Alvin Chau, was provided with credit of up to $266.67 million. Chau funded at least 3690 junket programs at The Star's Sydney casino, bringing in a turnover of about $12.6 billion. Despite media reports linking him to overseas crime syndicates, The Star continued to engage with the Suncity head, Mr Tynan said. It was only after Chau was arrested by Macau police and hit with a number of charges - including money laundering - that the casino stopped dealing with him, the court has heard. Another customer was given almost $167 million in credit despite The Star knowing from at least 2014 that he had been involved in alleged money laundering, Mr Tynan said. The casino also facilitated high-risk transactions from 1221 customers who transferred money in and out through channels that obscured their identity, the court was told. Staff at EEIS, a Macau-based subsidiary of The Star, wrote up falsified letters for local customers wanting to send funds through the Bank of China directly to the casino, Mr Tynan continued. These letters contained false claims about the source of the funds being deposited, the barrister said. Almost $990 million in deposits were made through The Star's hotel debit cards, allowing gamblers to transfer money directly to the casino without going through an Australian bank. The cards also allowed gamblers in countries like China with restrictions on gambling to disguise their transactions by claiming they were for other purposes like hotel accommodation, Justice Moore was told. The Star advanced money to customers who complained about the 24 to 48-hour waiting period before funds hit their accounts. Individuals could also withdraw cash directly, Mr Tynan said. "This is coming in anonymously, taken out in cash - it can be used for anything." AUSTRAC is seeking $400 million in penalties over the breaches while the casino has argued it can only pay $100 million without being pushed into administration. In April, the failing casino business received a $300 million rescue package from US gaming giant Bally's Corporation. The hearing continues on Friday. The Star was willing to offer millions in gambling credit to a known money launderer and wrote falsified letters to enable overseas bank transfers from unknown individuals. These details and many more have been exposed as financial watchdog AUSTRAC pursues the embattled casino giant in the Federal Court. The Star made "innumerable contraventions" of Australian anti-money laundering laws through its conduct, including a willingness to do business with 117 high-risk customers, barrister Daniel Tynan told a Federal Court hearing on Thursday. The casino has admitted that 70 of these customers - who were junket funders, operators or players - each posed a high money laundering risk. "They would have the opportunity to gamble that money, get the returns, wash it, do it again," Mr Tynan told Justice Cameron Moore. One of these customers, Suncity junket operator Alvin Chau, was provided with credit of up to $266.67 million. Chau funded at least 3690 junket programs at The Star's Sydney casino, bringing in a turnover of about $12.6 billion. Despite media reports linking him to overseas crime syndicates, The Star continued to engage with the Suncity head, Mr Tynan said. It was only after Chau was arrested by Macau police and hit with a number of charges - including money laundering - that the casino stopped dealing with him, the court has heard. Another customer was given almost $167 million in credit despite The Star knowing from at least 2014 that he had been involved in alleged money laundering, Mr Tynan said. The casino also facilitated high-risk transactions from 1221 customers who transferred money in and out through channels that obscured their identity, the court was told. Staff at EEIS, a Macau-based subsidiary of The Star, wrote up falsified letters for local customers wanting to send funds through the Bank of China directly to the casino, Mr Tynan continued. These letters contained false claims about the source of the funds being deposited, the barrister said. Almost $990 million in deposits were made through The Star's hotel debit cards, allowing gamblers to transfer money directly to the casino without going through an Australian bank. The cards also allowed gamblers in countries like China with restrictions on gambling to disguise their transactions by claiming they were for other purposes like hotel accommodation, Justice Moore was told. The Star advanced money to customers who complained about the 24 to 48-hour waiting period before funds hit their accounts. Individuals could also withdraw cash directly, Mr Tynan said. "This is coming in anonymously, taken out in cash - it can be used for anything." AUSTRAC is seeking $400 million in penalties over the breaches while the casino has argued it can only pay $100 million without being pushed into administration. In April, the failing casino business received a $300 million rescue package from US gaming giant Bally's Corporation. The hearing continues on Friday. The Star was willing to offer millions in gambling credit to a known money launderer and wrote falsified letters to enable overseas bank transfers from unknown individuals. These details and many more have been exposed as financial watchdog AUSTRAC pursues the embattled casino giant in the Federal Court. The Star made "innumerable contraventions" of Australian anti-money laundering laws through its conduct, including a willingness to do business with 117 high-risk customers, barrister Daniel Tynan told a Federal Court hearing on Thursday. The casino has admitted that 70 of these customers - who were junket funders, operators or players - each posed a high money laundering risk. "They would have the opportunity to gamble that money, get the returns, wash it, do it again," Mr Tynan told Justice Cameron Moore. One of these customers, Suncity junket operator Alvin Chau, was provided with credit of up to $266.67 million. Chau funded at least 3690 junket programs at The Star's Sydney casino, bringing in a turnover of about $12.6 billion. Despite media reports linking him to overseas crime syndicates, The Star continued to engage with the Suncity head, Mr Tynan said. It was only after Chau was arrested by Macau police and hit with a number of charges - including money laundering - that the casino stopped dealing with him, the court has heard. Another customer was given almost $167 million in credit despite The Star knowing from at least 2014 that he had been involved in alleged money laundering, Mr Tynan said. The casino also facilitated high-risk transactions from 1221 customers who transferred money in and out through channels that obscured their identity, the court was told. Staff at EEIS, a Macau-based subsidiary of The Star, wrote up falsified letters for local customers wanting to send funds through the Bank of China directly to the casino, Mr Tynan continued. These letters contained false claims about the source of the funds being deposited, the barrister said. Almost $990 million in deposits were made through The Star's hotel debit cards, allowing gamblers to transfer money directly to the casino without going through an Australian bank. The cards also allowed gamblers in countries like China with restrictions on gambling to disguise their transactions by claiming they were for other purposes like hotel accommodation, Justice Moore was told. The Star advanced money to customers who complained about the 24 to 48-hour waiting period before funds hit their accounts. Individuals could also withdraw cash directly, Mr Tynan said. "This is coming in anonymously, taken out in cash - it can be used for anything." AUSTRAC is seeking $400 million in penalties over the breaches while the casino has argued it can only pay $100 million without being pushed into administration. In April, the failing casino business received a $300 million rescue package from US gaming giant Bally's Corporation. The hearing continues on Friday.
West Australian
11 hours ago
- West Australian
'High risk': The Star's $167m credit to money launderer
The Star was willing to offer millions in gambling credit to a known money launderer and wrote falsified letters to enable overseas bank transfers from unknown individuals. These details and many more have been exposed as financial watchdog AUSTRAC pursues the embattled casino giant in the Federal Court. The Star made "innumerable contraventions" of Australian anti-money laundering laws through its conduct, including a willingness to do business with 117 high-risk customers, barrister Daniel Tynan told a Federal Court hearing on Thursday. The casino has admitted that 70 of these customers - who were junket funders, operators or players - each posed a high money laundering risk. "They would have the opportunity to gamble that money, get the returns, wash it, do it again," Mr Tynan told Justice Cameron Moore. One of these customers, Suncity junket operator Alvin Chau, was provided with credit of up to $266.67 million. Chau funded at least 3690 junket programs at The Star's Sydney casino, bringing in a turnover of about $12.6 billion. Despite media reports linking him to overseas crime syndicates, The Star continued to engage with the Suncity head, Mr Tynan said. It was only after Chau was arrested by Macau police and hit with a number of charges - including money laundering - that the casino stopped dealing with him, the court has heard. Another customer was given almost $167 million in credit despite The Star knowing from at least 2014 that he had been involved in alleged money laundering, Mr Tynan said. The casino also facilitated high-risk transactions from 1221 customers who transferred money in and out through channels that obscured their identity, the court was told. Staff at EEIS, a Macau-based subsidiary of The Star, wrote up falsified letters for local customers wanting to send funds through the Bank of China directly to the casino, Mr Tynan continued. These letters contained false claims about the source of the funds being deposited, the barrister said. Almost $990 million in deposits were made through The Star's hotel debit cards, allowing gamblers to transfer money directly to the casino without going through an Australian bank. The cards also allowed gamblers in countries like China with restrictions on gambling to disguise their transactions by claiming they were for other purposes like hotel accommodation, Justice Moore was told. The Star advanced money to customers who complained about the 24 to 48-hour waiting period before funds hit their accounts. Individuals could also withdraw cash directly, Mr Tynan said. "This is coming in anonymously, taken out in cash - it can be used for anything." AUSTRAC is seeking $400 million in penalties over the breaches while the casino has argued it can only pay $100 million without being pushed into administration. In April, the failing casino business received a $300 million rescue package from US gaming giant Bally's Corporation. The hearing continues on Friday.
