logo
British families sue TikTok over ‘blackout challenge' child deaths

British families sue TikTok over ‘blackout challenge' child deaths

Yahoo07-02-2025

TikTok is being sued by the families of four British children who died during a 'blackout challenge' craze that went viral on social media in 2022.
The families of Archie Battersbee, Isaac Kenevan, Julian 'Jools' Sweeney and Maia Walsh have taken legal action against the technology giant, which is owned by China's Bytedance, in a wrongful death lawsuit filed in the US. It is believed to be the first time British parents have sued TikTok in this manner.
The children, aged between 12 and 14, all died after passing out. They are believed to have suffered fatal injuries while copying a so-called 'blackout challenge'.
Matthew Bergman, a lawyer at the Social Media Victims Law Center, which is representing the families, said: 'TikTok's algorithm purposely targeted these children with dangerous content to increase their engagement time on the platform and drive revenue.'
Lawyers for the families claimed TikTok was a 'dangerous and addictive product that markets itself as fun and safe for children, while lulling parents into a false sense of security'.
TikTok has banned blackout challenge videos since 2020 and blocks searches or hashtags related to the videos. It also bars other dangerous pranks from its app. The company declined to comment.
Archie, 12, from Essex, died in 2022 after he was found non-responsive by his mother on April 7. He was taken off life support in August that year after a legal battle by his mother to keep him alive. She did not know he was using TikTok at the time of the incident.
She believes he had attempted the blackout challenge, although a coroner did not find any evidence he was copying something he had seen online. His death was ruled a 'prank or experiment' gone wrong.
Isaac, 13, died in March 2022 at his home in Essex. Lawyers for the family said his parents had believed the app was 'a fun, silly, and safe platform designed for kids and young people'. They later found videos on his phone in which he attempted to pass out.
Julian Sweeney, 14, from Cheltenham, died on April 13, 2022. Her family has campaigned for access to her child's data in what has been dubbed 'Jools' Law'.
Maia, 13, also from Essex, started using social media under her father's supervision, but lawyers for the family say she 'quickly became hooked on TikTok and began having trouble sleeping'.
A police investigation into her death in October 2022 is ongoing. Her father says she was targeted with dangerous challenge and self-harm videos in the days leading to her death.
The lawsuit, filed in Delaware, alleges the deaths of the children were the 'foreseeable result of ByteDance's engineered addiction-by-design and programming decisions'. It alleges they were bombarded with an 'endless stream of harms'. It said these were 'not harms the children searched for or wanted to see when their use of TikTok began'.
The legal claim is thought to be the first time British families have sued TikTok through the US courts over the death of a child. TikTok, Meta, Snapchat and other social media companies have been hit by hundreds of legal claims by US families and schools, alleging their products are defective and cause harm to children. The companies are fighting the cases.
TikTok narrowly avoided being blocked in the US in January, after President Donald Trump granted it a reprieve on a law that would have barred the app from US smartphone stores over national security concerns due to its China links. The company has always denied posing a security risk.
In 2021, TikTok strengthened its rules around online challenges to automatically detect and block more potentially dangerous content. In its online rules, TikTok says: 'The majority [of challenges] are fun and safe, but some promote harmful behaviours including the risk of serious injury. Our Community Guidelines prohibit dangerous challenges.'
While most online 'challenge' videos which go viral on social media are mundane or silly, a study commissioned by TikTok found around one in 50 teenagers had taken part in a 'dangerous' online challenge and around one in 300 had taken part in a 'really dangerous' challenge.
There have also previously been hoax challenges, which have been picked up by the media and seen false claims spread online.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 L.A. County men arrested for plotting to distribute 2,000 pounds of drugs, feds allege
4 L.A. County men arrested for plotting to distribute 2,000 pounds of drugs, feds allege

Los Angeles Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

4 L.A. County men arrested for plotting to distribute 2,000 pounds of drugs, feds allege

Four Los Angeles County men have been arrested on suspicion of running a drug trafficking operation and conspiring to distribute more than 2,000 pounds of drugs and hundreds of thousands of counterfeit pills, according to authorities. The men allegedly kept the drugs inside a safe house on Wilmington Avenue in Compton, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's Los Angeles Field Division said in a statement. Last month, federal agents seized 1,730 pounds of methamphetamine, 238 pounds of cocaine, 257 pounds of powdered fentanyl and about 360,000 counterfeit fentanyl pills from the home. Authorities also took possession of 13 firearms and seven vehicles. Authorities believe the men made about $1.6 million in drug proceeds since 2023. To hide their activities from law enforcement, the men used coded language to communicate via FaceTime and Snapchat, according to the DEA. In May 2023, when authorities say the drug distribution operation began, the men allegedly made $3,250 selling meth to a customer at a restaurant in Paramount, according to court records. A drug sale the next month brought in $6,500, court records say. The four men were arrested on Wednesday. Authorities identified them as Jesse 'Gordo' Lopez-Martinez, 27, of Long Beach; Carlos 'Losy' Mendoza Jr., 32, of Compton; Hector Merced Parra Jr., 25, of South Gate; and Juan 'Panchito' Francisco Felix Salazar, 28, of Whittier. Lopez-Martinez faces three counts of possession of drugs with the intent to distribute. Parra and Salazar were each charged with one count for possession of drugs with the intent to distribute. Mendoza faces four counts: two for possession of drugs with intent to distribute, one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He was previously convicted in L.A. in 2012 for felony drug transportation, authorities say. Parra and Salazar have been released on bond, while Lopez-Martinez and Mendoza remain in custody. All four men have pleaded not guilty. According to the DEA, Mendoza allegedly stored and safeguarded the drugs at the Compton residence while Lopez-Martinez allegedly arranged deliveries. Lopez-Martinez and Mendoza allegedly transported meth, and prosecutors say Salazar and Parra helped Lopez-Martinez supply fentanyl to customers. Parra also received fentanyl on consignment from Salazar for further distribution, authorities allege. 'The DEA will show zero tolerance for drug criminals, who continue to poison and devastate our communities,' Matthew Allen, special agent in charge of the L.A. Field Division, said in a statement. 'We're going to find you, shut down your activities, and ensure you face the full force of the law.' If convicted as charged, the four men could each face a 10-year mandatory minimum prison sentence and a maximum life sentence, according to the DEA. The investigation was conducted in collaboration with the Vernon Police Department, the Baldwin Park Police Department, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and Homeland Security Investigations. Trial is scheduled to begin on July 21.

Downton Abbey 3 Isn't Bringing Back Matthew Goode, But I Actually Like His Reasoning For Why This Is ‘A Really Positive Thing'
Downton Abbey 3 Isn't Bringing Back Matthew Goode, But I Actually Like His Reasoning For Why This Is ‘A Really Positive Thing'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Downton Abbey 3 Isn't Bringing Back Matthew Goode, But I Actually Like His Reasoning For Why This Is ‘A Really Positive Thing'

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. By the time Downton Abbey, one of the great Peak TV era shows, ended in 2015, Michelle Dockery's Lady Mary Talbot had been lucky enough to find love again, this time with Matthew Goode's Henry Talbot. The two of them were even expecting a child, and we got to meet little Caroline alongside her parents in the 2019 Downton Abbey movie. However, Henry wasn't around in 2022's Downton Abbey: A New Era and also won't appear in Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale, one of the later 2025 movie releases. However, Goode sees his absence this time around as a 'really positive thing' for a specific reason, and I have to say, I like the way he's thinking. As far as why Goode isn't appearing in Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale, it boiled down to scheduling conflicts, as he told THR that he was busy filming the British crime thriller series Dept. Q. The actor also mentioned that even if he had been able to carve out time, there was only 'half a page' of material for him. Goode continued: And actually, I said, you know what? Why can't this be a really positive thing? Because I don't know what they're doing. They might kill [Henry]! I didn't see the script. But it's a wonderful opportunity — [Mary, Michelle Dockery's character] is like this modern feminist icon and in a weird way, maybe she doesn't need a fella. Maybe Downton's enough or maybe some old suitor will come in. Now, it opens up the story to have something significant happen. Why have Henry come? I will admit that the idea of Mary losing another husband doesn't sit too well with me. Downton Abbey fans (who can currently revisit the show with a Peacock subscription) will obviously remember that Dan Stevens' Matthew Crawley was her chief love interest during the show's first three seasons, but he died in a car crash on the way home after seeing his newborn son in the hospital. In fact, Henry being a race car driver was the main reason Mary initially broke off her romantic relationship with him, as she couldn't bear the thought of losing another husband in a car crash. More on Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale Downton Abbey 3 Was Always Going To Be Difficult Without Maggie Smith, And Paul Giamatti Confirms 'It Was Not The Same' Downton Abbey 3's Michelle Dockery On The 'Beautiful' Third Movie And Honoring Maggie Smith But putting that aside, Mary did just fine without Henry by her side in A New Era, with his absence in that movie being attributed to him participating at a racing event in Istanbul. If Matthew Goode's musing that Henry Talbot could be killed off is correct, it's not like Mary is lacking in a support system to help her through this new round of grief, between her parents, sister, brother-in-law, the family's staff, the list goes on. My only request is that if Henry does indeed shuffle off this mortal coil, don't let it be from a car crash. It's also possible that nothing bad's going to happen to Henry, and whatever his small role would have been in Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale would simply have set up the reason for his exit. In any case, I'm ok with not seeing Mary with Henry again, nor do I need to see her take up another suitor. With this being the final film in the Downton Abbey franchise, I'd much rather see her spending as much time as possible with her family and other loved ones in her life. Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale opens in theaters on September 12. For the Matthew Goode fans out there, you're also welcome to watch him play Detective Carl Morck in Dept. Q, which can now be streamed with a Netflix subscription.

Decatur teen gets 40 years for killing mom, unborn baby
Decatur teen gets 40 years for killing mom, unborn baby

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Decatur teen gets 40 years for killing mom, unborn baby

DECATUR, Ill. (WCIA) — A Decatur teenager has been sentenced to 40 years in prison after a dispute over Snapchat two years ago escalated to shots being fired, killing a pregnant woman and her unborn baby. Mattarion Anderson, 17, was in court on Friday to learn his fate after he was convicted in April of first-degree murder and intentional homicide of an unborn child. After listening to three victim impact statements and hearing evidence from the defense, Judge Griffith condemned Anderson to 20 years in prison for each count — sentences that will run consecutively. Macon Co. Sheriff's Office investigating after two found dead in home Trying Anderson from the bench, Griffith found that he was one of three people who, on March 8, 2023, took part in a shooting that left 20-year-old Janiah Thomas dead. The mother of two, soon to be three, was visiting her boyfriend's home on Woodford Street when Anderson and his accomplices appeared, in retribution for an ongoing dispute. Decatur Police said in a sworn statement that Thomas' boyfriend and brother went outside once they were aware of Anderson's presence. Shots were fired a short time later and the bullets went flying into the home. Thomas was shot as she tried to protect her 4-year-old daughter, who was shot in the eye. The girl would lose her eye as a result of the shooting, along with her mother and unborn sibling. In April, Judge Griffith convicted Anderson of killing Thomas and her baby, but not for aggravated battery to Thomas' daughter. On Friday, more than two years after the deadly shooting, Griffith sentenced Anderson to four decades behind bars. However, the sentence could have been worse if Anderson were an adult when the crime was committed. He was facing adult charges, but Griffith decided against imposing a 25-year firearm enhancement for each count due to state statute concerning underage defendants. UPDATE: State Police name victims, release new info in Shelby Co. car vs. train crash Anderson is the second person to be sentenced in connection with Thomas' murder. A week after finding Anderson guilty, Griffith accepted a plea of guilty from Tarlan Mackey for residential burglary related to the shooting. Griffith sentenced Mackey to 10 years in prison for that crime while dismissing all counts of murder and aggravated battery. The third suspect in the case is Anderson's brother Mattavius. His case is still pending, with a pretrial hearing scheduled for Friday. Mattavius has pleaded not guilty to nine counts of murder and aggravated battery. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store