The Pentagon's DEI crackdown isn't just deleting history — it also seems to slight veterans
The Pentagon removed Jackie Robinson's military service story from its website, sparking outrage.
The deletion is part of a broader effort to eliminate DEI content from official online platforms.
The Defense Department defended the webpage removals, citing the "DEI" framing of the articles.
An online article about baseball icon Jackie Robinson's military service was taken down this week as part of the Defense Department's DEI-dragnet altering and erasing military history.
But it wasn't just the Dodgers Hall of Famer who got swept up in the Pentagon's widespread online DEI purge.
Many of the web pages, including the tribute to Robinson, had the word "DEI" added to the website's address, an alteration that many took as an official suggestion that these recognitions were largely or solely because of the person's race or gender.
This "DEI" labeling of years of old press releases and images, some dating from Trump's first administration, extended to the recently fired chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, trailblazing women and racially segregated units like the Tuskegee Airmen, Business Insider found. This adds to the list of articles that have received this treatment, including the highest-ranking Black Medal of Honor recipient, whose web address was briefly changed to include "deimedal."
The Pentagon doubled down on its decision to remove the content, claiming the articles had "DEI" framing, some of which originally appeared during cultural commemorations like Black History Month. Some pages, like Robinson's, were later restored after an uproar. The removals demonstrate the extent of the department's commitment to complying with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's directive to eliminate materials and practices it deems to be DEI.
The Defense Department declined to questions about why the DEI label was added to some web pages in addition to deleting its content or who had done so.
'Digital content refresh' on DEI
In late February, Hegseth ordered a "digital content refresh across all DoD public platforms," targeting material related to "critical race theory, gender ideology, and preferential treatment or quotas based upon sex, race or ethnicity, or other DEI-related matters," per a memorandum of the mandate.
In the weeks since the mandate was issued, error messages began to appear on webpages depicting diversity events at military bases and stories advocating for women, racial minorities, and LGBTQ+ troops.
Though the March 5 deadline for the onerous online purge has long passed, content continues to be removed from military-run websites, including profiles of biographies highlighting historic military leaders and units that existed long before diversity was a recognized organizational initiative.
Among the deletions was an article spotlighting Black soldiers throughout US history, from Revolutionary War spy James Armistead Lafayette to the legendary segregated World War I combat unit known as the Harlem Hellfighters, one of numerous alterations spotted by the news site Axios.
Published during Black History Month in 2017, the article recognized the "brave soldiers who broke barriers, saved lives, and paved the way for today's force."
The DEI labeling and deletions affected many other trailblazers and warfighters. An article about a Puerto Rican unit that served in World War II and Vietnam had one article's address changed to read, "deiinfantryman." The original DoD publicity arose from the regiment's recognition decades later, in 2016, with the Congressional Gold Medal.
Similarly, an article about retired Brig. Gen. Allison Hickey, an Air Force pilot who graduated in the first US Air Force Academy class with women, was labeled "dei" and its photos and text removed.
Removing and reversing
Alongside the now-restored story about Robinson's service in the US Army during World War II, a profile about Army Maj. Gen. Charles C. Rogers, the highest-ranking Black servicemember to receive the Medal of Honor, was temporarily taken down.
The story, part of a series honoring Medal of Honor recipients, largely focused on Rogers' decorated military career in the Army. The article briefly mentioned how he championed sex and race equality during his time in the Army and his status as the highest-ranking Black Medal of Honor recipient to this day.
The story returned to the Pentagon's website following criticism of the removal last week. The Defense Department said in a statement that the story was taken down during an "auto removal process" but failed to detail why the article was targeted in the first place.
Pentagon Press Secretary John Ullyot said in a statement that the department will correct the "rare cases that content is removed — either deliberately or by mistake — that is out of the clearly outlined scope of the directive."
"Now you're hurting recruiting, and you're also branding the greatest military in the world, the US military, a haven for white supremacists," said Brandon Friedman, a former US Army combat veteran who spotted that Rogers' Medal of Honor tribute had been labeled DEI. "Pulling Jackie Robinson off the website, have these people lost their minds?"
Erasing history
Other historical content remained noticeably absent from the Defense Department's website.
The DoD removed a story about the service of Marine Corps Pfc. Ira Hayes, a Pima Indian who "achieved immortal fame" as one of the six Marines in the iconic WWII photo raising the American flag atop Mount Suribachi on Iwo Jima, The Washington Post reported.
The tribute was written in 2021 in honor of National Native American Heritage Month, which the article described as a time to "reflect on the contributions and sacrifices Native Americans have made to the United States, not just in the military but in all walks of life."
Articles about the Navajo Code Talkers, the famed US Marine unit who were instrumental in decoding secret messages during World War II, were also labeled under the "DEI" umbrella and have since disappeared from some military websites, Axios reported.
An article about prominent Civil Rights activist Medgar Evers, a US Navy veteran, was also removed from the US Naval History and Heritage Command. However, another webpage about the active-duty US Navy dry cargo ship named after him remains online.
When asked why Evers' biography was taken down, an NHHC representative told Business Insider that the command was assessing and revising each page on its website per Hegseth's DEI directive.
A spokesperson for the Navy Office of Information was unable to provide answers to BI's questions by Thursday morning about the criteria that resulted in the page's removal.
DoD defends deletions
Despite the swift backlash for the online takedowns, the Defense Department defended the decision to remove the content due to its "DEI" framing.
"Everyone at the Defense Department loves Jackie Robinson, as well as the Navajo Code Talkers, the Tuskegee airmen, the Marine at Iwo Jima, and so many others — we salute them for their strong and, in many cases, heroic service to our education, full stop," Ullyot said.
He added: "We do not view or highlight them through the prism of immutable characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or sex."
Nonetheless, wholly deleting the content from the Pentagon's site appears to undermine the department's stated goal of "recognizing their patriotism and dedication to the warfighting mission like every other American who has worn the uniform," as Ullyot said in the statement.
Transparency
Some have speculated that DoD could have used an algorithm to review thousands of old articles, images, and public records for DEI-related keywords. The DoD did not say how it chose to delete these articles and alter their web addresses; the full number of altered addresses remains unknown.
The DEI label was also applied to the combat veteran President Donald Trump recently fired: Gen. CQ Brown, who had been the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. A web article about his trailblazing career was deleted, and the URL was altered to read "deiblack-history-month."
Despite Hegseth's vision to create "the most transparent Department of Defense in history," it remains unclear what guidelines DoD officials are following when flagging online content as DEI-related — both internally and externally.
"I guess I'll just stop taking photos of and sharing the stories of women and Black soldiers," an Army public affairs official told Military.com in late February. "Not sure how else to interpret this."
Staff writer Kelsey Baker contributed to this report.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
44 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. Army can't "continue to buy VCRs" amid global security shift
The U.S. Army Transformation Initiative trotted out by service leaders last month is just the tip of the iceberg. There will be additional pivots, debates, cuts and media appearances. Why it matters: "The risk is in not changing," Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George told Axios during an interview in his Pentagon office. "We've got to get better by 2026," he said, shrugging off longer-term ambitions like the Army of 2030 or 2040. "I think we have to be improving on a day-by-day, week-by-week basis." State of play: The changes introduced May 1 — combining Army Futures and Training and Doctrine commands, shifting to mobile brigade combat teams, axing AH-64D Apaches and M10 Bookers and more — are colloquially known as "1.0." There's "going to be 2.0 and 3.0," George said, "and that's how we need to look at it." He did not say what each iteration might comprise or target. Officials have claimed ATI will save some $48 billion over the next five years. Context: The goal is to produce a force that can shoot and kill more accurately from farther away while also being harder to detect, especially on the electromagnetic spectrum. "World events will tell you that we need to make adjustments," George said. (We spoke just days after Ukraine's surprise Spiderweb drone assault.) "We don't want to continue to buy VCRs just because that's what people are producing." Between the lines: Expect the fruits of canceled programs to be applied elsewhere.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
GOP backs Trump on LA, but there's skepticism over deploying Marines
Republican senators support President Trump's crackdown on people protesting his administration's work to deport thousands of migrants, but they are uncertain about the Pentagon's deployment of 700 active-duty Marines to California. The Trump White House appears confident that a showdown with California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) over illegal immigration is good politics for the president. But some GOP lawmakers are worried about the prospect of street clashes spreading to other cities and of Trump invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 to get the active-duty military more involved in responding to mass protests. There's no GOP opposition to a tough response to street protests. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine), who is up for reelection next year in a state Trump lost to Biden, said 'the violence that we're witnessing against law enforcement, ICE officers in L.A.' and the property damage is 'completely unacceptable and does call for a strong response. But she warned that 'sending in active-duty troops to deal with domestic law enforcement issues raises very serious concerns.' 'I do not agree with the president's decision to do that,' she said, before pivoting to support for Trump's decision to call in the National Guard without the consent of local officials. 'I think calling up the National Guard, which has experience in dealing with domestic disasters, whether man-made or weather-related, does make sense,' Collins said. 'But I do not think that sending in active-duty Marines is a good idea. 'I think it puts them in a very difficult position,' she added. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), a member of the Armed Services Committee, said he hopes 'cooler heads prevail' on both sides of the political spectrum as the administration continues operations to deport migrants. Rounds said he doesn't want to see street clashes and property destruction play out in other cities. 'Hopefully it does not occur and hopefully cooler heads prevail all the way around,' he said. 'The challenge … is you've got individuals that are creating a scene when [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] is coming in and doing their job.' Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a senior member of the Armed Services panel, declined to comment on the deployment of Marines. A poll of 4,309 U.S. adults by YouGov found that only 34 percent of Americans approved of Trump deploying Marines to Los Angeles, while 47 percent disapproved. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) on Tuesday defended Trump's decision to deploy 4,000 members of the California National Guard to help maintain the peace in Los Angeles, but he distanced himself from the decision to mobilize active-duty Marines, telling reporters he didn't know Trump's precise authority for doing so. 'I don't know the particulars on what authorities exist there, but my assumption is that the administration has been looking carefully at what he can and can't do under the law. Obviously, the 1798 Act is available to them if they choose to exercise it,' Thune told reporters. That's a reference to the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which authorizes the president during a declared war, invasion or predatory incursion to detain and deport citizens of an enemy nation. Thune argued Trump was justified in mobilizing the National Guard because local authorities failed to contain property destruction and the threat of violence. 'In this case, at least there were clear just failures on the part of state and local officials, which is why I think it required the president to take a federal response,' he said. 'There was a security situation out there that needed to be addressed, and I think ultimately, the president's objective is to keep people safe,' he said. Newsom accused Trump of 'intentionally causing chaos' by mobilizing troops, and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) said the move was 'completely unnecessary' because the Los Angeles Police Department was 'well equipped' to handle protests.' Trump's deployment of active-duty troops is raising questions on Capitol Hill about whether he will invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807. The president cited the law in January as potential authority to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, if necessary. White House aides drafted a proclamation during Trump's first term in 2020 to invoke the Insurrection Act in case Trump wanted to deploy active-duty troops to Washington, D.C., to respond to protests over the murder of George Floyd earlier that year. The president decided not to, despite calls by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), who wrote in a New York Times op-ed to 'send in the troops.' Gen. Eric Smith, the commandant of the Marine Corps, told Republican senators Tuesday morning that the 700 Marines Trump deployed would be limited to guarding federal properties and had training in crowd control. He said active-duty soldiers would not have arrest authority. Rounds told The Hill that Smith informed members of the Armed Services panel that Trump was operating under Title 10 of the United States Code, which includes the statutes often referred to as the Insurrection Act, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. 'They are there just as if they were on any other sovereign mission at an embassy anyplace else around the world. They have been trained in crowd control, but their mission is to protect other entities that are federal in nature, meaning buildings or other members of the military,' Rounds said. He said the National Guard troops — in contrast to the Marines — 'are federally activated' and 'members of the armed services under Title 10 rather than Title 32,' referring to the transfer of the California National Guard from Newsom to Trump. 'That was not part of the discussion,' he said of the Insurrection Act. 'I know it's available to him,' referring to Trump, 'but right now it's not necessary.' Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) claimed that the Democratic officials in California and Los Angeles 'seem not to be very concerned with controlling the violence' and 'in some ways are defiant of federal law' by refusing to work with federal officials to deport migrants who are living in the country illegally. He said 'my preference would be to have local, not national' law enforcement and troops handle local protests but warned that waiting too long to send in the National Guard could allow protests to spiral out of control, like they did in some cities during summer 2020 after Floyd's murder.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Orders in Marines in Dramatic Escalation of L.A. Protests
Donald Trump is sending hundreds of U.S. Marines to assist in Los Angeles in response to the ongoing protests. The active-duty Marines from Camp Pendleton in Southern California will be deployed to help protect federal agents and buildings, a senior Trump administration official told the Daily Beast. The Marines' mobilization comes after U.S. Northern Command had said they were prepared to mobilize Marines on Sunday as needed. The move is a dramatic escalation after the president also deployed the National Guard over the objection of California Governor Gavin Newsom and local officials. 'In light of increased threats against federal officers and federal buildings, 500 active-duty U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton will be deployed to Los Angeles to help protect federal agents and buildings,' the official told the Daily Beast. The U.S. Northern Command announced soon after that approximately 700 Marines with 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine Division would be integrated with the National Guard soldiers deployed in the Los Angeles area. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later took to X to confirm the deployment, adding, 'we have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers - even if Gavin Newsom will not.' Newsom weighed in on his X account on Monday night, continuing his personal attacks on Trump while adding news of another deployment, which was later confirmed by Sean Parnell, chief Pentagon spokesman and assistant to the secretary of defense for public affairs. 'I was just informed Trump is deploying another 2,000 Guard troops to L.A,' wrote Newsom. 'The first 2,000? Given no food or water. Only approx. 300 are deployed — the rest are sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders. This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous president's ego. This is Reckless. Pointless. And disrespectful to our troops.' The Defense Department's Rapid Response Unit hit back at Newsom, claiming his comments are a 'bald face lie.' 'These are soldiers fulfilling duties ordered by the @POTUS and the @SecDef,' the post read. Earlier on Monday, Trump had defended deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to California in response to immigration protests. The president argued that he no longer needed a request from the governor because Newsom is 'incompetent.' 'Look at the job he's doing in California. He's destroying one of our great states,' Trump said in response to a reporter's question during a roundtable event. The president also suggested that he would back Newsom being arrested, responding to a question from a reporter outside the White House 'I would.' Earlier on Monday, Newsom slammed the president for deploying the National Guard. 'This is exactly what Donald Trump wanted,' he wrote in a post on X. 'He flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalize the National Guard.' The California governor announced the state would sue the president. 'This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. Constitution,' Newsom wrote in another post. He wrote that the president signaling support for his arrest was an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' While the administration confirmed Marines would be mobilized Monday afternoon, the president appeared to play down their deployment. 'We'll see what happens,' Trump said when asked about deploying Marines. 'I think we have it very well under control. I think it would have been a very bad situation. It was heading in the wrong direction. It's now heading in the right direction.' Protests have continued in Los Angeles since Friday when law enforcement shot 'less-lethal' rounds at protesters who gathered in response to against federal immigration raids. Nearly 60 people were arrested in Los Angeles over the weekend, police said. Among those arrested were a person accused of throwing a Molotov cocktail at an officer. Another person was accused of ramming a motorcycle into a line of officers, injuring one. –Additional reporting by Cameron Adams.
