Australia regulator and YouTube spar over under-16s social media ban
By Byron Kaye
SYDNEY (Reuters) -Australia's internet watchdog and YouTube exchanged barbs on Tuesday after the regulator urged the government to reverse a planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned video-sharing platform from its world-first teen social media ban.
The quarrel adds an element of uncertainty to the December rollout of a law being watched by governments and tech leaders around the world as Australia seeks to become the first country to fine social media firms if they fail to block users aged under 16.
The centre-left Labor government of Anthony Albanese has previously said it would give YouTube a waiver, citing the platform's use for education and health. Other social media companies such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok have argued such an exemption would be unfair.
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said she wrote to the government last week to say there should be no exemptions when the law takes effect. She added that the regulator's research found 37% of children aged 10 to 15 reported seeing harmful content on YouTube - the most of any social media site.
"This is not a fair fight where our kids are concerned, vis-a-vis social media sites," Inman Grant told the National Press Club in Sydney.
She said social media companies deployed "persuasive design features" like recommendation-based algorithms and notifications to keep users online and "YouTube has mastered those, opaque algorithms driving users down rabbit holes they're powerless to fight against".
YouTube, in a blog post, accused Inman Grant of giving inconsistent and contradictory advice, which discounted the government's own research which found 69% of parents considered the video platform suitable for people under 15.
"The eSafety commissioner chose to ignore this data, the decision of the Australian Government and other clear evidence from teachers and parents that YouTube is suitable for younger users," wrote Rachel Lord, YouTube's public policy manager for Australia and New Zealand.
Inman Grant, asked about surveys supporting a YouTube exemption, said she was more concerned "about the safety of children and that's always going to surpass any concerns I have about politics or being liked or bringing the public onside".
A spokesperson for Communications Minister Anika Wells said the minister was considering the online regulator's advice and her "top priority is making sure the draft rules fulfil the objective of the Act and protect children from the harms of social media".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
32 minutes ago
- Business Insider
A former DreamWorks president just raised $11.6M to build franchises using AI
Chris deFaria, a former animation president at Warner Bros. and Comcast's DreamWorks, is betting he can create the next Hollywood franchises with the help of AI — and just raised $11.6 million in venture capital to do it. His company, Chronicle Studios, is backed by Patron and Point72 Ventures, with participation from Z Ventures, Sands Capital, and others. DeFaria and his cofounder, Aaron Sisto, met a few years ago through mutual friends. Sisto is a partner at First Spark Ventures, a firm cofounded by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. The pair saw marketing and distribution as the best way to help creators take their shows to the next level and ultimately develop the next generation of franchises. As AI began to gain traction, deFaria and Sisto sensed an opening to use the tech to help boost audience growth, believing that conventional marketing methods were losing effectiveness. That contrasts with some other players in Hollywood, who have sought to apply AI to the creative process in areas like visual effects and idea generation. "AI can't really make stories that are enduring," deFaria said. "The biggest pain point is getting an audience. There's wonderful stuff being done. I'm not sure anyone's getting to see it." Chronicle is starting with a focus on animators, where deFaria's background lies. It provides funding, a business plan, and a homegrown suite of AI tools to help them distribute their shows and build a loyal fan base in return for an equity stake. The tools do things like automate the creation of thumbnail photos for YouTube and monitor social media for reactions to the content. They plan to invest as much as 40% of the $11.6 million raised in creators, in the form of multiple investments over time per creator. So far, they've evaluated some 200 creators and invested in six, with a goal of backing up to 15 by the end of the year. Checks run in the neighborhood of $50,000. Chronicle wouldn't identify any of the creators it's backing, but said they're in various stages with projects that include a short film that's coming out and another that's due next year. One creator they pointed to as the type they would like to back is Vivienne Medrano. She's the creator of the YouTube animated series "Hazbin Hotel" and "Helluva Boss," and got a first-look deal with Amazon's Prime Video. Medrano has built a fan base partly by showing the process behind her animation. YouTube is a natural starting point for many of the projects Chronicle is backing. The Google-owned platform is increasingly becoming a home for TV-like series, with top creators or media companies launching shows or distributing existing episodes there. Chronicle isn't alone in chasing the independent creator opportunity. There's Further Adventures, a new studio that's investing in digital creators and independent filmmakers. Promise, an AI studio, launched last year and has gotten backing from Peter Chernin's North Road, Andreessen Horowitz, and Google. Others have tackled the distribution side of creators. Jellysmack helped YouTubers recirculate their videos on other platforms like Facebook and Snapchat in exchange for a cut of ad earnings. Amazon-backed Spotter provides capital and services, including an AI product, to help creators come up with new video ideas and elements. Chronicle's long-term goal in all its work with creators is to help them monetize their projects in various ways. That could be by selling or licensing to a streaming service, creating a free ad-supported streaming TV (FAST) channel, or even staging a musical. That's why they say they're not using AI just for short-term monetization gains on YouTube but rather to build loyal fan bases. "Hacking views does nothing for us," Sisto said. "If you're just hacking views, you won't get fandom or community."
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock-Split Watch: Is This AI Stock That's Soared 300% Next on the List?
Only one "Magnificent Seven" company hasn't yet split its stock. Stock splits make it easier for a broader range of investors to buy the shares. 10 stocks we like better than Meta Platforms › Stock splits have fascinated investors over the past few years, with even the biggest artificial intelligence (AI) names -- such as Nvidia and Amazon -- completing such operations after their stock prices skyrocketed. But one AI stock, in particular, hasn't ever launched a split, and that's Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META). Here's why this company, which has soared more than 300% over the past three years, could be next on the list. Before diving in, though, let's take a closer look at how and why companies split their stocks. These operations are used to lower the price of each individual share -- so companies generally do this after their stock prices have made significant gains and have arrived at a price that may discourage some investors from buying. For example, as stocks approach the $1,000 mark, even if valuation looks fine, they still may be viewed as expensive by certain investors. And investors who don't have access to fractional shares might find it difficult to buy a stock at these levels. These two elements could weigh on demand for the company's stock, limiting its potential for further gains. Companies split their stock by simply offering more shares to current holders -- the number of shares depends on the ratio of the split. So, for example, in a 10-for-1 split, if you originally held one share, you would hold 10 post-split. The value of each share would be worth less than it was prior to the operation, but the total value of your holding would remain the same. All of this means a stock split doesn't change anything fundamental about the company or the stock, but it does make it easier for a broader range of investors to buy. As mentioned, Nvidia and Amazon completed splits, along with other technology giants such as Broadcom and Alphabet. And, over time, almost every member of the "Magnificent Seven" -- a group of tech stocks that led the stock market higher last year -- has completed a stock split. The exception is social media and AI powerhouse Meta. Like its fellow Magnificent Seven players, Meta has delivered impressive stock performance -- and actually is the second-best performer over the past three years, after AI chip giant Nvidia. Today, Meta shares trade for more than $600, outpacing the rest of these star tech stocks -- Microsoft is the closest, with shares trading for about $470. Though Meta actually is the second-cheapest of the bunch -- trading for only 26x forward earnings estimates -- the stock's price tag still could dissuade investors or make it difficult for some investors to access it. When Nvidia launched its split a year ago, the company said it was doing so to make it easier for employees and other investors to invest -- so companies do recognize this as an issue and use stock splits to address it. If Meta, like Nvidia, takes this view, the tech giant could decide to launch a split in the months to come. A split also is a great idea at this point in Meta's story because it offers investors a positive message after a difficult first half for the tech industry. When a company splits the stock, bringing it down to a lower level, the move implies the company is confident about its prospects -- and believes the stock could soar once again. Finally, now is a good time to announce this sort of operation, because Meta could benefit from a more positive environment for AI stocks ahead. Earlier this year, investors worried about a slowdown in AI investment, but this didn't happen, and interest in AI remains high. The soaring demand seen by AI chip providers such as Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices illustrates this. Against this backdrop, investors may flock to companies heavily involved in AI, and this movement may lead Nvidia higher. Meta is known for its social media apps, led by the flagship Facebook, but the company also has developed its own large language model, Llama, and is using it to power features across its apps. This is key because the more time we spend on these apps, the more advertisers will see this as the ideal spot to reach us -- and advertising brings in most of Meta's revenue. All this means that a stock split could be very beneficial for both investors and for Meta -- and that's why this company may be next on the list to carry out such an operation. Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adria Cimino has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Stock-Split Watch: Is This AI Stock That's Soared 300% Next on the List? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
X Adds More Sports Engagement Options to Maintain Community Engagement
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. With Meta making a bigger push to lure sports communities over to its apps, X is looking to fight back, by adding various new sports engagement options which it hopes will enhance game day interaction in the app. X has been working on this since November last year, when it launched its new 'NFL Portal' element, which is designed to make it easier for users to stay up to date with key discussions around live NFL matches. As you can see in this example, the NFL Portal brings together posts from NFL teams, as well as key commentators, while also providing access to game schedules, live scores and stats. X added the same for NBA matches in April this year: And in the last week, X has also added some additional sports engagement elements, including updated share cards for sports games, and new score tracker notes on relevant posts. I mean, maybe you wouldn't want that, if you were hoping to catch the replay, but if you're looking up the event hashtag, you're likely fine with the score being spoiled. X users can also dock conversations about a live match, so they can keep on top of the discussion while X's video feed provides another means to share highlights in-stream. X will be hoping that this enhanced focus on sports discussion will prompt more engagement, and keep its top sports communities from migrating to other platforms instead. Because as noted, Meta's making a push for this audience as well. Meta already has a deal in place with the UFC, which will see exclusive, live content shared to Threads, while Threads now also has its own live score displays for in progress sporting events, which is a first step towards a similar game day hub like X. Meta has also made a specific point of highlighting that sports discussion is rising fast in the app, with some sports-related communities growing by millions in a matter of months. And amid the recent NBA Finals fanfare, Threads also hosted a live chat with ESPN's Malika Andrews to promote the event. In combination, you can see how Threads is looking to make inroads with this key discussion element, as another effort to put pressure on X. And given that sports is the biggest topic of discussion on X, that makes a lot of sense: The fact that X is now looking to add more sports engagement elements, and fast, suggests that Threads likely is making some progress on this front, and building its own sports-based communities, causing engagement challenges for the app. And if Threads can become more of a focal point for live sports discussion, that could fast become a major issue for Elon's social media project, which now runs the risk of becoming a bigger version of Parler or Truth Social, where political discussion becomes the domineering focus of the app. I suspect that many X users are not interested in such, but have largely been able to ignore it, in order to maintain their established sports communities. But if those groups start to fragment, and re-seed themselves on Threads instead, that could see a big chunk of X's usage filter away over time. I'd suggest that this is already happening, hence X's rethink of its sports elements, and the broader stats which show a decline in X usage. I also think that X is putting too much reliance on its Grok AI chatbot to drive engagement. Just this week, LinkedIn CEO Ryan Roslansky noted that LinkedIn's AI-generated post creation tools aren't catching on as it had hoped they would, which could point to a broader shift away from AI as a creation tool. Don't get me wrong, there's clearly value in AI for some elements, including analytics, ad targeting, product image generation, etc. But for personal, creative use, in regards to providing post text options, reimagining images, generating video, etc. I don't think that there's going to be as much value in these aspects, from a general user standpoint. The risk then is that by making these tools more readily available in-stream, platforms will eventually become more and more inundated by AI slop, which will turn users away. You can already see this starting on TikTok, where AI-generated video posts (mostly created in Google Veo), lacking in originality or creativity, and are starting to overtake human-created content. Yet, it's the human-created content that facilitates connection and engagement, because there's nothing unique about animated video generated from a text prompt. Anyone can do it, with the only real differentiator being in the concept and the writing behind it. And standing out in that respect is much more difficult. X's continued push on Grok could lead to the same, and it'll be interesting to see how the platform looks to counter engagement losses with more features designed to enhance the user experience, in variance to this. Because if X starts losing its key discussion groups, it's going to lose, period.
