Process to dissolve the Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation paused
A seagull takes flight off a statue of Captain George Vancouver outside Vancouver City Hall, on Saturday, January 9, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck
The City of Vancouver has put a pause on its process transitioning governance of the Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation, marking another delay to its much talked about plan to fully collapse the board.
In December 2023, Mayor Ken Sim announced his plan to abolish the board and reallocate its responsibilities to city council in a bid to save money. In November last year, a report from the city's Parks and Recreation Transition Working Group said the disintegration of the board would save the city approximately $7 million a year.
Removing the park board would require making an amendment to the Vancouver Charter, a provincial statute, and the city would need the legislature to vote on whether those changes could go ahead.
In a message sent to City of Vancouver staff and shared by Vancouver Park Board commissioner Thomas Digby, the city noted that the province made changes to the Vancouver Charter earlier this month, but made no mention of the park board.
'The provincial government did not introduce Charter amendments for consideration by the legislature in the spring session, which ended yesterday, May 29,' the statement read.
'The provincial government has reaffirmed its commitment to, at a future date, enact these legislative changes.'
In the meantime, any planning that was in place to prepare for a transition of governance has been paused.
Any information regarding the timing of any legislative changes will be released once the city receives it, it said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
43 minutes ago
- CBC
ETFs are outpacing mutual funds despite market volatility. Are rookie retail investors at risk?
Canadian investors are putting more of their money into exchange-traded funds (ETFs), according to recent data, even as the U.S.-led trade war rocks global stock markets, and some experts say rookie retail investors are at higher risk. Net sales of exchange-traded funds — a basket of stocks that can be bought and sold throughout the trading day — are outpacing those of mutual funds in Canada, especially among retail investors, according to a CIBC report published earlier this month. Mutual funds, which are sturdier investment products that have more embedded fees and fewer tax advantages, still make up a larger portion of Canadian investment portfolios. They're usually actively managed by a professional and are exposed to fewer intraday market swings because they're traded once per day after market close. Yet ETFs have grown at three times the rate of their older cousins in the last five years, signalling a shift in how both retail investors and professionals are approaching their investment strategies. Sales for both dropped dramatically in 2022, at the onset of the inflation crisis. "People have been disappointed with [mutual fund] performance for a long time, and historically, most people have had more investments in mutual funds than in ETFs," said Dan Hallett, a Windsor, Ont.,-based vice president of research for Highview Financial Group. "More people are paying attention to the costs that are embedded in their investments and the ETF structure is generally a lower-cost vehicle than a mutual fund, particularly on the retail side," he said. "But it's also happening at the advisory level." In fact, ETF assets (the value of all the equities and cash held in the funds) reached an all-time high of $518 billion in 2024, a report from the Investment Funds Institute of Canada shows. Those assets have ballooned by nearly seven times in the last decade. Retail investors are contributing heavily to that growth, both reports say, as more people opt to take their investments into their own hands rather than pay a professional financial adviser the fees to manage their portfolios. But there are concerns about risk. South Korea, worried about rookie retail investors who are buying exchange-traded products (including ETFs) by leveraging debt, has introduced a one-hour mandated training for those who manage their own investments. Impact on investor outcomes In the U.S., investment management company Vanguard's VOO has become one of the world's best-selling ETFs by bundling the highest performing stocks from the S&P 500 index. The company's own risk scale, which measures the likelihood of losing money on an investment, puts the VOO at a risk level of four out of five, for products that are "broadly diversified but are subject to wide fluctuations in share prices." It recommends it for long-term investors. Sal D'Angelo, the head of product at Vanguard Canada, says there are a few reasons why ETF uptake has grown substantially in the last several years. Both retail investors and professional portfolio managers are moving to lower-cost options; There's more interest in indexing, which is a passive investment strategy that matches an index's best-performing stocks, rather than trying to beat the index's growth; and there are more retail investors buying ETFs in general. WATCH | What the bond market selloff means: How the U.S. bond market made Trump blink | About That 1 month ago Duration 8:42 Vanguard Canada's version of the S&P 500 ETF is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the VFV ticker. It boasted an annual return of 35.24 per cent last year and 23.3 per cent in 2023. This year, in the wake of a tariff-induced roller-coaster market environment, the ETF is showing a year-to-date loss of -3.07 per cent. D'Angelo argues that ETFs work well in these conditions because of their flexibility. "ETFs as a vehicle, I think, work really well in volatile markets because they have that immediate liquidity if you do want to trade," he said. Others say that the influx of investors buying ETFs under volatile market conditions poses some concerns. "It's concerning to me in terms of the impact on investor outcomes," said Hallett. He thinks the same factors that left some investors disappointed in mutual funds could eventually afflict ETFs, too. "When you have investors that are trying to build a portfolio and they're bombarded with almost a dizzying array of choices, only the most disciplined and knowledgeable investors will benefit from that and can easily sift through it," he said. "Everybody else is going to get very distracted," Hallett said, "and that's where you end up with a disappointing performance." Massive jump in April The data comes as a new generation of investors have game-ified day trading, buying and sell stocks at the drop of a hat from their phones and tablets. Automated tools — which let investors set trading parameters that are then executed by a bot, like selling a stock when it hits a certain price — are also seeing more frequent use. Tradeweb, a company which operates marketplaces for traders, saw an 83 per cent jump in the number of retail investors using automated tools to make trades in April compared to the same month a year earlier. "Something we haven't seen so prolifically in previous periods of market volatility is an increase in clients turning to automation," wrote Adam Gould, the global head of equities at Tradeweb. "However, in April, we saw investors using automated tools [to] enhance reactivity to a challenging trading landscape with greater speed of execution." Marius Zoican, an associate professor of finance at the University of Calgary, studies the gameification of investing and monitors retail investor behaviour. "If the market goes up five per cent within a day or drops five per cent intraday, and if you are holding ETFs and you are receiving these notifications, it's very tempting to act on them, even though those are about past performance," he said. "Once you're sort of nudged … into this idea that the market is going down, you're likely to just go on your phone and and sell. And that's perhaps not [the] optimal behaviour." He added that during highly volatile times, like the period we're currently in, ETFs can face a liquidity rush if too many people try to sell at the same time. "That might create a divergence between the price of the ETF and the price of the underlying basket," he explained, whereas mutual funds managed by a professional have more guardrails against impulsive investment behaviour. "When there's a lot of volatility, there are always additional risks for retail [investors], for small investors who may act impulsively."
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Trump biopic The Apprentice takes home top film award at Canadian Screen Awards
Social Sharing The divisive, little-seen yet still-controversial Donald Trump biopic The Apprentice managed to grab the brass ring on Sunday, taking home the top award of best motion picture at the final night of the Canadian Screen Awards. It beat out stiff competition in that top category from filmmaker Matthew Rankin's Universal Language, which made the Academy Awards shortlist for best international feature late last year. And while The Apprentice was still the big winner of the night with two, Rankin's surreal comedy was no slouch either. Its five prior wins over the weekend and one Sunday, for directing, meant it still had the most wins of all films nominated. "I'm from Winnipeg, I'm not accustomed to winning anything," Rankin joked, before referencing his film's commentary on alienation, xenophobia and culture shock. "We all know what political moment we're living in; every day there are new Berlin walls shooting up all around us and pitting us against each other into very cruel binaries," he said. "If our film stands for anything, it stands for the fact that kindness can be a radical gesture." It wasn't the only surprise of the night: CTV's Children Ruin Everything increased its trophy count to three, as it stepped in to snatch best comedy series from Crave's Late Bloomer, which had snapped up four trophies this weekend. And while it was up for a total of 20 awards — the most of any nominated title — Law & Order Toronto: Criminal Intent only managed to increase its trophy count by one, to pull in a paltry total of three this year. The win was a big one, though, as the Canadian version of the expansive Law & Order franchise won best drama series. Triumphant as they were, some of the awards' biggest winners were honoured outside the big night: TV movie Wynonna Earp: Vengeance and documentary series The Tragically Hip: No Dress Rehearsal both earned seven honours earlier over the weekend. Pointed messages But Sunday's winners did at least occasionally broach big topics. Upon receiving the best feature length documentary trophy, Molly Wickham alluded to the subject of their film Yintah, which follows Witsuwit'en Nation fighting for its sovereignty in the face of planned pipeline projects. "We still face colonial occupation, and we are still fighting to live in peace as on our land," Wickham said. "The fight continues and we will never give up. Our sovereignty is tied to our collective freedom." Canada's Drag Race won best reality competition — having now done so for every year but one of its five-year broadcast — and increased its total count to eight, the most of any awarded productions this year. Drag queen and Drag Race host Brooke Lynn Hytes spoke about what she'd most like to ask U.S. President Donald Trump backstage in the press room. "What foundation do you use? Because it is the wrong shade," she said, before addressing his policies targeting transgender people. "Why are you targeting the most marginalized, smallest group of people in the country and making an example out of them when they are not doing anything to hurt anybody; they're just trying to exist?" And as The Apprentice 's producer Daniel Bekerman took to the stage, he also spoke of Trump — the subject of their film, who threatened a lawsuit to remove it from circulation. "Our movie shows how the young Donald Trump amassed wealth and power by finding a dilapidated building and slapping his name on it," he said. "Now he wants to slap his name on this country." "The most powerful person in the world tried to squish us, and they failed. They failed." But all in all, the twelve awards and jokes on offer were more or less safe, smooth sailing for a show that hasn't found itself far from disapproval or drama over the past few years. After a pre-packaged, pre-recorded change of format in 2023 that led to complaints from none other than Eugene Levy, the CSAs returned to a live format in 2024, though one that largely focused on the dire and potentially dismal future of Canadian film and television. There was a new round of complaints this year, centred around the awards show's plan to air exclusively online, eschewing the traditional TV broadcast. But after a last-minute reversal of that decision, things went ahead much the same as any prior, nondescript year. That engineered smoothness resulted in an almost pointed exclusion of reference to the many dark clouds hanging over the Canadian film industry. From proposed Hollywood tariffs, to ongoing feuds between the CRTC and streaming platforms fighting against Canadian content obligations, or the bleak performance of Canadian English-language films in comparison to their American counterparts at the box office, few of the industry's existential issues made their way into a broadcast more concerned with gentle preening. Dimmed starlight Instead, there were cautiously celebratory allusions to Canada's artistic importance, such as Manny Jacinto's Radius award for international impact, and an in-memoriam segment for Donald Sutherland presented by his son, actor Kiefer Sutherland, along with hit-and-miss jokes so typical of such ceremonies. The general tone was set by host Lisa Gilroy in her opening skit. In it, she jokingly compared herself to "comedy legend" Martin Short, versus her own status as "Instagram account-holder, Lisay Gilroy," who was like "a Canadian Nikki Glaser, only less successful." But the intermittent bits were just enough to keep the night moving along, if not write home about. And unsurprisingly, the star power for Canada's biggest night was dimmed. The two A-list winners — Sebastian Stan for The Apprentice and Cate Blanchett, who won best performance in a drama for Rumours — did not even offer video or written acceptance speeches, let alone attend. When presenting the night's last award, Hytes even managed to sneak in a self-aware joke that worked for finally breathing a bit of honesty into the proceedings. "The eyes of the world are focused on this stage," she said to doubting laughs. "And by the world, I do mean Canada." The stars who did attend did seem genuinely affected by the honour. As Allegiance 's Supinder Wratch accepted her trophy for best lead performer in a drama series, her voice quivered while remarking on her father's recent passing. And when Run the Burbs ' Andrew Phung won best lead performer in a comedy series, he could barely keep from crying during his acceptance speech. Despite it being his sixth career acting CSA, he struggled through the emotion the award brought out as he barrelled through thank-yous. "Today is our twentieth anniversary," he said as his voice broke and the camera pointed to his wife, Tamara Sharpe. "When I felt like I couldn't do anything, you made me believe that I could do everything. Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, thank you so much."
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
1 exam, 50% of final grade. Students say Quebec must follow rest of Canada and change 'unfair' system
Social Sharing As students across the province get ready to write their ministerial exams, the pressure is high – and so are the stakes. Luca Di Fiore, a Grade 11 student, says the final exam feels like a judgment. "It seems unfair almost after everything you do throughout the entire year," he said. "To hear that one test that you do at the end of the year, irrespective of everything you've accomplished throughout the entire year, could just change everything for you [is unfortunate]." Quebec is the only province in Canada where some final exams account for 50 per cent of high school students' final grades. Some teachers and students have been pushing for change and wish to be heard. The province has standardized Grade 10 and 11 exams in French, English, mathematics, history and science – all worth between 25 and 35 per cent of final grades. But some, including history of Quebec and Canada and basic French as a second language, count for 50 per cent. Other Canadian provinces also administer standardized exams, but none are weighted as heavily. Quebec wasn't always the only province placing such emphasis on these exams. Alberta brought its equivalent – Diploma Exams – down to 30 per cent 10 years ago. Di Fiore explained that if students are unable to retain everything they learned during the year, it can make all their hard work feel "pointless" when it all comes down to just three hours. His classmate, Mia Beauchamp, shared that a poor exam result has the power to bring down her mood and her confidence and makes her doubt whether she'll pass the year. "I think it's very stressful because we can't remember it all. Teachers aren't expected to remember it all, why are we?" she asked. She believes the exam's weight should be reduced. Di Fiore proposed replacing the ministerial exam with monthly standardized tests from the ministry. Although he acknowledged the value in maintaining test uniformity to ensure consistent teaching across the province, he emphasized the need to discuss lowering the exam's weight. WATCH | Students, teachers want standardized testing to weigh less: Do ministerial exams count for too much in Quebec high schools? 9 minutes ago Duration 2:59 'Not the way the real world works' Paul Berry, a Grade 10 and 11 mathematics and history teacher at Options High School, is also advocating for a reduction in the final exam's weight. While he sees their importance, he argued they shouldn't hold the level of prominence currently given to them. "[The government treats] these exams like they're sacred texts and like they're the be-all and end-all," he said, adding that the experience is very heavy for many students. "There's nothing really in life where you're going to be facing that type of situation … It's just not the way the real world works." Berry and his colleagues work with many students who struggle with mental health and learning disabilities. He expressed concern over whether these students can effectively demonstrate their knowledge under such pressure. "For the most vulnerable students, it's really them who get hit the hardest," he said. Berry also views the situation as a sign of distrust in teachers, who spend their entire year with their students. "It shows a real lack of appreciation for the work that we do and a lack of concern for the real-life consequences that some of these students will face if they're not able to meet what the government considers to be the standard," he said. Current model limits teachers, some teachers say Michael Wadden, a Grade 10 and 11 history teacher at a high school in Montreal's West Island, remarked that it often feels like teachers are "teaching to an exam." He wishes he had more freedom to engage students through alternative methods – like a mock parliament, debates, analysis and reflection – but says those activities risk cutting into exam preparation time. Wadden argued that the current model limits students' ability to reflect, express their opinions and take a stance – skills he says all teachers would love to encourage them to develop, especially in a course that teaches Canadian and Quebec history. Around this time of year, he starts to see more absenteeism as students realize much of the classroom time will be dedicated to reviewing material they feel they can study on their own. Wadden also pointed out that some of his students are grappling with trauma and issues at home. "To have everything so dependent on one day and three hours is just not fair to these kids," he said. Wadden's colleague, Esther Ste-Marie, a Grade 7 social studies teacher, noted that even though her students don't yet write ministerial exams, teachers are already working hard to prepare them for Grade 10. Still, this year, she's trying something new: prioritizing a project-based approach and critical thinking. "It's been working well, but I still have at the back of my head … my students. They still need to be able to do a formal test because in Grade 10, they'll have to do it like everybody else," she said. Ste-Marie pointed out that this reality ties teachers to the responsibility of preparing students for ministerial exams. "The ministry is asking us to create those students ready for the 21st century skills to make them lifelong learners, to make them critical thinkers, but yet they're limiting us," she said. "We want them to think outside the box, but we're not allowing them to think outside the box." How Alberta's exam reform benefited students Jason Schilling, the president of the Alberta Teachers' Association, explained that the province's decision to make final exams worth 30 per cent instead of 50 significantly relieved pressure on students. "It also allowed me as a teacher to assess my students in a variety of different ways that would show what the students know more than necessarily sitting down and doing their reading comprehension in a written test in such a high stakes kind of moment," he said. "When it's not weighted as much or if it's not weighted at all, it does allow you flexibility to be more creative." Quebec Education Minister Bernard Drainville stated last week that he is not considering any changes. "Fifty per cent to ensure equality, to ensure that we can compare results from one school to the next, from one region to the next," he told reporters. But Di Fiore, while understanding Drainville's perspective, disagrees. "If we're talking about equality, if everybody's at 30 [per cent], that's still equality, right?" asked Di Fiore. "And why are students getting pressure put on them if the thing that we're attempting to evaluate with these [exams] is the school systems?" Di Fiore believes those affected by the current system deserve a voice in the decision. "If you're a doctor, you talk to your patient about what they're feeling," he said. "I think everybody should be involved in that conversation so we can get all perspectives." WATCH | Learn more about Quebec's plan to ban cellphones in schools: Full cellphone ban part of new 'civility' rules in Quebec schools 1 month ago Duration 2:43 New regulations will prohibit students in public and private schools from using electronic devices on school property as of September 2025. Quebec Education Minister Bernard Drainville hopes the regulation will lead to better concentration and socialization between students. The rules also set requirements for how students address teachers and staff.
