logo
We Tested Apple CarPlay Ultra. It's Great—But There's a Catch

We Tested Apple CarPlay Ultra. It's Great—But There's a Catch

Motor 110 hours ago

"Does it have CarPlay?" It's one of the first questions anyone—driver, passenger, or buyer—asks about a new car. The frustrating menus, clunky user interfaces, and overall poor experience surrounding modern car infotainment systems have driven the majority of people to
Apple CarPlay
(or Android Auto, Google's native equivalent), which effectively mirrors your phone on the infotainment display.
Since CarPlay's introduction in 2014, it's been almost exclusively for the center display. Now, though, with the arrival of CarPlay Ultra, the entire gauge cluster and dashboard turn into an Apple-mimicking iPhone projection. But of course, it's not without a bit of controversy.
Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1
Fourteen automakers originally signed on for CarPlay Ultra when Apple announced it back in 2022. But some, like Audi, Ford, and Mercedes-Benz, have since
backed away from the deal
, while General Motors continues its assault on CarPlay entirely. Genesis, Hyundai, Kia, Porsche, and Aston Martin, though, still welcome the new technology.
On the surface, it's a debate between the popularity of CarPlay and the automaker's ability to tightly control its user experience. Beneath the many consumer layers, automakers are worried about handing over user data to Apple—data that the automakers find extremely valuable.
If they aren't selling your data to insurance companies, they're selling it to advertisers or aggregators looking for valuable details on consumer habits. Cluing Apple into that data isn't something automakers will do readily.
In the case of Aston Martin, it recognized the popularity of CarPlay and made the decision "for [its] customers." As a small-volume luxury carmaker, Aston stands to lose if it doesn't get with the times. For much larger brands, this isn't as much of an issue.
Nonetheless, I got to sample and stress-test CarPlay Ultra for a few hours in a 2025 DBX and lightly grill Aston about how Ultra integrates into existing systems.
First and most importantly, CarPlay Ultra only works with an iPhone 12 or newer running iOS 18.5. Upon first connection, the phone uploads 50 MB of data to the car, basically a folder full of graphical assets specific to each vehicle. Ultra runs alongside the automaker's infotainment system as a sort of plug-in program, interfacing with the onboard systems for advanced driver assistance, air conditioning, radio, and drive modes so that most functions can be controlled through CarPlay.
CarPlay Ultra does not deeply interface with the vehicle network. Instead, the onboard systems offer the relevant information to CarPlay and nothing more, at least according to Aston Martin. In nerd speak, CarPlay doesn't even communicate on the controller area network bus (CAN bus) of the DBX.
Effectively, it's Apple graphics and UI over Aston's systems. It does run as a small operating system within the DBX, but it's not an entirely new infotainment system, and it still operates as a phone projection.
Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1
Effectively, it's Apple graphics and UI over Aston's systems.
Curiously, Aston did not have to pay a licensing fee either. All the automaker had to do was foot the development costs on integration, and Apple simply provided support. As Aston tells it, integration was relatively painless, with Apple listening to feedback from Aston and vice versa. But customers beware: As the old saying goes, 'If the product is free, you are the product.'
Still, the user interface is classic Apple: Easy and intuitive. All major functions were easy to find under the new "Vehicle" menu, with specific push notifications while using physical controls. For example, clicking the ADAS off button on the center console prompted a CarPlay notification confirming the system's deactivation.
Even drive mode selections were displayed when switching from Sport to Sport+, and specific drive mode settings were available deeper within CarPlay, allowing adjustments to things like the dampers, steering, and engine tuning, among others.
The controversial piece, the gauge cluster, was also a highlight. It ran faster and looked slicker than Aston's native stuff, though that's more of an Aston issue than a CarPlay improvement.
Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1
Photo by: Chris Rosales / Motor1
The ability to customize colors and backgrounds on a variety of layouts was lovely, and Aston's collaborative gauge cluster was crisp, with the Apple-specific stuff existing between the speedometer and tachometer. A full-screen Apple Maps projection also exists in the gauge cluster with turn-by-turn navigation.
It's all undeniably Apple, but extremely nice to look at and use.
There were a few caveats, though. Ultra is wireless only, which is difficult enough for standard CarPlay at times. Using Aston's provided iPhone 15, it ran smoothly for the two hours I tested it. Yet, using it with my personal iPhone 13 Pro Max running iOS 18.5 was excruciatingly laggy and slow. I attempted to use it for 15 minutes, but it never smoothed out, so I reverted back to the iPhone 15. That said, it's still in the early stages, so there are probably some bugs that need ironing out, and there's a new switching menu to smoothly choose between paired phones.
At any rate, CarPlay Ultra is here—and it's very good. While the DBX does lose a little bit of Aston Martin charm, it still has a reasonable amount of brand identity beneath the Apple onslaught. But even Aston's new infotainment system, for as good as it is, benefits from legibility improvements and additional ease of use. That makes CarPlay Ultra an easy win.
But what happens once Ultra goes up against Hyundai and Porsche's excellent systems? With automakers dropping out of Ultra and dragging their feet on integration, we will have to wait and see.
More On Apple CarPlay
Chevy's Infotainment System Is Excellent—Especially With CarPlay: Review
GM Swears Ditching Apple CarPlay Was Still the Right Move
Stop Trying to Reinvent the Infotainment System
Apple CarPlay iOS 18: All the Updates You Should Care About
Share this Story
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Reddit
WhatsApp
E-Mail
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mark Zuckerberg overhauled Meta's entire AI org in a risky, multi-billion dollar bet on ‘superintelligence'
Mark Zuckerberg overhauled Meta's entire AI org in a risky, multi-billion dollar bet on ‘superintelligence'

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Zuckerberg overhauled Meta's entire AI org in a risky, multi-billion dollar bet on ‘superintelligence'

Mark Zuckerberg is stacking the deck in the AI race, betting that unlimited capital, top talent, and raw computing power will ensure victory. If the winning hand Zuckerberg is chasing—AI 'superintelligence'— is still very much a vague and theoretical concept, the Meta CEO's remarkable series of moves unveiled Monday instantly changed the reality for everyone else in the game, particularly the pioneering AI startups without Meta's resources. Zuckerberg announced a major revamp of its AI operations on Monday, putting the company's collection of AI businesses and projects under the umbrella of a newly created organization called Meta Superintelligence Labs, or MSL, and appointing Alexandr Wang, the former CEO of data-labeling startup Scale AI, as Meta's first ever Chief AI Officer. 'As the pace of AI progress accelerates, developing superintelligence is coming into sight,' Zuckerberg wrote in an internal memo obtained by Fortune. 'I believe this will be the beginning of a new era for humanity, and I am fully committed to doing what it takes for Meta to lead the way.' He added that the details he would share were about building towards a company vision of 'personal superintelligence for everyone.' The new superintelligence lab, Zuckerberg wrote, 'includes all of our foundations, product, and FAIR teams, as well as a new lab focused on developing the next generation of our models.' He also confirmed that former GitHub CEO and investor Nat Friedman has also joined Meta to partner with Wang to lead MSL, heading Meta's work on AI products and applied research. 'Nat has served on our Meta Advisory Group for the last year, so he already has a good sense of our roadmap and what we need to do,' Zuckerberg wrote. Fortune reported last week that Friedman is also connected with Wang and Scale – he is a longtime and active Scale investor and co-hosted the secretive Scale AI Security Summit in Utah in November 2023. Meta has embarked on an extraordinary hiring spree in recent weeks, bringing Wang on board as part of a $14.3 billion deal with Scale, and recruiting top researchers from OpenAI with rumored $100 million compensation offers. In Zuckerberg's internal memo on Monday, he named eleven top researchers who had joined Meta from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. For OpenAI, which kicked off the generative AI craze with the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, Meta's aggressive hiring spree represents a critical threat. OpenAI's chief research officer Mark Chen described the situation as feeling like someone 'breaking into our home,' calling the talent loss 'theft.' OpenAI said it had begun recalibrating compensation and crafting 'creative' retention packages to stay competitive. While OpenAI has a longstanding partnership with Microsoft, which has invested more than $13 billion in OpenAI, the relationship between the two companies has reportedly grown strained over the past year. As Meta increasingly seeks to move into OpenAI's territory however, the Sam Altman led startup may need to find allies with deep pockets. OpenAI recently began using AI chips made by Google, according to media reports, signaling a growing bond between the two companies, even though Google's Gemini LLMs compete directly with OpenAI. With an internet advertising business that generates more than $40 billion every quarter, Meta can afford to bankroll a no-holds-barred AI batter even it doesn't immediately deliver a profit. Still, Meta's latest moves carry plenty of risks. In making Wang chief AI officer, Meta has chosen someone who is not a computer scientist to lead all of its AI efforts—a choice that may not go over well with Meta's deep bench of AI scientists and PhDs, many of whom have already decamped. Zuckerberg noted in his memo that he and Wang had worked together for several years and said 'I consider him to be the most impressive founder of his generation.' There is also no agreed-upon formal definition of 'superintelligence,' though it is typically refers to an intelligence that vastly surpasses human capabilities in virtually all domains, including scientific creativity, general wisdom, and social skills—exceeding human cognition across the board. Superintelligence is generally perceived as going beyond artificial general intelligence, or AGI, which, though also vague, typically refers to an AI system with human-level intelligence across a wide range of work-related tasks. That is, it can reason, plan, solve problems, understand language, and learn in a generalizable way, much like a human. Zuckerberg claimed that Meta is 'uniquely positioned to deliver superintelligence to the world,' pointing to its efforts to build out data centers supporting more computing power than smaller labs – it is currently spending tens of billions on data centers and is raising more. The Financial Times reported last week that Meta is seeking $29 billion from private capital firms for its all-in push to build AI data centers. Of course, Microsoft and Google are also spending tens of billions of dollars in cap ex to build out their AI infrastructure. And OpenAI has said it intends to invest $500 billion with partners including Softbank in the coming years to build out its Stargate network of AI datacenters. If the race to Superintelligence is a test of wills and capital, Zuckerberg seems to be betting that he can outlast the competition. This story was originally featured on

NBA free agency 2025 tracker, live updates: Latest deals, news, reaction and more as negotiating window opens
NBA free agency 2025 tracker, live updates: Latest deals, news, reaction and more as negotiating window opens

New York Times

time30 minutes ago

  • New York Times

NBA free agency 2025 tracker, live updates: Latest deals, news, reaction and more as negotiating window opens

The Hawks' Dejounte Murray trade with New Orleans keeps on paying dividends. Not only did Atlanta obtain the pick that went to the Celtics for Kristaps Porziņģis and defensive stopper Dyson Daniels, but also the $25 million trade exception that deal generated now has been used to acquire Nickeil Alexander-Walker from the Minnesota Timberwolves. Atlanta will still have several million of that exception left over, as well as its full $14.1 million nontaxpayer midlevel exception and a $13 million exception from the Bogdan Bogdanović trade. But as a practical consequence, a hugely productive offseason in Atlanta is now down to smaller moves. Atlanta sent only a second-round pick to Minnesota in the sign-and-trade to assure it topped every other team on the market, ultimately going a shade over the nontaxpayer midlevel exception to get Alexander-Walker. The Hawks still have roughly $13 million remaining below the tax line with at least two more roster spots to fill, and seem likely to target another guard based on current needs. For its trouble, Minnesota will receive a trade exception for roughly $14.4 million. The Wolves are hugely unlikely to use it this season because they're way over the first apron, but it's a possibility for next summer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store