4 takeaways from RFK Jr.'s dual congressional hearings
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testified during back-to-back hearings in the House and Senate on Wednesday for the first time since his confirmation.
Kennedy faced questions on vaccines, canceled medical research and his drastic overhaul of the federal health agency during the hearings about President Trump's budget request, which could lead to even greater cuts.
Here are some key takeaways:
Democrats used the hearings to hammer Kennedy on his vaccine messaging.
Amid the deadliest measles outbreak in decades, the secretary has muddied his message about the importance of the measles shot in an effort to appeal to both the general public and anti-vaccine hard-liners.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) pressed Kennedy on new standards for vaccine approvals and on his comments about the measles shot.
'You told the public that the vaccine wanes very quickly. You went on the 'Dr. Phil' show and said the measles vaccine was never fully tested for safety. You said there was fetal debris in the measles vaccine,' Murphy said Wednesday afternoon.
'All true,' Kennedy shouted. 'Do you want me to lie to the public?'
'None of that is true,' Murphy retorted.
Earlier in the day, House Appropriations ranking member Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) told Kennedy he was 'promoting quackery.'
'Under your watch, our country is now failing to contain vaccine-preventable diseases,' she added.
When asked by Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) if he would choose to vaccinate his own children today against measles, Kennedy hesitated a bit before answering: 'Probably.'
Kennedy has previously said he vaccinated his now-adult children but regrets that decision.
'What I would say is my opinions about vaccines are irrelevant,' Kennedy said. 'I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me.'
He did not directly answer whether he'd vaccinate his children against polio or chickenpox, and he said he thinks vaccination is a personal choice.
Kennedy defiantly defended his overhaul of HHS, even as he seemed hazy on some of the details and the impact of putting 10,000 employees on administrative leave.
'We had to act quickly' on the layoffs, Kennedy said in response to questions from Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.). 'We understood there would be some mistakes made and that we would go back and reverse them … but it was more important to do decisive action quickly.'
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) asked Kennedy about funding delays and cuts that would threaten domestic violence-prevention programs.
'My understanding is that the domestic violence funding was not cut,' Kennedy said. 'I don't know why people would be experiencing even delays.'
But Murkowski pointed out that because of the agency layoffs 'it may be that you don't have people processing these things.'
Kennedy dodged some specific questions about the reorganization of HHS, citing a court order. But he claimed it was his decision to fire probationary employees and that Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency provided information to aid the effort.
'I pushed back on certain ones and canceled certain ones,' Kennedy said.
Speaking broadly, he denied that many HHS offices were being eliminated, saying instead that some were being transferred to the Administration for a Healthy America, a new office proposed by the Trump administration.
Rep. Lois Frankel (D-Fla.) asked Kennedy exactly how many HHS employees have been laid off since January. Kennedy stated 10,000 people had been laid off and 10,000 more chose the Trump administration's 'fork in the road' deferred resignation offer.
'They're being paid to do nothing,' Frankel surmised.
'Well … a lot of them are supposed to be coming in still,' Kennedy responded.
'But they're coming in to do nothing,' Frankel pushed back. 'They're not allowed to work.'
'No, no. We want them working,' Kennedy insisted.
GOP lawmakers zeroed in on moves by the Trump administration that impact their constituents on Wednesday as well.
While not directly undermining Kennedy or questioning major moves, such as agency layoffs, Republicans pushed for answers on different parts of his agenda. Their questions showed a willingness to push back on 'Make American Healthy Again' priorities, particularly if the department's efforts conflicted with their districts' livelihoods.
In the House, Republican lawmakers sought answers on how new regulations would affect their districts. They thanked Kennedy for reinstating some fired workers and sought assurances that programs crucial to their constituents would be reinstated.
Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.) questioned how expensive the Food and Drug Administration's initiative to phase out artificial food dyes would be for the snack food manufacturers in his district.
'I think these dyes are safe. They've been approved but really trying to find substitutes — the costs we've seen estimate five to 10 times to try to fix that,' Fleischmann said, asking that Kennedy work with him on both the cost and the safety of any new dyes used to replace the ones being phased out.
Rep. Riley Moore (R-W.Va.) sought assurances from Kennedy that employees and programs at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) would be fully restored. Hundreds of NIOSH employees, including those at a Morgantown facility in Moore's district, had been laid off before being rehired this week by Kennedy.
The West Virginia Republican also asked for guarantees that the Coal Workers Health Surveillance Program and the Respirator Approval Program at NIOSH will be fully reinstated.
Wednesday was also the first time Kennedy testified in front of Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), the chair of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions who publicly wrestled with whether or not to confirm Kennedy.
Cassidy ultimately voted for Kennedy after receiving promises from Kennedy and the Trump administration to be kept informed about any controversial decisions made by the department.
'I will carefully watch for any effort to wrongfully sow public fear about vaccines,' Cassidy said at the time.
But while Cassidy pressed Kennedy hard in his confirmation hearing, especially about Kennedy's long-standing false claim that vaccines cause autism, he took a much softer tone on Wednesday.
'Much of the conversation around HHS's agenda has been set by anonymous sources in the media and individuals with a bias against the president,' Cassidy said in his opening statement. 'Americans need direct reassurance from the administration, from you Mr. Secretary, that its reforms will make their lives easier, not harder.'
Cassidy did not directly ask Kennedy about vaccines on Wednesday.
At one point, he interjected to correct the record when Kennedy said no vaccine except the COVID-19 shot had been evaluated against a placebo.
'The rotavirus, measles and HPV vaccines have been and some vaccines are tested against previous versions,' Cassidy said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
11 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE
WASHINGTON — The White House on Tuesday officially asked Congress to claw back $9.4 billion in already approved spending, taking funding away from programs targeted by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. It's a process known as 'rescission,' which requires President Donald Trump to get approval from Congress to return money that had previously been appropriated. Trump's aides say the funding cuts target programs that promote liberal ideologies. The request, if it passes the House and Senate, would formally enshrine many of the spending cuts and freezes sought by DOGE. It comes at a time when Musk is extremely unhappy with the tax cut and spending plan making its way through Congress, calling it on Tuesday a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the federal deficit. White House budget director Russ Vought said more rescission packages and other efforts to cut spending could follow if the current effort succeeds. ' Here's what to know about the rescissions request: The request to Congress is unlikely to meaningfully change the troublesome increase in the U.S. national debt. Tax revenues have been insufficient to cover the growing costs of Social Security, Medicare and other programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the government is on track to spend roughly $7 trillion this year, with the rescission request equaling just 0.1% of that total. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at Tuesday's briefing that Vought would continue to cut spending, hinting that there could be additional efforts to return funds. 'He has tools at his disposal to produce even more savings,' Leavitt said. Vought said he can send up additional rescissions at the end of the fiscal year in September 'and if Congress does not act on it, that funding expires.' 'It's one of the reasons why we are not putting all of our expectations in a typical rescissions process,' he added. A spokesperson for the White House Office of Management and Budget, speaking on condition of anonymity to preview some of the items that would lose funding, said that $8.3 billion was being cut from the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. NPR and PBS would also lose federal funding, as would the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, also known as PEPFAR. The spokesperson listed specific programs that the Trump administration considered wasteful, including $750,000 to reduce xenophobia in Venezuela, $67,000 for feeding insect powder to children in Madagascar and $3 million for circumcision, vasectomies and condoms in Zambia. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., complimented the planned cuts and pledged to pass them. 'This rescissions package reflects many of DOGE's findings and is one of the many legislative tools Republicans are using to restore fiscal sanity,' Johnson said. 'Congress will continue working closely with the White House to codify these recommendations, and the House will bring the package to the floor as quickly as possible.' Members of the House Freedom Caucus, among the chamber's most conservative lawmakers, said they would like to see additional rescission packages from the administration. 'We will support as many more rescissions packages the White House can send us in the coming weeks and months,' the group said in a press release. Sen. Susan Collins, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, gave the package a less optimistic greeting. 'Despite this fast track, the Senate Appropriations Committee will carefully review the rescissions package and examine the potential consequences of these rescissions on global health, national security, emergency communications in rural communities, and public radio and television stations,' the Maine lawmaker said in a statement. Boak writes for the Associated Press.
Fox News
12 minutes ago
- Fox News
Booker, Cruz spar over threats to US judges in fiery Senate spat
Sens. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas., sparred Tuesday over the uptick in threats made to federal court judges during President Donald Trump's second term. Their heated standoff comes as federal judges have issued a record number of injunctions against the flurry of executive actions by the president. The testy exchange took place during a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing titled "The Supposedly Least Dangerous Branch: District Judges v. Trump." Cruz, the subcommittee chair, used his remarks at the outset of the hearing to take aim at Democrats on the subcommittee, who he said were "utterly silent" about judicial threats under the Biden administration, including after threats were made against conservative Supreme Court justices. Cruz took aim at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., for "unleashing" protesters who gathered outside the homes of Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh prior to their decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization – the landmark ruling that overturned a 50-year-old abortion rights precedent – which he later said was ironic given the current "pearl-clutching" stance of Democrats on the panel. His remarks sparked a quick rebuke from Booker, who said, "Something you said is actually dangerous, and it needs to be addressed." "This implication that there was silence [from Democrats on the panel] at a time there were threats on people's houses is absolutely absurd," he continued. "I remember the rhetoric and the comments, the concern from [Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del.]," Booker said. "I actually distinctly remember you, chairman, on more than one occasion, condemning those attacks on Republican-appointed jurists." "To say things like that just feeds the partisanship in this institution, and it feeds the fiery rhetoric. And it's just plain not true," Booker added. In response, Cruz argued the "angry mobs" that appeared outside the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices prior to their decision in Dobbs were in violation of U.S.C. Section 1507. That law prohibits picketing outside the homes of judges or justices' homes in a way that could influence their decision or otherwise obstruct justice. Despite the protests, Cruz said, the Biden-led Justice Department "prosecuted nobody." "I really appreciate that you have now shifted the accusation you made earlier," Booker shot back. "Your accusation was that we were silent in the face of protests at Supreme Court justices' homes. Again, we joined together in a bipartisan way, not only to condemn that but to pass legislation to extend round-the-clock security protection. So if you're saying we didn't criticize –" he started before Cruz interjected. "Did the Biden DOJ go out and arrest a single person under this law?" the Texas lawmaker asked. Booker attempted to respond before Cruz interrupted again, "Did the Biden DOJ arrest even one [person]? Again, the answer is no." Booker attempted once more to respond before Cruz interrupted again, prompting Booker to raise his voice. "I did not interrupt you, sir, I would appreciate it if you would let me finish," he told Cruz. "I am sick and tired of hearing the kind of heated partisan rhetoric, which is one of the reasons why we have such divisions in this country," Booker continued, prompting Cruz to laugh openly in response. "The attacks we see from the president of the United States of America, trolling and dragging judges through is what we should be talking about," Booker said. "I'm simply taking issue with the claim that you made at the top, that people on the Democratic side of the aisle do not care about the safety and the security of judges and said nothing," he continued, adding that the notion that his Democrat colleagues said nothing in the face of Supreme Court justice threats "is a patent lie." The two continued arguing before Cruz said, "Let the record reflect that Spartacus did not answer the question and did not tell us whether the criminal law" under U.S.C. Section 1507 should be enforced, "because he knows the answer is yes." The hearing comes as the number of threats against federal judges has spiked during Trump's second term, which has seen hundreds of federal lawsuits filed in courts across the country seeking to either pause or halt the flurry of sweeping executive orders and actions taken by the president. Trump has repeatedly criticized what he called "activist judges," prompting Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to issue a rare public warning. The U.S. Marshals Service said last week that it has investigated more than 370 threats against federal judges since Trump's inauguration in January, which is a sharp rise from 2024, when 509 people were investigated during the entire year. Democrats on the panel used Tuesday's hearing to renew requests for the Justice Department and FBI to investigate an uptick in anonymous "pizza deliveries" sent to federal judges, which can be used as a threat or warning to let judges know their home address is known.
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
Gov. Kathy Hochul's No. 2 pushed to resign after he announces he wants her job: ‘Shouldn't be on the payroll'
ALBANY – Et tu, Antonio? Some establishment Democrats called for Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado to resign Tuesday – one day after he announced he'd run in a party primary against Gov. Kathy Hochul. 'He shouldn't be on the payroll of the employer he opposes,' Queens Borough President Donovan Richards told The Post. Advertisement 'Hochul has been very good for Queens. Whatever we've asked for, she has delivered,' Richards, who has been rumored as a potential new LG pick himself, said. Hochul handpicked Delgado to be her No. 2 in 2022, but it's long been expected he'd throw his hat in the ring to try to unseat her in the 2026 election. 3 Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado will not step down even as he campaigns to unseat his boss, per a spokesperson. Hans Pennink Advertisement 'I call for the ungrateful Mr. Delgado to IMMEDIATELY RESIGN as Lieutenant Governor,' Assemblywoman Yudelka Tapia (D-Bronx) wrote on X Monday night with an endorsement of the governor. Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie (D-Bronx) praised Hochul and pushed back against the idea of a primary in comments to POLITICO though he stopped short of calling for Delgago to step aside. 'Governor Hochul has been a strong partner working with me on behalf of all New Yorkers,' Heastie said. 'We need to be united.' A spokesperson for Delgado stamped out any speculation the lieutenant governor will relinquish his title and $210,000 per year paycheck, which are effectively all the perks of the office Hochul has left him with. Advertisement 'When someone challenges the status quo, the establishment pushes back — we expected that. But Antonio Delgado isn't running to win over insiders,' said Steven Ileka, Delgado's press secretary. 'He's running to fight for everyday New Yorkers, not the powerful few.' 3 Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie is backing Gov. Kathy Hochul and calling for Dems to be united after Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado officially entered the Governor's race Monday. Hans Pennink Delgado also faced calls to turn down the temperature within the party ranks even if he stays put. 'I respect the will of the voters, so I'm not calling on Delgado to resign—but he needs to chill and stop stirring infighting,' Assemblywoman Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn (D-Brooklyn), who also chairs the Brooklyn Democratic Committee, told The Post in a statement. Advertisement 'Governor Kathy Hochul is a respected and popular Democratic incumbent with a strong track record and bold leadership on the issues that matter—affordability, public safety, education, immigration, and more,' Bichotte Hermelyn added. 3 'The powerful and well-connected have their champions. I'm running for Governor to be yours,' Delgado said in a video announcing his candidacy. Kevin C. Downs for NY Post Delgado's infant campaign has already taken an approach of attacking Hochul and her growing crew in the capital. 'The powerful and well-connected have their champions. I'm running for Governor to be yours,' Delgado said in a video announcing his candidacy. On his campaign website, the LG rips Hochul for vetoing two bills that would help expand childcare access and promises to deliver state-funded universal childcare. He also calls for 'universal healthcare' and expanding New York's public option. Hochul's campaign declined to comment.
