Judge Arrested by Trump Administration Fights Back With Trump's Own Immunity Case
A Milwaukee judge who was arrested for allegedly shielding an undocumented immigrant from ICE arrest has argued that she can't be prosecuted based on the same case that granted President Donald Trump broad immunity for 'official' acts.
The FBI arrested Hannah Dugan last month after she allegedly told agents with Immigration and Customs Enforcement that they needed a warrant to arrest an undocumented immigrant who had appeared in her courtroom on a misdemeanor charge.
FBI Director Kash Patel accused Dugan in a social media post of 'intentionally misdirecting federal agents away' from the man, a Mexican immigrant named Eduardo Flores Ruiz who was nevertheless arrested outside the courthouse.
Dugan was indicted on Tuesday for allegedly concealing a person from arrest and obstruction. A day later, her lawyers argued in a motion to dismiss the case that Dugan is 'no ordinary criminal defendant.'
The motion argued that the problems with the prosecution were 'legion,' including the fact that they allegedly violated the U.S. Constitution's fundamental principle of federalism. But 'most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts,' it said.
As evidence, the motion cited the 2024 Supreme Court case Trump v. United States in which the court ruled the president had absolute immunity for 'official acts.'
The 6-3 ruling involved Trump's criminal prosecution over his attempts to overturn former President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory.
It didn't provide a standard for what counts as an 'official act' or determine whether any of Trump's individual actions fell within that category, saying only that the lower courts needed to consider the case in light of the sweeping immunity afforded to the president.
Dugan's motion argued that the same standard should apply not just to the president, but to judges.
'Immunity is not a defense to the prosecution to be determined later by a jury or court; it is an absolute bar to the prosecution at the outset,' the motion said.
The motion denied that Dugan had directed the defendant to leave through the jury door so he could evade ICE agents, but even if she had, 'Judges are empowered to maintain control over their courtrooms specifically and the courthouse generally,' according to the motion.
It also cited other evidence showing that judges have enjoyed immunity for official acts dating back to the 17th century in England, and carrying on through U.S. common law.
Dugan is scheduled to appear in federal court on Thursday, The New York Times reported. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has temporarily removed her from the bench while the case against her is in progress.
Earlier this month, more than 150 former state and federal judges signed a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi saying Dugan's arrest was an attempt to 'intimidate and threaten the judiciary,' and a 'cynical effort' that undermined the rule of law.
MAGA diehards, meanwhile, have said they hope the judge's arrest is just the first of many.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
39 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
Check your gadgets: FBI warns millions of streaming devices infected by malware
The FBI issued a public warning last week about a massive cybercrime operation exploiting everyday internet-connected devices. The botnet, dubbed BADBOX 2.0, has quietly infiltrated millions of TV streaming boxes, digital projectors, tablets, car infotainment systems, and other smart gadgets commonly found in homes across the U.S. What BADBOX 2.0 actually does Once compromised, these devices don't just underperform or crash, they secretly enlist your home internet connection into a residential proxy network. That means cybercriminals can hide behind your IP address to commit crimes like ad fraud, data scraping, and more. All of it happens behind the scenes, without the victim's knowledge. Recommended Videos 'This is all completely unbeknownst to the poor users that have bought this device just to watch Netflix or whatever,' said Gavin Reid, chief information security officer at cybersecurity firm Human Security, in an interview with Wired. What devices are affected? According to the FBI, BADBOX 2.0 has infected: TV streaming boxes Digital projectors Aftermarket vehicle infotainment systems Digital picture frames Most of these devices are manufactured in China and marketed under generic or unrecognizable brand names. Security researchers estimate at least 1 million active infections globally, with the botnet potentially encompassing several million devices overall. The worst offenders belong to the 'TV98' and 'X96' families of Android-based devices, both of which are currently available for purchase on Amazon. In the example below, one of the potentially problematic devices is advertised as 'Amazon's Choice.' How the infections happens There are two primary sources for infection: Pre-installed malware: Some devices arrive already compromised, having been tampered with before reaching store shelves. Malicious app installs: During setup, users are often prompted to install apps from unofficial marketplaces, where malware-laced software opens backdoors. This marks an evolution from the original BADBOX campaign, which relied primarily on firmware-level infections. The new version is more nimble, using software tricks and fake apps to broaden its reach. How to tell is your device is infected Here are the red flags to watch for: The device asks you to disable Google Play Protect It comes from an unfamiliar or no-name brand It's advertised as 'unlocked' or able to stream free content It directs you to download apps from unofficial app stores You notice unexplained internet traffic on your home network How to protect your home network To stay safe, the FBI recommends the following precautions: Avoid unofficial app stores . Stick to the Google Play Store or Apple's App Store. . Stick to the Google Play Store or Apple's App Store. Don't chase suspicious bargains . Extremely inexpensive, unbranded gadgets are often too good to be true. . Extremely inexpensive, unbranded gadgets are often too good to be true. Monitor your network . Keep an eye on unusual internet usage patterns or devices that you don't recognize. . Keep an eye on unusual internet usage patterns or devices that you don't recognize. Stay updated. Regularly update your devices and router with the latest firmware and security patches. If you suspect a device on your network may be infected, disconnect it immediately and consider filing a report with the FBI at Be skeptical of bargain gadgets If seems too good to be true, it probably is. Fyodor Yarochkin, a senior threat research at Trend Micro said it best, 'There is no free cheese unless the cheese is in a mousetrap.'
Wall Street Journal
42 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Deportation Wars Begin
Rounding up and deporting millions of illegal migrants was never going to go down without protest. But President Trump is determined to do it, and no one can say he didn't tell voters during the campaign. But there are risks for both sides of this dispute, and especially for the country if it turns violent and triggers a military response from the White House. The weekend's clashes in Los Angeles are a sign of what could be ahead. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has been staging raids around the city hunting for migrants, including at businesses where they are thought to work. Workers, union leaders and pro-migrant activists hit the streets in protest. The clashes turned nasty in some places, some officers were hurt, and ICE and local police made arrests, including of a prominent union leader for interfering with federal officers. President Trump then invoked a little-used law to override what is typically state control and sent in 2,000 troops from the California National Guard. Cue the outrage from Democrats and cries of law-breaking on both sides.
Newsweek
43 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Scott Bessent Accuses Gavin Newsom of Threatening 'Tax Evasion'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent accused California Governor Gavin Newsom of "threatening to commit criminal tax evasion" after the Democratic leader suggested in a social media post that the state should consider withholding federal tax payments in response to possible funding cuts from the Trump administration. Newsweek has reached out to Newsom's press office for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters The Trump administration has threatened to withhold federal funding from various state programs and institutions, including research and education programs. Last week, CNN reported that the administration is considering cutting grant funding to the University of California and California State University systems. In late-May, President Donald Trump threatened to pull "large scale federal funding" from the Golden State unless it bars transgender athletes from competing in girls' sports. Bessent's remarks come amid ongoing tensions between federal, state, and local authorities as protests continue in Los Angeles, which were sparked following immigration raids during which police followed the Trump administration's directives to arrest people. Some protesters have thrown rocks at officers, with one allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail, and burning items in the streets. Agents have used tear gas on the crowds. The clashes highlight deepening conflicts between sanctuary jurisdictions and federal immigration policy, as Trump has implemented sweeping changes through executive orders and deployed the National Guard against local leaders wishes. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 7. Inset: California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in West Hollywood, California, on March 26. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 7. Inset: California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in West Hollywood, California, on March 26. Photo by Corine Solberg/Sipa USA/Aaron Schwartz/AP Images What To Know On Friday, Newsom shared a screenshot of a CNN article on X, formerly Twitter, about the Trump administration's potential move to cut federal funding to the state, writing, "Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it's time to cut that off." Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it's time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 6, 2025 His post followed a CNN report that the Trump administration is targeting California's public university system over alleged antisemitism on campus. The administration has already taken similar action against Harvard University. California is the most populous state in the country with over 39 million people. It leads all the states in federal tax collection, with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) reporting that California contributed around $806 billion to total IRS collections in the 2024 fiscal year, which is about 15 percent of the national total. A recent analysis by the Rockefeller Institute of Government found the state contributed $83.1 billion more in federal taxes in 2022 than it received back. In response to the governor, Bessent, who oversees the IRS, wrote in an X post on Sunday: "Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion. His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes." Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion. His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes. (1/3) — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) June 8, 2025 In a follow up post, he wrote: "I am certain most California businesses know that failing to pay taxes owed to the Treasury constitutes tax evasion and have no intention of following the dangerous path Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening." In a third post, the treasury secretary called the governor's comments "extremely reckless." Federal law defines a willful attempt to evade or defeat federal taxes as a felony under United States law. The public clash comes as Newsom is sparring with Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over deployment of the National Guard, and potentially active-military Marines, following protests in California sparked over federal immigration enforcement operations. Hegseth wrote in a Saturday evening post on X that in addition to mobilizing guards, nearby Marines may also be called upon, writing, "And, if violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." What People Are Saying White House spokesperson Kush Desai told CNN in a Friday statement: "No taxpayer should be forced to fund the demise of our country," in regard to certain California policies related to energy and immigration. "No final decisions, however, on any potential future action by the Administration have been made, and any discussion suggesting otherwise should be considered pure speculation." Robert Rivas, speaker of the California State Assembly, wrote in a BlueSky post about the CNN article on Friday: "This is unconstitutional and vindictive. We're the nation's economic engine and the largest donor state, and deserve our fair share. I'll use every legal and constitutional tool available to defend CA -- we must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes." What Happens Next? The tension between the Trump administration and Newsom don't show signs of easing.
