logo
Harvard defeats tyranny. (At least, it did 250 years ago.)

Harvard defeats tyranny. (At least, it did 250 years ago.)

Boston Globe14-05-2025

Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The current
Advertisement
Like Lexington and Concord, Cambridge was a front of its own in 1775. To be sure, Harvard alumni included both Tories and patriots, and to this day, the university's architectural legacy reflects this mixed heritage. Near the campus, a stretch of Brattle Street is still called 'Tory Row' because of its association with wealthy Loyalists. One of the prettiest buildings on the campus is Holden Chapel, a Georgian gem, completed in 1744. Its financing was arranged by a prominent son of Harvard, Thomas Hutchinson, later reviled by most of Massachusetts for his pro-English policies as governor. When things got too hot for him, he emigrated to England, where he received an honorary degree from Oxford, conferred on July 4, 1776.
Advertisement
But overwhelmingly, Harvard was on the patriot side during the struggle to establish the United States of America.
It was perhaps natural for Harvard to join the cause of resistance to a distant monarch, for many of the university's founders had fled England precisely to escape the oppressive policies of King Charles I a century and a half earlier. To a striking degree, the founders of Massachusetts and Harvard included alumni of Oxford and Cambridge (130 of whom were living in greater Boston in 1646, 10 years after Harvard's founding). They were eager to maintain their intellectual distance from a monarch who was trying to bend England's universities to his will. Creating a new university, across the ocean from Charles I and his censorious archbishop, William Laud, was an effective way to do that.
In the 1760s, political tensions were growing again under a different king, George III, and were keenly felt on campus. Then as now, student protests were a fact of life, and well before the Battle of Lexington, undergraduates were rallying around a 'Liberty Tree,' or 'Rebellion Elm,' in Harvard Yard, denouncing British oppression, and swearing never to drink the 'pernicious herb,' British tea.
Advertisement
Cambridge grew crowded between 1770 and 1773, when the British ordered the General Court to meet there, to avoid Boston's angry mobs. This is one of the reasons for a line in the Declaration of Independence blaming King George III for moving legislative assemblies to places 'unusual, uncomfortable and distant.' Yes, our country's founding document takes a swipe at Cambridge.
To the students, however, the General Court's sessions offered a welcome distraction. When the Revolution came, they were ready. On April 19, 1775, six undergraduates joined the Minutemen who were making their stand at Lexington and Concord. Later that day, the first alumnus to be killed in the war was Major Isaac Gardner, shot by the British in North Cambridge as they were retreating to Boston.
Things heated up quickly after that. Campus buildings were converted into barracks for the Continental Army. The students were let out early on May 1, the library was packed up and sent to Andover for safekeeping, and the soldiers were welcomed in. Parents who worry about campus overcrowding today may be astonished to know that little Massachusetts Hall held 640 soldiers.
It was in Cambridge that George Washington took command of the army (a local hotel, the Sheraton Commander, still bears tribute). He was also given an honorary degree, the first of 16 presidents to be so honored.
Throughout the 1775-1776 academic year, for the only time in its history, Harvard convened at a new location, in Concord. By the time the students returned, in June 1776, the British had evacuated Boston, and the Revolution had moved south. But Harvard alumni played an important role in the work of creating the political and diplomatic architecture needed for a new country. Eight alumni signed the Declaration of Independence.
Advertisement
That document has assumed new relevance in recent weeks, arguing that Americans should not have to submit to the imperious demands of a ruler exceeding his authority. The catalog of royal sins includes 'cutting off our trade with all parts of the world,' sending 'swarms of Officers to harass our people,' 'depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury,' and 'transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences.'
An America that trusted knowledge
Even as the new country was coming into existence, the Founders were looking at history in creative ways. For John Adams, seeking examples of earlier alliances among the Colonies, it was helpful to read about the New England Confederation, an alliance among Massachusetts, Plymouth, and the various Connecticut Colonies, launched in 1643. Adams and others also scoured Harvard's library for books on military tactics, since the war was coming so close to them.
There were many reasons the patriots prevailed in the existential crisis that began in April 1775. It goes without saying that courage was needed, but the American cause also benefited from a solidarity among the states that surprised and confounded the British. In other ways, too, Americans proved more resilient than the British: living off the land, enduring greater hardships, and adapting constantly. In a similar way, America's universities have shown unexpected pluck in recent weeks,
Advertisement
The Founders never surrendered their vision of a civil society, even as they endured severe privations. To a remarkable extent, they kept building even as they fought for survival. This was true on campus as well. Harvard's medical school stems from the improvised field hospitals that were created around Boston during the early years of the Revolution. A learned institution, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, was founded in Cambridge at nearly the same moment, in 1780. Its first class embraced foreign as well as local intellectuals, including a Swede and five Frenchmen.
In all of these ways, the Founders built a United States of America that trusted knowledge and reached out creatively to the rest of the world. Harvard was only one of many universities that contributed to the result. But because of the attacks that have arrived with such frequency in recent weeks, America's oldest university has come to represent something larger than itself.
It is unclear how the coming legal standoff will play out. It may simply fade away, as so many other Trump policies have. But the American Revolution suggests that an essential advantage is conferred upon the side that learns from its history.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump 'gold card' website opens. Here's how to join the $5 million waitlist
Trump 'gold card' website opens. Here's how to join the $5 million waitlist

USA Today

time38 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump 'gold card' website opens. Here's how to join the $5 million waitlist

Trump 'gold card' website opens. Here's how to join the $5 million waitlist Show Caption Hide Caption Trump wants to sell $5 million 'gold cards' as path to citizenship President Donald Trump says he wants to offer wealthy immigrants "gold cards" that would give a pathway to citizenship in exchange for a $5 million purchase price. President Donald Trump's long-touted "gold card," which offers foreigners a path to U.S. citizenship after paying $5 million to the government, is open for business. But even if you have the money, there's a waitlist at And read the fine print carefully: Your $5 million doesn't buy you immediate citizenship. Trump has said that he is not seeking approval from Congress as he is not providing gold card buyers with citizenship - only a path to citizenship. The path to citizenship requirements for card buyers are unclear and White House officials have said more details will be provided soon. The most common path to U.S. citizenship through naturalization is being a lawful permanent resident for at least five years. It requires the applicant to be least 18 years old when they apply, be able to read, write, and speak basic English (depending on age) and be of "good moral character." Trump has described the card, which he has also dubbed the Trump card, as 'somewhat like a green card, but at a higher level of sophistication.' 'FOR FIVE MILLION $DOLLARS, THE TRUMP CARD IS COMING!,' President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social on June 11. 'Thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World.' The website shows an image of the gold-colored card, emblazoned with a likeness of Trump's face, and asks a few questions including name, region, email address and if an applicant is applying for themselves or as a business. The new website asks interested people to fill out a form that specifies eight regions: Europe, Asia (including Middle East), North America, Oceania, Central America, South America, Caribbean and Africa. Other countries also offer immigration programs that offers permanent residency or citizenship to foreign investors in exchange for investment. Portugal, for example, offers residency and a path to EU citizenship after five years. When he first floated the idea in February, Trump said the card would replace the "EB-5" immigrant investor green card visa program, The EB-5 visa allows immigrant investors the option to invest between $800,000 and $1.05 million to obtain a green card. The investment money is used to help create or preserve U.S. jobs. 'Wealthy people will be coming into our country by buying this card,' Trump said in February. 'They'll be wealthy, and they'll be successful, and they'll be spending a lot of money, and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people.' 'It's a road to citizenship for people and essentially people of wealth or people of great talent where people of wealth pay for those people of talent to get in,' he said. Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal

Federal judge sides with anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil, halts Trump administration's deportation bid
Federal judge sides with anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil, halts Trump administration's deportation bid

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal judge sides with anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil, halts Trump administration's deportation bid

A federal judge sided with Mahmoud Khalil, an anti-Israel ringleader detained by the Trump administration, blocking the government from continuing to hold him on "foreign policy" grounds. U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz on Wednesday granted a preliminary injunction preventing the government from detaining or removing Khalil, 30, based on a memorandum issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The memo asserted that Khalil's presence "compromises a compelling foreign policy interest." "The government cannot claim an interest in enforcing what appears to be an unconstitutional law," Farbiarz wrote, adding that the threat to free speech raised serious First Amendment concerns. The ruling is a significant legal setback for the administration's efforts to deport Khalil, who has been held at a detention facility in Louisiana following his involvement in anti-Israel demonstrations at Columbia University. Federal Judge Says Attempted Deportation Of Anti-israel Ringleader Mahmoud Khalil May Be Unconstitutional While the ruling grants a preliminary injunction against Khalil's removal, it stops short of ordering his release. Read On The Fox News App The court's decision will remain on hold until Friday morning, giving the government time to appeal. READ THE RULING – APP USERS, Click Here Anti-israel Ringleader Mahmoud Khalil's Free Speech Lawsuit Against Us Government Must Be Heard: Judge Khalil, a green card holder, was arrested after leading student protests on the Ivy League campus. He has argued that his free speech rights were being "eroded" by the Trump administration. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attorneys have argued that Khalil's free speech claims were a "red herring," saying that the 30-year-old lied on his visa applications. Khalil, they said, willfully failed to disclose his employment with the Syrian office in the British Embassy in Beirut when he applied for permanent U.S. residency. The agency also accused Khalil of failing to disclose his work with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees and membership in Columbia University Apartheid Divest. Rubio has cited a provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to justify Khalil's removal from the U.S. The provision allows the secretary of state to deport noncitizens if the secretary determines their presence in the U.S. "would have serious adverse foreign policy consequences." Rubio accused Khalil of participating in "antisemitic protests and disruptive activities, which foster a hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States." "Condoning antisemitic conduct and disruptive protests in the United States would severely undermine that significant foreign policy objective," Rubio wrote. Khalil has Algerian citizenship through his mother, but was born in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria. As of Wednesday evening, no further hearings are scheduled in Khalil's immigration case. "We're just waiting for the judge to issue her ruling," Johnny Sinodis, a partner at Van Der Hout LLP who is representing Mahmoud Khalil in immigration proceedings, said during a press conference following the hearing. Meanwhile, the federal court's preliminary injunction will prevent Khalil's removal until at least article source: Federal judge sides with anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil, halts Trump administration's deportation bid

Judge blocks Trump administration's attempt to deport Mahmoud Khalil
Judge blocks Trump administration's attempt to deport Mahmoud Khalil

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge blocks Trump administration's attempt to deport Mahmoud Khalil

Editor's note: The video above aired in a previous newscast. (AP)– A federal judge has ruled that the government must release Mahmoud Khalil, the former Columbia University graduate student whom the Trump administration is trying to deport over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. But Khalil, a legal U.S. resident, will remain in custody until at least Friday, giving the government time to appeal, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz said Wednesday. More Local News 'The court's decision is the most significant vindication yet of Mahmoud's rights,' said Ramzi Kassem, co-director of CLEAR, a legal nonprofit and clinic at the City University of New York that represents Khalil. 'But we aren't out of the woods until Mahmoud is free and back home with his wife and child.' Lawyers and spokespersons for the Justice Department, which is handling the case, didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under President Donald Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against the war in Gaza. He was then flown across the country and taken to an immigration detention center in Jena, Louisiana, thousands of miles from his attorneys and wife, a U.S. citizen who gave birth to their first child while he was in custody. Khalil's lawyers challenged the legality of his detention, accusing the Trump administration of trying to suppress free speech. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he has the power to deport Khalil because his presence in the U.S. could harm foreign policy. Farbiarz had ruled earlier that expelling Khalil from the U.S. on those grounds was likely unconstitutional. In his new ruling Wednesday, the judge said that Khalil had shown that his continued detention is causing irreparable harm to his career, his family and his free speech rights. However, the judge put his order on hold until 9:30 a.m. Friday to allow the government time to appeal. He also required Khalil to post a $1 bond before he is freed. More Local News In his ruling, Farbiarz cited Khalil's statement to the court last week that the revocation of his green card has damaged his career prospects, including a decision by Oxfam International to rescind a job offer to serve as a policy adviser. The judge also noted that the decision deterred Khalil from engaging in constitutionally protected protests and free speech-related activities. 'The Court finds as a matter of fact that the Petitioner's career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled — and this adds up to irreparable harm,' the judge wrote. Farbiarz noted in his ruling that the government has also argued it is detaining and deporting Khalil in part because of alleged omissions on his green card application. But the judge said evidence presented by his attorneys showed lawful permanent residents are virtually never detained for such a thing. Khalil, in his statement to the court last week, also disputed that he wasn't forthcoming on the application. For example, he said he was never employed by or served as an 'officer' of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, as the administration claims, but completed an internship approved by the university as part of his graduate studies. More Local News The judge's decision comes after several other legal residents targeted for their activism have been released from custody, including another Palestinian student at Columbia, Mohsen Mahdawi; a Tufts University student, Rumeysa Ozturk; and a Georgetown University scholar, Badar Khan Suri. Rubio has cited a rarely used statute to justify the deportation of Khalil and others, which gives him power to deport those who pose 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.' Khalil isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. The government, however, has said that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country for expressing views that the administration considers to be antisemitic and 'pro-Hamas,' referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Khalil, then an international affairs graduate student, had served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists at Columbia who took over a campus lawn last spring to protest Israel's military campaign in Gaza. The university brought police in to dismantle the encampment after a small group of protesters seized an administration building. Khalil is not accused of participating in the building occupation and wasn't among the people arrested in connection with the demonstrations. But images of his maskless face at protests, along with his willingness to share his name with reporters, made him an object of scorn among those who saw the protesters and their demands as antisemitic. The White House accused Khalil of 'siding with terrorists,' but has yet to give any evidence for the claim. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store