Israel's Gaza attacks spur european leaders to criticize Netanyahu
Some of Israel's most loyal supporters in Europe are increasingly speaking out against the war in Gaza, with several nations, including Germany, considering trade sanctions and curbs on arms sales.
In recent weeks, the U.K., Netherlands and France have started mulling such moves against Israel to help end the 20-month conflict, which has destroyed much of Gaza and sparked what international aid agencies say is a hunger crisis. Germany's pivot was the most surprising due to its historical position that protecting Israel is a post-Holocaust obligation.
German anger with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government grew when it intensified military operations against Hamas in mid-May and continued blocking aid to Gaza, according to information obtained by Bloomberg. In the German government's first such comments since the start of the war, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the humanitarian situation could "no longer be justified by a fight against Hamas terrorism."
Merz spoke to Netanyahu on Sunday and said it was "necessary to allow sufficient humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip immediately."
The condemnation is symbolic of the shift in Europe and of Israel's increasing isolation.
Opinion polls show growing discontent. In a survey last week by Civey for Germany's Tagesspiegel newspaper, more than half the respondents said it was wrong for Berlin to export weapons to Israel.
The sentiment is similar in several other nations and protests have escalated. Last month, the Netherlands saw one of its biggest protests in years, with tens of thousands of people calling for the war to stop.
"It's simply become impossible for most European governments to continue supporting Israel's war despite strong ongoing commitments to Israel's security," said Julien Barnes-Dacey, program director for the Middle East and North Africa at the European Council on Foreign Relations.
More countries are taking action and calling for the European Union to adopt sanctions on Israel. The E.U.'s foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, in May said there is "a strong majority" in favor of reviewing the bloc's trade agreement with Israel. Merz subsequently said Germany - one of Israel's main arms suppliers - is considering restrictions on military exports.
The E.U. is Israel's largest trading partner, with the two exchanging $47 billion of goods last year, according to the International Monetary Fund, and a change in policy would have a palpable impact on the Jewish state's economy, which is under strain because of the war.
The U.K. announced plans to pause free-trade talks with Israel and sanctions against a handful of individuals and entities it said were engaged in violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.
Still, European governments remain supportive of Israel's right to defend itself and E.U. sanctions would likely face opposition from the likes of Hungary. In addition, any measures to cut weapons exports could hurt European defense companies, while risking reciprocal action from Israel, which sells air-defense and other military equipment to Europe.
Aid controversy
Outrage in Europe escalated over a Israel- and U.S.-backed proposal to restart aid distribution to Gaza. The United Nations said the plan would supply nowhere near enough food and medicine to the territory's more than 2 million Palestinians and politicize handouts.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the Swiss-based nonprofit running the program, started distribution last week and says enough meals will be available as more centers open.
Israel says the plan's necessary to avoid supplies falling into the hands of Hamas. It also says its escalation of ground and air attacks in Gaza are needed to force Hamas to surrender and release the 58 hostages it still holds.
Iran-backed Hamas, designated a terrorist group by the U.S. and the E.U., triggered the war when thousands of fighters crossed into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and abducting 250.
More than 54,000 Gazans have been killed in the war, according to the Hamas-run health ministry in the Palestinian territory. Israel has lost more than 400 troops in Gaza combat.
Images of hungry and injured children and a territory reduced to rubble have spread across news bulletins and social media, intensifying protests and prompting more pressure on Israel to increase aid supplies and stop its bombardment. On Friday, French President Emmanuel Macron said that Europe will have to harden its collective stance toward Israel unless the situation in Gaza improves soon.
"The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable," France said in a joint statement with the U.K. and Canada on May 19. "We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions."
France, home to both the largest Jewish and Muslim communities in Europe, is seeking to rally international support for Palestinian statehood and this month it is set to co-chair a U.N. conference in New York with Saudi Arabia. The French president will be in Rome later Tuesday for a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni, where he is likely to bring up the issue.
Although Italy recently urged Israel to end the war, Meloni's government is unlikely to support Palestinian independence and has maintained support for Netanyahu.
The French public is largely supportive of the initiative, with a poll by Odoxa last month showing nearly two thirds of people favor a Palestinian state and 61% would back political and economic sanctions on Israel. According to the same poll, Macron's approval rating improved largely due to his shift on Gaza.
For now, Israel's most important ally, the U.S., is standing by Netanyahu's government. Still, President Donald Trump has consistently spoken of wanting to stabilize the Middle East and has said he wants the conflict in Gaza to end.
Trump "could actually strengthen the Franco-Saudi push for Palestinian statehood because Palestinian statehood cannot happen without a ceasefire in Gaza," Rym Momtaz, editor in chief of Carnegie Europe's blog Strategic Europe, said.
Netanyahu has lashed out at Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, accusing them of "inviting more such atrocities" on Israel.
For the E.U., forging consensus is often a long process, with several rounds of horse trading. Yet Germany's comments are "a real marker" of how things have moved, according to Barnes-Dacey of the European Council on Foreign Relations.
"But Europeans will need to back up their statements of condemnation with real material steps," he said, "if they want to be taken seriously and are genuinely seeking to shift Israeli positioning."
---------
-With assistance from Heidi Taksdal Skjeseth, Patrick Van Oosterom, Peter Martin, Ellen Milligan, Jennifer Duggan, Daniel Basteiro and Sanjit Das.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BlackRock, Goldman Scale Up Tax Trades in $3 Trillion SMA Boom
(Bloomberg) -- This year's stock market turbulence has punished ordinary investors. But for the wealthy, it's opened up fresh opportunities to convert equity swings into tax breaks — fueling a growing Wall Street business that turns volatility into a financial advantage. Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. NYC Mayoral Candidates All Agree on Building More Housing. But Where? Senator Calls for Closing Troubled ICE Detention Facility in New Mexico California Pitches Emergency Loans for LA, Local Transit Systems BlackRock Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley are among firms scaling up a strategy known as tax-loss harvesting, typically offered through customized portfolios called separately managed accounts. When markets drop, managers sell stocks trading below their purchase price to realize losses. Those losses offset gains elsewhere in a portfolio, reducing clients' tax liabilities while maintaining overall portfolio exposure. The approach allows investors to shrink their current-year IRS bills while deferring capital gains into the future. In April's selloff, for example, a manager could dump Home Depot Inc. and rotate into Lowe's Cos Inc., maintaining sector exposure while staying inside tax rules. Once a boutique service reserved only for the ultra-rich, investment firms are repackaging market turbulence as a fiscal opportunity, with automated trading programs scanning portfolios daily as equity conditions shift. With fee pressure eroding revenue in traditional asset management, Wall Street is leaning more heavily on tax-optimization trades to differentiate offerings, retain clients and defend margins in a competitive marketplace. 'There is just inherently going to be more volatility in the system,' said Scott Smith, senior director at industry consultant Cerulli Associates. 'With trade policies, tariffs, taxes, everything is on the table. There is no assumption of what the future looks.' In one particularly active stretch during April's selloff, BlackRock's Aperio, a platform for personalized portfolios, executed more than $18 billion in trades. That generated $700 million in realized losses that can be used to offset taxable gains elsewhere in client portfolios, or so-called tax-loss harvesting. That equated to roughly $5 to $7 in losses realized for every $100 traded that month. 'We monitor daily. We look at losses and high-cash positions. We balance harvesting with managing tracking error,' said Ran Leshem, who oversees BlackRock's separately managed account business, now managing $220 billion. 'Our goal is to be the market leader in SMAs.' Still, even as this year's selling frenzy created opportunities, the equity rebound that followed highlights a trade-off: while the approach can lower future tax bills, it also locks in losses that may prove costly if markets quickly recover, making the ultimate payoff difficult to measure in real time. Regardless, the opportunities are only growing. Direct indexing, where investors hold individual stocks directly rather than through pooled funds, has become the backbone of this tax-optimization machine. With the SMA market expected to grow from $3 trillion to $5 trillion by 2027, firms are layering on increasingly complex techniques to compete, pitched as added-value services. Tax-loss harvesting is only one lever. Advisors also optimize dividend timing, gain deferrals, charitable gifting and jurisdictional overlays in an attempt to juice after-tax portfolio performance. 'Risk management and tax management go hand in hand,' said Monali Vora, global head of wealth investment solutions at Goldman Sachs Asset Management. 'You can't do one without the other.' Aperio's long-short tax-aware strategies, launched in 2023, amplify gross exposure — boosting the number of positions that can generate harvestable losses, while keeping market exposure roughly the same. About 7% of April's realized losses came from these strategies. While still a small share of overall assets, it's part of the firm's expanding business. Managing tracking error, or how closely a portfolio tracks its benchmark, remains a challenge. The IRS wash-sale rule bars investors from buying back the same, or substantially identical, securities over a specified timeframe. Firms navigate these constraints by swapping into correlated securities. Selling Moderna Inc. and buying Pfizer Inc. is straightforward; replacing a giant like Apple Inc. requires more complex substitutes. 'Clients are seeking alpha, downside protection and more tax-loss harvesting potential for both ETF and stock positions,' Leshem said. 'But with that comes the tug of war between harvesting and maintaining tracking error.' At Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, the approach is different. Instead of mirroring an index, the Texas-based firm uses broad diversification across thousands of stocks to reduce wash-sale risk, reallocating proceeds toward securities with higher expected returns based on their quant model. 'We can keep the profile of the account but take advantage of tax opportunity,' said Savina Rizova, co-chief investment officer and global head of research. Dimensional, which lowered its account minimum to $500,000 in 2021, harvested $20 million in net losses across about 1,400 accounts in April — averaging $16,700 in losses per $1 million invested. Parametric, Morgan Stanley's direct indexing arm, strikes a more cautious tone. 'Tax-loss harvesting is one layer of customization, but there are many others,' said co-president and CIO Tom Lee. 'For most institutions, tax management isn't their focus.' At the height of April's volatility, Parametric harvested $620 million in losses, generating around $230 million in potential tax benefits. That same month, Parametric also introduced an offering with a $25,000 minimum investment, part of a broader push to open direct-indexing features to smaller accounts and widen the client base for tax-managed SMAs. Quant hedge funds such as AQR Capital Management are also in tax-optimization arena, applying long-short structures aimed at maximizing harvestable losses while managing exposure drift. As competition heats up, Goldman Sachs Asset Management is pushing into new customization features to expand its tax-optimized platform, such as introducing capabilities to migrate equity ETFs into SMA portfolios. The firm has also ramped up its engineering staff to scale automation and global execution as tax-optimized services become increasingly industrialized. While tax-loss harvesting can reduce tax bills, research shows the biggest benefits tend to accrue to wealthier investors with large taxable portfolios and steady capital gains to offset. As such, for investors able to access these platforms, the appeal is simple. 'There is an awareness among investors that it's not what you make, it's what you keep,' said Parametric's Lee. 'Taxes represent a headwind for investors to the extent they have to realize gains in taxable accounts. You can take advantage of volatility when it comes.' --With assistance from Justina Lee and Lu Wang. New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling What America's Pizza Economy Is Telling Us About the Real One Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
11 minutes ago
UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway sanction 2 far-right Israeli Cabinet ministers
JERUSALEM -- Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway said Tuesday they have imposed sanctions on two far-right Israeli government ministers for allegedly 'inciting extremist violence' against Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich face asset freezes and travel bans from the five countries. The ministers are champions of expanding Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The decision by Western governments friendly to Israel was a sharp rebuke of Israel's settlement policies in the West Bank and of settler violence, which has spiked since Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack ignited the war in the Gaza Strip. The five countries' foreign ministers said in a joint statement that Ben-Gvir and Smotrich 'have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. Extremist rhetoric advocating the forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous.' Israel's Foreign Ministry said earlier it had been informed of the sanctions. Smotrich, the country's finance minister, wrote on social media that he found out that Britain had decided to sanction him for obstructing the viability of a Palestinian state. 'We are determined to continue building,' he said. 'We overcame Pharoah, we'll overcome Starmer's Wall.' Ben-Gvir, the national security minister, wrote on social media. Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called the move 'outrageous.' He said he had discussed it with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and they would meet next week to discuss Israel's response. The Biden administration took the rare step of sanctioning radical Israeli settlers implicated in violence in the occupied West Bank — sanctions that were then lifted by President Donald Trump. Eitay Mack, an Israeli human rights lawyer who spent years campaigning for the sanctions on Smotrich and Ben-Gvir — along with violent West Bank settlers — described the move as 'historic.' 'It means the wall of immunity that Israeli politicians had has been broken," he said. 'It's unbelievable that it took so long for Western governments to sanction Israeli politicians, and the fact that it's being done while Trump is president is quite amazing,' said Mack. "It is a message to Netanyahu himself that he could be next." Israel captured the West Bank along with east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians want those territories for their hoped-for future state. Settlement growth and construction have been promoted by successive Israeli governments stretching back decades, but it has exploded under Netanyahu's far-right coalition, which has settlers in key Cabinet posts. There are now well over 100 settlements and 500,000 Israeli settlers sprawling across the territory from north to south — a reality, rights groups say, dimming any hopes for an eventual two-state solution.
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Uncertainty May Lead to 'Pothole' for Stocks: Seema Shah
"This is a tough environment for investors," Seema Shah, Principal Asset Management chief global strategist, says. Speaking on "Bloomberg Open Interest," Shah also says the Federal Reserve won't cut rates until at least the fourth quarter. (Source: Bloomberg)
