'It's finally over' - fracking site to shut decade after protest clash
An exploratory shale rock drilling site where police clashed with anti-fracking demonstrators has been decommissioned more than a decade later.Tests were carried out by energy firm IGas at Barton Moss in Salford between 2013 and 2014, while environmental campaigners set up a protest camp nearby.Successor company Star Energy has announced that the controversial wells at the site, which has not been operational for a decade, will now be plugged and the area will be restored.Martin Porter, who was part of the Frack Free Manchester group which campaigned against the drilling, said he was "glad that it is now finally over".
Fracking, a technique for extracting gas and oil from shale rock, was banned in 2019 by the UK government, though the embargo was temporarily lifted while Liz Truss was prime minister in 2022.
The method prompted widespread alarm for causing seismic tremors, with 120 recorded at the Cuadrilla fracking site in Blackpool where repeated protests were held. IGas was granted permission to build a test well and explore the potential energy reserves at Barton Moss in Irlam in 2013.Groups including Frack Free Manchester sought to disrupt the firm by obstructing lorries and locking themselves onto to the entrance. Many were arrested by police who clashed with protestors at the site.
Star Energy has confirmed via its 2024 annual accounts that the Barton Moss site, along with other non-operational wells, would be decommissioned.The company said about £1.1m will be spent to restore the site alongside others in the UK. Mr Porter said the Frack Free campaign was a "small part of the battle to defeat shale gas, but an important one".He said: "The campaigners who ended fracking in Lancashire learnt their trade by coming to Barton Moss, and the brave councillors who voted against Cuadrilla did so after seeing our campaign on their TVs."When the camp left in 2014 we had won."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Why are Ely North junction improvements taking so long?
There are dozens of rail schemes waiting for government funding but few have had their hopes raised and then dashed as often as Ely North 25 years campaigners have argued that improving it would make it possible to run more freight and passenger services and help grow the local despite the project getting the go-ahead from previous governments on at least two occasions, the work is yet to costs, complicated engineering and a slowness to make decisions are being the government about to publish its 10-year infrastructure strategy, there are hopes that the project will make it on to this list for funding. But why is it taking so long? Lines from Norwich, Cambridge, King's Lynn, Peterborough and Ipswich all meet at Ely North first started talking about improving the junction back in 2011 the politicians were involved with the South West Norfolk MP Liz Truss bringing together local councils and business then, there have been numerous meetings, reports written and several ministerial visits to Ely argument has never really changed: extra track and improve the signalling would lead to an increase in services, encouraging more passengers to use the train and take thousands of lorries off the why has nothing happened? Engineering challenges The more you study the problem, the more complicated it becomes."Ely isn't called the Isle of Ely for nothing," says Charlotte Cane, the local Liberal Democrat MP."It is surrounded by wetland, making the soil difficult to build heavy infrastructure on. But we know how to do it; it just needs commitment and money"And that isn't the only problem."The B1382 Ely and Prickwillow Road is another serious sticking point" says Chris Burton from lobbying group Rail Future."It crosses the line to Norwich, the line to King's Lynn and the busiest line to March and Peterborough."Local people already keep getting caught at the [three] level crossings and it will be even worse if they start running more trains."There is no space to put a bridge in so you will need another project to get the road out of the way of the railway."It is these obstacles that have driven up the estimated cost of improving the junction to £0.5bn. Treasury delays The longer the project is delayed, the more the cost goes up."Every new government or [rail] minster wants to look at everything again," says Cain."You do a business case under one set of criteria and then, five years later, you're asked to do a business case under another set of criteria."Governments need to be less fixated on making new announcements which are their announcements, and more willing to continue things that have already been started."There is also a fear that the Treasury is reluctant to commit money to the scheme."I think we have been making enough noise and making the best case that can be made, but Ely never seems to glow well enough in the political spectrum to move itself up the list," says Mr says rail schemes linking bigger conurbations in other parts of the country, particularly the north, seem to get funding more wonders if governments think too much about seats that could be under threat at the next election when they allocate Palmer, the former Conservative Mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, and now chair of the Eastern Powerhouse lobbying group, is more damning."The Treasury does not look at infrastructure as a way of bringing growth," he says."They just look at it as a cost to the Treasury. They don't particularly care if you say to them 'Build this infrastructure and it will bring you economic growth over a sustained period and therefore give you more money.'"Treasury insiders insist that every scheme is judged on its economic merit and the benefits it can bring to the economy. What next? Network Rail was given £13m by the government in 2020 to develop options for the junction and prepare an outline business says the report was submitted to the Department for Transport (DfT) in 2022 and is awaiting a DfT was given extra money for capital projects in last week's spending review. It has already announced £6.4bn for East West Rail between Oxford and Cambridge and more announcements are expected MPs insist that the government understands the importance of Ely and remain confident that it will soon receive even if it does, producing a new business case, finding a solution to the B1382 issue, applying for planning permission, acquiring land and then actually doing the work means that it is likely to be the best part of a decade before Ely North junction is improved.
The Herald Scotland
3 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Do the Scottish Conservatives have any reason to exist?
Before dismissing this prospect out of hand, consider the point that political parties are manufactured, not innate. They are coalitions of the more or less willing, designed to provide a vaguely coherent offer to the electorate in order to secure power and effect change. Consequently, they have no guaranteed right to exist. Anyone remember the squadrone volante? In the old, pre-Union Scots Parliament, they steered a cautious middle way between the Court and Country parties, before eventually sinking into oblivion. OK, so that is an obscure recollection. Consider this instead. In the 19th century, the Liberals were utterly dominant in Scottish politics. Their role was largely usurped by the Labour Party. The Tories battled on. They secured, in 1955, the only popular majority ever achieved by any party in Scotland since universal suffrage. But that was a Unionist vote. As times changed, and the SNP rose, the Tories struggled again, eventually losing every Scottish Westminster seat in 1997. They were only rescued as a party by the advent of devolution and by proportional representation. Two developments they had steadfastly opposed. And more recently? They flourished to a degree under Ruth Davidson's leadership. She contrived to corral pro-Union votes to her side by depicting her party as the most reliable bulwark for that Union. And now? Two points. Indyref2 seems relatively distant, meaning that the political focus is elsewhere. The Davidson bulwark has less clout. Read more from Brian Taylor: Secondly, there is an alternative on the Right, in the shape of Reform, explicitly promising to supplant the Tories before going for the other parties. The Tories have endured defections. To Reform. And MSP Jamie Greene who switched to the Liberal Democrats. His verdict on his erstwhile party? He reckons folk are 'completely scunnered' with the Scots Tories. Nodding towards the Tories' Westminster leader, he summons up a vision of 'Kemi-geddon.' Not, I would suggest, the most felicitous phrase. But you take his point. Ms Badenoch has scarcely inspired confidence since taking over. Her own view, delivered this week during exchanges with the Prime Minister, was that she gets better every week, while Keir Starmer gets worse. Again, less than uplifting. Trying hard. Getting better. It is all a bit like a school report delivered to a struggling pupil by a kind and supportive teacher. However, is it entirely her fault? I would suggest not. She might well get better. Except she is burdened by voter memories of her predecessors. Rishi Sunak might be exculpated somewhat. But not Boris Johnson and certainly not Liz Truss. Lest there is any danger of the voters forgetting, Labour constantly summons up the spectre of the unfunded Truss budget which so spooked the markets that she had to quit. Only this week, the Chancellor referred repeatedly to Ms Truss, as she set out her own spending plans. The Prime Minister taunted Kemi Badenoch, saying reflections of Liz Truss would continue to haunt the Tories. Yes, Kemi Badenoch has had a troubled start to her leadership. But, as one close observer noted to me, Winston Churchill would struggle to lead the Conservatives right now, given the degree of entrenched voter anger at governance past. While noting that, I would add that Tory problems are exacerbated by the presence of an alternative offer on the Right. The Tories previously dismissed UKIP. Reform appears more challenging. Is Russell Findlay happy in his role as Scottish Conservative leader? (Image: PA) And what of Holyrood? I noted recently that Russell Findlay does not seem entirely content in his role. Perhaps, one suggested to me, he was happier in his previous job as an inquisitive, investigative journalist. However, a senior insider dismisses that prospect. I was told that Mr Findlay is determined to set out a clear direction for the Scottish Tories – by differentiating them sharply from their main rivals. He will not, I was told, be 'knocked off course' by Reform. He believes that the SNP, in particular, talked up the challenge of Reform in the recent Hamilton by-election, only to witness a set-back for their own party as Labour won. The big Scottish Tory offer? Lower taxes in Scotland, including the removal of lower bands. Amounting, they say, to a substantial saving for every worker. In the past, the Scots Tories have been somewhat reluctant to pursue this route. They feared it would not be seen as credible, that they would be challenged on spending cuts. Ideologically, they fretted over departing from a UK fiscal pattern. No longer. They say they will fund tax cuts by civil service efficiency savings, an approach also backed by the Chancellor. And by cuts to Scotland's benefits bill. Read more: In response to which, John Swinney sharpens the knife he has already honed for UK Labour – and turns it upon the Scottish Conservatives, accusing both of seeking to gain electorally from enhancing poverty. Both his rivals demur. But there is more from Mr Findlay. In conference this weekend, he is projecting what he calls 'common sense' policies. Reflecting, as one insider noted to me, the 'real priorities of the Scottish people, stopping the nonsense of the political bubble.' So potholes, rather than gender reform. An end to the North Sea windfall tax. An understandable move, in keeping with Tory instincts. Except that John Swinney has already shifted ground to focus on fundamentals. And Labour's Anas Sarwar talks without ceasing about popular concerns such as the NHS. And Reform? Both UK and Scottish Tory leaders will hope to sideline them. That might prove difficult, especially given the options offered by list voting. Other factors. Reform themselves may be subject to closer scrutiny. As the Holyrood election approaches, people may turn their attention to big choices. Who forms the new devolved government which will set their taxes and control their public services? The Tories hope they can bring a distinctive perspective to that choice. They know they are down. They can only hope – and believe – they are not yet out. Brian Taylor is a former political editor for BBC Scotland and a columnist for The Herald. He cherishes his family, the theatre - and Dundee United FC
Telegraph
6 days ago
- Telegraph
The treaty Gibraltar wants, for the future we all need
For over five years, Gibraltar has been at the centre of one of the most complex, technical, and geopolitically sensitive negotiations undertaken by the United Kingdom and the European Union since Brexit. The process has consumed me. It has occupied close to half of my time in elected office, taken over almost every waking hour of the last five years, and, in truth, deprived the people of Gibraltar of their Chief Minister in the way they are used to having him, that is, from fixing housing and parking complaints to defending their sovereignty in the international arena. For much longer than I would have wanted, I have been behind closed doors, in physical or virtual boardrooms, working through the details of a document that will shape the next generation of our people. It has been a relentless, exhausting endeavour. Throughout this time, the UK and Gibraltar teams have worked together seamlessly, 'hand in glove', without a flash of daylight between us. We have worked in close partnership with both Conservative and Labour prime ministers and foreign secretaries; from Dominic Raab, Liz Truss and James Cleverly to David Cameron and now David Lammy. What we have negotiated is not the product of fragmented agendas, but the position of a unified British family determined to find a solution worthy of our people. Without a treaty, Gibraltar could be staring down the barrel of a hard border, marked by endless queues, disrupted supply chains, and a deeply uncertain future for many of our businesses. Our hospitals and elderly care homes would face chronic understaffing, and the surrounding region would suffer the almost certain loss of employment for many of the 15,000 cross-border workers who depend on Gibraltar's economy to support their families. The services we deliver to our people would all come under strain. Our public finances would be pushed to the brink. The self-governing Gibraltar we have built would be diminished, replaced by something poorer, more isolated, more inward-looking, and ultimately less able to thrive as a proud, British European Territory. Instead, we now stand at the threshold of something remarkable, and not just for Gibraltar, but also for the United Kingdom, for Spain, and for Europe and our people. Something bold. Something forward looking and hopeful. Something that finally breaks free of the negative inertia that has defined too much of our recent past. Unlocking potential across borders This is politics at its most elevated. The service-led principle of working for our people's benefit and not the performative personal antagonism that too often infects public life. Real, hard graft that overcomes challenges to deliver progress. This is the kind of result our people demand when they voice distrust and decry the political 'establishment'. Our Spanish and EU counterparts, for their part, have brought to the table a seriousness of purpose that also reflects the gravity of the moment. They, too, have recognised that this treaty is not merely about fluidity of movement, but about unlocking human and economic potential across borders. Make no mistake: the treaty that is now within reach is not one that the Gibraltarians have been forced to accept. Our people voted for us to have a mandate to turn our New Year's Eve agreement of 2020 into a UK/EU agreement/treaty. So we say 'yes' to this agreement, but not because we don't know how to say 'no' when we have to. We did so, emphatically, in 2002, when we triggered a referendum to reject Jack Straw's proposal of joint sovereignty with Spain, and I am just as adamant today that this treaty will not in any way compromise British sovereignty over Gibraltar. That will be set out, black upon white, in the treaty when it is published. It is a legal undertaking given by both sides in clear and unequivocal terms. So to be clear: in this treaty we have not ceded any control of Gibraltar to any authority. Just like today, only Gibraltar will decide who enters Gibraltar – exactly as we agreed in 2020 when Dominic Raab was foreign secretary and Boris Johnson was prime minister. This treaty unleashes the potential to usher in a new era. One in which we move beyond the tired narratives of the past on constant sovereignty disputes, towards a future defined by hope, cooperation and shared prosperity. It will pave the way for better jobs, more investment and lasting stability for Gibraltar and the wider region. It can deliver more harmonious human relations and a better quality of life for all our people. When you read it, I ask that you to look up from the pages of this treaty and see that better reality as it peers back at us from the future. This will be the treaty Gibraltar wants. It will be a treaty the UK and the EU can be proud of. And it will be a treaty that will propel us all to the better future politicians are elected to deliver. When the time comes, back Gibraltar and its proudly British people by backing the Gibraltar treaty.
