'TikTok craze behind beauty spot parking issues'
An MP says a "TikTok craze" is behind the "increasingly untenable" state of parking at beauty spots in the Peak District.Jon Pearce, who represents High Peak in Derbyshire, says social media users have been flocking to the area to see the sunrise and sunset at Mam Tor.Roads in the national park have recently been blighted by bad parking, including on 11 January, when "around 200 cars" prevented gritting from taking place.Pearce has now written to Peak District authorities calling for "immediate and decisive action", less than a week after councillors in Hope Valley called for an "urgent plan of action" to tackle parking in the area.
In the letter addressed to the Peak District National Park, Derbyshire County Council, Derbyshire Police and High Peak Borough Council, Pearce said the situation was "unacceptable".He said: "Residents are rightly alarmed that current parking restrictions are failing to deter motorists from parking irresponsibly."The consequences of this unchecked behaviour are severe - our roads are increasingly unsafe".Pearce told the BBC he lives in Hope Valley, where parking has "got out of hand" and is "causing chaos".He said: "I understand a lot of the issues we're having at the moment is because there's a TikTok craze for going and seeing sunrise, sunset on Mam Tor and that's caused the peak in the parking issues we've got at the moment."But that has at least given us the heads up that we've got to be prepared for the summer."
Pearce says he believes solutions such as barriers on verges, higher fines, improved road signage and more seasonal public car parking sites can be put in place before the peak tourism season this summer.A Derbyshire County Council meeting on Wednesday heard that boulders could be placed on either side of the road near Mam Tor to try and curb the spike in illegal parking.Rushup Edge has seen the most parking fines in the most recent complete year at almost 2,000, above Edale and Castleton, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS).A council highways manager told the meeting that a key issue on Mam Tor was a "lack of education" around road restrictions, such as clearways and double-yellow lines.
A spokesperson for Peak District National Park Authority said it would be meeting with other local authorities in March to discuss "realistic, appropriate and workable ideas" to address the issue.They said: "The priority of the National Park Management Plan is to create an 'area management' style approach, but also back this with a clear evidence-base of accurate and timely data."It is the authority's intention to pilot this approach in the areas currently affected by increased visitor footfall, such as around Castleton."Derbyshire Police said officers were conducting frequent patrols in problem areas, adding that parking dangerously was "not an option".
A force spokesperson said: "Most people do manage to park safely, but we have seen dangerous and irresponsible parking from some people in recent weeks, bringing roads to a standstill and hindering emergency services."Nowhere safe to park? Drive on, there are hundreds of options of places to start a walk."Councillor Charlotte Cupit, Derbyshire County Council's cabinet member for highways assets and transport, said not all of the parking problems were under the authority's control or remit.However, she said the council was "doing all we can to deal with the issues we are responsible for", adding it had been working with police and other authorities on a "multi-agency basis to try to resolve the issues, and we will continue to do this".Cupit said the authority does not own any land or car parks in the national park, but was "working to proactively support sustainable travel, rather than concreting over the Peak District".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
TikTok creating more than 500 new British jobs as UK users top 30 million
The Chinese-owned social media firm said its UK workforce would expand to 3,000 this year as part of its 'deep commitment' to the UK. It will also open a new 135,000sq ft office in London's Barbican, which is set to open early next year. The group already has its UK headquarters in Farringdon, London, which were opened in 2022. TikTok unveiled the plans as it said it now has more than 30 million regular users in the UK each month, which makes the market is biggest user community in Europe. Adam Presser, director of TikTok UK and global head of operations and trust and safety, said: 'Whether through direct investment in jobs and innovation, or the wider economic contribution from millions of British businesses on TikTok, we're pleased to be increasing our investment and presence here in the UK, an important hub for TikTok.' But it comes after Cabinet minister Pete Kyle signalled he was looking at measures to restrict the amount of time children spend on their phones, including through a possible 10pm curfew. Mr Kyle was asked on Sunday morning whether he would look at limiting the time children spend on social media to two hours per app after the Sunday People and Mirror reported the measure was being considered by ministers. The Online Safety Act has passed into law, and from this year will require tech platforms to follow new Ofcom-issued codes of practice to keep users safe online, particularly children. Hefty fines and site blockages are among the penalties for those caught breaking the rules, but many critics have argued the approach gives tech firms too much scope to regulate themselves. TikTok's Mr Presser said that, as well as its UK expansion plans, the group also invests 'significantly' in safety. He said: 'What underpins our continued growth is our deep commitment to safety and to creating an enjoyable and secure digital space to sustainably support creators, entrepreneurs and the wider economy, which is why we also invest significantly in safety.' TikTok first launched its UK operations in 2018 and is financially incorporated in Britain. The group was fined 530 million euro (£446 million) by the Irish data protection watchdog last month for breaching EU privacy rules around transferring user data to China. The video-sharing app was also sanctioned for not being transparent with users about where personal data was being sent and ordered the platform to comply with data protection rules within six months. TikTok said it would appeal against the decision. The social media giant, which is owned by China-based ByteDance, has been under scrutiny from regulators around the world over how it handles personal data, and is also facing a ban in the United States over its China links, which the US government has said is a national security issue.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
They hoped their children's deaths would bring change. Then a Colorado bill to protect kids online failed
Bereaved parents saw their hopes for change dashed after a bill meant to protect children from sexual predators and drug dealers online died in the Colorado state legislature last month. Several of those parents had helped shape the bill, including Lori Schott, whose 18-year-old daughter Annalee died by suicide in 2020 after consuming content on TikTok and Instagram about depression, anxiety and suicide. 'When the legislators failed to vote and pushed it off onto some fake calendar date where they're not even in session, to not even have accountability for where they stand – as a parent, it's a slap in the face,' said Schott, who identifies as a pro-second amendment Republican. 'It's a slap in the face of my daughter, and to other kids that we've lost.' Had the legislation passed, it would have required social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to investigate and take down accounts engaged in gun or drug sales or in the sexual exploitation or trafficking of minors. It also mandated the creation of direct hotlines to tech company personnel for law enforcement and a 72-hour response window for police requests, a higher burden than under current law. Additionally, platforms would have had to report on how many minors used their services, how often they did so, for how long and how much those young users engaged with content that violated company policies. Several big tech firms registered official positions on the bill. According to Colorado lobbying disclosures, Meta's longtime in-state lobby firm, Headwater Strategies, is registered as a proponent for changing the bill. Google and TikTok also hired lobbyists to oppose it. 'We're just extremely disappointed,' said Kim Osterman, whose 18-year-old son Max died in 2021 after purchasing drugs spiked with fentanyl from a dealer he met on Snapchat. '[Legislators] chose big tech over protecting children and families.' Protections for users of social media (SB 25-086) passed both chambers before being vetoed on 24 April by governor Jared Polis, a Democrat, who cited the bill's potential to 'erode privacy, freedom and innovation' as reasons for his veto. Colorado's senate voted to override the veto on 25 April, yet those efforts fell apart on 28 April when the state house opted to delay the vote until after the legislative session ended, effectively blocking an override and keeping the bill alive. The bill originally passed the senate by a 29-6 vote and the house by a 46-18 margin. On 25 April, the senate voted 29-6 to override Polis's veto. Lawmakers anticipated that the house would take up the override later that day. At the time, according to those interviewed, there appeared to be enough bipartisan support to successfully overturn his veto. 'It was an easy vote for folks because of what we were voting on: protecting kids from social media companies,' said the senator Lindsey Daugherty, a Democrat and a co-sponsor of the bill. She said she urged house leadership to hold the vote Friday, but they declined: 'The speaker knew the governor didn't want us to do it on Friday, because they knew we would win.' The parents who advocated for the bill attribute its failure to an unexpected, 11th-hour lobbying campaign by a far-right gun owners' association in Colorado. Two state legislators as well as seven people involved in the legislative process echoed the parents' claims. Rocky Mountain Gun Owners (RMGO) cast the bill as an instrument of government censorship in texts and emails over the legislation's provisions against 'ghost guns', untraceable weapons assembled from kits purchased online, which would have been prohibited. RMGO launched massive social media and email campaigns urging its 200,000 members to contact their legislators to demand they vote against the bill. A source with knowledge of the workings of the Colorado state house described the gun group's social media and text campaigns, encouraging Republicans voters to contact their legislators to demand opposition to the bill, as incessant. '[Legislators] were getting countless calls and emails and being yelled at by activists. It was a full-fledged attack. There was a whole campaign saying: 'This is a government censorship bill,'' they said. The group's actions were instrumental in a campaign to deter house Republicans from voting against the veto, resulting in the quashing of the bill, and unexpected from an organization that had been facing funding shortfalls, according to 10 people interviewed who were involved in the design of the bill and legislative process. Sources in the Colorado state house spoke to the Guardian on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal from RMGO. The house had delayed the vote until 28 April, which allowed RMGO time to launch a campaign against the bill over the weekend. When lawmakers reconvened Monday, the house voted 51-13 to postpone the override until after the legislative session ended – effectively killing the effort. The gun activists' mass text message campaign to registered Republican voters asserted the social media bill would constitute an attempt to 'compel social media companies to conduct mass surveillance of content posted on their platforms' to search for violations of Colorado's gun laws, describing the bill as an attack on first and second amendment rights, according to texts seen by the Guardian. Founded in 1996, RMGO claims to have a membership of more than 200,000 activists. It is recognized as a far-right group that takes a 'no-compromise' stance on gun rights. Dudley Brown, its founder and leader, also serves as the president of the National Association for Gun Rights, which positions itself further to the right than the National Rifle Association (NRA). RMGO has mounted criticism against the NRA for being too moderate and politically compromising. Critics have described RMGO as 'bullies' and 'extremists' because of its combative tactics, which include targeting and smearing Democrats and moderate Republicans. The group did not respond to requests for comment on its legislative efforts. RMGO is a well-known presence at the Colorado capitol, typically opposing gun-control legislation. Daugherty described its typical campaign tactics as 'scary'. She got rid of her X account after being singled out by the group over her work on a bill to ban assault weapons earlier this year. 'When we were running any of the gun bills at the capitol, they put my and some other legislators' faces on their websites,' she said. A screenshot of a tweet from RMGO showed Daugherty with a red 'traitor' stamp on her forehead. The group's campaign resulted in the spread of misinformation about the bill's impact on gun ownership rights, sources involved in the legislative process said. 'The reason I was in support of the bill, and in support of the override, was it has to do with child trafficking and protecting the kids,' said the senator Rod Pelton, a Republican, who voted in favor of the veto override in the senate. 'I just didn't really buy into the whole second amendment argument.' Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The bill had enjoyed the backing of all 23 of Colorado's district attorneys as well as bipartisan state house support. RMGO's late-stage opposition to the social media bill marked a break from its usual playbook. The group generally weighs in on legislation earlier in the process, according to eight sources, including two of the bill's co-sponsors, Daugherty and the representative Andy Boesenecker. 'They really ramped up their efforts,' Boesenecker said. 'It was curious to me that their opposition came in very late and appeared to be very well funded at the end.' In recent years, RMGO group had been less active due to well-documented money problems that limited its ability to campaign on legislative issues. In a 2024 interview, the group's leaders stated plainly that it struggled with funding. Daugherty believes RMGO would not have been able to embark on such an apparently costly outreach campaign without a major infusion of cash. A major text campaign like the one launched for SB-86 was beyond their financial capacity, she said. Others in Colorado politics agreed. 'Rocky Mountain Gun Owners have not been important or effective in probably at least four years in the legislature. They've had no money, and then all of a sudden they had tons of money, funding their rise back into power,' said Dawn Reinfeld, executive director of Blue Rising Together, a Colorado-based non-profit focused on youth rights. The campaign made legislators feel threatened, with primary elections in their districts over the weekend, Daugherty said, particularly after accounts on X, formerly Twitter, bombarded the bill's supporters. 'Folks were worried about being primaried, mostly the Republicans, and that's kind of what it came down to,' Daugherty said. Aaron Ping's 16-year-old son Avery died of an overdose in December after buying what he thought was ecstasy over Snapchat and receiving instead a substance laced with fentanyl. Ping saw the campaign against the bill as an intentional misconstrual of its intent. 'It was looking like the bill was going to pass, until all this misinformation about it taking away people's gun rights because it addresses people buying illegal shadow guns off the internet,' he said. Ping gave testimony in support of the bill in February before the first senate vote, alongside other bereaved parents, teens in recovery and a district attorney. 'The bill gave me hope that Avery's legacy would be to help. So when it didn't pass, it was pretty soul-crushing,' said Ping. Several states, including California, Maryland, Vermont, Minnesota, Hawaii, Illinois, New Mexico, South Carolina and Nevada, have introduced legislation aimed at improving online safety for children in the past two years. These efforts have faced strong resistance from the tech industry, including heavy lobbying and lawsuits. Maryland became the first state to successfully pass a Kids Code bill, signing it into law in May 2024. But the victory may be short-lived: NetChoice, a tech industry coalition representing companies including Meta, Google and Amazon, quickly launched a legal challenge against the measure, which is ongoing. Meanwhile, in the US federal government, the kids online safety act (Kosa), which had wound its way through the legislature for years, died in February when it failed to pass in the House after years of markups and votes. A revamped version of the bill was reintroduced to Congress on 14 May. In California, a similar bill known as the age-appropriate design code act, modeled after UK legislation, was blocked in late 2023. A federal judge granted NetChoice a preliminary injunction, citing potential violations of the first amendment, which stopped the law from going into effect. In the US, you can call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline on 988, chat on or text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor. In the UK, the youth suicide charity Papyrus can be contacted on 0800 068 4141 or email pat@ and in the UK and Ireland Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@ or jo@ In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
TikTok creating more than 500 new British jobs as UK users top 30 million
The Chinese-owned social media firm said its UK workforce would expand to 3,000 this year as part of its 'deep commitment' to the UK. It will also open a new 135,000sq ft office in London's Barbican, which is set to open early next year. The group already has its UK headquarters in Farringdon, London, which were opened in 2022. TikTok unveiled the plans as it said it now has more than 30 million regular users in the UK each month, which makes the market is biggest user community in Europe. Adam Presser, director of TikTok UK and global head of operations and trust and safety, said: 'Whether through direct investment in jobs and innovation, or the wider economic contribution from millions of British businesses on TikTok, we're pleased to be increasing our investment and presence here in the UK, an important hub for TikTok.' But it comes after Cabinet minister Pete Kyle signalled he was looking at measures to restrict the amount of time children spend on their phones, including through a possible 10pm curfew. Mr Kyle was asked on Sunday morning whether he would look at limiting the time children spend on social media to two hours per app after the Sunday People and Mirror reported the measure was being considered by ministers. The Online Safety Act has passed into law, and from this year will require tech platforms to follow new Ofcom-issued codes of practice to keep users safe online, particularly children. Hefty fines and site blockages are among the penalties for those caught breaking the rules, but many critics have argued the approach gives tech firms too much scope to regulate themselves. TikTok's Mr Presser said that, as well as its UK expansion plans, the group also invests 'significantly' in safety. He said: 'What underpins our continued growth is our deep commitment to safety and to creating an enjoyable and secure digital space to sustainably support creators, entrepreneurs and the wider economy, which is why we also invest significantly in safety.' TikTok first launched its UK operations in 2018 and is financially incorporated in Britain. The group was fined 530 million euro (£446 million) by the Irish data protection watchdog last month for breaching EU privacy rules around transferring user data to China. The video-sharing app was also sanctioned for not being transparent with users about where personal data was being sent and ordered the platform to comply with data protection rules within six months. TikTok said it would appeal against the decision. The social media giant, which is owned by China-based ByteDance, has been under scrutiny from regulators around the world over how it handles personal data, and is also facing a ban in the United States over its China links, which the US government has said is a national security issue.
