logo
Berkshire family call for change after son's murder abroad

Berkshire family call for change after son's murder abroad

BBC News21-05-2025

The family of a man who was murdered in the US are calling for more support when loved ones are killed abroad.Tom Reeve, 28, from Maidenhead, was shot dead when a man entered a bar in Amarillo, Texas, in 2009.His step-father Brian Millin said the process following his death had taken "far too long, and there wasn't enough help from the government" on issues like contacting foreign consulates, translating documents and repatriation.A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said the family had been supported at the time but are yet to explain what processes are currently in place.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Under-Secretary of State for Justice Alex Davies-Jones said the government was looking at what extra information could "better signpost help for those affected by crimes overseas"."I intend to consult on the new code with all new members and the public in due course," he said.Mr Millin explained his stepson had been on holiday with two friends during a visit to see his biological father when he decided to take a road trip "because he liked the song" (Is This The Way To) Amarillo by Tony Christie.He was killed when a gunman opened fire in an armed raid at a bar.Ray Carlos Cisneros was later arrested and jailed for the killing.
Mr Millin said: "We managed to contact the consulate in Houston but there is a time difference and they were not always very helpful..."We decided to handle everything directly ourselves including repatriation of Tom because we were not getting any help from our government at this end or that end."The murder of any family member is traumatic and you're just not prepared for it. "When it's abroad it just compounds the issues, the time differences and very often there's a language difficulty."
'Morally wrong'
Mr Millin has since got involved with the charity Murdered Abroad and the issue has been taken up by their MP Joshua Reynolds who is also calling on the government to "do more to help these families".He said: "There's already a requirement for consulates to be able to support families but there is no clear criteria of what this means."I've set out a number of tests that I think will be clear, that we want to be looking at in the future."Translating legal and investigative documents into English, guidance and support around legal systems."The Foreign Office have got this information, the Foreign Office knows how these work so it should be able to support these families in doing so."Tom's mother Maggie said: "His last words to me were 'chill mother, it will all be fine' and I'd like to think that it would. It will be fine if we can get this changed. It's just morally wrong."
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mommy influencer Emilie Kiser's desperate fight to stop video of son's death becoming public
Mommy influencer Emilie Kiser's desperate fight to stop video of son's death becoming public

Daily Mail​

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Mommy influencer Emilie Kiser's desperate fight to stop video of son's death becoming public

Influencer Emilie Kiser has been fighting tirelessly to keep her late son's private records from becoming public, including tragic footage of the toddler's death. Kiser, a popular mommy blogger, lost her three-year-old son Trigg on May 18 - six days after he was found unresponsive in a backyard pool in Arizona. Before it was confirmed that Trigg, who was often featured in his mother's viral videos, was the child who died, many speculated online about him being the victim. Once news broke that he was the boy who drowned, a 'media frenzy' unleashed as internet sleuths and fans of Kiser took it upon themselves to request records - including videos - in relation to his death. This then prompted her to file a lawsuit just one week after his passing against several agencies in Maricopa County to block private information from getting out. On Wednesday, the Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County ruled in her favor, granting her temporary confidentiality, meaning evidence will not be released while the court makes its final ruling on the tragedy. The 26-year-old mother's declaration 'reflects an intensely personal account of her grief and trauma' that was 'submitted to help the court understand her perspective - not for public consumption,' a source told In her motion, Kiser has specifically urged the court to keep not just detailed records of Trigg's death private, but also footage as '100+ public records requests' for the video have come in, according to the source. The intense amount of records requests 'only serves to satisfy morbid curiosity more than any type of justice,' they added. Kiser, who was not home at the time of the drowning, 'should not be forced to relive the aftermath through viral footage,' the source stated. 'The motions behind the push for release are concerning. In many cases, requests appear to be driven by monetization and notoriety, not accountability,' they continued. 'That is not a valid justification for invading a family's grief.' Since news of her legal filing came out, many online have speculated that Kiser chose to do so as a way to cover up information, but according to the source, that is completely false. 'Emilie has fully cooperated with investigators. The focus here is not on withholding information, but on safeguarding the dignity of a child and allowing a grieving family the space and privacy to heal.' The source also revealed chilling details on what Kiser and her family are going through as 'rabid fans' have swarmed her home and tried to reach out to them. 'Rabid fans and media have surrounded Emilie's home, filmed through her windows, and sent unsolicited packages' they said. Kiser has four million followers on TikTok and 1.7 million on Instagram, but according to the source, her 'public profile does not negate her right to privacy, nor does it make her son's death a matter for public consumption. 'Being online should not strip someone of basic human decency.' Following the tragic ordeal at the family's pool, a neighbor told that the influencer's house was swarmed with five police cars. Emergency responders arrived and performed life-saving efforts until Trigg was airlifted to Phoenix Children's Hospital for specialized care. Kiser hasn't posted since the tragedy, but her followers have continued to flood her accounts with messages of support and condolences before she turned off her comment sections. Meanwhile, her husband Brady Kiser, Trigg's father, made his accounts private following his death. Kiser or her legal representation haven't reviewed the police report, security camera footage, scene photos, 911 recording, or autopsy photos, per the lawsuit. Kiser and Brady first became parents in July 2021 when they welcomed their son Trigg. Just over two years later, in September 2024, the couple revealed they were expecting their second child. 'WE GOTTA BABY GROWING,' Kiser captioned a sonogram post. 'We can not wait to add another angel to our family. Whatever you are, we love you so much already.' In March, the Kiser family officially grew by one with the arrival of their second son, Theodore. 'Emilie is trying her best to be there for her surviving son, two-month-old Theodore. But every day is a battle,' the suit said.

Dismay and disbelief as Trump bans visitors from a dozen countries
Dismay and disbelief as Trump bans visitors from a dozen countries

Reuters

time16 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Dismay and disbelief as Trump bans visitors from a dozen countries

June 5 (Reuters) - Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned from visiting the United States expressed dismay and disbelief on Thursday at President Donald Trump's new sweeping travel ban as his administration intensifies its immigration crackdown. Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday barring citizens of 12 countries from entering the U.S. starting on Monday, asserting that the restrictions were necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists." The order was reminiscent of a similar move Trump implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. That directive faced court challenges and went through several iterations before the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ban in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed that ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience." But the new ban is much more expansive and covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Citizens of seven other countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - will be partially restricted. A senior diplomat with the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, who asked not to be named, said Trump's justification did not stand up to scrutiny. "Sudanese people have never been known to pose a terrorist threat anywhere in the world," the official said. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the U.S. a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S. Afghans who worked for the U.S. or U.S.-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the U.S. expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Fatima, a 57-year-old Afghan women's rights defender waiting in Pakistan for her U.S. visa to be processed, had her dreams shattered overnight after Trump's order. "Unfortunately, the decisions made by President Trump turned all the hopes and beliefs of us into ashes," she told Reuters, asking that only her first name be published for security reasons. Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt was not part of the travel ban. "Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday. When asked why he chose this moment to unveil the ban, he said: "It can't come soon enough." The visa ban takes effect on June 9 at 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT). Visas issued before that date will not be revoked, the order said. In total, just under 162,000 immigrant visas and temporary work, study, and travel visas were issued in fiscal year 2023 to nationals of the affected countries in the now banned visa categories, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The ban is likely to face legal challenges. But Stephen Yale-Loehr, a retired professor of immigration law at Cornell Law School, said he expected those lawsuits to face an uphill climb, because the latest ban contains various exemptions and cited specific security concerns with each country. The ban includes exemptions, such as for dual nationals, permanent residents, immigrant visas for immediate family members of U.S. citizens and athletes traveling for major sporting events like the World Cup. "Trump has learned from the mistakes of earlier travel bans," he said. Some foreign officials said they were prepared to work with the U.S. to address Trump's security concerns. "Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised," Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement.

Musk is suffering from ‘Trump derangement syndrome,' US president suggests
Musk is suffering from ‘Trump derangement syndrome,' US president suggests

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Musk is suffering from ‘Trump derangement syndrome,' US president suggests

Donald Trump accused Elon Musk of suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome', as he signalled the official collapse of their once warm relationship. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' Mr Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' His remarks illustrate the president's intense anger over the world's richest man's meddling with his legislative agenda after leaving the White House with a golden key and a warm televised send-off. Mr Musk immediately hit back, writing on his social media platform, X: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' he posted. 'Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' Since stepping down as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency last week, Mr Musk has slammed Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the national debt. Discussion of their broken friendship overshadowed the president's Oval Office press conference with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, as Mr Trump said his former ally was lashing out because he did not get his own way. He claimed the Tesla chief executive was upset that his ally had been rejected as the next administrator of Nasa and that the bill meant the end of tax breaks for electric vehicles worth billions to his company. 'He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' he said. 'And if you saw the statements he made about me … he said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon.' Mr Trump added that Mr Musk was probably missing the Oval Office and the trappings of power. 'It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it,' he said. 'But we have it with others too. 'They leave and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone.' Mr Musk appeared in the Oval Office last Friday for his send-off. At the time, Mr Trump said he was 'not really leaving' and would continue to visit the White House. Things quickly unravelled when Mr Musk went on a six-hour X session on Tuesday night, posting his criticism of the bill, particularly that it does not do enough to cut federal spending. Independent analysts warn that its spending cuts are not balanced by tax breaks, with the result that the bill will add more than $2 trillion to the national debt during the next decade. Mr Musk kept up his attacks on Thursday, live tweeting during the president's Oval Office sit-down with Mr Merz. He rejected claims that he had supported the bill when he was at the White House. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it,' he posted. Earlier, he resurfaced an old tweet of Mr Trump's. Wise words — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 And he continued as Mr Trump went on the attack, posting a message suggesting he might be amenable to a trimmed down version: 'Slim Beautiful Bill for the win.' The bill is crucial to Mr Trump's strategy. It contains much of his domestic policy agenda, as well as the campaign promises that propelled him to victory in last year's election, such as ending taxation on overtime and tips. This week, Mr Trump all but disappeared from view as he focused on meetings and phone calls to keep Republicans on side. The bill has already passed the House but faces a difficult passage through the Senate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store