Lawmakers will try again Thursday to pass bill slowing Nebraska minimum wage increases
State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln talks with State Sen. Tony Sorrentino of the Elkhorn area on May 14, 2025, after the defeat of a Raybould-led bill to slow down annual voter-approved increases to the state's minimum wage because Sorrentino missed the final vote. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — A week after the procedural failure of a proposal to slow down voter-approved minimum wage increases, Nebraska lawmakers on Thursday will reconsider the final vote.
If the bill's previous supporters hold, the measure would have enough support to pass. State Sen. Tony Sorrentino of the Elkhorn area, a freshman lawmaker, missed the final vote to pass Legislative Bill 258, from State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln.
That's because the vote came up about two hours earlier than expected after lead opponent State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln realized Sorrentino's absence and changed tactics.
The bill failed 31-17. Amending a law that voters enact requires at least 33 votes. LB 258 would make annual bumps to the minimum wage smaller and more predictable, supporters say, and create carveouts to pay teen workers less.
One listed 'no' vote, State Sen. Beau Ballard of Lincoln, supported the bill originally but tried to sit out the vote to let lawmakers reconsider the vote. He was marked as a 'no' vote under a rule change in January. A reconsideration motion requires a senator on the 'prevailing' side to want to change a vote, or the requesting senator must have missed the vote.
Sorrentino missed last Wednesday's vote, because he was escorting colleagues he met through business to a meeting across the street. Of opponents who consider the issue decided, Sorrentino said, 'We all have to learn the rules of the Legislature.'
Multiple senators said such a reconsideration motion on a bill from final reading, while likely allowed under the legislative rules, hadn't been used since 1984.
The effort could ignite a rules fight over whether the reconsideration should be allowed.
Speaker John Arch of La Vista confirmed this week that a reconsideration motion would come Thursday, though he said he couldn't say when. The Legislature will take up either Ballard's motion or a new reconsideration motion Sorrentino filed Tuesday, the final day he could do so under the Legislature's rules. At least 30 senators must agree to reconsider.
Asked to comment on the reconsideration, Raybould said, 'No.'
She said a reporter should ask Conrad for comment, who Raybould said was already discussing the motion. Last week, she said she thought Democratic-aligned lawmakers were acting in 'goodwill,' because they knew Raybould had the votes.
The fight has been personal for Raybould, a longtime grocery store executive, who views the legislation as creating a 'balance' that progressives, including Conrad, have rejected.
'I have never seen such a blatant, bald-faced, self-serving, self-dealing, selfish, unethical example of self-dealing as this bill in the Legislature,' State Sen. Megan Hunt of Omaha said during an April 1 debate.
Sorrentino, a former business owner, said he's personally not in favor of a legislated minimum wage, describing himself as a 'true fan of supply and demand.' He said the market is a better indicator.
Sorrentino said it's not a vote about 'putting people in poverty, because frankly, I've seen cases where minimum wage is never going to fly, it's way too low.'
LB 258 is Raybould's 2025 priority bill. She is the lone Democrat in favor of LB 258 as well as a separate LB 415 to weaken a voter-approved paid sick leave framework that takes effect Oct. 1, after 2024 passage. Republican State Sen. Dave Wordekemper of Fremont opposes LB 258 and the current version of LB 415. There are 33 Republicans in the officially nonpartisan body.
There were some initial conversations about attaching LB 258 to LB 415. That approach heightens the risk that voters could repeal the legislative changes and go back to the voter-approved language, which some advocates have discussed as a response to LB 415.
Legislative Bill 258, related to the state minimum wage, would remove inflationary bumps after the base wage rises to $15 on Jan. 1, which voters approved in 2022. Future increases would be fixed at a 1.75% annual rate beginning in 2026. That was a deal struck between State Sens. Jane Raybould of Lincoln, the sponsor, and Stan Clouse of Kearney to provide 'certainty.'
Average inflation, as calculated by the ballot measure's current language, was 2.6% last year and 4.18% for the past five years. Over the past 10 years, inflation was 2.63%. And over the past 25 years, it was 2.39%, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Midwest.
LB 258 would also create a 'youth minimum wage' for workers aged 14 or 15. Beginning next year, those young workers could be paid $13.50 (the current minimum wage), which would increase by 1.5% every five years, beginning in 2030.
The youth minimum wage would stay below $15 — the floor that voters created for all workers beginning Jan. 1 — until 2065 under LB 258, according to a Nebraska Examiner analysis.
Teen workers aged 16 to 19 could still be paid a 'training wage,' which would no longer apply to 14 or 15 year olds with the creation of the 'youth minimum wage.' The training wage allows employers to pay teen workers a lower rate for up to the first 90 days of employment.
Current law allows the training wage to be 75% of the federal minimum wage, so as low as $5.44. LB 258 would increase the training wage to $13.50 beginning in September. The amended training wage would rise by 1.5% annually beginning in 2027.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
3 minutes ago
- Fox News
Retired Justice Stephen Breyer's brother assigned to Newsom National Guard lawsuit
The brother of retired liberal Justice Stephen Breyer was assigned Tuesday to preside over the lawsuit that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom brought against the Trump administration in California this week. Judge Charles Breyer, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, is set to oversee the case, which alleges President Donald Trump deprived California of its sovereignty by federalizing thousands of National Guard soldiers in response to anti-immigration enforcement protests and riots in Los Angeles County. Breyer is the younger brother of Stephen Breyer, who was appointed by Clinton to the high court and served on the bench for nearly three decades beginning in 1994. Stephen Breyer's retirement led to former President Joe Biden replacing him with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Charles Breyer, who serves on the federal bench in the Northern District of California, will oversee a lawsuit that pits Newsom, one of the country's most prominent Democrats and a possible 2028 presidential contender, against Trump. Newsom alleged in the lawsuit that Trump made an "unprecedented power grab" by mobilizing the National Guard in his state, a highly unusual move for a president to do without the consent of the governor. Trump has said the move was necessary to protect ICE personnel and federal buildings as some protesters engaged in unlawful assembly and pelted law enforcement with concrete bottles and other hard objects. After the National Guard proclamation, more unrest broke out in parts of the county involving rioters setting fire to several self-driving cars and looting some stores. Newsom alleged Trump's decision to send in the military spurred more chaos. Federal court cases in the Northern District of California are assigned by the Clerk of the Court "blindly and at random" through an automated system, according to the court's website. Fox News Digital reached out to Charles Breyer's chambers for comment on his assignment. The news of Charles Breyer presiding over the case comes as some Republicans have floated the theory that Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., secretly took on Trump cases to sabotage them in favor of plaintiffs. Boasberg directly addressed the claims during a court hearing, saying his assignments, like most others in the court, were randomly assigned by a computer.


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Lara Trump: Gavin Newsom Has Completely Deserted His State
Lara Trump, host of 'My View With Lara Trump', joins Fox Across America With Jimmy Failla to share her thoughts on the effort being made by certain Democratic lawmakers to point the finger at the White House for the anti-ICE riots that have been unfolding in California. 'Now they're trying to, of course, paint the picture like Donald Trump is the one who has done something improper. Donald Trump the one trying to enforce the laws that have always been there. They just haven't been paid attention to for four years. So everybody better get used to this. This is what people voted for. This is what November 5th told the country, you know, that the American people wanted. This is an 80-20 issue. 80 percent of the public says that they don't want criminal, illegal aliens running amok in our country. They don't want murderers. They do not want rapists. They do not gang members living next door to them and wreaking havoc on our society. They want them out, and President Trump is doing that. Shame on people like Maxine Waters, who is out there, of course, as usual, just fanning the flames of this and trying to get people even more riled up She ought to be ashamed of herself the things that she's saying But obviously we know she will take any opportunity to try and damage Republicans and of course President Trump that she gets. Absolutely disgusting to see the things she's been saying.' Lara Trump Discusses Elon Musk's Legacy Jimmy and Lara also discuss recent revelations about how aides to former President Biden attempted to hide his cognitive decline from the American people. Listen to the podcast to hear what else they talked about!


CNBC
23 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump says D.C. military parade protesters will be met with 'very heavy force'
President Donald Trump warned Tuesday that protestors at his upcoming military parade in Washington, D.C., will be met with "heavy force." "We're going to be celebrating big on Saturday," Trump said at the White House about the parade marking the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. "And if there's any protester that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force," said Trump, before repeating that threat twice. "I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force." But security officials and the U.S. Secret Service, during a briefing Monday, said that they were tracking roughly nine protests aimed at the parade, which is being held on Trump's 79th birthday. They said that the number of protesters is expected to be much smaller than the number of people attending the parade. The parade has drawn strong criticism from lawmakers in Congress, including some Republicans who question the event's high price tag and optics. The parade could cost up to $45 million, according to an Army spokesperson. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said Tuesday that he is concerned about the message that the parade could send, NBC News reports. "I wouldn't have done it," Paul said. "I'm not sure what the actual expense of it is, but ... we were always different than, you know, the images you saw in the Soviet Union and North Korea," Paul said. "We were proud not to be that," he continued Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said he would not "spend the money" on the event if it were up to him. Trump's warning about protests at the parade comes on the heels of his deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and about 700 Marines to Los Angeles in response to protests over federal immigration enforcement efforts. The state's Democratic leaders, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, and groups including the American Civil Liberties Union have fiercely opposed Trump's deployments. Newsom sued Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Monday over the deployments and has asked a federal judge to block them. Trump's deployments will cost roughly $134 million, a Pentagon official told a House subcommittee on Tuesday.