logo
France's Socialists to submit no-confidence bill amid pensions dispute, weakening Bayrou

France's Socialists to submit no-confidence bill amid pensions dispute, weakening Bayrou

Straits Times6 hours ago

FILE PHOTO: French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou speaks during the questions to the government session at the National Assembly in Paris, France, June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Sarah Meyssonnier/File Photo
PARIS - France's Socialists will file a no-confidence measure against Prime Minister Francois Bayrou after pension talks collapsed, a senior party lawmaker said on Tuesday, but it seems unlikely to pass after the far-right indicated it would not follow suit.
Months-long talks between French trade unions and employers over reforms to the pension system crumbled late on Monday, prompting Bayrou to summon both sides for talks to find a way forward.
The failure of those talks makes Bayrou vulnerable, as his centrist government, grouping President Emmanuel Macron's Ensemble alliance and the conservative Republicans, could fall anytime if left-wing and far-right parties band together to back a motion of no-confidence.
It also augurs badly for what are likely to be even tougher talks over the 2026 budget bill, with the government seeking to push through 40 billion euros ($46 billion) in spending cuts.
Boris Vallaud, leader of the Socialists in the lower house, told parliament that Bayrou had not kept his promise to put a new pension reform bill to parliament.
"This compels us to file a motion of censure," Vallaud said.
The hard-left France Unbowed has previously supported the idea of a confidence vote, but without support from Marine Le Pen's far-right National Rally (RN), the measure looks unlikely to pass.
Gaëtan Dussausaye, an RN lawmaker, said the RN was not looking to topple the government, and Le Pen did not mention such a move when she addressed parliament.
"We don't censure for nothing — but that's exactly what the left is proposing here," said Dussausaye.
Bayrou finds himself in a similar situation to the previous prime minister, Michel Barnier, whose three-month-long administration was propped up by the RN until it backed a no-confidence measure in December over his belt-tightening 2025 budget bill.
In parliament on Tuesday, Bayrou said he was still convinced that "there is a path, albeit a very difficult one, that can lead us out of this impasse".
In what were billed as last-chance talks, pension negotiators failed to agree on how to amend an unpopular 2023 overhaul of the pension system that will gradually raise the retirement age to 64 from 62.
Unions wanted to allow workers with physically taxing jobs to retire earlier, and to give more weight to maternity leave, while employers were wary of concessions that could weigh on the system's finances.
Bayrou, a centrist and long-time debt hawk, had called the union-employer talks in a bid to prevent the Socialists withdrawing their support for him. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US airstrikes failed to destroy Iran's nuclear sites, sources say
US airstrikes failed to destroy Iran's nuclear sites, sources say

Straits Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

US airstrikes failed to destroy Iran's nuclear sites, sources say

People inspecting the apparent remains of a ballistic missile in northern Israel, following an attack by Iran on June 24. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON/TEL AVIV/ISTANBUL - US airstrikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear capability and only set it back by a few months, according to one initial US intelligence assessment, as a shaky ceasefire brokered by President Donald Trump took hold between Iran and Israel. Three sources familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told Reuters of the preliminary assessment. According to two of the sources, the assessment was prepared by the US Defence Intelligence Agency. One of the sources said Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and in fact the country's nuclear programme may have been set back only a month or two. The assessment contradicted Mr Trump's assertion that the weekend strikes had succeeded in destroying Tehran's nuclear programme and raised questions about further US military action if indeed the programme survived the intense aerial bombardment. The White House said the intelligence report was 'flat out wrong'. Mr Trump's administration told the UN Security Council on June 24 that its weekend strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities had 'degraded' Iran's nuclear programme, short of Mr Trump's earlier assertion that the facilities had been 'obliterated'. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on June 24 that Israel in its 12 days of war with Iran had removed the threat of nuclear annihilation and was determined to thwart any attempt by Tehran to revive its programme. 'We have removed two immediate existential threats to us - the threat of nuclear annihilation and the threat of annihilation by 20,000 ballistic missiles,' he said, in video remarks issued by his office. Israel launched the surprise air war on June 13, hitting Iranian nuclear sites where it said Iran was trying to develop an atomic bomb and killing top military commanders in the worst blow to the Islamic Republic since the 1980s war with Iraq. Iran, which says its uranium enrichment programme is for peaceful purposes and denies trying to build nuclear weapons, retaliated with a series of missile barrages on Israeli cities. Earlier on June 24, both Iran and Israel signalled that the air war between the two nations had concluded, at least for now, after Mr Trump scolded them for violating a ceasefire he announced at 5am GMT (1pm in Singapore). 'Great victory' Israel's military lifted restrictions on activity across the country at 8pm local time (1am on June 25 in Singapore), and officials said Ben Gurion Airport, the country's main airport near Tel Aviv, had reopened. Iran's airspace likewise will be reopened, state-affiliated Nournews reported. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said his country had successfully ended the war in what he called a 'great victory,' according to Iranian media. Mr Pezeshkian also told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman that Tehran was ready to resolve differences with the United States, according to official news agency IRNA. A senior White House official said Mr Trump brokered the ceasefire deal with Mr Netanyahu, and other administration officials were in touch with the Iranians. Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani secured Tehran's agreement during a call with Iranian officials, an official briefed on the negotiations told Reuters on June 24. Both Israel and Iran took hours to acknowledge they had accepted the ceasefire and accused each other of violating it, underscoring the fragility of the truce between the two bitter foes and the challenge of achieving lasting peace between them. Mr Trump scolded both sides but aimed especially stinging criticism at Israel, telling the close US ally to 'calm down now'. He later said Israel called off further attacks at his command. Israel's defence minister, Mr Israel Katz, said he told his US counterpart, Mr Pete Hegseth, that his country would respect the ceasefire unless Iran violated it. Mr Pezeshkian likewise said Iran would honour the ceasefire as long as Israel did, according to Iranian media. A satellite view showing the site of Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment plant, after the US struck the nuclear facility on June 21. PHOTO: REUTERS Whether the Israel-Iran truce can hold is a major question given the deep mistrust between the two nations. But Mr Trump's ability to broker a ceasefire showed Washington retains some leverage in the volatile region. Israeli armed forces chief of staff Eyal Zamir said a 'significant chapter' of the conflict had concluded but the campaign against Iran was not over. He said the military would refocus on its war against Iran-backed Hamas militants in Gaza. Iran's military command also warned Israel and the United States to learn from the 'crushing blows' it delivered during the conflict. Iranian authorities said 610 people were killed in their country by Israeli strikes and 4,746 injured. Iran's retaliatory bombardment killed 28 people in Israel, the first time its air defences were penetrated by large numbers of Iranian missiles. Oil prices plunged and stock markets rallied worldwide in a sign of confidence inspired by the ceasefire, which allayed fears of disruption to critical oil supplies from the Gulf. Ceasefire violations? Earlier in the day, Mr Trump admonished Israel with an obscenity in an extraordinary outburst at an ally whose air war he had joined two days before by dropping massive bunker-buster bombs on Iran's underground nuclear sites. Before departing the White House en route to a Nato summit in Europe, Mr Trump told reporters he was unhappy with both sides for the ceasefire breach but particularly frustrated with Israel, which he said had 'unloaded' shortly after agreeing to the deal. 'I've got to get Israel to calm down now,' Mr Trump said. Iran and Israel had been fighting 'so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing.' Mr Netanyahu's office acknowledged Israel bombed a radar site near Tehran in what it said was retaliation for Iranian missiles fired three-and-a-half hours after the ceasefire was due to begin. It did not explicitly say whether the strike on the radar site took place before or after they spoke. The Islamic Republic denied launching any missiles and said Israel's attacks had continued for an hour-and-a-half beyond the time the truce was meant to start. In both countries, there was a palpable sense of relief. 'Who mediated or how it happened doesn't matter. The war is over. It never should have started in the first place,' said Mr Reza Sharifi, 38, heading back to Tehran from Rasht on the Caspian Sea, where he had fled with his family. Mr Arik Daimant, a software engineer in Tel Aviv, said: 'Regrettably, it's a bit too late for me and my family, because our house back here was totally destroyed in the recent bombings last Sunday. But as they say, 'Better late than never', and I hope this ceasefire is a new beginning.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

UK to purchase fighter jets capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons
UK to purchase fighter jets capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons

Straits Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

UK to purchase fighter jets capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons

FILE PHOTO: A Lockheed Martin F-35A fighter jet performs during an exhibition flight at the 55th International Paris Airshow at Le Bourget Airport near Paris, France, June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo THE HAGUE - The British government said on Tuesday that it would purchase a dozen F-35A fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons in what it described as the biggest expansion of its nuclear deterrent in a generation. The purchase of the Lockheed Martin jets would allow Britain's air force to carry nuclear weapons for the first time since the end of the Cold War, Downing Street said. "In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted, which is why my government is investing in our national security," Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement. Britain is increasing defence spending and upgrading its military forces, including its submarine fleet, as it faces increasing hostility from Russia and as the United States retrenches from its traditional role as a defender of European security. The British government said the purchase of the jets would allow it to contribute so-called dual-capable aircraft to NATO to carry nuclear weapons in the event of a conflict. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said "this is yet another robust British contribution to NATO". Britain's nuclear deterrent currently rests solely on the Trident submarine-based system, which misfired during a test last year, the second successive test failure after one veered off course in 2016. The last time Britain possessed an independent air-launched nuclear capability was in 1998 when the WE-177 free fall bomb was withdrawn from service, according to Britain's parliament. Tactical nuclear weapons are intended for battlefield use, as opposed to strategic weapons designed to be fired across vast distances. By purchasing the F-35A fighter jets, Britain would be able to diversify its military options and align more closely with NATO allies such as France, and the United States, which maintains land, sea, and air-based nuclear capabilities. The F-35A fighter jets are capable of carrying U.S. B61 tactical nuclear weapons. Britain would likely need the United States to supply those weapons for use on the planes, said one British official who declined to be named. The United States withdrew its last nuclear weapons from Britain in 2008, in a sign at that time that the threat of conflict following the end of the Cold War was receding. Downing Street said buying the new jets would support about 20,000 jobs in Britain and underline its commitment to NATO. The government has pledged to boost overall defence and security spending to 5% of economic output by 2035 to meet a NATO target and said on Tuesday it must "actively prepare" for war at home for the first time in years. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Nigeria and Brazil sign $1 billion agreement to boost agriculture
Nigeria and Brazil sign $1 billion agreement to boost agriculture

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Nigeria and Brazil sign $1 billion agreement to boost agriculture

A drone view shows ships and containers at the Port of Santos, in Santos, Brazil April 3, 2025. REUTERS/Amanda Perobelli/File Photo ABUJA - Nigeria and Brazil signed a $1 billion agreement on Tuesday to boost agriculture, food security, energy and defence in the West African nation, Nigeria's vice president Kasim Shettima said. Both countries aim to "deploy over $1 billion to deliver mechanised farming equipment, training, and service centres across Nigeria," Shettima said in a statement posted on X. Much farming in Nigeria is subsistence and land is owned by families or individuals which makes large-scale acquisition problematic. Nigeria also imports food for its 200 million plus population. "We are moving from subsistence to scale in agriculture, and in energy, we are taking long-overdue steps to attract serious investment into gas production, refining, and renewables," Shettima added. The agreements were signed in Abuja during a visit by Brazil's vice president Geraldo Alckmin to Africa's most populous nation. Shettima told his Brazilian counterpart that reforms embarked upon by President Bola Tinubu have helped reshaped Nigeria's economy. Nigeria is targeting a $1 trillion economy by 2030, with reforms to agriculture, energy, education, and public finance. The country has also asked banks to recapitalise to attract foreign investments. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store