Palestine Action banned from protesting outside parliament
After Palestine Action members broke into RAF Brize Norton and graffitied two military planes, the Metropolitan police are taking no chances with them in London. The forced has banned protests planned for today from taking place outside parliament, imposing an exclusion zone around Westminster. Meanwhile police have said that demonstrations by the group cannot begin before noon in central London and must wrap up by 3pm. If activists break these rules, they could face arrest. Crikey!
It hasn't completely stumped campaigners, however, with the group moving their protests to Trafalgar Square instead. Announcing the new location on social media, Palestine Action fumed: 'The Metropolitan Police are trying to deter support from Palestine Action by banning the protest from taking place at the House of Parliament. Don't let them win!' A gathering of around 200 people has met in the area, with some kitted out in face coverings and brandishing Palestinian flags. Placards that scream 'Britain, US, Israel are terrorists… Hands off Palestine Action' have been distributed, while volunteers on the ground have handed out 'bust cards' that give legal advice in case of arrest.
The protests come ahead of the Home Secretary's written statement – in which she will lay out plans to proscribe Palestine Action, effectively branding them a terrorist organisation
The protests come ahead of Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's written statement – in which she will lay out plans to proscribe the group, effectively branding them a terrorist organisation – that is expected to be put before parliament today. The move comes as a security review begins at military bases across the country after the protestors managed to gain access to the RAF unit in Oxfordshire. But while the Home Secretary's plans have garnered praise from across the political spectrum – with former Tory home secretary Suella Braverman among those lauding Labour – the move has also received significant backlash.
Amnesty International UK have raged that: 'Terrorism powers should never have been used to aggravate criminal charges against Palestine Action activists and they certainly shouldn't be used to ban them.' Meanwhile left-wingers like independent MP Zarah Sultana and former adviser to Jeremy Corbyn, James Schneider, have taken to social media to slam Cooper's decision, with Schneider writing: 'Every freedom-loving person should oppose the proscription of Palestine Action.' And Irish author Sally Rooney has even waded in, writing in the Guardian today that:
From the suffragettes to the gay rights movement to the anti-apartheid struggle, genuine political resistance has always involved intentional law-breaking… Proscribing an entire organisation under the Terrorism Act is not the same thing as prosecuting particular individuals for specific transgressions… If the government proceeds down this path, any ordinary person in the UK could in theory be sent to prison simply for expressing verbal support for non-violent activism. Quite aside from the broader principle, this would represent an alarming curtailment of free speech.
Will Cooper bend under pressure and soften her stance on it all? Stay tuned…
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Selina Scott's attack does not prove London has fallen
Last week Selina Scott, the former ITV News at Ten anchor, was assaulted and robbed in a busy area of central London. Scott said she was 'furious about the lack of police on our streets', as the attack happened in broad daylight in the West End. The Metropolitan Police quickly responded defending the number of officers on patrol – 'not just in uniform on foot, but also in plain clothes and in vehicles'. Scott's attack will be taken by some as further proof that 'London has fallen'. This phrase, usually posted online by people finger-wagging from outside the M25, has come to encompass a number of gripes about London – from crime rates in the capital to how many shops are run by immigrants. Matt Goodwin's assertion that London is 'so over', after a day of expensive pints, cancelled trains and people with accents, has been shared by others as proof that London is 'now in visible decline, with deteriorating standards and no real sense of identity or belonging'. Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner, but my hackles cannot help but rise. It's all getting a bit Brass Eye – Tory MPs tweeting about trains with graffiti and social commentators complaining that the UK's biggest urban area doesn't have more of a quiet, leafy feel to it. These critics have more in common with Sadiq Khan 's desire to pedestrianise the capital city into suburban hell than the average Londoner. If Robert Jenrick posts another video complaining about car boot sales I'm going to scream. Cities are full of life – none so full as London. They also attract extremes, which means along with the buzz and the beauty comes filth, chaos and even danger. The day London becomes more like Potters Bar is the day it truly has fallen. That all being said, the fact that Scott – a 74-year-old woman – was attacked in broad daylight and not even offered help to get home is not nothing. Rising crime, from the theft of phones and bicycles to serious assault and even murder, should not be a part of London's identity. So whose fault is it? The Met's response to Scott's assault is telling. There might well be a higher number of police officers being sent out to patrol the streets, but that doesn't mean that they're making a difference to public safety. Today, you would be more likely to get a police visit if you wrote something politically incorrect on X than if you were to jump a granny. At the risk of asking the armed wing of the state to find its bicep, it's true that the police seem unable or unwilling to do their job properly – a fact that's known and abused by those who want to get up to no good. The Met is capable of cracking heads when it wants to. No force is spared on Tommy Robinson supporters or lockdown critics. No police power is too big for the parents who misspoke on WhatsApp. Big cities always have their problems, but they're also always changing. Hackney's murder mile is now almost solely populated by middle-class hipsters on Lime bikes. From council bores strangling London nightlife by imposing noise controls and cancelling late licences to pearl-clutchers scared of busy tubes, many want to turn London into something it isn't. My home city hasn't quite fallen, but there seem to be a lot of people willing it to.
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jamaican drug dealer claims she should be allowed to remain in the UK as her six attempts to stay so far have been bad for her mental health
A Jamaican drug dealer who has applied for asylum six times says repeatedly applying for permission to stay in the UK is bad for her mental health. The woman, who has not been named, arrived in Britain in 2002 and was jailed for six years the following year for selling Class A drugs. Deportation proceedings started but she then made multiple applications to avoid being sent back to the Caribbean island. Following her last appeal, the woman - who suffers from mental health issues including schizophrenia - has been granted 'limited' leave to remain until 2026. She claimed the refusal by the Home Office to grant her indefinite permission to stay was a breach of her human rights and a demanded a judicial review of the decision. The Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber denied her request after hearing that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is already reconsidering her application. The hearing was told that the drug dealer, known only as AXS, was sentenced to six years in prison for supplying Class A drugs in 2003, following which deportation proceedings began. Her asylum claim was initially denied but in May 2008 but she successfully appealed under the European Convention on Human Rights claiming she was at risk of torture or degrading treatment if she was returned to the Caribbean island. A First-tier Tribunal found she would be at risk of ill-treatment in Jamaica on account of her sexual orientation. She made further successful claims in 2010, 2012, 2015, 2019 and 2023, when she was on each occasion granted limited leave to remain. In 2015 her son was allowed to enter the country, with the judge in that case observing that his mother was likely to remain in the UK for the rest of her life. Before the 2023 application, the woman applied for indefinite right to leave but that was refused, with a further limited leave granted until 2026. This decision is now being reviewed by the government, the hearing was told. The tribunal, held in May in London, heard that she had suffered sexual abuse and rape in Jamaica, had been sectioned and was a paranoid schizophrenic. She has an IQ of 61 - classed as mild mental disability. Dr Rachel Thomas, consultant clinical psychologist, deemed that the 'repeated act of applying for further leave was retraumatising the applicant and damaging her mental health'. Dr Thomas was of the opinion that the her mental health was unlikely to improve, and in fact likely to deteriorate significantly, unless she was permitted to remain permanently in the UK, the tribunal heard. Upper Tribunal Judge Mark Blundell decided that there had been no issues with the judicial process in refusing her indefinite leave. He said the tribunal should not intervene until the Home Office has made a new decision when the Secretary of State may 'decide that the impact of refusing ILR would have such a serious impact on her mental health that it cannot now be justified by any relevant countervailing considerations'. Judge Blundell concluded: 'The facts remain very much in dispute, particularly as regards the impact of the denial of IRL (Indefinite Right to Leave) on the applicant's mental health. 'The absence of an extant decision from the Secretary of State is significant, and it is not appropriate, even in this human rights context, for the tribunal to act as the primary decision maker. I accept that these delays are regrettable in a case involving a person with mental health problems.'
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment phone snatcher receives instant karma as he's knocked off his bike by furious Londoners - and loses shoe that police use to catch him
This is the shocking moment a phone snatcher is captured being knocked off his bike by furious Londoners before losing a shoe that police later used to catch him. Spencer Duarte, of Saffron Walden, was tackled off his e-bike by members of the public after he stole a phone from an innocent victim's hand in Ludgate Hill, London, on August 7 last year. Dramatic video footage showed the moment a quick-thinking pedestrian leapt into the street and intercepted the robber, who fell into the road while on his bike. Duarte, who initially stood up and was able to get back on his bike, was then chased down by two more members of the public. Cornered on the side of the pavement, he was pulled from his bike a second time as he attempted to flee. The phone thief, dressed in a flourescent top and helmet, then proceeded to run across the road away from the furious Londoners. In a last minute attempt at halting the robber, another four pedestrians reached out to try and grab hold of Duarte, who darted at speed between the different men before making a successful exit down the road. During the ensuing struggle, Duarte lost a shoe, which police detectives later used to catch him for his crimes as a result of the DNA it held. The 28-year-old, who was spotted and arrested by Metropolitan Police officers on September 9, admitted to one count of theft at Inner London Crown Court on Monday. He also accepted that he had items in his rucksack going equipped to steal. Duarte is due to be sentenced on September 12. Dubbed the 'Cinderella phone snatcher', Andrew Walker, physical forensics manager of the City of London Police, described how Duarte was ultimately caught as a result of his trainer being left at the scene. He said: 'We were able to get sufficient levels of DNA from the shoe to obtain a single, major profile that was suitable for searching against the national DNA database. 'This search generated a 'hit' to a male whose profile had previously been uploaded. 'The slipper fitted our Cinderella and we were able to bring him before the courts.' Jake Dean, Police Constable of the City of London Police, said: 'Do not come to the City and think you can steal from residents, workers or visitors without paying the penalty. 'Our targeted patrols, excellent police work and extensive CCTV will mean you will be caught and brought to justice. In a last minute attempt at halting the robber, another four pedestrians reached out to try and grab hold of Duarte, who darted at speed between the different men before making a successful exit down the road 'Phone snatching has a significant impact on victims and our key priority has been to reduce the number of phones stolen and relentlessly target those criminals responsible.' The dramatic video comes as it was revealed that a staggering nine phones an hour were reported stolen in London last year, at a cost of £50million. Amounting to an annual 80,000 smartphones stolen, senior Scotland Yard bosses admitted there was a 'growing and very serious problem' as they struggle to grapple with the 'organised criminal enterprise '. They revealed how three-quarters of stolen devices in the capital are sent abroad, with vast numbers ending up in both Algeria and China. Appearing before a House of Commons committee, the Metropolitan Police officers said the black market for smartphones was driving rates of theft, robbery and knife crime. It was even seeing those criminals who were once involved in drug crime pivoting towards smartphone theft and robbery as an alternative means of illicit income. The officers warned that gangs of teenagers on bikes were committing 10 to 20 thefts at a time in some parts of London. James Conway, the Met Police's lead on phone theft, said the scale of phone theft in London last year had a street value of around £20million. However, the replacement value of stolen phones for members of the public and insurance companies was estimated at £50million last year. 'Around half of the robberies in London are mobile it's driving our robbery problem,' he added. DCS Conway stressed that tough enforcement action appeared to be encouraging a decline in offences. 'In the first couple of months of this financial year (there has been) around a 50 per cent reduction in theft,' he said. 'And around a 13 per cent reduction in robbery when we compare to the opening months of the previous financial year.'
