logo
Donald Trump's 25 Percent Tariffs Could Kill Off The Cheap Car

Donald Trump's 25 Percent Tariffs Could Kill Off The Cheap Car

Yahoo28-03-2025

Good morning! It's Friday, March 28, 2025, and this is The Morning Shift: Your daily roundup of the top automotive headlines from around the world, all in one place. This is where you'll find the most important stories that are shaping the way Americans drive and get around.
In this morning's edition, we're looking at which cars Donald Trump's new 25 percent import tariffs will hit hardest and hear about the threats made against automakers if they raise prices. Plus, find out which cars are included in a probe of 2 million vehicles launched by the NHTSA, and Kia outlines its plans to build hybrids in America.
Read more: Judge Takes Away Man's Dodge Charger Hellcat After He Acted Like A Hellcat Owner
After weeks of will they, won't they, president Donald Trump confirmed that a 25 percent tariff is coming for imported cars sold in America. The fee will take effect from April 2 and will hit full cars and car parts shipped into the U.S. from overseas.
The full impact of the tariffs remains to be seen, but experts are warning that the fallout could hit cheaper cars much more severely, reports Bloomberg. Finding a cheap car is already a tough task, with average prices in America edging ever closer to $50,000. Picking a bargain could now get much harder with sub-$30,000 cars likely to feel the brunt of Trump's tariffs for several reasons:
"It's going to be a real struggle for those buyers," said Erin Keating, executive analyst at researcher Cox Automotive. "We only expect prices to rise and incentives will go away. Some vehicles could go away."
The tariffs could disproportionately hit cheaper cars because many of the most affordable models sold here simply aren't made here. The least expensive offerings from General Motors, Ford, Kia and Hyundai are assembled outside the U.S. at plants in Canada and Mexico, which will fall foul to the new fees.
The cost of these budget-friendly models made outside the U.S. could be set to rise by as much as $5,855 on average, Bloomberg adds, which could mean the difference between buying a new car and not for some shoppers. It's for this reason that Stellantis chairman John Elkann warned that the "affordability of our products" and the current "uncertainty" in the U.S. could hit demand across the country.
All this talk of increased car prices in the Land of the Free might make you question why Trump proposed the tariffs in the first place, as he's all about improving the life of normal Americans, right? This wasn't the goal of the tariffs, and Trump reportedly threatened automakers who said the new fees would result in an increase in prices for their cars.
During a call with some of the country's top automotive CEO's, the "Home Alone 2" actor reportedly said "the White House would look unfavorably" on price hikes off the back of the tariffs, according to the Wall Street Journal. The call left some execs "worried they would face punishment" should prices rise, the WSJ adds:
Instead, Trump said, they should be grateful for his elimination of what he called former President Joe Biden's electric-vehicle mandate, which involved subsidies and emissions requirements to encourage electric-car production. He made a lengthy pitch for how they would actually benefit from tariffs, two people on the call said, adding that he was bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. and was better for their industry than previous presidents.
During an event to confirm that the 25 percent tariffs would come into effect from April 2, Trump claimed the new taxes would, in fact, lower prices for American car shoppers. Trump claimed the move will incentivize companies to plow millions of dollars into American manufacturing so that they can build their cars here and skirt the worst of the tariffs.
Sure, some companies have said they're considering expanding some of their manufacturing here in America, but as is the case with many cheaper cars, it's just not financially sustainable for automakers to build every car they sell in America on U.S. soil. As such, experts are warning that once stockpiles run low, prices of cars in the U.S. could rise by 10 to 12 percent in the coming months.
Right, enough tariff talk for one day, let's move on. Now, it's time to check in with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and find out what cars are broken this week, and it turns out that it's Honda's time on the naughty step. The Japanese automaker is facing a probe of more than 2 million cars over issues with its engines.
The NHTSA is probing restart issues that could impact 2.2 million Honda cars, reports Reuters. The issue is related to the stop-start function, which Honda calls Auto Idle Stop, as it fails to restart the engine at some intersections and traffic lights, as the site explains:
The NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation has received complaints of AIS failure from consumers who have already implemented the countermeasures. The engineering analysis will consider potential safety defects along with collecting additional data regarding Honda's countermeasure service campaign.
The Office of Defects received more than 1,300 complaints relating to issues with the stop-start system, and even heard of four incidents that resulted in crashes or fires and two that led to injuries.
The probe will impact a whole host of Honda and Acura models, NHTSA explained in a release. It will hit the 2016-2019 Honda Pilot, 2019-2022 Honda Passport and 2020-2023 Honda Ridgeline, as well as the 2015-2020 Acura TLX and 2016-2020 Acura MDX.
Automakers have spent the past few years plowing millions of dollars into their electric vehicle manufacturing plants across the U.S. The investment included the commitment from Hyundai and Kia that the two Korean brands would build a new Georgia plant with the aim of increasing EV capacity.
Now, after EV sales failed to match projections and many shoppers looked to hybrid power instead, Kia and Hyundai confirmed that it will bring production of new hybrid cars to the new Georgia plant as well, reports Reuters:
But in a shift in strategy, Hyundai now plans to add hybrid cars to the factory's production lines at a time when demand for pure electric cars is cooling and President Donald Trump's administration is threatening to end EV subsidies. Kia vehicles will represent 40% of the Georgia facility's total production, Kia CEO Song Ho-sung told reporters on the sidelines of an opening ceremony for the factory on Wednesday.
At the same time, the two automakers announced that total capacity at the site is set to expand from 300,000 vehicles annually to 500,000, Reuters adds. The move will bring Hyundai and Kia's combined U.S. production capacity to 1.2 million vehicles per year, up from the 850,000 cars that the two currently build in the U.S. every year.
If you think about your favorite song of all time, is it one that's changed over the years or something that's stuck with you through thick and thin? I think mine's changed a bit over time, while remaining similar.
Artists like Arcade Fire, David Bowie and The Killers have all claimed the crown at some point, but today I'm back in love with the song that's probably held the title for the longest. It's the final track on the Arctic Monkeys' second album and, for a band that consistently puts their best tracks at the end of every record, this one really is a doozy.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.
Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.

Politico

time21 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.

President Donald Trump is vowing to spark a manufacturing boom with tariffs to protect American workers and industry. So far, it's manufacturers that have borne the brunt of the pain. The president's surprise decision to raise tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50 percent will hit domestic manufacturing just as a new report shows the industry is already contracting. Uncertainty about where tariff rates will ultimately land — or where they'll be applied — has forced businesses to make hard decisions that could cut into both profits and hiring. And a leading trade group on Thursday called on Trump to give the companies a break on the tariffs. 'For a president who is intent on building U.S. manufacturing, the tariff strategy he's laid out is remarkably short-sighted,' said Gordon Hanson, a Harvard Kennedy School professor whose groundbreaking 2016 research work, 'The China Shock,' was among the first to sound the alarm about the threat to American industry. 'It fails to recognize what modern supply chains look like.' 'Even if you're intent on reshoring parts of manufacturing, you can't do it all,' he said. 'Steel and aluminum are part of that.' If Trump's tariffs fail to result in a manufacturing renaissance — a central focus of his presidential campaign — it could weaken the prospects of a GOP coalition that's increasingly reliant on working-class voters who supported his protectionist trade policies. But as unanticipated tariffs continue to drive up input costs for companies that need steel and aluminum for production, the warning signs emanating from manufacturers are getting louder. An index published this week by the Institute for Supply Management, which tracks manufacturing, slipped for the third straight month in May as companies made plans to scale back production. A quarterly survey conducted by the National Association of Manufacturers reported the steepest drop in optimism since the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, with trade uncertainty and raw material costs cited as top concerns. Federal Reserve data this month reported weaker manufacturing output. The manufacturers' association on Thursday urged Trump to develop a 'speed pass' that would allow companies to avoid costly new duties on imported raw materials and components that are essential to U.S. producers. 'The steel and aluminum tariffs are almost custom-made to hurt American manufacturing,' said Ernie Tedeschi, a former top Biden administration economist who's now with the Yale Budget Lab. Trump and top administration officials argue that tariffs will encourage investment in domestic manufacturers, which should lead to better-paying jobs, a more resilient economy and more secure supply chains. Exports climbed in April as the president's tariffs took hold, which contributed to an eye-popping decline in the U.S. trade deficit. Indeed, the overall economy remains solid, and businesses are continuing to hire, according to Friday's jobs report for May. Despite the trade headwinds, employment in the manufacturing sector has remained steady since Trump took office. 'As the president says, if you don't make steel, you can't fight a war. He's protecting that industry and bringing it back,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Senate lawmakers this week. 'You're going to see more steel and aluminum furnaces and mills in the history of this country get built over the next three years.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Trump welcomed the monthly jobs report, posting on Truth Social: 'AMERICA IS HOT! SIX MONTHS AGO IT WAS COLD AS ICE! BORDER IS CLOSED, PRICES ARE DOWN. WAGES ARE UP!' Still, domestic manufacturers who rely on international supply chains for critical steel and aluminum inputs will face tough choices if they want to maintain their profits while keeping output steady. 'Higher costs are expected. Higher input prices. The question is, what do you do with those costs? How much can you pass along to the consumer? How much can you negotiate with your suppliers?' said Andrew Siciliano, a partner at KPMG who leads the consulting firm's trade and customs practice. The challenges posed by the increase in steel and aluminum tariffs are particularly acute because it's far from clear whether domestic suppliers will be able to meet the demands of domestic manufacturers. Almost half the aluminum used in the U.S. last year came from foreign sources, according to federal data, and roughly a quarter of all steel is imported. Either way, 'input costs are going to be higher,' Siciliano said. 'If they pass it on, it could affect demand. If they don't pass it on, it could affect profitability.' That isn't to say manufacturers won't benefit from tariffs in the long term. To the extent that Trump's overall tariff regime limits imports, U.S.-based industrial production could expand to address unmet demand. The Budget Lab's analysis of Trump's tariff regime — which includes the 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum — projects that manufacturing output could grow by 1.3 percent over the next five years if existing import duties are left in place. But Tedeschi cautioned that growth may exclude segments like electronic and semiconductor production — which tend to generate higher incomes for workers. Meanwhile, output in other sectors like construction or agriculture would likely contract. Julia Coronado, founder of MacroPolicy Perspectives, also said the flurry of new import duties may prompt some manufacturers to actually move their manufacturing facilities offshore rather than subject their supply chains and production processes to multiple tariffs. 'If I have to assemble a bunch of parts and inputs, why don't I just don't do that on the Canadian or Mexican side of the border and then pay the tariff on the final good?' she said. An even bigger challenge may involve finding and training workers who can staff up any facilities that reshore. Most Americans work in the service sector and, to the extent tariffs lead to reshoring, those facilities will likely rely heavily on automation, according to economists at the Bank of America Institute. Finding qualified workers in the U.S. is either too difficult or too expensive. 'Whatever manufacturing production comes back to the U.S. will require far fewer jobs than 30 or 40 years ago,' Hanson said. 'It's just the way the world has gone.'

Elon Musk's Net Worth Takes $27 Billion Hit Amid Feud With Pres. Donald Trump
Elon Musk's Net Worth Takes $27 Billion Hit Amid Feud With Pres. Donald Trump

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's Net Worth Takes $27 Billion Hit Amid Feud With Pres. Donald Trump

Elon Musk's exit from President Donald Trump's White House has resulted in the two towering figures feuding online, with the richest man in the world's net worth taking a significant hit due to the back-and-forth. Finance pub Forbes reports that Musk's net worth fell below $400 billion this Thursday, dropping from $414.7 billion to $388 billion, a difference of around $26.7 billion. More specifically, Musk's Tesla stock declined 14%, or $47 per share, to $285 on what Forbes calls, 'an otherwise flat day for the market.' The drop in value came almost immediately after Musk and Pres. Trump began exchanging blows on social media Thursday (June 5), with Musk claiming that Trump would've never been elected for a second term if it were not for him (Musk spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election) while Trump accused Musk of having 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' Musk also accused Trump of being listed on the Jefferey Epstein files, suggesting the current president has a direct connection to the late sex offender and financier. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk wrote on X, which he owns. '[Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He later followed up, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' The rift seemingly began after Musk exited his role as one of Trump's advisors and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Soon after, Elon called out Trump and Republicans for passing the One Big Beautiful Bill, which Musk deemed a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill' that is a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump fired back by suggesting he would terminate government contracts with Musk's businesses, which include rocket company SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. This threat is possibly what led to Musk's businesses dropping in value literally overnight. The Hill reports that White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called Thursday's spat 'an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again.' More from Donald Trump's Pardon For NBA YoungBoy Could Be In Jeopardy Donald Trump Announces Travel Ban And Restrictions Affecting 19 Countries Following Terrorist Attack In Colorado Elon Musk Slams Donald Trump Agenda Bill Days After White House Exit Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Prominent lawyers join press freedom fight to thwart Paramount settlement with Trump
Prominent lawyers join press freedom fight to thwart Paramount settlement with Trump

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Prominent lawyers join press freedom fight to thwart Paramount settlement with Trump

With new legal muscle, the nonprofit Freedom of the Press Foundation is upping pressure on Paramount Global to abandon efforts to settle President Trump's $20-billion lawsuit targeting CBS and "60 Minutes." Respected Washington litigator Abbe David Lowell this week joined the team representing the New York advocacy group, which has vowed to sue Paramount should it settle with Trump. The group owns Paramount shares. Lowell, who has represented Hunter Biden, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, is working on the case with attorney Norm Eisen, a Trump critic who helped House Democrats with strategy during Trump's first impeachment hearings in 2019. Eisen is a former ambassador to the Czech Republic who served as White House ethics advisor under President Obama. Late Thursday, the two attorneys sent a strongly worded letter to Paramount's chairwoman and controlling shareholder Shari Redstone and other board members arguing that a Trump settlement would cause "catastrophic" harm to the embattled media company. 1st Amendment experts have labeled Trump's lawsuit frivolous. But Paramount leaders are desperate to end the Trump drama and some believe a truce could clear a path for the Federal Communications Commission to approve the company's $8-billion sale to David Ellison's Skydance Media. Paramount needs the FCC to authorize the transfer of the CBS station licenses to the Ellison family. The prospect of a Trump settlement has carved deep divisions within Paramount, which includes CBS News and "60 Minutes." 'Trading away the credibility of CBS's news division to curry favor with the Trump Administration is an improper and reckless act that will irreparably damage the company's brand and destroy shareholder value," Lowell said in a statement late Thursday. "The board is legally and morally obligated to protect the company, not auction off its integrity for regulatory approval," Lowell said. Read more: Why Paramount's efforts to settle Trump's lawsuit have drawn mounting political heat The FCC review of Skydance's proposed takeover of Paramount has become a slog. Skydance and Paramount face an October deadline to finalize the sale or the deal could collapse. Paramount, in a statement, said that it is treating the FCC review and the Trump lawsuit as separate matters. "We will abide by the legal process to defend our case,' a corporate spokesman said. Paramount's lawyers entered mediation with the president's legal team in late April, but no resolution has been reached. Paramount offered $15 million to Trump to end his suit, according to the Wall Street Journal, but the president rejected the overture and asked for more. On Thursday, Redstone disclosed that she has been diagnosed with thyroid cancer and is receiving treatment. Last month, doctors removed her thyroid but cancer cells had spread to her vocal chords. Read more: Paramount chair Shari Redstone has been diagnosed with thyroid cancer In their seven-page letter, Lowell and Eisen told Paramount's leaders that, should they approve a Trump settlement to gain traction at the FCC, they would be violating their fiduciary duty to shareholders and potentially breaking federal anti-bribery statutes. "We believe [a settlement] could violate laws prohibiting bribery of public officials, thereby causing severe and last damage to Paramount and its shareholders," Lowell and Eisen wrote. "To be as clear as possible, you control what happens next," they said. The admonition follows a similar warning from three U.S. senators — Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) In a May 19 letter, the senators wrote that paying money to Trump to help win clearance for the Paramount sale could constitute a bribe. 'It is illegal to corruptly give anything of value to public officials to influence an official act,' the three senators wrote in their letter. Read more: '60 Minutes,' the Associated Press, an Iowa newspaper: Trump's attacks on the media reach new heights In addition, two California Democrats have proposed a state Senate hearing to examine problems with a possible Trump settlement. The senators invited two former CBS News executives — who both left, in large part, because of the controversy — to testify before a yet-unscheduled joint committee hearing in Sacramento. The California lawmakers, in their letter, said a Trump settlement could also violate California's Unfair Competition Law because it could disrupt the playing field for news organizations. Earlier this week, Paramount asked shareholders to increase the size of its board to seven members at the company's annual investor meeting next month. The Freedom of the Press Foundation was created in 2012 to protect and defend public interest journalism. This spring, Lowell left his former major law firm, Winston & Strawn, where he had been a partner for years. He formed his own boutique firm, Lowell & Assoc., with a focus on "public interest representation in matters that defend the integrity of the legal system and protect individuals and institutions from government overreach," according to its website. Read more: Trump, '60 Minutes' and corruption allegations put Paramount on edge with sale less certain Lowell's firm also includes lawyer Brenna Frey, who made a high-profile exit from another prominent law firm, Skadden Arps, after it cut a deal with Trump to avoid becoming a target. That law firm agreed to provide $100 million in free legal services. Last month, Frey appeared on CBS' "60 Minutes" to air her decision to resign from Skadden Arps. 'I was able to tell my story on CBS's '60 Minutes' because of the independence of a courageous news division, which is what's at risk now," Frey said in a statement. Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store