Elon Musk savages White House aide blamed for sinister move that led to First Buddy's fall out with Trump
Elon Musk continued his feud with the Trump administration on his way out of Washington, referring to the director of presidential personnel as 'a snake.'
Sergio Gor, who feuded with Musk during his time as head of DOGE and reportedly killed Musk's preferred nominee for NASA administrator, is accused of not being vetted before taking the job.
The media saw it as the man in charge of vetting White House employees not being looked into himself, while Musk saw it in a different way, writing on X Wednesday night: 'He's a snake.'
Musk's post remains up which is notable given the Tesla CEO has apologized for going 'too far' in his wild statements regarding Donald Trump during their falling out.
When DailyMail.com reached out to the White House, they defended Gor's credentials and a White House official noted that he helped Musk get many of his preferred DOGE employees installed in Washington.
'Mr. Gor is fully compliant with all applicable ethical and legal obligations. His security clearance is active, any insinuation he doesn't maintain a clearance is false.' said White House Counsel David Warrington.
Nonetheless, several prominent officials defended Gor's work in the second Trump administration.
JD Vance added: 'Sergio has led the effort to ensure committed, principled America First advocates staff the President's government. He's done a great job, and will continue to do so.'
'Sergio is a vital member of the team and he has helped President Trump put together an Administration that is second to none,' White House Communications Director Steven Cheung said.
'As a long-time advisor, there is nobody more capable of ensuring the government is staffed with people who are aligned with the mission to make America great again and work towards implementing the President's agenda.'
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called The New York Post's original story 'sad' and 'baseless gossip' and called Gor a 'trusted advisor to President Trump.'
Trump's surprise decision to change Musk's preferred pick to lead NASA may have done more to fuel the historic blowup between the two men than previously known.
The president canceled his nomination of Jared Isaacman as NASA's administrator after Musk officially left the White House on Friday.
Isaacman, a billionaire, pilot and astronaut, was close with Musk and even flew to space with Musk's Dragon program on Operation Polaris Dawn in 2024.
But he had a history of donating funds to Democrats, including recent Democratic candidates who ran against GOP senators Tim Sheehy of Montana and Bernie Moreno of Ohio in 2024.
Despite his donations, Isaacman was approved by the Senate committee in April and was expected to get confirmed this week in the Senate.
But Trump's advisor Gor reportedly delivered Trump a list of Isaacman's donations to Democrats.
Gor did not appreciate Musk's involvement in personnel matters, the report noted, as they had a tense relationship.
'This was Sergio's out-the-door 'f**k you' to Musk,' one White House official said.
Trump and Musk spoke about Issacson's record prior to their press conference last Friday.
Despite their conversation, Trump pulled Issacson's nomination on Saturday.
'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social site.
Musk responded to the news with disappointment
'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X.
The president mused Thursday that Musk's personal attacks might have been trigged by his decision.
'I know that disturbed him He wanted and rightfully recommended somebody that I guess he knew very well. I'm sure he respected him, to run NASA. But I didn't think it was appropriate. He happened to be a Democrat, like totally Democrat,' Trump said, adding that the administration had the right to nominate a Republican to the position.
As the person in charge at the White House personnel office, Gor is a powerful aide that is rarely crossed as he influences who is allowed to work in the administration.
Gor, a long-time loyal Deputy Chief of staff to Sen. Rand Paul, left in 2019 to serve as Chief of Staff to Trump Victory Finance Committee.
He also is a close associate of Donald Trump Jr. and and officiated Rep. Matt Gaetz's wedding in August 2021.
Gor also co-founded Trump Jr.'s publishing company and founded a pro-Trump super PAC in the 2024 election, spending nearly $72 million.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
23 minutes ago
- Finextra
Inside AI Assisted Software Development and why tools are not enough (Part 1): By John Adam
The recent squeeze on funding and margins is by no means only being felt in the financial services and fintech sectors. But it's fair to say the pinch is particularly hard and the necessity to quickly and effectively innovate is simultaneously more pressing than ever. The good news is, new AI tools can speed up delivery and improve the quality of software projects without adding to headcount. But even if that general statement is true, just using tools is not enough. Especially in a regulated industry like financial services. If there is no pre-approved list of tools and how and where they are applied in an SDLC (software development lifecycle), organisations have governance, observability, measurability and consistency issues. If 'real' gains are not measured by benchmarking against 'before', do they really exist? Tree falling in a forest metaphor. Certainly not in a way that can be scaled across or up an organisation. There is no clear business case, just intuition. Are tools and where and how they are being used compliant with organisational policy and regulatory frameworks? Has anyone read the privacy policies? I'm personally convinced that a big AI company having its Facebook/Cambridge Analytica moment falls under 'when, not if'. And when the first big AI privacy scandal does break, you don't want your organisation published in a list in a newspaper. To benefit from and scale the gains of an AI-assisted SDLC, organisations need a framework for structured, consistent integration + governance, observability and measurability. Just tools isn't enough. Realistic gains from an AI-assisted SDLC It's important to note that at the time of writing, we are in a period of rapid change in AI tooling. A good framework operates at a level or two higher than specific tools and allows for them to be interchangeable with upgrades. The market most of us operate in is at a point in its cycle where resources are at a premium. Most of the organisations I work with are expected to deliver more with less compared with pre-2023. In that context, banking the productivity gains achievable with AI tooling is non-negotiable. Organisations are demanding it in the demand for greater, better output despite fewer resources. Getting it right is also non-negotiable and that means marrying increased productivity with measurability, observability and governance, which I cover in-depth in Part 2 of this article. As an introduction to building a proper framework, I'll start by explaining the realistic improvements AI can provide to each stage of the SDLC: Product prototyping Developers use prototypes to test idea viability and functionality, and to gather user and investor feedback. Historically, the average prototype required 2 to 6 weeks of teamwork to complete. But by amplifying developers' work via low-code/no-code prototyping and AI-generated code and other AI tools, a clickable prototype can now be completed in days or even hours. UX/UI design UX (user experience) and UI (user interface) designers collaborate closely with developers to design website and app interfaces. Using AI tools that can quickly generate multiple design mock-ups and UI components based on foundational style guides and example concepts, designers can visualise ideas and user flows in various contexts to improve design clarity and direction long before designs touch a developer's desktop. Clarity improves the quality of initial designs and reduces designer-developer back-and-forth, meaning larger projects that took 4 to 6 months to complete now require far less effort and time. Even UXR (User Experience Research) is accelerated and refined. User interviews are, by necessity, long and complex, and result in large, qualitative datasets. AI tools can highlight patterns and repetition in datasets and transcripts in seconds—shining a spotlight on insights, false positives or even biased questions that human researchers may have overlooked. Architecture Software architects plan higher-level design, bridging technical and business requirements. Their diagrams include the sum of a products' components and their respective interactions; until recently, the initial design phase alone took 1 to 2 weeks. Using AI, architects can quickly draw up diagrams to easily visualise these relationships and standardise dependency versions across services. AI can also be trained to use PR comments to report architectural violations, and libraries can be unified to encourage stability across features. Better consistency and immediate feedback mean architects can work faster and create fewer iterations of a product before diagrams meet stakeholder expectations. Coding AI-powered tools for coding have a variety of use cases. My team uses a mix of tools and GenAI to: ensure comprehensive project documentation, automate code documentation and README generation, scan for duplicate code and suggest improvements, improve understanding of complex, inconsistent or unfamiliar code bases, unify code styles and standards across different microservices, and perform code completion and check for bugs and inconsistencies based on defined standards. Paired with manual oversight to catch any mistakes, we've accelerated writing and testing code by a minimum of 20% across projects. GenAI makes complex codebases easily understandable—meaning team members can flexibly move to work on unfamiliar projects and diminish time spent on internal comms by about 25%. One tool we use is SonarQube, which reviews code without executing it. It runs automatically in GitLab CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery and Deployment) pipeline to find bugs, report security vulnerabilities, and enforce code standards to unify style and mitigate potential misunderstandings down the line with better code readability. Testing and QA (Quality Assurance) As they write code, developers write and run unit tests to detect initial bugs and security issues that eat up between 10% and 20% of their time. The SDLC is slowed further by code reviews and PRs, or feedback from experienced colleagues. Tests are postponed by days, sometimes weeks, if various code reviews are required and dependent on busy colleagues. GenAI can augment developers' efforts by writing unit tests, conducting code reviews and PRs in real time, and automatically generating and solving for edge cases to overcome bottlenecks like a lack of expertise or teammates' availability. AI augmented QA can reduce redundancy, unify access to code, and consolidate fragmented knowledge across a project to make a QA team more efficient. And AI-driven tools like Selenium, for example, can automate web app test writing and execution, accelerating product releases and improving product reliability. Automated testing is especially compelling in the context of projects with tight deadlines and few resources. For example, my team's AI toolkit for QA testing includes Llama 3.3 LLM to generate test cases and analyse code and Excel-based legacy documents, IntelliJ AI Assistant to automatically standardise test case formatting, and GitLab to run and test scripts automatically in the CI/CD pipeline. QA is one of the most impactful applications of AI tools in the SDLC and can commonly slash the resources required by up to 60%, while increasing test coverage. Deployment When a product is deployed to end users, AI can be added to the CI/CD to forecast use patterns and improve caching strategies, as well as automatically prioritise and schedule tasks for parallel execution. With AI oversight, the number of repetitive tasks is automatically reduced and resource allocation anticipated, improving latency and product release cycles without added manual effort. And AI-driven caching accelerates and simplifies rollbacks (reverting a newly deployed system to a more stable version of itself) by analysing previous deployments and predicting the necessary steps, reducing further manual effort by DevOps teams, for instance. My team uses Dytrance during deployment, which monitors and analyses system status, and sends self-healing recommendations in real time. Maintenance and Monitoring At this stage, teams work to fix bugs, keep the system secure and functioning well, and make improvements based on user feedback, performance data and unmet user needs. AI can automatically perform root cause analysis for error monitoring, and suggest solutions for maintenance and debugging. Tools my team uses include AWS Cloud Watch and Azure Monitor with AIOps, which automatically collect, analyse, and suggest responses based on monitoring data, accelerating issue response and system updates by 10x. The big picture The acceleration of the individual stages of software development is incentive enough for some teams to add tools and GenAI models to their workflows; especially at stages like QA and coding, where use cases are various and results potent. But by taking a step back and considering AI's impacts on the SDLC holistically, the argument in favour of AI implementation can be turned into a real business case. A business case that can be used to accelerate AI transformation across an organisation: Backed by a strong framework, organisations implementing AI across their SDLC see a 30%+ acceleration across projects in the first 6 months. The keyword being 'strong.' Organisations need a framework that guides leadership to select tools and govern their use, measures outcomes to understand the amount of value different tools offer, and encourages adoption in teams' workflows. Without it, teams are unable to measurably extract the full potential from new tools and efforts, and risk breaching internal and third-party governance in areas such as data privacy. Keeping my word count and your patience in mind, I split my deep dive into a framework for AI governance, measurement and adoption into a separate article: Here is Inside an AI-assisted software development framework: using tools is not enough Part 2.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Business news live: FTSE opens higher but retail sales fell sharply in May
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Cheerios abruptly axes three beloved flavors
By Cereal fans are mourning the loss of several Cheerios products after General Mills quietly discontinued them. Honey Nut Cheerios Medley Crunch, Chocolate Peanut Butter Cheerios, and 18-ounce boxes of Honey Nut Cheerios Minis have all been axed. General Mills didn't offer a specific reason for the cuts,, but told ABC News that it could be for reasons 'ranging from insufficient consumer demand to ingredients no longer available or other supply chain constraints.' Cereal enthusiast Kayla Simonsen leaked the news on Instagram earlier this month, leaving Cheerio fans heartbroken. 'I'm so sad chocolate peanut butter cheerios were my favorite. It's always sold out or low stock at the stores I buy it from,' an Instagrammer commented on the post. 'Loved the medley crunch! What a bummer! I already can't find them anywhere,' another shopper claimed. General Mills offers over 20 different flavors and made headlines in 2023 for pulling its Maple Cheerios off store shelves . Cheerios competes with other cereals like Honey Bunches of Oats, which was part of a recent recall over fears of metal in the food . Social media users were mainly saddened over the loss of the chocolate peanut butter cereal, which launched in 2017. While Instagram users are mourning over the 'tragic' medley loss, fans had already been grieving on X after Cheerios confirmed the flavor was discontinued in March . The Honey Nut Cheerios Minis began flying off shelves after they were announced as a new addition last year. Post Consumer Brands discontinued the longtime Oreo O's cereal to make room for Oreo Puffs, a similar cereal offering. General Mills brought back its Frosted Lemon Cheerios, which are available for a limited time. The manufacturer is also keeping up with fans and keeping an eye on what Cheerio flavors they're looking for.
