
Fancy a masterpiece? Just pop one in your basket! V&A's new open-access outpost will thrill art-lovers
On a table in a study room at the new V&A East Storehouse, a silk-embroidered Alexander McQueen dress decorated with Hieronymus Bosch paintings has been laid out for me to see intimately. Creatures from The Garden of Earthly Delights cavort and gurn in my face, including a bird monster perched on a high stool that defecates out sinners. Ah, the privileges of a critic – except it isn't my special experience at all. This opportunity for a personal encounter with an exquisite object is available to everyone and anyone, free of charge, as part of this unprecedented reinvention of the Victoria & Albert Museum that is V&A East Storehouse. It isn't even difficult to arrange. All you do is look up the collection online and, if an object is in the Storehouse, you add it to your cart of up to five treasures, place an order, and in a fortnight they will be available for your private delight.
You can choose anything from theatre posters to Renaissance paintings to shoes. If they're movable they will be brought to the study room, if not you go to them. I recommend the Ajanta paintings in the ground floor storage facility where I found one towering over me, its damaged parts covered with what looked like sticking plasters, adding to the mystery of this great mass of red and green out of which emerge sharply portrayed people. It's a full-size copy of one of the Ajanta cave paintings in India – one of 300 made for the V&A in the late 19th century by a team from Bombay School of Art.
By the time I found this tremendous document of world art, I was already floating. Curators traditionally decide how to contextualise and arrange a museum's objects and most invidiously how much of a public collection is on view and how much hidden in stores. Here everything is on view, at the time and in the arrangement of your choosing. If you can't be bothered with the Order an Object service, you can simply wander this cabinet of curiosities for the people, exploring the nation's Victorian attic.
After you enter through heavy protective doors, lungs full of tar fumes from the roadworks along the perimeter of Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, the artworks start coming immediately in a walkway stuffed with sculptures including a bust of Dante – which is ominous given his Inferno has a gate inscribed 'Abandon hope all you who enter here'. But this Dante leads to enchantment. You stand nervously on a glass floor looking down on a massive yet elegant colonnade built in the 1630s for the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan (creator of the Taj Mahal) for his personal hammam in the Red Fort at Agra. What a rare, sensual treasure. The wonder of the Storehouse is the way it makes you feel close to art, as if you owned it – which is as it should be with a national collection. There is abundance everywhere you look – Andalusian column capitals, a statue of Buddha, a giant Georgian doll's house – mixed as randomly yet lovingly as objects in someone's home. Their beauty is unleashed, free of captions, asking only to be enjoyed.
That goes plus size for The Biggest Picasso in the World. Two colossal women are running on a beach, their powerful limbs thick and fleshy, hand-in-hand, hair flying. In Picasso's small original 1922 painting Two Women Running on the Beach, they are heroic, but here they are actually giants. It was copied for the 1924 Ballets Russes production Le Train Bleu in just 24 hours. Picasso was so impressed he signed it as an authentic Picasso – his signature, too, is colossal.
What does it all mean? I suppose it would be possible to dismiss this as a brainless treasury, the reduction of great art to blissful entertainment. But when you open up the entire contents of a museum collection and show them as a single aesthetic marvel, the museum itself becomes the object of scrutiny. Seeing Bodhisattva, Donatello's Virgin Mary and, in my private study selection, an Islamic astrolabe (an ancient astronomical instrument) all in the same place, you can't help wondering how they all got here.
The V&A East Youth Collective Community wondered too. In a side aisle, their selection of apparently random global treasures are connected by one thing: 'An enslaver we choose not to name,' says the text, who spent an ill-gotten fortune on these things.
Sign up to Art Weekly
Your weekly art world round-up, sketching out all the biggest stories, scandals and exhibitions
after newsletter promotion
From one point of view everything here can be seen this way – this enslaver's collection is a microcosm of the sins of a colonial museum. By opening itself up so completely, V&A East Storehouse offers critique as well as celebration. Is that propagandist? Only if you can show how a global collection formed by Victorian Britain when we ruled the waves somehow doesn't have anything to do with the British empire. Still, it would be better history to name the enslaver.
This is what the museum of the future looks like – an old idea that's now been turned inside out, upside down, disgorging its secrets, good and bad, in an avalanche of beautiful questions, created with curiosity, generous imagination and love.
The V&A East Storehouse, Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, London, opens 31 May
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Guardiola dreams of World Cup glory but has no plans to leave City anytime soon
BARCELONA, June 5 - Pep Guardiola has no plans to leave Manchester City anytime soon but the Spaniard has often thought about what it would be like to guide an international team and says he would love to take on the challenge of a World Cup or Euros campaign. "I would love to be in a World Cup, in a Euro, a Copa America,' Guardiola told Reuters in an exclusive interview. 'I have always thought about it. But it depends on many, many things. If it happens, it's fine. If it doesn't happen, it's more than fine as well." After winning 12 domestic top-flight titles across Spain, Germany and England, Guardiola endured a trophyless campaign with City last season, a shock to the system after so much success. While he came in for some stinging criticism over his elite squad's failure on all fronts, Guardiola said he was not interested in "proving the haters wrong' when City start afresh next season. "It's to prove myself that I can do it, I don't want to have those feeling that last season left' he added. "Because when we win, the wine tastes better afterwards, you sleep better. I don't know a manager who loses games and sleeps like a baby. It doesn't happen. You've got to worry. That's part of our life." Top of Guardiola's 'to-do list' is to win another Champions League with City and should they cross paths once more with Real Madrid, his nemesis Carlo Ancelotti will not be in the opposing dugout after the Italian took charge of Brazil. Mere mention of Ancelotti's departure was enough to put a smile on Guardiola's lips. The pair faced each other five times in the knockout rounds of the Champions League, with the Italian coming out on top in all but one. "I'm so happy for him,' Guardiola said. "But I'm so happy that he's not in Madrid anymore because all the time he beats me. That I don't have to handle it anymore." The Spaniard added that it was unrealistic to expect him to win everything every year, and said that even the most successful athletes lose more than they win. "I won 12 domestic leagues in 16 years. It's not bad, I would say. But you cannot win all the time. I cannot win the Champions League all the time," he added. "Michael Jordan, the best athlete I've ever seen in my life won six NBA Championships in 15 years. Tiger Woods, one incredible golf player, Jack Nicklaus, I don't know how many he has. But they lost more Grand Slams than they won. It happens." Enjoying a short holiday in Barcelona, Guardiola said he is just trying to live a "normal life" before football pulls him back in, with City set to play in the revamped Club World Cup in the United States from June 14 to July 13. 'Wake up later and don't be with the players. Try to live what would be a normal life,' Guardiola said. 'Go to a concert, lay down on the sofa, read books. I can play golf when my body allows me. Watch series that people suggest to me during the season to watch, like I'm not able to do. "And I want to tell you something. Usually, I'm going to do the same things as you do in your life.'


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle wanted to change surname to Spencer 'amid fears Charles was delaying Archie and Lilibet's passports because the application included HRH titles'
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle feared Archie and Lilibet's British passports were being held up at the behest of their grandfather the King over the use of their HRH titles, it was claimed today. The Sussexes are said to have become 'exasperated' about waiting months for their children's passports to arrive and believed it was being 'blocked' due to the use of their royal titles. The couple thought the application would take weeks and suspected it was because they wanted HRH on Archie and Lilibet's British travel documents. They then began exploring changing their surname to Spencer - a nod to Princess Diana, as revealed by The Mail on Sunday. 'The King hadn't wanted Archie and Lili to carry the titles, most of all the HRH, and the British passports, once created, would be the first and perhaps the only legal proof of their names', a source close to Harry and Meghan reportedly told The Guardian. 'There was clear reluctance to issue passports for the kids'. The insider has claimed that Harry wanted Archie and Lilibet, whose fourth birthday yesterday was marked with a video of her mother and father twerking before her birth, to have HRH titles so when they are adults they retain the chance to become working royals, should they wish. However, Buckingham Palace has pushed back on the claims the King or any of his staff intervened. When asked if there was any objection from Charles or aides to the passports being issued with the HRH titles, a spokesman said: 'No' but declined to comment further. Buckingham Palace denied that the King or any of his aides had anything to do with the delays in issuing their passports A gift basket and HRH note sent to Meghan's friend, CEO of IT Cosmetics Jamie Kern Lima. Meghan's spokesman last month denied that has been using it for commercial gain On their birth certificates, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children are Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. But according to reports their applications used the surname Sussex, not Mountbatten-Windsor, which Archie had on his previous US and British passports. The average wait for a UK passport is currently around three weeks. But apparently Harry and Meghan cancelled their initial standard applications after three months and reapplied using the UK Government's 24-hour passport service. But then their online meeting to fasttrack the applications was eventually cancelled at the 11th hour owing to a 'systems failure.' The Guardian's source claimed that Harry and Meghan feared officials in the UK were 'dragging their feet' because Archie and Lilibet's passport applications included the titles HRH. The insider added: 'Harry was at a point where British passports for his children with their updated Sussex surnames (since the death of Queen Elizabeth II) were being blocked with a string of excuses over the course of five months. 'Out of sheer exasperation he went to his uncle to effectively say: 'My family are supposed to have the same name and they're stopping that from happening because the kids are legally HRH, so if push comes to shove, if this blows up and they won't let the kids be called Sussex, then can we use Spencer as a surname?'.' The couple then reportedly asked their lawyers to write to the HM Passport Office threatening to pursue a data subject access request relating to Archie and Lilibet's applications. Days later the two passports were reportedly issued with HRH titles and Sussex as the new surname. A spokesman for Harry and Meghan said: 'We do not comment on private issues pertaining to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex 's children.' The Home Office declined to comment. Meghan Markle posted a video of her and Prince Harry twerking in a hospital room before Lilibet's birth to mark her fourth birthday yesterday The Sussexes' use of HRH has proved highly controversial because the couple are said to have reassured the Queen that they would not use the title after they emigrated to the US. But then MailOnline revealed last month that Meghan Markle calls herself Her Royal Highness to friends - but has denied that in doing so she is flouting the Megxit deal agreed with the late monarch. The former actress, 43, sparked controversy after her friend Jamie Kern Lima shared a picture of a food hamper with a note that said it was 'With the compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex'. Although no laws were passed or documents signed to prevent their use, Harry and Meghan's agreement with the late Queen and senior officials was that they would stop using the word 'Royal' and their HRH titles after they quit duties and emigrated to the US to become 'financially independent' from the Crown. A spokesman for the Sussexes insisted that they do not use HRH titles for commercial purposes. A source close to the royal couple suggested that the image shared by Jamie Kern Lima was taken before the Duchess launched her As Ever brand in early March. In the podcast, Jamie Kern Lima claimed that she had been sent the jam last year. The Sussexes have never had their HRH taken away by Queen Elizabeth II or King Charles. The source close to the couple said that while Meghan and Harry do not publicly use 'HRH ', their titles remain. Last weekend The Mail on Sunday revealed how Prince Harry sought advice from Princess Diana 's brother about changing his family name to Spencer. Sources told Richard Eden that the Duke of Sussex actively explored ways to assume his mother's surname – a move that would have involved ditching Mountbatten-Windsor, used by his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. It is understood he discussed the issue with Earl Spencer – whose family seat is Althorp in Northamptonshire – during a rare visit to Britain, but was told that the legal hurdles were insurmountable. 'They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step,' said a friend of Harry. Nevertheless, the fact that he consulted the Earl over the issue – a proposal that would dismay his brother and father – is a vivid expression of the toxic rift with his family. Mountbatten-Windsor is the surname available to descendants of the late Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip. It combines the Royal Family 's name of Windsor and the Duke of Edinburgh 's adopted surname. Royal author Tom Bower has claimed that 'Meghan decided her real object in life was to be Diana'. If the name change had succeeded, Meghan's daughter, who is believed to have met the King only once, would have become Lilibet Diana Spencer, a more fulsome tribute to Harry's late mother. The move would be particularly hurtful to King Charles, who cherishes the Mountbatten name just as his father did.


Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Franc leading Swiss back to deflation vortex, asset stockpiling
LONDON, June 5 (Reuters) - The supercharged Swiss franc is sucking Switzerland back into a deflationary vortex that its central bank will once again struggle to escape, possibly recycling a fresh wave of financial flows back out across the world. The Swiss franc, long perceived as a haven in stressful times, has seen its broad nominal exchange rate index surge 5% since U.S. President Donald Trump's return to the White House. But this is just the latest leg of a relentless appreciation of 20% in five years and 33% over the past decade. In a small open economy, that latest move has been enough to force deflationary relapse and the first drop in annual aggregate Swiss consumer prices in four years last month. In turn, the Swiss National Bank will almost certainly cut its already meagre 0.25% interest rate back to zero this month. A return to the negative interest rate era of the eight years through 2022 now seems almost inevitable further out. Markets already see a one-in-three chance of that happening as soon as the SNB's meeting on June 19. As the last experiment showed, there's a limit to how negative rates can go - mainly because it would be cheaper for big savers to vault their own money than have banks dock more than about 0.75% of deposits annually. And so the SNB may quickly have to resume selling francs and expanding its balance sheet once again to ward off deflation. It's been here before. The SNB's balance sheet ballooned almost 10-fold over the decade to 2022, hitting more than 1 trillion francs ($1.3 trillion) at its peak. While it has shrunk since to 843 billion francs, it remains bigger than annual Swiss GDP and more than four times that of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet as a share of the U.S. economy. Even though the SNB has appeared somewhat reluctant to resume outright franc sales recently, its top brass has pointedly refused to rule out either negative rates or another protracted bout of franc intervention. A sustained reversal of the franc's fortunes may allow the country to dodge the problem of course - with much of this year's franc surge coming against the ebbing dollar, unlike the euro/Swiss rate focus of a decade ago during the euro crisis. But if "safety" flows are at least part of what's driving the Swiss currency higher this year, then it's hard to see trade or geopolitical peace breaking out anytime soon. While this may all feel like deja vu in Switzerland, a slow-motion repeat of the "frankenshock" episode, it speaks to some of the biggest trends impacting markets today and has numerous implications globally. Rebuilding SNB reserves from today's already lofty levels could put upward pressure on a range of euro debt and dollar equity assets. The SNB remains a top 50 shareholder in all seven of the top U.S. big tech megacap stocks, for example, as well as euro zone government debt. The SNB diversified away from the euro in favour of dollars during the euro debt crisis over a decade ago and now holds an equal share of both euro and dollar holdings, as Barclays analysts point out. "A reversal of that trend would not be unprecedented," they said, referring to "jitters" around the prospect of the SNB diversifying away from the dollar in light of recent trade developments. While the SNB's trade-weighted franc index is dominated by a 42% euro weighting, the dollar still commands a 14% share and the dollar, yuan, yen and sterling combined account for about a third of the total. And so a sharp weakening of the dollar, dollar-priced commodities and other dollar-linked currencies still packs a punch for Switzerland regardless of relative stability on the euro. The other complication of a renewed intervention bout is that Switzerland finds itself firmly on the radar of the Trump Treasury's "currency manipulator" report, expected by analysts to be published this month. ING's Francesco Pesole reckons one reason the SNB has been holding off from intervention so far this year is precisely because it wants to avoid being labelled a manipulator by Washington and thus face a more extreme tariff onslaught. Pesole says that with Switzerland already in the "currency manipulator" report's sights due to the country's trade surplus with the U.S., its current account surplus more broadly and its long history of currency capping, the SNB may push negative rates as far as they can go before wading back into foreign exchange markets. "Should the (U.S.) Treasury's FX report be published before then, markets may increase their bets on a 50bp rate cut in June on the view that being added to the monitoring list further reduces the scope for FX interventions," he wrote. Unlike previous franc surges, when FX purchases were the obvious solution, the SNB may now find itself "damned if it does, and damned if it doesn't." The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters