
Hong Kong's security net extends beyond arrests as small businesses pressured
It's been years since mass arrests all but silenced pro-democracy activism in Hong Kong. But a crackdown on dissent in the semiautonomous Chinese city is still expanding, hitting restaurants, bookstores and other small businesses.
Shops and eateries owned by people once associated with the largely subdued pro-democracy movement are feeling a tightening grip through increased official inspections, anonymous complaint letters and other regulatory checks.
Those critical of the city's political changes say it's a less visible side of a push to silence dissent that began five years ago when Beijing imposed a national security law to crush challenges to its rule, under which opposition politicians were jailed and pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily was shuttered.
China said the law was necessary for the city's stability following anti-government protests in 2019.
In 2024, the city passed its own national security law, which has been used to jail people for actions like writing pro-independence messages on the back of bus seats and wearing a T-shirt carrying a protest slogan that authorities deemed could imply the separation of Hong Kong from China, a red line for Beijing.
In recent weeks, food authorities sent letters to restaurants warning that their business licenses could be revoked if the government deems them to be endangering national security or public interest.
Frequent inspections
Leticia Wong, a former pro-democracy district councilor who now runs a bookstore, says her shop is frequently visited by food and hygiene inspectors, the fire department or other authorities over complaints about issues like hosting events without a license. It happens most often around June 4, the anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.
Her records show government authorities took measures against her shop some 92 times between July 2022 and June 2025, including inspecting her shop, conspicuously patrolling outside, or sending letters warning her of violations. She has been studying regulations to protect herself from accidentally breaking them.
"Some areas look trivial — and they really are — but they still have the power to make you face consequences," she said.
In an emailed reply to The Associated Press, the fire department said it conducted checks at Wong's business following multiple complaints this year. Wong's bookstore passed most of them but still faces enforcement action for failing to provide valid certificates for two fire extinguishers and its emergency lighting system, it said.
Other small business owners described similar experiences.
A bakery that put up pro-democracy decorations during the 2019 protests saw food authorities' inspections jump from quarterly to monthly over the past one to two years, mostly over labeling complaints. Its owner, who asked to remain anonymous fearing government retribution, said the frequent inspections made running the business a struggle.
A restaurant owner who received the notice of the newly added terms on possible license revocation over national security violations said he doesn't know what could be considered a violation and fears one wrong move could cost his staff their jobs. He spoke on the condition of anonymity, fearing potential impact on his business partners and employees.
Food authorities said inspections follow the law, information and public complaints. They maintained that the new national security conditions for food business licenses were clearly defined and would not affect law-abiding operators.
The Hong Kong Chief Executive's office has not immediately commented.
Anonymous denunciations
Others say they have lost opportunities after anonymous letters were sent to employers or business partners.
Wong said an anonymous letter sent to an organization that had planned an event at her shop prompted them to cancel the booking. Separately, she lost a freelance job after a funder demanded that a social enterprise not hire her without a specific reason.
Her landlord also received an anonymous letter warning them not to rent the space to her.
'I feel that this society is working very hard — that is, within the system, under the official system, working very hard to reject me, or to make my life difficult,' Wong said.
Chan Kim-kam, another former district councilor, says she lost both a part-time job and a role in a play after the people she worked for were pressured. A school where she taught sociology part-time asked her to leave after it received a letter claiming that she made a student uncomfortable.
The letter, which was written in the simplified Chinese characters used in mainland China but less prominently in Hong Kong, included links to news reports about her arrest under the homegrown national security law last year, though she was never charged.
Meanwhile, the city's Leisure and Cultural Services Department told her drama group to replace her or lose their venue, she said.
'I think it's really such a pity. When the culture of reporting people has become so intense, it destroys the trust between people,' she said.
Cultural authorities, declining to discuss specific bookings, said all their venue bookings were managed under established procedures.
Rule of law in question
Hong Kong leader John Lee has said the security law upholds the rule of law principle and only an extremely small portion of people were targeted. He noted 332 people have been arrested for offenses related to national security, about 66 each year on average, or 0.2% of the police's annual arrest figures. Still, he warned of persisting soft resistance, saying 'the streets are full of petty people.'
Local broadcaster i-Cable News said national security guidelines would be issued to government workers. Secretary for Security Chris Tang told the broadcaster that even a cleaner should report words endangering national security, if any are found during their job.
But Eric Lai, a research fellow at Georgetown Center for Asian Law, said Hong Kong is using regulatory powers to monitor and regulate dissent without checks and balances. Local courts were unable to check the powers granted to the government under the security laws, he said.
It fits a common pattern among undemocratic governments like mainland China, he said. In many cases across the border, law enforcement officers frequently harass and surveil dissenters without formal charges.
'It tells the world that the so-called rule of law in Hong Kong is only a facade of rule by men,' he said.
Outside a court on Jun. 12, members of the pro-democracy party League of Social Democrats protested against their convictions over street booth activities with a banner that says 'rule of law in name, silencing voices in reality.'
They were fined for collecting money without a permit and displaying posters without approval. The judge said freedom of expression was not absolute and restrictions could be imposed to maintain public order.
On Sunday, the party announced it had dissolved, citing immense political pressure and consideration of consequences for its members, months after the city's biggest pro-democracy party announced to move toward disbandment. Its chairperson Chan Po-ying wiped away tears at the news conference.
'In the past, the government said it focused on a small portion of people. Now, it includes various kinds of people in Hong Kong, ordinary residents,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
How far Nigeria don reach to change Donald Trump ban bifor di 60 days deadline?
Recently, President Donald Trump administration don announce say dem go soon enforce rules wey go block citizens from Nigeria, Ghana and 34 oda nations from entering di United States, even if dem get valid visa or to stay back afta di 60 days grace period afta di termination of appointment. Dis new directive of travel wey dem dey currently dey refine dey set to become policy as e dey come from renewed executive order wey dem do to tighten American national security. Kontris wey dey affected Di list of possible kontris wey fit dey affected: Nigeria, Ghana, Niger, Senegal, Republic of Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Egypt, Gabon, Tanzania, Gambia, Ethiopia, Malawi, Liberia, South Sudan, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Bhutan, Cambodia, Cape Verde, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Kyrgyzstan, Mauritania, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, São Tomé and Príncipe, Syria, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Why di deadline and possible ban? Di sweeping 60 days travel ban deadline dey come from renewed executive order wey dem do to tighten national security and as necessary crack down by say dem restrict migration from kontris wey dem flag say dem no get beta identity verification systems; visa overstays; potential national risks; or suspected links to terrorism. Dem give di 60 day deadline to di goments of dis targeted kontris and e instruct dem make dem submit wetin dem call actionable remediation plans to address security and documentation wahala ova dia illegal immigrants wey dey live for America. Dis also add to di grace period wey dem give non-immigrant workers wey dem don sack or wey by demsefs decide to resign from dia work for America. Di grace period according to di USCIS wey dey in charge of immigration wahala for America na optional regulatory provision wey allow some eligible non-immigrant workers wey get dis visas: H-1B; E-1; E-2; E-3; L-1; H-1B1; 0-1 and TN to still stay for di United States while dem dey file to change to anoda non-immigrant visa. How Nigeria goment dey handle di mata? Nigeria Minister of Foreign Affairs and Chair of di ECOWAS Mediation and Security Council, Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar don tok say e dey worry ova how dis new wave of US visa restrictions fit affect African kontris and Nigeria in particular. E say di ministry dey work hard on any of di commas wey dem find for screening, vetting or taking back of citizens as di cable tok. Oga Alkassim Abdul Kadir wey be di special assistant on media and communication to di minister of foreign affairs also explain give di BBC say di diplomatic cable wey di US Department of State send bin tell embassies and consulates for dis kontris to judge dia host kontris by dia willingness to improve dia citizens travel documentation and take steps to address di status of dia nationals wey dey for America illegally. Di Nigerian goment don collabo wit di necessary bodies to address di mata. How Ecowas react to di possibility say dem fit ban dem Oga Tuggar wey tok on behalf of Ecowas kontris about di mata for di 54th Ordinary Session of di Ecowas Mediation and Security Council for Abuja, Nigeria; warn say if President Trump ban dem las-las e go block trade, diplomatic engagement and regional growth well-well. E say, "e go dey unfortunate if e come to pass becos we be region of opportunities wey readi to do deals". Oga Tuggar say di policy dey more like diplomatic misstep as e torchlight how e fit cast economic collabo for time wen West Africa dey positioned for global partnerships. E note say "we get critical minerals and even rare earth like Samarium from di Monazite wey dem find for my home state of Bauchi". E also add say, "we for dis part of di world na students for di Art of di Deal and we don dey part of di international trading system even bifor di modern state system". Di foreign affairs minister follow appeal to di United States make dem rethink dis move say di region get oda options. E say "Ecowas kontris and di US get rare opportunity to create partnership based on need. We also be beta option to more distant and politically different energy producers." E add say, "we go do deals to prosper, di only question na wit who? Who go collect di opportunities for our region by allowing goment officials, and technocrats, business executives and business pipo to travel freely to go come back so dem go fit close deals." Till now, world pipo still dey wait for di deadline to finish so dem go know which kontris President Trump administration go partially or completely ban as dem don plan am.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
More than 250,000 Afghans left Iran in June alone, UN says
More than 256,000 Afghans left Iran in June alone, marking a surge in returns to Afghanistan since Tehran set a hard deadline for repatriations, the UN's migration agency International Organization for Migration (IOM) recorded as many as 28,000 Afghans leaving Iran in a single day in June, after the Iranian regime ordered all undocumented Afghans to leave the country by 6 July. The number of Afghan refugees in neighbouring Iran has swelled since the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan in 2021, many of whom live without legal has contributed to growing anti-Afghan sentiment in Iran, with refugees facing systemic discrimination. The IOM said more than 700,000 Afghans had left Iran since January, with spokesperson Avand Azeez Agha telling news agency AFP that 70% had been "forcibly sent back".The surge in repatriations - and the deadline - have come since Iran and Israel engaged in direct conflict with one another, beginning with Israel attacking nuclear and military sites in mid-June. A ceasefire has since been brokered. As the two exchanged daily strikes, the Iranian regime arrested several Afghan migrants it suspected of spying for Israel, state media these claims, a new wave of deportations began. The semi-official Iranian Mehr news agency reported that police had been directed to accelerate deportations, though the police later denied this."We're scared to go anywhere because there's always the fear they might accuse us of being spies," one Afghan migrant in Iran, who we are not naming to protect their identity, told BBC Persian."At the checkpoints, they do body searches and check people's phones. If they find any messages or videos from foreign media on social networks, it could literally put someone's life in danger. "Many Iranians insult us, saying things like: 'you Afghans are spies' or 'you work for Israel'."Numerous reports in Iranian media indicate that even Afghans with valid visas and documentation have been forcibly deported. Some Afghans who were detained and later freed said they were accused by officials of betraying the Jamal, the UN's refugee co-ordinator for Afghanistan, said that while there was now a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, "the consequences of that war continue"."This movement pre-dates the war, but it has been exacerbated by it," he told BBC Pashto. "And what we hear from the returnees is a series of actions that have caused them to come back, some of them quite coercive, others not as much." Afghan refugees are not eligible for Iranian citizenship, even if they are born in the country, while many are unable to open bank accounts, buy SIM cards or live in certain areas. Employment opportunities are also heavily restricted, and are often limited to hard labour with low this latest push to remove them, Iranian authorities have also urged the public to report undocumented Afghans."There are oppressors here, and there are oppressors there," a second Afghan in Iran said. "We migrants have never been free, never lived a free life."Another said "the future for Afghans living in Iran looks really bleak", adding: "The police are violent and humiliating, and now even the Basij [volunteer militia] have been tasked with arresting Afghans."The surge in repatriations comes after Pakistan accelerated its own drive to expel undocumented Afghans, saying it could no longer manage hosting Jamal said the number of refugees returning to Afghanistan from both Iran and Pakistan this year was in excess of one he thanked both nations for taking in millions of Afghans over the past few decades of instability, he urged them to seek a joint solution to the UN director said humanitarian provisions at the border had been "overwhelmed", adding: "There is simply too many people coming back."Maulvi Abdul Salam Hanafi, deputy prime minister in the Taliban government, said on Saturday that talks with Iranian officials were under way over the Taliban's transport minister also said it was accelerating efforts to transport refugees from the border to their homes.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
The UK faces a deadly threat. It needs a new home guard
The government has set out what the UK needs to protect itself from direct attacks in an increasingly hostile and dangerous world. In short, the assessment is we need to be ready to go to war – and fast. State powers – Russia today, maybe China tomorrow – have the capability to cause major damage to the UK, its economy and way of life, and we currently have no viable plans or forces to protect the country. The Strategic Defence Review (SDR) recognised the threats, but did not address crucial facts, like that if faced with drone attacks of the type that Ukraine suffers almost nightly, the UK has absolutely no means of stopping them. The National Security Strategy that followed the review last week also talked about the need to bolster what it calls home defence. 'The UK is directly threatened by hostile activities including assassination, intimidation, espionage, sabotage, cyber attacks and other forms of democratic interference,' it noted. 'Meanwhile, critical national infrastructure – including undersea cables, energy pipelines, transportation and logistics hubs – will continue to be a target.' But neither of the reviews addressed, directly, the fact that the army cannot be deploying divisions into Europe while also defending the UK homeland – the two missions are contradictory. And neither acknowledged that the country is naked against any missile attack, so needs to actually buy something quickly. The police in the UK are not large enough or trained to undertake home defence outside of a very small range of missions. Protecting critical national infrastructure requires troops on the ground, patrolling, to provide physical protection as well as deterrence. In the Cold War, there were more than 35,000 Territorial Army troops tasked with home defence, backed up by regular army units, as well as Royal Navy and RAF units. In 1982, to increase numbers in the face of a growing Soviet threat, the Home Service Force was established, recruiting former Service personnel 'too old' to be in the TA, but still with decades of experience. I know of one HSF company in East Anglia that had a corporal who had served as a captain in the Korean War, where he had won the Military Cross – this was not uncommon. Priceless experience and knowledge, despite possibly creaky joints. Overall, in the 1980s, more than 60,000 Service personnel were tasked with defending the UK, and the US Air Force added thousands more to this mix. To put this into some perspective, the total strength, today, of the UK police forces is 170,000. So, military home defence forces would need to be at least a third of the size of the police to begin to be effective. And one has to recall that compared to the days of the Cold War, the number of vital infrastructure sites that need to be defended has grown – the internet and 5G didn't exist in the 1980s. Although the National Security Strategy suggests that the Army Reserve (the old TA) could be the centre of home defence, it is worth noting that in the late-1980s, the TA was 73,000 – today it is just over 20,000, a shadow of its former self. Elsewhere in Europe, home defence is better provisioned. In France and Italy, the Gendarmerie is over 100,000-strong, and the Carabinieri is around 110,000. Both have a range of automatic weapons, as well as some light armoured vehicles and many helicopters. Home defence in the Nordic and Baltic States is not just an adjunct to the 'real' military – it is the core of their defence policies. Finland has tested plans to mobilise up to 1 million troops, most for home defence, in time of war, and the aim is that this would be achieved in a week. The risks to the UK homeland and its infrastructure – but there is no real appetite to take the measures required to get close to protecting these Sweden doubled its home defence/resilience budget this year to £6bn by 2028 (aspects of military home defence are in the core defence budget, which has been rising as well) – the equivalent spend in the UK would be £15bn this financial year, and £30bn in 2028. What has hampered adult discussion of UK home defence is that as soon as anyone raises the idea, the first response is 'Dads' Army', with accompanying sniggering. But the Home Service Force was actually a success in the 1980s, getting thousands to come back into uniform, bringing their skills to the mix, in a very short number of months. The HSF didn't have to be as fit as Regulars and didn't have to have the full range of skills – this should be a model for the future, much as it is in the Nordic/Baltic States. The risks to the UK homeland and its infrastructure, bridges and internet, are accepted as real – but there is no real appetite to take the measures required to get close to protecting these. An anti-missile system to defend just part of the UK would be £10-15bn up-front. To get an Israeli-style anti-missile system would cost over £30bn. A Home Defence Force of, say, 30,000, would cost close to £3bn in equipment, pay, infrastructure, and training every year – a fraction of what the Nordics spend on this. The heavyweight boxer, Mike Tyson, famously said: 'Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth'. The 'punch in the mouth' for the UK, in the case of an attack on the homeland, would be the blacking out of lights, bringing down the internet, and food not getting to the supermarkets. It could also be a ballistic missile attack, causing levels of casualties not seen since the Second World War. Unthinkable? Look to Kyiv, Kherson – this is what 'normal life' is like there. Home Defence is not Dad's Army, it is about enhancing the protection of the UK's infrastructure and the lives of the inhabitants. But it comes with a cost, and a need for a portion of the UK's population to think very differently. Tough choices needed? Yes. Leadership required? Yes. Money essential? Yes. Getting these three through in the current climate will be very hard – but failure to do so leaves us all vulnerable.